-
1.
Fludarabine or cyclophosphamide in combination with total body irradiation as myeloablative conditioning prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia: an analysis by the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT
Giebel, S., Labopin, M., Socié, G., Aljurf, M., Salmenniemi, U., Labussière-Wallet, H., Srour, M., Kröger, N., Zahrani, M. A., Lioure, B., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2023
Abstract
In this registry-based study we retrospectively compared outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) following conditioning with total body irradiation (TBI) combined with either cyclophosphamide (Cy) or fludarabine (Flu). TBI 12 Gy + Cy was used in 2105 cases while TBI 12 Gy + Flu was administered to 150 patients in first or second complete remission. In a multivariate model adjusted for other prognostic factors, TBI/Cy conditioning was associated with a reduced risk of relapse (HR = 0.69, p = 0.049) and increased risk of grade 2-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD, HR = 1.57, p = 0.03) without significant effect on other transplantation outcomes. In a matched-pair analysis the use of TBI/Cy as compared to TBI/Flu was associated with a significantly reduced rate of relapse (18% vs. 30% at 2 years, p = 0.015) without significant effect on non-relapse mortality, GVHD and survival. We conclude that the use of myeloablative TBI/Cy as conditioning prior to allo-HCT for adult patients with ALL in complete remission is associated with lower risk of relapse rate compared to TBI/Flu and therefore should probably be considered a preferable regimen.
-
2.
Fludarabine/TBI 8 Gy versus fludarabine/treosulfan conditioning in patients with AML in first complete remission: a study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT
Bug, G., Labopin, M., Niittyvuopio, R., Stelljes, M., Reinhardt, H. C., Hilgendorf, I., Kröger, N., Kaare, A., Bethge, W., Schäfer-Eckart, K., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2023
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
The optimal reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen is a matter of debate. We retrospectively compared conditioning with fludarabine plus fractionated total body irradiation of 8 Gy (FluTBI) and fludarabine plus treosulfan 30, 36 or 42 g/m(2) (FluTreo) in 754 patients with AML above the age of 40 years undergoing an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in first complete remission (CR). After balancing patient characteristics by propensity score matching of 115 patients in each group, FluTBI was associated with a significantly lower probability of relapse compared to FluTreo (18.3% vs. 34.7%, p = 0.018) which was counteracted by a higher non-relapse mortality (NRM, 16.8% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.02). Thus, overall survival and graft-versus-host disease-free and relapse-free survival at 2 years were similar between groups (OS 66.9% vs. 67.8%, GRFS 50.3% vs. 45.6%). Univariate analysis by age group demonstrated a higher NRM exclusively in patients ≥55 years of age treated with FluTBI compared to FluTreo (27.6% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.02), while a similarly low NRM was observed in patients <55 years in both groups (6.0% vs. 4.7%, p = ns). We conclude that both conditioning regimens are effective and safe, but FluTBI may better be reserved for younger patients below the age of 55 years.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults above the age of 40 years with AML, undergoing an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in first complete remission and reported to the EBMT registry (n=754, pair matched to produce a population of 230)
Intervention
Conditioning with fludarabine plus fractionated total body irradiation of 8 Gy (FluTB, n=115)
Comparison
Conditioning with fludarabine plus treosulfan 30, 36 or 42 g/m(2) (FluTreo, n=115)
Outcome
After balancing patient characteristics by propensity score matching of 115 patients in each group, FluTBI was associated with a significantly lower probability of relapse compared to FluTreo (18.3% vs. 34.7%) which was counteracted by a higher non-relapse mortality (NRM, 16.8% vs. 5.3%). Thus, overall survival and graft-versus-host disease-free and relapse-free survival at 2 years were similar between groups (OS 66.9% vs. 67.8%, GRFS 50.3% vs. 45.6%). Univariate analysis by age group demonstrated a higher NRM exclusively in patients ≥55 years of age treated with FluTBI compared to FluTreo (27.6% vs. 5.8%), while a similarly low NRM was observed in patients <55 years in both groups (6.0% vs. 4.7%).
-
3.
Total body irradiation plus fludarabine versus thiotepa, busulfan plus fludarabine as a myeloablative conditioning for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation. A study by the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT
Swoboda, R., Labopin, M., Giebel, S., Angelucci, E., Arat, M., Aljurf, M., Sica, S., Pavlu, J., Socié, G., Bernasconi, P., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2022
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Optimal conditioning for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) and post-transplant cyclophosphamide has not been established so far. We retrospectively compared outcomes for two myeloablative regimens: fludarabine + total body irradiation (Flu-TBI, n = 117) and thiotepa + iv. busulfan + fludarabine (TBF, n = 119). Patients transplanted either in complete remission (CR) or with active disease were included in the analysis. The characteristics of both groups were comparable except for patients treated with TBF were older. In univariate analysis the incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 2 years was increased for TBF compared to Flu-TBI (31% vs. 19.5%, p = 0.03). There was a tendency towards reduced incidence of relapse after TBF (p = 0.11). Results of multivariate analysis confirmed a reduced risk of NRM using Flu-TBI (HR = 0.49, p = 0.03). In the analysis restricted to patients treated in CR1 or CR2, the use of Flu-TBI was associated with a decreased risk of NRM (HR = 0.34, p = 0.009) but an increased risk of relapse (HR = 2.59, p = 0.01) without significant effect on survival and graft-versus-host disease. We conclude that for haplo-HCT recipients with ALL, Flu-TBI may be preferable for individuals at high risk of NRM while TBF should be considered in cases at high risk of relapse.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with haploidentical (n=haematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (n=236)
Intervention
Fludarabine + total body irradiation conditioning (Flu-TBI, n=117)
Comparison
Thiotepa + iv. busulfan + fludarabine conditioning (TBF, n=119)
Outcome
In univariate analysis the incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 2 years was increased for TBF compared to Flu-TBI (31% vs. 19.5%). There was a tendency towards reduced incidence of relapse after TBF. Results of multivariate analysis confirmed a reduced risk of NRM using Flu-TBI (HR = 0.49). In the analysis restricted to patients treated in CR1 or CR2, the use of Flu-TBI was associated with a decreased risk of NRM (HR = 0.34) but an increased risk of relapse (HR = 2.59) without significant effect on survival and graft-versus-host disease.
-
4.
Total body irradiation + fludarabine compared to busulfan + fludarabine as "reduced-toxicity conditioning" for patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in first complete remission: a study by the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT
Giebel, S., Labopin, M., Sobczyk-Kruszelnicka, M., Stelljes, M., Byrne, J. L., Fegueux, N., Beelen, D. W., Rovira, M., Spyridonidis, A., Blaise, D., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2020
Abstract
The optimal conditioning for patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) has not been defined so far. In this retrospective study, we compared two "reduced-toxicity" regimens: intravenous busulfan at a total dose of 9.6?mg/kg (3 days)?+?fludarabine (Bu3/Flu) and total body irradiation at a dose of 8?Gy?+?fludarabine (TBI8Gy/Flu). In the entire study cohort (n?=?518), the probabilities of overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 2 years for Bu3/Flu and TBI8Gy/Flu were 62% vs. 72.5% (p?=?0.051), 59.5% vs. 65% (p?=?0.15), 30% vs. 20% (p?=?0.01), and 10% vs. 14% (p?=?0.18), respectively. In multivariate model for patients <50 years old, TBI8Gy/Flu was associated with improved LFS (hazard ratio (HR)?=?0.5, p?=?0.04), OS (HR?=?0.31, p?=?0.004), and survival free from both graft-versus-host disease and relapse (HR?=?0.55, p?=?0.03), as well as tendency to reduced risk of relapse (HR?=?0.53, p?=?0.08). Among patients aged 50 years or older the use of TBI8Gy/Flu was associated with increased incidence of NRM (HR?=?3.9, p?=?0.0009), with no significant impact on other outcome measures. We conclude that the use of TBI8Gy/Flu as "reduced-toxicity" regimen may be advised in younger patients with AML referred for allo-HCT.
-
5.
Impact of Total Body Irradiation- Versus Chemotherapy-Based Myeloablative Conditioning on Outcomes of Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
Dholaria, B., Labopin, M., Angelucci, E., Ciceri, F., Diez-Martin, J. L., Bruno, B., Sica, S., Koc, Y., Gulbas, Z., Schmid, C., et al
American journal of hematology. 2020
Abstract
The optimal myeloablative conditioning (MAC) for patients undergoing haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) is unknown. We studied the outcomes of total body irradiation (TBI) versus chemotherapy (CT) based MAC regimens in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. The study included 1008 patients who underwent first haplo-HCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide, following TBI (N=89, 9%) or CT (n=919, 91%) based MAC. Patients in the TBI cohort were younger (median age, 38 vs. 47 yrs, p<0.01) and more likely to receive BM graft (57% vs. 43%, p=0.01). Two-year overall chronic GVHD (cGVHD) incidence was 42% vs. 27% (p<0.01) and extensive cGVHD incidence was 9% vs. 12% (p=0.33) in TBI and CT cohorts, respectively. Graft failure was reported in 2 (2%) TBI- and 65 (7%) CT-MAC recipients (p=0.08). Death from veno-occlusive disease was reported in 1(3%) TBI and 11(3%) CT patients who died during the study period. In the multivariate analysis, TBI was associated with increased risk for overall cGVHD (hazard ratio=1.95, 95% confidence interval:1.2-3.1, p<0.01) compared to CT-based MAC. The choice of conditioning regimen did not impact relapse incidence, leukemia-free survival, non-relapse mortality, overall survival or GVHD-relapse-free survival in multivariate analysis. In conclusion, major transplant outcomes were not statistically different between TBI-based MAC and CT-based MAC in patients with AML after haplo-HCT/PTCy. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
-
6.
Fludarabine/busulfan versus fludarabine/total-body-irradiation (2 Gy) as conditioning prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients (>/=60 years) with acute myelogenous leukemia: a study of the acute leukemia working party of the EBMT
Heinicke, T., Labopin, M., Polge, E., Niederwieser, D., Platzbecker, U., Sengelov, H., Choi, G., Cornelissen, J., Blaise, D., Kuball, J., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2019
Abstract
Nonmyeloablative (NMA) conditioning regimens facilitate allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) in elderly patients and/or in those with comorbidities. The acute leukemia working party (ALWP) of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) compared the outcomes of patients ≥60 years with AML in first complete remission (CR1), that had received an alloSCT following NMA conditioning, i.e. either fludarabine/busulfan (FB2) or fludarabine/total-body-irradiation-2Gy (FluTBI2Gy). A total of 1088 patients were included (median age 65 years). Donors were matched siblings (MSD) and matched unrelated donors (MUD) in 47% and 53%, respectively. In vivo T-cell depletion (TCD) was applied to 79% and none (0%) of patients in the FB2 and FluTBI2Gy groups, respectively. In the MSD group we found a trend for less extensive cGVHD in patients receiving FB2 with in vivo TCD, HR: 0.49, p = 0.08, and in those without worse NRM, HR: 2.14, p = 0.04, and a trend for more total cGVHD, HR: 1.61, p = 0.09. Patients transplanted from MUDs had a significantly higher incidence of total cGVHD, extensive cGVHD and a worse GRFS with FluTBI2Gy in comparison to FB2, HR: 2.44; p < 0.0001; HR 4.59; p < 0.00001 and HR: 1.35; p = 0.03, respectively. No differences were observed with respect to LFS, OS, RI, NRM, and aGVHD.
-
7.
Reduced Relapse Incidence with FLAMSA-RIC conditioning compared to Busulfan/Fludarabine for AML-patients in first or second complete remission - A Study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT
Heinicke, T., Labopin, M., Schmid, C., Polge, E., Socie, G., Blaise, D., Mufti, G. J., Huynh, A., Brecht, A., Ledoux, M. P., et al
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2018
Abstract
BACKGROUND Busulfan/fludarabine (BuFlu) is a widely used conditioning regimen for patients with myeloid malignancies. The sequential FLAMSA protocol (fludarabine+Ara-C+amsacrine chemotherapy followed by either cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation (FLAMSA-TBI) or cyclophosphamide and busulfan (FLAMSA-Bu)) has shown remarkable activity in high risk AML patients. Here, we compare the outcomes of AML patients transplanted in CR1 or CR2 after conditioning with BuFlu or FLAMSA. METHODS Eligible patients had their first allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) for AML in CR1 or CR2 between 1/2005 and 6/2016. Donors were matched related or unrelated with up to one mismatch. Conditioning consisted of either BuFlu or FLAMSA. Propensity score matching was applied and comparisons were performed using weighted Cox regression. RESULTS BuFlu conditioning was used in 1197 patients, whereas FLAMSA-TBI and FLAMSA-Bu were used in 258 and 141 patients, respectively. Median follow-up of survivors was 24.72 months. In univariate analysis, relapse incidence (RI) was 30.3%, 21.9% and 23.1% in the BuFlu, FLAMSA-TBI and FLAMSA-Bu groups, respectively, p<.01 and non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 2 years was 16.1%, 16.4% and 26.7%, respectively, p<.01. Leukemia free survival (LFS) at two years was 53.6%, 61.6% and 50.1%, respectively, p=.03. Weighted Cox regression revealed that FLAMSA-TBI compared to BuFlu was associated with lower RI, HR 0.64 (0.42-0.98), p=0.04 and a trend for better LFS, HR 0.72 (0.49-1.06), p=0.09. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that compared to BuFlu conditioning with FLAMSA-TBI leads to reduced relapse incidence at two years in AML patients transplanted in CR1or CR2.