-
1.
Similar outcomes following non-first-degree and first-degree related donor haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute leukemia patients in complete remission: a study from the Global Committee and the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Ye, Y., Labopin, M., Chen, J., Gulbas, Z., Zhang, X., Koc, Y., Blaise, D., Ciceri, F., Polge, E., Houhou, M., et al
Journal of Hematology & Oncology. 2023;16(1):25
Abstract
There are situations where non-first-degree (NFD) related donors have to be considered as alternatives to first-degree (FD) related donors for haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HAPLO). However, the efficacy of these NFD related transplants remains uncertain. All consecutive adult patients (≥ 18 years) with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) or acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) in CR who underwent a first HAPLO between 2010 and 2021 in the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry were analyzed. Exact matching and propensity score matching was used. The NFD-to-FD ratio was 1:3. 2703 patients (AML: n = 2047; ALL: n = 656) in CR received a first HAPLO from either NFD (n = 154) or FD (n = 2549) related donors in 177 EBMT centers. 123 NFD and 324 FD HAPLO were included for analysis after matching. Median patient age was 35.6 and 37.2 for the NFD and FD cohorts, respectively. Both cohorts reached good engraftment rates (NFD: 95.7% vs. FD, 95.6%; p = 0.78). The 2-year relapse incidence (NFD, 21.1% vs. FD, 22.6%; p = 0.84) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) (NFD, 13.2% vs. FD, 17.7%; p = 0.33) were not significantly different. The 2-year overall survival (OS) (NFD, 71.8% vs. FD, 68.3%; p = 0.56), leukemia-free survival (LFS) (NFD, 65.7% vs. FD, 59.7%; p = 0.6) and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) (NFD, 50.9% vs. FD, 47.8%; p = 0.69) also showed no significant differences. The two cohorts showed no difference in terms of cumulative day 180 grade II-IV, grade III-IV acute GVHD, 2-year cumulative incidences of chronic and extensive chronic GVHD. For HAPLO in patients with acute leukemia, NFD related donors could be equivalent substitutions when FD related donors are not available.
-
2.
Comparison of outcomes for HLA-matched sibling and haplo-identical donors in Myelodysplastic syndromes: report from the chronic malignancies working party of EBMT
Raj, K., Eikema, D. J., Sheth, V., Koster, L., de Wreede, L. C., Blaise, D., Di Grazia, C., Koc, Y., Potter, V., Chevallier, P., et al
Blood cancer journal. 2022;12(9):140
Abstract
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are the second common indication for an Allo-HCT. We compared the outcomes of 1414 matched sibling (MSD) with 415 haplo-identical donors (HD) transplanted with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as GVHD prophylaxis between 2014 and 2017. The median age at transplant with MSD was 58 and 61 years for HD. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was longer for HD being 20 vs 16 days for MSD (p < 0.001). Two-year overall survival (OS) and PFS (progression free survival) with MSD were significantly better at 58% compared with 50%, p ≤ 0.001, and 51% vs 47%, p = 0.029, with a HD. Relapse at 2 years was lower with a HD 23% than with MSD 29% (p = 0.016). Non relapse mortality (NRM) was higher with HD in the first 6 months post-transplant [HR 2.59 (1.5-4.48) p < 0.001] and was also higher at 2 years being 30% for HD and 20% for MSD, p ≤ 0.001. The incidence of acute GVHD grade II-IV and III-IV at 100 days was comparable for MSD and HD, however, chronic GVHD at 2 years was significantly higher with MSD being 44% vs 32% for HD (p < 0.001). After multivariable analysis, OS and primary graft failure were significantly worse for HD particularly before 6 months [HR 1.93(1.24-3.0)], and HR [3.5(1.5-8.1)]. The median age of HD 37 (IQR 30-47) years was significantly lower than sibling donors 56 (IQR 49-62 years) p < 0.001. However, there was no effect on NRM, relapse or PFS. This data set suggests that a MSD donor remains the preferred choice in MDS over a haplo donor. Transplants with haploidentical donors result in satisfactory long-term outcome, justifying it's use when no better donor is available.
-
3.
Comparable Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life for Severe Aplastic Anemia: Haploidentical Combined With a Single Cord Blood Unit vs Matched Related Transplants
Lei, M., Li, X., Zhang, Y., Qu, Q., Jiao, W., Zhou, H., Wang, Q., Qiu, H., Tang, X., Han, Y., et al
Frontiers in oncology. 2021;11:714033
Abstract
We retrospectively compared the outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients who received haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with a single unrelated cord blood unit (Haplo-cord HSCT) (n = 180) or matched related donor (MRD)-HSCT (n = 128). After propensity score matching, we were able to match 88 patients in each group and to compare the outcomes between the two matched-pair groups. Haplo-cord recipients exhibited a longer median days for neutrophil engraftment (12 vs 11, P = 0.001) and for platelet engraftment (15 vs 13, P = 0.003). Haplo-cord recipients a high cumulative incidence of grades II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (29.8 vs 14.0%, P = 0.006), while similar III-IV acute GVHD, total chronic GVHD, and moderate to severe chronic GVHD at four-year (all P < 0.05). Among the Haplo-cord HSCT and MRD-HSCT groups, the four-year GVHD-free/failure-free survival rates were 73.5% and 66.9% (P = 0.388) respectively, and the overall survival rates were 81.5% and 77.2% (P = 0.484), respectively. Similar comparable results also were observed between the corresponding first-line, older or younger than 40 years old subgroups. The Haplo-cord HSCT group exhibited higher scores in the physical component summary, physical functioning, general health and social functioning than the MRD-HSCT group (all P < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, young age and Haplo-cord HSCT were favorable factors for HRQoL, while moderate to severe cGVHD was associated with lower HRQoL. These results suggest that for SAA patients, Haplo-cord HSCT could achieve at least comparable efficacy and HRQoL to MRD-HSCT.
-
4.
The consensus on indications, conditioning regimen, and donor selection of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for hematological diseases in China-recommendations from the Chinese Society of Hematology
Xu, L., Chen, H., Chen, J., Han, M., Huang, H., Lai, Y., Liu, D., Liu, Q., Liu, T., Jiang, M., et al
Journal of hematology & oncology. 2018;11(1):33
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is widely used to treat malignant hematological neoplasms and non-malignant hematological disorders. Approximately, 5000 allo-HSCT procedures are performed in China annually. Substantial progress has been made in haploidentical HSCT (HID-HSCT), pre-transplantation risk stratification, and donor selection in allo-HSCT, especially after the establishment of the "Beijing Protocol" HID-HSCT system. Transplant indications for selected subgroups in low-risk leukemia or severe aplastic anemia (SAA) differ from those in the Western world. These unique systems developed by Chinese doctors may inspire the refining of global clinical practice. We reviewed the efficacy of allo-HSCT practice from available Chinese studies on behalf of the HSCT workgroup of the Chinese Society of Hematology, Chinese Medical Association and compared these studies to the consensus or guideline outside China. We summarized the consensus on routine practices of all-HSCT in China and focused on the recommendations of indications, conditioning regimen, and donor selection.
-
5.
Haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation compared to matched unrelated transplantation for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Gu, B., Wu, X., Chen, G., Ma, X., Jin, Z., Tang, X., Han, Y., Fu, C., Qiu, H., Sun, A., et al
Leukemia Research. 2017;59:41-46
Abstract
To investigate the effect of haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Haplo-HCT) in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL), the outcome of 58 patients with Ph+ ALL who received Haplo-HCT (n=42) or matched unrelated donor transplantation (MUD-HCT) (n=16) during the same period were analyzed retrospectively. All patients received a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based regimen before transplantation, and TKI was resumed primarily after transplantation. At the 3-year follow-up, the overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and non-relapse mortality (NRM) rates in Haplo-HCT group were 69.1, 64.3, 19.0, and 14.3%, respectively, without significant differences from that of MUD-HCT. Haplo-HCT was not related to higher incidences of severe acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) (17.6+/-5.2% vs. 20.0+/-10.0%, P=0.603) or chronic GvHD (19.5+/-7.1% vs. 13.3+/-8.6%, P=0.637) as compared to MUD-HCT. Multivariate analysis showed that chronic GvHD was associated with lower relapse rate in Haplo-HCT group. Haplo-HCT is a promising choice for improving the long-term survival in Ph+ ALL patients.Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
-
6.
Alternative donors for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in poor-risk AML in CR1
Versluis, J., Labopin, M., Ruggeri, A., Socie, G., Wu, D., Volin, L., Blaise, D., Milpied, N., Craddock, C., Yakoub-Agha, I., et al
Blood Advances. 2017;1(7):477-485
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) remains the treatment of choice to consolidate remission in patients with poor-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). With increasing alternative donors available, the preferred donor or stem cell source is debated. We set out to study outcome in recipients of alloHSCT with poor-risk AML in first complete remission (CR1) by donor type. A total of 6545 adult patients with poor-risk AML in CR1 receiving an alloHSCT using matched related donor (MRD, n = 3511) or alternative donors, including 10/10 (n = 1959) or 9/10 matched unrelated donors (MUDs, n = 549), umbilical cord blood (UCB) grafts (n = 333), or haplo-identical (haplo) donors (n = 193) were compared. Overall survival (OS) at 2 years following MRD alloHSCT was an estimated 59 +/- 1%, which did not differ from 10/10 MUD (57 +/- 1%) and haplo alloHSCT (57 +/- 4%). OS, however, was significantly lower for 9/10 MUD alloHSCT (49 +/- 2%) and UCB grafts (44 +/- 3%), respectively (P < .001). Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) depended on donor type and was estimated at 26 +/- 3% and 29 +/- 3% after haplo alloHSCT and UCB grafts at 2 years vs 15 +/- 1% following MRD alloHSCT. Multivariable analysis confirmed the impact of donor type with OS following MRD, 10/10 MUD, and haplo alloHSCT not being statistically significantly different. NRM was significantly higher for alternative donors as compared with MRD alloHSCT. Collectively, these results suggest that alloHSCT with MRDs and 10/10 MUDs may still be preferred in patients with poor-risk AML in CR1. If an MRD or 10/10 MUD is not available, then the repertoire of alternative donors includes 9/10 MUD, UCB grafts, and haplo-identical donors. The latter type of donor is increasingly applied and now approximates results with matched donors. Presented by J.V. as an oral presentation at the 56th annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, San Francisco, CA, 6-9 December 2014, and at the 42nd annual meeting of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Valencia, Spain, 3-6 April 2016.Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.
-
7.
Matched and mismatched unrelated donor compared to autologous stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: a retrospective, propensity score-weighted analysis from the ALWP of the EBMT
Saraceni, F., Labopin, M., Gorin, N. C., Blaise, D., Tabrizi, R., Volin, L., Cornelissen, J., Cahn, J. Y., Chevallier, P., Craddock, C., et al
Journal of hematology & oncology. 2016;9(1):79
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimal post-remission strategy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is matter of intense debate. Recent reports have shown stronger anti-leukemic activity but similar survival for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) from matched sibling donor compared to autologous transplantation (auto-HSCT); however, there is scarcity of literature confronting auto-HSCT with allo-HSCT from unrelated donor (UD-HSCT), especially mismatched UD-HSCT. METHODS We retrospectively compared outcome of allogeneic transplantation from matched (10/10 UD-HSCT) or mismatched at a single HLA-locus unrelated donor (9/10 UD-HSCT) to autologous transplantation in patients with AML in first complete remission (CR1). A total of 2879 patients were included; 1202 patients received auto-HSCT, 1302 10/10 UD-HSCT, and 375 9/10 UD-HSCT. A propensity score-weighted analysis was conducted to control for disease risk imbalances between the groups. RESULTS Matched 10/10 UD-HSCT was associated with the best leukemia-free survival (10/10 UD-HSCT vs auto-HSCT: HR 0.7, p=0.0016). Leukemia-free survival was not statistically different between auto-HSCT and 9/10 UD-HSCT (9/10 UD-HSCT vs auto-HSCT: HR 0.8, p=0.2). Overall survival was similar across the groups (10/10 UD-HSCT vs auto-HSCT: HR 0.98, p=0.84; 9/10 UD-HSCT vs auto-HSCT: HR 1.1, p=0.49). Notably, in intermediate-risk patients, OS was significantly worse for 9/10 UD-HSCT (9/10 UD-HSCT vs auto-HSCT: HR 1.6, p=0.049), while it did not differ between auto-HSCT and 10/10 UD-HSCT (HR 0.95, p=0.88). In favorable risk patients, auto-HSCT resulted in 3-year LFS and OS rates of 59 and 78 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that in AML patients in CR1 lacking an HLA-matched sibling donor, 10/10 UD-HSCT significantly improves LFS, but this advantage does not translate in better OS compared to auto-HSCT. In intermediate-risk patients lacking a fully HLA-matched donor, auto-HSCT should be considered as a valid option, as better survival appears to be provided by auto-HSCT compared to mismatched UD-HSCT. Finally, auto-HSCT provided an encouraging outcome in patients with favorable risk AML.