Abstract

Although most children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) receive fractionated total body irradiation (FTBI) as myeloablative conditioning (MAC) for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), it is an important matter of debate if chemotherapy can effectively replace FTBI. To compare outcomes after FTBI versus chemotherapy-based conditioning (CC), we performed a retrospective EBMT registry study. Children aged 2-18 years after MAC for first allo-HSCT of bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) from matched-related (MRD) or unrelated donors (UD) in first (CR1) or second remission (CR2) between 2000 and 2012 were included. Propensity score weighting was used to control pretreatment imbalances of the observed variables. 3.054 patients were analyzed. CR1 (1.498): median follow-up (FU) after FTBI (1.285) and CC (213) was 6.8 and 6.1 years. Survivals were not significantly different. CR2 (1.556): median FU after FTBI (1.345) and CC (211) was 6.2 years. Outcomes after FTBI were superior as compared with CC with regard to overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), relapse incidence (RI), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). However, we must emphasize the preliminary character of the results of this retrospective "real-world-practice" study. These findings will be prospectively assessed in the ALL SCTped 2012 FORUM trial.

Abstract

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has evolved from an experimental to a successful treatment modality reaching worldwide 80.000 HSCT/year. Distribution and trends of HSCT, however, remain heterogeneous. Activities range from none to more than 511/10 million population between countries and regions. Here, we report on a successful autologous and allogeneic HSCT program for adult and pediatric patients started two decades ago in Northern Africa. From 1998 to December 2017, a total of 2828 HSCT was performed of which 2059 were allo-HSCT (1474 adults and 585 children). The activities were analyzed according to indication, donor type, stem cell source, and trends over time. There was a significant difference in indications according to age. Adult patients were transplanted more often for hematological malignancies. In children, the indications were distributed equally between malignant and non-malignant diseases. Overall activities increased substantially in AML and to a lower extent in ALL and CLL despite sharp reduction of activity in CML after 2005. Finally, a higher transplantation rate (33/10 million population) was reached as compared to most regions of the world except Europe and USA/Canada. Overall survival in children with AML was 56.0% at 15 years, in adults 61.3% at 5 years, and in patients with CML 55.5% at 15 years without difference between reduced intensity condition (RIC) and myeloablative conditioning (MAC). Patients with Ph+ ALL had the lowest survival reaching 26.7% at 5 years. Highest survival was observed in patients with aplastic anemia, Fanconi anemia, and thalassemia reaching 77.3%, 73.5%, and 75.7% at 15 years respectively. Long distances and late referral remain a challenge for this large country.

Abstract

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) are the source of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants currently used for malignant and non-malignant hematological diseases. PBSC harvest may be difficult in young children who are donors. Extracorporeal separator line priming by red blood cells or albumin alone is usually required to improve haemodynamic tolerance and efficacy of collection. We present our experience with 29 children weighing 20 kg or less mobilised between January 2005 and June 2018. The median age and weight at the time of apheresis were 5 years and 18 kg, respectively. A total of 54 PBSC were performed. The median cell yield per apheresis was 5.9 × 10(6) CD34(+)cells/kg (2,5-13,9) recipient body weight (RBW). Despite their low weight, insertion of a femoral catheter was avoided in 58.6% of children. Nineteen donors required 2 or 3 apheresis sessions without any major complication. Twenty-nine pts with hemopathies have successfully benefited from PBSC except one case of rejection with aplastic anemia.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Addition of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCY) to standard immunosuppressive agents reduces GVHD in different donor settings. METHODS We compared the outcomes of adults with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allo-HSCT from HLA-identical sibling donors after the use of PTCY (n = 197) or ATG (n = 1913). RESULTS Patients in the PTCY group were younger than those in the ATG group (median age, 47 vs 54 years; P < .01). Peripheral blood was the most frequently used stem cell source, being significantly more frequent in the ATG group than in the PTCY group (95% vs 70% P < .01). The conditioning regimen was more frequently myeloablative in the PTCY group than in the ATG group (59% vs 48%; P < .01). Time to neutrophil engraftment was shorter in the ATG group than in the PTCY group (17 vs 20 days; P < .01). No differences were observed according to the other transplantation outcomes, except for chronic GVHD of all grades and extensive chronic GVHD at 2 years, which were significantly lower in the ATG group compared with the PTCY group (P < .02). CONCLUSION PTCY is feasible in an HLA-identical sibling setting, and despite similar outcomes, ATG may be associated with lower incidence of chronic GVHD.

Abstract

The development of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) programs can face significant challenges in most developing countries because such endeavors must compete with other government health care priorities, including the delivery of basic services. While this is may be a limiting factor, these countries should prioritize development of the needed expertise to offer state of the art treatments including transplantation, by providing financial, technological, legal, ethical and other needed support. This would prove beneficial in providing successful programs customized to the needs of their population, and potentially provide long-term cost-savings by circumventing the need for their citizens to seek care abroad. Costs of establishing HSCT program and the costs of the HSCT procedure itself can be substantial barriers in developing countries. Additionally, socioeconomic factors intrinsic to specific countries can influence access to HSCT, patient eligibility for HSCT and timely utilization of HSCT center capabilities. This report describes recommendations from the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (WBMT) for establishing HSCT programs with a specific focus on developing countries, and identifies challenges and opportunities for providing this specialized procedure in the resource constrained setting.

Abstract

The development of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) programs can face significant challenges in most developing countries because such endeavors must compete with other government health care priorities, including the delivery of basic services. While this is may be a limiting factor, these countries should prioritize development of the needed expertise to offer state of the art treatments including transplantation, by providing financial, technological, legal, ethical and other needed support. This would prove beneficial in providing successful programs customized to the needs of their population, and potentially provide long-term cost-savings by circumventing the need for their citizens to seek care abroad. Costs of establishing HSCT program and the costs of the HSCT procedure itself can be substantial barriers in developing countries. Additionally, socioeconomic factors intrinsic to specific countries can influence access to HSCT, patient eligibility for HSCT and timely utilization of HSCT center capabilities. This report describes recommendations from the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (WBMT) for establishing HSCT programs with a specific focus on developing countries, and identifies challenges and opportunities for providing this specialized procedure in the resource constrained setting.

Abstract

Treatment of relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (RR-ALL) remains a clinical challenge with generally dismal prognosis. Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation using sequential conditioning ("FLAMSA"-like) has shown promising results in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia, but little is known about its efficacy in RR-ALL. We identified 115 patients (19-66 years) with relapsed (74%) or primary-refractory (26%) ALL allografted from matched related (31%), matched unrelated (58%), or haploidentical donor (11%). Median follow-up was 37 (13-111) months. At day 100, cumulative incidences of grade II-IV/III-IV acute graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) were 30% and 17%, respectively. Two-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 25% with 11% extensive cases. Two-year relapse incidence (RI) was 45%, non-relapse mortality was 41%. Two-year leukemia free survival (LFS) was 14%, overall survival (OS) 17%, and GVHD relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 14%. In multivariable analysis, Karnofsky score <90 negatively affected RI, LFS, OS, and GRFS. Conditioning with chemotherapy alone, compared with total body irradiation (TBI) negatively affected RI (HR = 3.3; p = 0.008), LFS (HR = 1.94; p = 0.03), and OS (HR = 2.0; p = 0.03). These patients still face extremely poor outcomes, highlighting the importance of incorporating novel therapies (e.g., BITE antibodies, inotuzumab, CAR-T cells). Nevertheless, patients with RR-T-cell ALL remain with an unmet treatment need, for which TBI-based sequential conditioning could be one of few available options.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Outcomes for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) have significantly improved in recent years. OBJECTIVES To assess the incremental improvement of transplanted AML patients in the last two decades. METHODS Patients included in this analysis were adult AML patients who underwent allo-SCT from an HLA matched sibling donor (MSD) or matched unrelated donor (MUD) in first remission. Patient outcomes were assessed between three cohorts according to the year of transplant (1993-2002, 2003-2007, and 2008-2012). RESULTS The analysis comprised a total of 20187 patients of whom 4763 were transplanted between 1993-2002, 5835 in 2003-2007, and 9589 in 2008-2012. In multivariate analysis, leukemia free survival (LFS) rates were significantly improved in more recently transplanted patients compared to patients transplanted in 1993-2002 [Hazard ratio (HR)=0.84, confidence interval (CI) 95%, 0.77-0.92; P=0.003], a benefit which also extended to improved overall survival (OS) (HR=0.8, CI 95%, 0.73-0.89; P<0.0001), and decreased non-relapse mortality (NRM) rates (HR=0.65, CI 95%, 0.56-0.75; P<0.0001). Subset analysis revealed that in MSD, the rates of LFS, NRM, and OS significantly improved in patients in the more recent cohort with similar results also seen in MUD. Finally, the incidence of acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) was significantly reduced leading to improved GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) rates in more recently transplanted patients. CONCLUSION Outcome of allo-SCT for AML patients has markedly improved in the last two decades owing to decreased non-relapse mortality and improved rates of leukemia-free survival resulting in significantly longer survival. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Abstract

We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 1837 adults and children with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) who underwent matched sibling donor (MSD) and matched unrelated donor (MUD) haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) between 2000 and 2013. Patients were grouped by transplant conditioning containing either ATG (n=1283), alemtuzumab (n=261) or no serotherapy (NS) (n=293). The risks of chronic GvHD were significantly reduced when ATG or alemtuzumab were compared to no serotherapy (p=0.021 and p=0.003, respectively). Acute GVHD was significantly reduced in favor of alemtuzumab compared to ATG (P=0.012) and no serotherapy (p < 0.001). By multivariate analysis, when compared to ATG, alemtuzumab was associated with a lower risk of developing acute (OR 0.262; 95% CI 0.14-0.47; p<0.001) and chronic GVHD (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.35 - 0.94; p=0.027). OS was significantly better in ATG and alemtuzumab patients compared with no serotherapy (p=0.010 and p=0.025). Our data shows inclusion of serotherapy in MSD and MUD HSCT for patients with SAA reduces chronic GVHD and provides a survival advantage over patients not receiving serotherapy. Notably, alemtuzumab reduced the risk of acute and chronic GvHD compared to ATG and indicates that alemtuzumab might be the serotherapy of choice for MSD and MUD transplants for SAA. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.