1.
Acute GVHD prophylaxis plus ATLG after myeloablative allogeneic haemopoietic peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation from HLA-identical siblings in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia in remission: final results of quality of life and long-term outcome analysis of a phase 3 randomised study
Bonifazi, F., Solano, C., Wolschke, C., Sessa, M., Patriarca, F., Zallio, F., Nagler, A., Selleri, C., Risitano, A. M., Messina, G., et al
The Lancet. Haematology. 2019;6(2):e89-e99
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND We previously showed that human anti-T-lymphocyte globulin (ATLG) plus ciclosporin and methotrexate given to patients with acute leukaemia in remission, having allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation with peripheral blood stem cells from an HLA-identical sibling donor after myeloablative conditioning, significantly reduced 2-year chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) incidence and severity, without increasing disease relapse and infections, and improves cGVHD-free and relapse-free survival (cGRFS). The aim of an extended follow-up study was the assessment of long-term outcomes, which are, in this context, scarcely reported in the literature. We report unpublished data on quality of life (QoL) from the original study and the results of a follow-up extension. METHODS In the original open-label study, patients with acute myeloid and lymphoblastic leukaemia in first or subsequent remission, having sibling HLA-identical allogeneic peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ATLG plus standard GVHD prophylaxis with ciclosporin and short-term methotrexate (ATLG group) or standard GVHD prophylaxis without ATLG (non-ATLG group). Conditioning regimens were cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg with either total body irradiation (12 Gy) or busulfan (12.8 mg/kg intravenously or 16 mg/kg orally), with or without etoposide (30-60 mg/kg). Randomisation was stratified according to centre and disease risk. The primary endpoint was cumulative incidence of cGVHD at 2 years. The primary and secondary endpoints, excluding QoL, have been published. QoL, assessed using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HDC29 questionnaires, was an unpublished secondary endpoint, which we now report here. A follow-up extension was then done, with the primary endpoint cumulative incidence of cGVHD. Enrolment has been completed for both studies. The original trial (number, NCT00678275) and follow-up extension (number, NCT03042676) are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. FINDINGS In the original study, from Dec 14, 2006, to Feb 2, 2012, 161 patients were enrolled and 155 were randomly assigned to either the ATLG group (n=83) or to the non-ATLG group (n=72). In the follow-up study, which started on Feb 7, 2017, and was completed on June 30, 2017, 61 patients were included in the ATLG group and 53 were included in the non-ATLG group. Global health status showed a more favourable time course in the ATLG group compared with the non-ATLG group (p=0.02; treatment by visit interaction). ATLG was descriptively superior to non-ATLG at 24 months for physical function (points estimate -14.8 [95% CI -26.4 to -3.1]; p=0.014) and social function (-19.1 [-38.0 to -0.2]; p=0.047), gastrointestinal side-effects (8.8 [2.5-15.1]; p=0.008) and effect on family (13.5 [1.2-25.8]; p=0.032). Extended follow-up (median 5.9 years [IQR 1.7-7.9]) confirmed a lower 5-year cGVHD incidence (30.0% [95% CI 21.4-41.9] vs 69.1% [59.1-80.1]; analysis for entire follow-up, p<0.001), no increase in relapses (35.4% [26.4-47.5] vs 22.5% [14.6-34.7]; p=0.09), improved cGRFS (34.3% [24.2-44.5] vs 13.9% [7.1-22.9]; p=0.005), and fewer patients still in immunosuppression (9.6% vs 28.3%; p=0.017) in the ATLG group compared with the non-ATLG group. 5-year overall survival, relapse-free survival, and non-relapse mortality did not differ significantly between groups. INTERPRETATION The addition of ATLG to standard GVHD prophylaxis improves the probability of surviving without disease relapse and cGVHD after myeloablative peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation from an HLA-identical sibling donor for patients with acute leukaemia in remission. Further additional benefits are better QoL and shorter immunosuppressive treatment compared with standard GVHD prophylaxis without ATLG. Therefore, in this setting, ATLG plus standard GVHD prophylaxis should be preferred over the standard GVHD prophylaxis alone. FUNDING Neovii Biotech.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with acute myeloid and lymphoblastic leukaemia in first or subsequent remission, undergoing sibling HLA-identical allogeneic peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation.
Intervention
ATLG plus standard GVHD prophylaxis with ciclosporin and short-term methotrexate (ATLG Group, n=83)
Comparison
Standard GVHD prophylaxis without ATLG (non-ATLG group, n=72)
Outcome
Global health status showed a more favourable time course in the ATLG group compared with the non-ATLG group. ATLG was descriptively superior to non-ATLG at 24 months for physical function and social function, gastrointestinal side-effects and effect on. Extended follow-up confirmed a lower 5-year cGVHD incidence , no increase in relapses, improved cGRFS, and fewer patients still in immunosuppression in the ATLG group compared with the non-ATLG group. 5-year overall survival, relapse-free survival, and non-relapse mortality did not differ significantly between groups.
2.
Impact of t-cell depletion strategies on outcomes following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for idiopathic aplastic anemia: A study on behalf of the european blood and marrow transplant (ebmt) saa working party
Samarasinghe, S., Clesham, K., Iacobelli, S., Sbianchi, G., Knol, C., Hamladji, R. M., Socie, G., Aljurf, M., Koh, M., Sengeloev, H., et al
American journal of hematology. 2018
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 1837 adults and children with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) who underwent matched sibling donor (MSD) and matched unrelated donor (MUD) haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) between 2000 and 2013. Patients were grouped by transplant conditioning containing either ATG (n=1283), alemtuzumab (n=261) or no serotherapy (NS) (n=293). The risks of chronic GvHD were significantly reduced when ATG or alemtuzumab were compared to no serotherapy (p=0.021 and p=0.003, respectively). Acute GVHD was significantly reduced in favor of alemtuzumab compared to ATG (P=0.012) and no serotherapy (p < 0.001). By multivariate analysis, when compared to ATG, alemtuzumab was associated with a lower risk of developing acute (OR 0.262; 95% CI 0.14-0.47; p<0.001) and chronic GVHD (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.35 - 0.94; p=0.027). OS was significantly better in ATG and alemtuzumab patients compared with no serotherapy (p=0.010 and p=0.025). Our data shows inclusion of serotherapy in MSD and MUD HSCT for patients with SAA reduces chronic GVHD and provides a survival advantage over patients not receiving serotherapy. Notably, alemtuzumab reduced the risk of acute and chronic GvHD compared to ATG and indicates that alemtuzumab might be the serotherapy of choice for MSD and MUD transplants for SAA. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.