-
1.
Double unrelated umbilical cord blood vs HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation: the BMT CTN 1101 trial
Fuchs, E. J., O'Donnell, P. V., Eapen, M., Logan, B., Antin, J. H., Dawson, P., Devine, S., Horowitz, M. M., Horwitz, M. E., Karanes, C., et al
Blood. 2021;137(3):420-428
-
-
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Results of 2 parallel phase 2 trials of transplantation of unrelated umbilical cord blood (UCB) or bone marrow (BM) from HLA-haploidentical relatives provided equipoise for direct comparison of these donor sources. Between June 2012 and June 2018, 368 patients aged 18 to 70 years with chemotherapy-sensitive lymphoma or acute leukemia in remission were randomly assigned to undergo UCB (n = 186) or haploidentical (n = 182) transplant. Reduced-intensity conditioning comprised total-body irradiation with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine for both donor types. Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis for UCB transplantation was cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and for haploidentical transplantation, posttransplant cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, and MMF. The primary end point was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS). Treatment groups had similar age, sex, self-reported ethnic origin, performance status, disease, and disease status at randomization. Two-year PFS was 35% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28% to 42%) compared with 41% (95% CI, 34% to 48%) after UCB and haploidentical transplants, respectively (P = .41). Prespecified analysis of secondary end points recorded higher 2-year nonrelapse mortality after UCB, 18% (95% CI, 13% to 24%), compared with haploidentical transplantation, 11% (95% CI, 6% to 16%), P = .04. This led to lower 2-year overall survival (OS) after UCB compared with haploidentical transplantation, 46% (95% CI, 38-53) and 57% (95% CI 49% to 64%), respectively (P = .04). The trial did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in the primary end point, 2-year PFS, between the donor sources. Although both donor sources extend access to reduced-intensity transplantation, analyses of secondary end points, including OS, favor haploidentical BM donors. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01597778.

PICO Summary
Population
Patients aged 18 to 70 years with chemotherapy-sensitive lymphoma or acute leukaemia in remission (n=368)
Intervention
Cord blood transplantation (UCB, n=186)
Comparison
Haploidentical transplantation (n=182)
Outcome
Two-year PFS was 35% after UCB compared with 41% haploidentical transplant. Prespecified analysis of secondary end points recorded higher 2-year nonrelapse mortality after UCB: 18%, compared with 11% for haploidentical transplantation. This led to lower 2-year overall survival (OS) after UCB compared with haploidentical transplantation, 46% and 57%, respectively. The trial did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in the primary end point, 2-year PFS, between the donor sources.
-
2.
Allogeneic transplantation for Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide
Webster, J. A., Luznik, L., Tsai, H. L., Imus, P. H., DeZern, A. E., Pratz, K. W., Levis, M. J., Gojo, I., Showel, M. M., Prince, G., et al
Blood advances. 2020;4(20):5078-5088
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (alloBMT) is standard of care for adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) in first complete remission (CR1). The routine pretransplant and posttransplant use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has dramatically improved outcomes, but the optimal conditioning regimen, donor type, and TKI remain undefined. The bone marrow transplant database at Johns Hopkins was queried for adult patients with de novo Ph+ ALL who received alloBMT using posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as a component of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis from 2008 to 2018. Among transplants for Ph+ ALL, 69 (85%) were performed in CR1, and 12 (15%) were performed in second or greater remission (CR2+). The majority of transplants (58%) were HLA haploidentical. Nearly all patients (91.4%) initiated TKI posttransplant. For patients in CR1, the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 66%. The use of nonmyeloablative conditioning, absence of measurable residual disease (MRD) according to flow cytometry at transplant, and the use of dasatinib vs imatinib at diagnosis were associated with improved overall survival (OS) and RFS. Neither donor type nor recipient age ≥60 years affected RFS. When analyzing all transplants, alloBMT in CR1 (vs CR2+) and the absence of pretransplant MRD were associated with improved RFS. Most relapses were associated with the emergence of kinase domain mutations. The cumulative incidence of grade 3 to 4 acute GVHD at 1 year was 9%, and moderate to severe chronic GVHD at 2 years was 8%. Nonmyeloablative alloBMT with PTCy for Ph+ ALL in an MRD-negative CR1 after initial treatment with dasatinib yields favorable outcomes.

PICO Summary
Population
Adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) undergoing allogeneic transplantation (n=76)
Intervention
Myeloablative conditioning in first complete remission (CR1 MAC, n=26); Non-myeloablative conditioning in first complete remission (CR1 NMAC, n=43)
Comparison
Patients in second or subsequent remission (CR2+, n=12)
Outcome
For patients in CR1, the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 66%. The use of nonmyeloablative conditioning, absence of measurable residual disease (MRD) according to flow cytometry at transplant, and the use of dasatinib vs imatinib at diagnosis were associated with improved overall survival (OS) and RFS. Neither donor type nor recipient age ≥60 years affected RFS. When analyzing all transplants, alloBMT in CR1 (vs CR2+) and the absence of pretransplant MRD were associated with improved RFS. Most relapses were associated with the emergence of kinase domain mutations. The cumulative incidence of grade 3 to 4 acute GVHD at 1 year was 9%, and moderate to severe chronic GVHD at 2 years was 8%.
-
3.
Non-Myeloablative Allogeneic Transplantation with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide after Immune Checkpoint Inhibition for Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma: a Retrospective Cohort Study
Paul, S., Zahurak, M., Luznik, L., Ambinder, R. F., Fuchs, E. J., Bolanos-Meade, J., Wagner-Johnston, N., Swinnen, L. J., Schoch, L., Varadhan, R., et al
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2020
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved in relapsed classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). The safety and effectiveness of allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (alloBMT) in ICI pre-treated cHL patients remain unclear. The aim of this study is to assess outcomes of cHL patients receiving ICIs before alloBMT using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. METHODS We performed a retrospective study of relapsed/refractory cHL patients undergoing alloBMT with PTCy at Johns Hopkins between Nov 2004 and Sept 2019. Engraftment, GVHD incidence, non-relapse mortality (NRM), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients receiving pre-alloBMT ICI or standard salvage chemotherapy. FINDINGS We identified 105 consecutive relapsed/refractory cHL patients, of which 37 (35.2%) received ICIs and 68 (64.7%) received chemotherapy without ICIs (no-ICI) before alloBMT. ICI and no-ICI patients experienced a 3-year estimated OS of 94% versus 78%, [hazard ratio (HR) 0.35 (95% CI: 0.08-1.56), P=0.17) and a 3-year estimated PFS of 90% and 65% [HR 0.3 (95 % CI: 0.09-1), P=0.05], respectively. We observed no statically significant difference in the 12-month cumulative incidence of acute grade II-IV GVHD or in the 24-month incidence of chronic GVHD. INTERPRETATION ICIs do not increase acute or chronic GVHD incidence compared to salvage chemotherapy. cHL patients receiving ICIs prior to alloBMT experienced outstanding PFS and OS. Thus ICI therapy is safe in cHL patients when undergoing alloBMT with PTCy and may improve post-alloBMT disease progression and survival. FUNDING National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute grants.
-
4.
Myeloablative haploidentical BMT with posttransplant cyclophosphamide for hematologic malignancies in children and adults
Symons, H. J., Zahurak, M., Cao, Y., Chen, A., Cooke, K., Gamper, C., Klein, O., Llosa, N., Zambidis, E. T., Ambinder, R., et al
Blood advances. 2020;4(16):3913-3925
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Promising results have been reported for patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies undergoing HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation (haploBMT) with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), but there are few data on outcomes with myeloablative conditioning in this context. We report the results of a single-institution, prospective phase 2 trial of myeloablative haploBMT using busulfan-based or total body irradiation-based conditioning in 96 children or adults (median age, 42 years; range, 1-65 years) with high-risk hematologic malignancies. Recovery of neutrophils and platelets occurred at a median of 24 and 29 days. Engraftment of donor cells with chimerism >95% was achieved in 91%. The cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grades II to IV and grades III to IV at day 100 was 11% and 4%, and of chronic GVHD at 6 and 12 months was 4% and 15%, with 6% moderate to severe. The cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 6% at 100 days and 11% at 1 year (19% in those aged >55 years). The cumulative incidence of relapse at 1 year was 35%; at 3 years, it was 43%. In multivariable analysis, relapse was associated with increased age (P = .02 for age 20-55 years and P = .02 for age >55 years) and with minimal residual disease before transplantation (P = .05). The overall survival at 1 and 3 years is 73% and 54%, and event-free survival at 1 and 3 years is 57% and 49%. We show that haploBMT with PTCy after myeloablative conditioning is safe and efficacious for adult and pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies. Careful consideration must be given to using myeloablative conditioning in patients age >55 years. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00796562.
-
5.
Double unrelated umbilical cord blood versus HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation (BMT CTN 1101)
Fuchs, E. J., O'Donnell, P. V., Eapen, M., Logan, B. R., Antin, J. H., Dawson, P., Devine, S. M., Horowitz, M. M., Horwitz, M. E., Karanes, C., et al
Blood. 2020
-
-
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Results of two parallel phase II trials of transplantation of unrelated umbilical cord blood or bone marrow from HLA-haploidentical relatives provided equipoise for direct comparison of these donor sources. Between June 2012 and June 2018, 368 patients aged 18-70 years with chemotherapy-sensitive lymphoma or acute leukemia in remission were randomly assigned to undergo cord blood (n=186) or haploidentical (n=182) transplant. Reduced intensity conditioning comprised total body irradiation with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine for both donor types. Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis for cord blood transplantation was cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil and for haploidentical transplantation, post-transplant cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival. Treatment groups had similar age, sex, self-reported ethnic origin, performance status, disease and disease status at randomization. Two-year progression-free survival was 35% (95% CI, 28-42%) compared to 41% (95% CI, 34-48%) after cord blood and haploidentical transplants, respectively (p=0.41). Pre-specified analysis of secondary endpoints recorded higher 2-year non-relapse mortality after cord blood, 18% (95% CI, 13-24%) compared to haploidentical transplantation, 11% (95% CI, 6-16%), p=0.04. This led to lower 2-year overall survival after cord blood compared to haploidentical transplantation, 46% (95% CI, 38-53) and 57% (95% CI 49-64%), respectively (p=0.04). The trial did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint, 2-year progression-free survival, between the donor sources. While both donor sources extend access to reduced intensity transplantation, analyses of secondary endpoints, including overall survival, favor haploidentical bone marrow donors. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-National Cancer Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01597778).
Clinical Commentary
Dr. Julia Wolf, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
What is known?
Allogeneic stem cell transplant is a potentially curative treatment option for patients with poor risk or relapsed acute leukaemia or lymphoma. Transplant outcomes are, amongst other factors, dependent on optimal donor selection; despite recent advances, donor availability remains an area of unmet need for many patients. Fully HLA matched sibling donors are the preferred choice but are available in <30% of patients, while fully matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplants are available in <20% of non-Caucasian patients. For patients who lack a HLA matched donor, alternative stem cell sources include double umbilical cord transplant (DUCT) and haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HaploSCT). DUCT is associated with low immunogenicity and non-invasive harvesting, but utility is limited by lack of further cell availability, e.g. for donor lymphocyte infusions, as well as cost. A small (n = 45) randomised trial (Sanz, J. et al, 2020) comparing DUCT and HaploSCT in the myeloablative setting showed increased non-relapse mortality in the DUCT group but no significant difference in terms of relapse rates or overall survival (OS). While other data is extensive it is often registry based and retrospective. Prospective data in the reduced intensity setting is limited.
What did this paper set out to examine?
This randomised multi-centre phase III trial set in the United States is the first randomised trial to compare DUCT and HaploSCT for the treatment of leukaemia and lymphoma in adults in the setting of reduced intensity conditioning. It aims to compare the two donor sources in terms of 2-year progression free survival (PFS) as primary endpoint and engraftment, acute and chronic Graft versus Host Disease (GvHD), non-relapse mortality, relapse/progression and OS as secondary endpoints.
What did they show?
The authors compared data from 368 patients (DUCT = 186 vs HaploSCT = 182) enrolled from 33 centres over a 6-year period from 2012 to 2016. The cohort represents 90% of the planned accrual of 410 patients – the trial closed early due to slow accrual. Patients aged 18-70 years with high risk acute leukaemia and lymphoma with good performance score, adequate organ function and available haploidentical donor or double umbilical cord unit were included. Exclusion criteria were fairly selected. Patients were well matched in terms of age, sex, self-reported ethnic origin, performance status, disease and disease status at randomisation. Reduced intensity conditioning comprised cyclophosphamide and fludarabine with total body irradiation for both donor types. GvHD prophylaxis for cord blood transplantation was cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and PtCy, tacrolimus and MMF for HaploSCT.
RESULTS: DUCT and HaploSCT were comparable for the primary endpoint of 2-year PFS (35% vs 41%; p=0.41). Analysis of secondary endpoints reached statistical significance for some of the chosen parameters: DUCT was associated with higher 2-year non-relapse mortality (18% vs 11%; p=0.04) and lower OS (46% vs 57%; p=0.04). Death was most commonly attributed to recurrent disease and relapse rates were comparable in both groups (47% in DUCT vs 48% in HaploSCT; p=0.968). HaploSCT showed higher cumulative incidence of neutrophil recovery at day 56 while no difference was seen in platelet recovery. Similar rates of acute and chronic GvHD were observed.
What are the implications for practice and for future work?
While this study didn’t demonstrate a significant difference in its’ primary end point, it showed an OS benefit and lower non-relapse mortality in the HaploSCT arm. Higher non-relapse mortality associated with DUCT may be explained by lack of immunologic memory and associated higher rates of infection, especially in the early post-transplant period. A recent meta-analysis (Poonsombudlert, et al. 2019) concurs that HaploSCT is associated with improved OS but also demonstrated lower relapse rates, lower rates of acute GvHD and higher rates of chronic GvHD in HaploSCT compared with DUCT. These findings were not replicated in this study. Lower non-relapse mortality and improved OS were also reported in a retrospective study of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (Kosuri, S. et al, 2017) which also demonstrated improved 4-year PFS in HaploSCT compared with DUCT.
While both donor sources improve access to reduced intensity transplantation, improved overall survival and lower non-relapse mortality with comparable GvHD rates shown in this study make HaploSCT an increasingly attractive option for patients without matched sibling transplant.

PICO Summary
Population
Patients aged 18-70 years with chemotherapy-sensitive lymphoma or acute leukaemia in remission (n=368)
Intervention
Cord blood transplantation (n=186)
Comparison
Haploidentical transplantation (n=182)
Outcome
Two-year progression-free survival was 35% compared to 41% after cord blood and haploidentical transplants, respectively. Pre-specified analysis of secondary endpoints recorded higher 2-year non-relapse mortality after cord blood, 18% compared to haploidentical transplantation, 11%. This led to lower 2-year overall survival after cord blood compared to haploidentical transplantation, 46% and 57%, respectively. The trial did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint, 2-year progression-free survival, between the donor sources.
-
6.
Shortened-duration immunosuppressive therapy after nonmyeloablative, related HLA-haploidentical or unrelated peripheral blood grafts and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide
DeZern, A. E., Elmariah, H., Zahurak, M., Rosner, G. L., Gladstone, D. E., Ali, S. A., Huff, C. A., Swinnen, L. J., Imus, P., Borrello, I., et al
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2020
-
-
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
With post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, nonmyeloablative (NMA) HLA-haploidentical (haplo) and HLA-matched blood or marrow (BMT) have comparable outcomes. Previous reports showed that discontinuation of immunosuppression (IS) as early as day 60 after infusion of bone marrow (BM) haplo allograft with PTCy is feasible. There are certain diseases in which peripheral blood (PB) may be favored over BM, but, given the higher rates of GVHD with PB, excessive GVHD becomes an increased concern. We present a completed, prospective single-center trial of stopping IS at days 90 and 60 after NMA PB transplantation. Between 12/2015-7/2018, 117 consecutive patients with hematologic malignancies associated with higher rates of graft failure after NMA conditioned BM transplantation and PTCy, received NMA PB allografts on trial. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of reduced-duration IS (from Day 5 through Day 90 in cohort 1 and through Day 60 in cohort 2). Of the 117 patients (median age 64 years, range 22-78), the most common diagnoses were myelodysplastic syndrome (33%), acute myeloid leukemia (with minimal residual disease or arising from antecedent disorder) (32%), myeloproliferative neoplasms (19%) myeloma (9%), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (7%). Shortened IS was feasible in 75 pts (64%) overall. Ineligibility for shortened IS resulted most commonly from GVHD (17 pts), followed by early relapse (11 pts), non-relapse mortality (NRM) (7 pts), patient/ physician preference (4 pts) or graft failure (3 pts). Of the 57 patients in the D90 cohort, 33 (58%) stopped IS early as planned. Of the 60 patients in the D60 cohort, 42 (70%) stopped IS early as planned. The graft failure rate was 2.6%. After IS cessation, the median time to diagnosis of grade II-IV GVHD was 21 days and 32 days in the day 90 and day 60 cohorts respectively, with almost all cases developing within 40 days. Approximately one-third of these patients did restart IS. All outcome measures were similar in the 2 cohorts and to our historical outcomes with 180 days of IS. The cumulative incidence of grade 3-4 acute GVHD were low at 2 and 7% in D90 and D60, respectively. Severe chronic GVHD was 9% (D90) and 5% (D60) at 2 years. The two year overall survival was 67% for both the D90 and D60 cohorts, The two year progression free survival was 47% for the Day 90 cohort and 52% for the Day 60 cohort with the GVHD-free relapse-free survival less than 35% for both cohorts. These data suggest that reduced-duration IS in pts receiving NMA PB grafts with PTCy is feasible and carries an acceptable safety profile.

PICO Summary
Population
Patients with hematologic malignancies associated with higher rates of graft failure (n=117)
Intervention
Non-myeloablative haploidentical transplant with immunosuppression days 5-90 (D90 cohort, n=57)
Comparison
Non-myeloablative haploidentical transplant, with immunosuppression days 5-60 (D60 cohort, n=60)
Outcome
Shortened immunosuppression (IS) was feasible in 75 pts (64%) overall. Ineligibility for shortened IS resulted most commonly from GVHD (17 pts), followed by early relapse (11 pts), non-relapse mortality (NRM) (7 pts), patient/ physician preference (4 pts) or graft failure (3 pts). Of the 57 patients in the D90 cohort, 33 (58%) stopped IS early as planned. Of the 60 patients in the D60 cohort, 42 (70%) stopped IS early as planned. The graft failure rate was 2.6%. After IS cessation, the median time to diagnosis of grade II-IV GVHD was 21 days and 32 days in the day 90 and day 60 cohorts respectively, with almost all cases developing within 40 days. Approximately one-third of these patients did restart IS. All outcome measures were similar in the 2 cohorts and to our historical outcomes with 180 days of IS. The cumulative incidence of grade 3-4 acute GVHD were low at 2 and 7% in D90 and D60, respectively. Severe chronic GVHD was 9% (D90) and 5% (D60) at 2 years. The two year overall survival was 67% for both the D90 and D60 cohorts, The two year progression free survival was 47% for the Day 90 cohort and 52% for the Day 60 cohort with the GVHD-free relapse-free survival less than 35% for both cohorts.
-
7.
Haploidentical BMT for severe aplastic anemia with intensive GVHD prophylaxis including posttransplant cyclophosphamide
DeZern, A. E., Zahurak, M. L., Symons, H. J., Cooke, K. R., Rosner, G. L., Gladstone, D. E., Huff, C. A., Swinnen, L. J., Imus, P., Borrello, I., et al
Blood advances. 2020;4(8):1770-1779
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a stem cell disorder often treated with bone marrow transplantation (BMT) to reconstitute hematopoiesis. Outcomes of related HLA-haploidentical (haplo) donors after reduced-intensity conditioning with intensive graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis including posttransplantation cyclophosphamide are presented here from 37 SAA, 20 relapsed/refractory (R/R), and 17 treatment-naive (TN) SAA patients. Median follow-up is 32 months (90% confidence interval [CI], 29-44). The median age was 25 (range, 4-69) years. The median time to neutrophil recovery was 17 days (range, 15-88). Four of 37 patients (11%) experienced graft failure (GF). There was 1 primary GF of 20 patients in the R/R group and 3 of 17 in the TN group at 200 cGy (1 primary, 2 secondary), but none in the 10 patients who received 400 cGy total body irradiation. Two patients with GF succumbed to infection and 2 were rescued with second haplo BMT. The overall survival for all patients is 94% (90% CI, 88-100) at 1 and 2 years. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD at day 100 is 11%. The cumulative index of chronic GVHD at 2 years is 8%. Similar results were seen in 10 SAA patients who received the identical nonmyeloablative regimen with posttransplant cyclophosphamide but matched donor transplants. Haplo BMT with posttransplant cyclophosphamide represents a potential cure in SAA, with all 20 R/R currently alive, disease-free, and with no evidence of active GVHD. Extending this approach to TN patients was associated with higher GF rates, but an increase in total body irradiation dose to 400 cGy was associated with durable engraftment without greater early toxicity. Nonmyeloablative haplo BMT in TN SAA could lead to a paradigm shift, such that essentially all patients can proceed quickly to safe, curative BMT. These trials were registered at www.cincialtrials.gov as #NCT02224872) and #NCT02833805.
-
8.
Thrombotic Microangiopathy after Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide-Based Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis
Imus, P. H., Tsai, H. L., DeZern, A. E., Jerde, K., Swinnen, L. J., Bolaños-Meade, J., Luznik, L., Fuchs, E. J., Wagner-Johnston, N., Huff, C. A., et al
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2020
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (taTMA) is a systemic vascular illness associated with significant morbidity and mortality, resulting from a convergence of risk factors after allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (alloBMT). The diagnosis of taTMA has been a challenge, but most criteria include an elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), low haptoglobin, and schistocytes on peripheral blood smear. We performed a retrospective review of the 678 consecutive adults who received high-dose post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) between January 1, 2015, and August 31, 2018. In April 2016, we initiated a monitoring program of weekly LDH and haptoglobin measurements and blood smears when those 2 parameters were both abnormal on all of our adult patients undergoing alloBMT for hematologic malignancies. During the entire period, the 1-year cumulative incidence of taTMA was 1.4% (95% confidence interval, 0.5% to 2.3%). Eight patients were taking tacrolimus at the time of diagnosis, and 1 was not on any immunosuppression. Eight of 9 patients (89%) were hypertensive. Four patients had invasive infections at the time of diagnosis, 4 patients required renal replacement therapy, and 5 of 9 patients were neurologically impaired. Eculizumab was given to 6 patients (0.9%), of whom 2 died and 4 recovered with resolution of end-organ dysfunction. The paucity of events made the determination of risk factors difficult; however, the low incidence of taTMA in this cohort may be related to the limited use of myeloablative conditioning regimens, low incidence of severe GVHD, and use of PTCy. PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis appears to be associated with a low incidence of severe taTMA.
-
9.
Three prophylaxis regimens (tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and cyclophosphamide; tacrolimus, methotrexate, and bortezomib; or tacrolimus, methotrexate, and maraviroc) versus tacrolimus and methotrexate for prevention of graft-versus-host disease with haemopoietic cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning: a randomised phase 2 trial with a non-randomised contemporaneous control group (BMT CTN 1203)
Bolanos-Meade, J., Reshef, R., Fraser, R., Fei, M., Abhyankar, S., Al-Kadhimi, Z., Alousi, A. M., Antin, J. H., Arai, S., Bickett, K., et al
The Lancet. Haematology. 2019;6(3):e132-e143
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prevention of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) without malignant relapse is the overall goal of allogeneic haemopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We aimed to evaluate regimens using either maraviroc, bortezomib, or post-transplantation cyclophosphamide for GvHD prophylaxis compared with controls receiving the combination of tacrolimus and methotrexate using a novel composite primary endpoint to identify the most promising intervention to be further tested in a phase 3 trial. METHODS In this prospective multicentre phase 2 trial, adult patients aged 18-75 years who received reduced-intensity conditioning HCT were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by random block sizes to tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg on days 3 and 4, followed by tacrolimus starting on day 5 and mycophenolate mofetil starting on day 5 at 15 mg/kg three times daily not to exceed 1 g from day 5 to day 35); tacrolimus, methotrexate, and bortezomib (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1, 4, and 7 after HCT); or tacrolimus, methotrexate, and maraviroc (maraviroc 300 mg orally twice daily from day -3 to day 30 after HCT). Methotrexate was administered as a 15 mg/m(2) intravenous bolus on day 1 and 10 mg/m(2) intravenous bolus on days 3, 6, and 11 after HCT; tacrolimus was given intravenously at a dose of 0.05 mg/kg twice daily (or oral equivalent) starting on day -3 (except the post-transplantation cyclophosphamide, as indicated), with a target level of 5-15 ng/mL. Tacrolimus was continued at least until day 90 and was tapered off by day 180. Each study group was compared separately to a contemporary non-randomised prospective cohort of patients (control group) who fulfilled the same eligibility criteria as the trial, but who were treated with tacrolimus and methotrexate at centres not participating in the trial. The primary endpoint (GvHD-free, relapse-free survival [GRFS]) was defined as the time from HCT to onset of grade 3-4 acute GvHD, chronic GvHD requiring systemic immunosuppression, disease relapse, or death. The study was analysed by modified intention to treat. The study is closed to accrual and this is the planned analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02208037. FINDINGS Between Nov 17, 2014, and May 18, 2016, 273 patients from 31 US centres were randomly assigned to the three study arms: 89 to tacrolimus, methotrexate, and bortezomib; 92 to tacrolimus, methotrexate, and maraviroc; 92 to tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide; and six were excluded. Between Aug 1, 2014, and Sept 14, 2016, 224 controls received tacrolimus and methotrexate. Controls were generally well matched except for more frequent comorbidities than the intervention groups and a different distribution of types of conditioning regimens used. Compared with controls, the hazard ratio for GRFS was 0.72 (90% CI 0.54-0.94; p=0.044) for tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide, 0.98 (0.76-1.27; p=0.92) for tacrolimus, methotrexate, and bortezomib, and 1.10 (0.86-1.41; p=0.49) for tacrolimus, methotrexate, and maraviroc. 238 patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicities: 12 (13%) had grade 3 and 67 (73%) grade 4 events with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide; ten (11%) had grade 3 and 68 (76%) had grade 4 events with tacrolimus, methotrexate, and bortezomib; and 18 (20%) had grade 3 and 63 (68%) had grade 4 events with tacrolimus, methotrexate, and maraviroc. The most common toxicities were haematological (77 [84%] for tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide; 73 [82%] for tacrolimus, methotrexate, and bortezomib; and 78 [85%] for tacrolimus, methotrexate, and maraviroc) and cardiac (43 [47%], 44 [49%], and 43 [47%], respectively). INTERPRETATION Tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide was the most promising intervention, yielding the best GRFS; this regimen is thus being prospectively compared with tacrolimus and methotrexate in a phase 3 randomised trial. FUNDING US National Health, Lung, and Blood Institute; National Cancer Institute; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease; and Millennium Pharmaceuticals.

PICO Summary
Population
Adults aged 18-75 who received reduced-intensity conditioning HCT
Intervention
3 arms, assigned randomly: 1) tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide; 2) tacrolimus, methotrexate, and bortezomib; or 3) tacrolimus, methotrexate, and maraviroc.
Comparison
Control group who fulfilled the same eligibility criteria as the trial, but who were treated with tacrolimus and methotrexate at centres not participating in the trial.
Outcome
Tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide was the most promising intervention, yielding the best GRFS. Compared with controls, the hazard ratio for GRFS was 0.72 for tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide, 0.98 for tacrolimus, methotrexate, and bortezomib, and 1.10 for tacrolimus, methotrexate, and maraviroc.
-
10.
Haploidentical transplantation using posttransplant cyclophosphamide as GVHD prophylaxis in patients over age 70
Imus, P. H., Tsai, H. L., Luznik, L., Fuchs, E. J., Huff, C. A., Gladstone, D. E., Lowery, P., Ambinder, R. F., Borrello, I. M., Swinnen, L. J., et al
Blood advances. 2019;3(17):2608-2616
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Hematologic malignancies in older people are unlikely to be cured with chemotherapy alone. Advances in allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (alloBMT), especially nonmyeloablative (NMA) conditioning and the use of haploidentical donors, now make this therapy available to older people; however, long-term outcomes and predictors of success are unclear. We reviewed the outcomes of 93 consecutive patients aged 70 and older (median, 72; range, 70-78), who underwent haploidentical BMT at Johns Hopkins Hospital between 1 September 2009 and 1 April 2018. All patients received NMA conditioning and posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. The 2-year overall survival was 53%, and 2-year event-free survival was 43%. The 180-day cumulative incidence (CuI) of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 14%, and the 2-year CuI was 27%. The 2-year CuI of relapse was 30%. Of 78 patients who were alive and had their weight recorded on day 180, weight loss predicted subsequent NRM (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.0; 95% CI, 1-1.13; P = .048). In conclusion, haploidentical BMT with PTCy is feasible and relatively safe in septuagenarians. Although early, 6-month NRM was relatively low at 14%, but overall NRM continued to climb to 27% at 2 years, at least in part because of late deaths that appeared to be somewhat age related. Further studies to elucidate predictors of NRM are warranted.

PICO Summary
Population
Consecutive patients older than 70 years with haematological malignancies (n=93)
Intervention
Haploidentical BMT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide GvHD prophylaxis
Comparison
None
Outcome
The 2-year overall survival was 53%, and 2-year event-free survival was 43%. The 180-day cumulative incidence (CuI) of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 14%, and the 2-year CuI was 27%. The 2-year CuI of relapse was 30%. Of 78 patients who were alive and had their weight recorded on day 180, weight loss predicted subsequent NRM.