-
1.
Complex karyotype but not other cytogenetic abnormalities is associated with worse posttransplant survival of patients with nucleophosmin 1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia: A study from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Acute Leukemia Working Party
Moukalled, N., Labopin, M., Versluis, J., Socié, G., Blaise, D., Salmenniemi, U., Rambaldi, A., Gedde-Dahl, T., Tholouli, E., Kröger, N., et al
American journal of hematology. 2024
-
-
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
In the 2022 European LeukemiaNet classification, patients with nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1)-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were classified in the adverse-risk category in the presence of high-risk cytogenetics (CG). Nonetheless, the impact of various CG aberrations on posttransplant outcomes remains to be unraveled. This registry study analyzed adult patients with NPM1-mutated de novo AML who underwent their first allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in the first complete remission from 2005 to 2021. A total of 3275 patients were identified, 2782 had normal karyotype, 493 had chromosomal aberrations including 160 with adverse-risk CG, 72 patients had complex karyotype (CK), and 66 monosomal karyotype (MK). Overall, 2377 (73%) patients had FLT3-ITD. On univariate analysis, only FLT3-ITD, minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity and CK, but not abnormal CG, affected posttransplant outcomes. On multivariable analysis, CK was associated with lower overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.72, p = .009). In the subgroup of 493 patients with aberrant CG, the 2-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) and OS were around 61% and 68%, respectively. On multivariable analysis for this subgroup, CK and MRD positivity were associated with increased risk of relapse (HR 1.7, p = .025; and 1.99, p = .003 respectively) and worse LFS (HR 1.62, p = .018; and 1.64, p = .011 respectively) while FLT3-ITD, MK, or other CG abnormalities had no significant effect. Importantly, CK negatively affected OS (HR 1.91, p = .002). In the first complete remission transplant setting, CK was found as the only cytogenetic risk factor for worse outcomes in NPM1-mutated AML. Nevertheless, even for this subgroup, a significant proportion of patients can achieve long-term posttransplant survival.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults with NPM1-mutated de novo AML with known cytogenetic and FLT3-ITD status, reported to the EBMT registry (n=3275)
Intervention
Analysis of the impact of high-risk cytogenetics (CG) on allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in the first complete remission.
Comparison
None
Outcome
Overall, 2377 (73%) patients had FLT3-ITD. On univariate analysis, only FLT3-ITD, minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity and CK, but not abnormal CG, affected posttransplant outcomes. On multivariable analysis, CK was associated with lower overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.72). In the subgroup of 493 patients with aberrant CG, the 2-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) and OS were around 61% and 68%, respectively. On multivariable analysis for this subgroup, CK and MRD positivity were associated with increased risk of relapse (HR 1.7, p = .025; and 1.99) and worse LFS (HR 1.62, p = .018; and 1.64 respectively) while FLT3-ITD, MK, or other CG abnormalities had no significant effect. Importantly, CK negatively affected OS (HR 1.91). In the first complete remission transplant setting, CK was found as the only cytogenetic risk factor for worse outcomes in NPM1-mutated AML.
-
2.
Myeloablative conditioning with thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine does not improve the outcome of patients transplanted with active leukemia: final results of the GITMO prospective trial GANDALF-01
Bonifazi, F., Pavoni, C., Peccatori, J., Giglio, F., Arpinati, M., Busca, A., Bernasconi, P., Grassi, A., Iori, A. P., Patriarca, F., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2022
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
The outcome of refractory/relapsed (R/R) acute leukemias is still dismal and their treatment represents an unmet clinical need. However, allogeneic transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only potentially curative approach in this setting. A prospective study (GANDALF-01, NCT01814488; EUDRACT2012-004008-37) on transplantation with alternative donors had been run by GITMO using a homogeneous myeloablative conditioning regimen with busulfan, thiotepa and fludarabine while GVHD prophylaxis was stratified by donor type. The study enrolled 101 patients; 90 found an alternative donor and 87 ultimately underwent allo-HSCT. Two-year overall survival of the entire and of the transplant population (primary endpoint) were 19% and 22%, without significant differences according to disease, donor type and disease history (relapsed vs refractory patients). Two-year progression-free survival was 19% and 17% respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality were 49% and 33% at two years. Acute grade II-IV and chronic GVHD occurred in 23 and 10 patients. Dose intensification with a myeloablative two-alkylating regimen as sole strategy for transplanting R/R acute leukemia does seem neither to improve the outcome nor to control disease relapse. A pre-planned relapse prevention should be included in the transplant strategy in this patient population.
PICO Summary
Population
People with refractory/relapsed leukaemia for whom an unrelated donor search at the IBMDR was activated at any time (n=101)
Intervention
Alternative donor transplantation with myeloablative conditioning regimen of busulfan, thiotepa and fludarabine (Patients undergoing transplant, n=87)
Comparison
Outcome
Two-year overall survival of the entire and of the transplant population (primary endpoint) were 19% and 22%, without significant differences according to disease, donor type and disease history (relapsed vs refractory patients). Two-year progression-free survival was 19% and 17% respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality were 49% and 33% at two years. Acute grade II-IV and chronic GVHD occurred in 23 and 10 patients.
-
3.
Narsoplimab, a Mannan-Binding Lectin-Associated Serine Protease-2 Inhibitor, for the Treatment of Adult Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation-Associated Thrombotic Microangiopathy
Khaled, S. K., Claes, K., Goh, Y. T., Kwong, Y. L., Leung, N., Mendrek, W., Nakamura, R., Sathar, J., Ng, E., Nangia, N., et al
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2022;:Jco2102389
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
PURPOSE Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (HSCT-TMA) is a serious complication with significant mortality and no approved therapy. HSCT-TMA results from endothelial injury, which activates the lectin pathway of complement. Narsoplimab (OMS721), an inhibitor of mannan-binding lectin-associated serine protease-2 (MASP-2), was evaluated for safety and efficacy in adults with HSCT-TMA. METHODS In this single-arm open-label pivotal trial (NCT02222545), patients received intravenous narsoplimab once weekly for 4-8 weeks. The primary end point (response rate) required clinical improvement in two categories: (1) laboratory TMA markers (both platelet count and lactate dehydrogenase) and (2) organ function or freedom from transfusion. Patients receiving at least one dose (full analysis set [FAS]; N = 28) were analyzed. RESULTS The response rate was 61% in the FAS population. Similar responses were observed across all patient subgroups defined by baseline features, HSCT characteristics, and HSCT complications. Improvement in organ function occurred in 74% of patients in the FAS population. One-hundred-day survival after HSCT-TMA diagnosis was 68% and 94% in FAS population and responders, respectively, whereas median overall survival was 274 days in the FAS population. Narsoplimab was well tolerated, and adverse events were typical of this population, with no apparent safety signal of concern. CONCLUSION In this study, narsoplimab treatment was safe, significantly improved laboratory TMA markers, and resulted in clinical response and favorable overall survival.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with persistent thrombotic microangiopathy after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT-TMA) in multiple centres in USA, Europe and Asia (n=28)
Intervention
Intravenous narsoplimab once weekly for 4-8 weeks
Comparison
None
Outcome
The response rate was 61%. Similar responses were observed across all patient subgroups defined by baseline features, HSCT characteristics, and HSCT complications. Improvement in organ function occurred in 74% of patients in the full analysis set population. One-hundred-day survival after HSCT-TMA diagnosis was 68% and 94% in FAS population and responders, respectively, whereas median overall survival was 274 days in the FAS population. Narsoplimab was well tolerated, and adverse events were typical of this population, with no apparent safety signal of concern.
-
4.
Upfront stem cell transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with del(17p) and t(4;14): a study from the CMWP-EBMT
Gagelmann, N., Eikema, D. J., de Wreede, L. C., Rambaldi, A., Iacobelli, S., Koster, L., Caillot, D., Blaise, D., Remémyi, P., Bulabois, C. E., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2020
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
We analyzed newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients with del(17p) and/or t(4;14) undergoing either upfront single autologous (auto), tandem autologous (auto-auto) or tandem autologous/reduced-intensity allogeneic (auto-allo) stem cell transplantation. 623 patients underwent either auto (n?=?446), auto-auto (n?=?105), or auto-allo (n?=?72) between 2000 and 2015. 46% of patients had t(4;14), 45% had del(17p) while 9% were reported having both abnormalities. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 51% (95% confidence interval [CI], 45-58%) for single auto, 60% (95% CI, 49-72%) for auto-auto, and 67% (95% CI, 53-80%) for auto-allo (p?=?0.187). Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 17% (95% CI, 12-22%), 33% (95% CI, 22-43%), and 34% (95% CI, 21-38%; p?=?0.048). Five-year relapse rate was 82, 63, and 56%, while non-relapse mortality was 1, 4, and 10%. In multivariable analysis, in t(4;14) with single auto as reference, auto-auto (hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; p?=?0.007) and auto-allo (HR, 0.45; p?=?0.018) were associated with better PFS. In terms of t(4;14) and OS, auto-auto appeared to improve outcome compared with single auto (HR, 0.49; p?=?0.096). In del(17p), outcome in PFS was similar between single auto and auto-auto, while auto-allo appeared to improve PFS (HR, 0.65; p?=?0.097). No significant difference in OS was identified between the groups in patients with del(17p).
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with newly diagnosed myeloma with del(17p) and/or t(4;14) (n=623)
Intervention
Autologous transplant (auto, n=446), tandem autologous (auto-auto, n=105)
Comparison
tandem autologous/reduced intensity allogeneic transplant (auto-allo, n=72)
Outcome
Five-year overall survival (OS) was 51% for single auto, 60% for auto-auto, and 67% for auto-allo Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 17%, 33%, and 34%. Five-year relapse rate was 82, 63, and 56%, while non-relapse mortality was 1, 4, and 10%. In multivariable analysis, in t(4;14) with single auto as reference, auto-auto (hazard ratio [HR], 0.44) and auto-allo (HR, 0.45) were associated with better PFS. In terms of t(4;14) and OS, auto-auto appeared to improve outcome compared with single auto (HR, 0.49;). In del(17p), outcome in PFS was similar between single auto and auto-auto, while auto-allo appeared to improve PFS (HR, 0.65).
-
5.
The outcome of two or more HLA loci mismatched unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute leukemia: an ALWP of the EBMT study
Nagler, A., Dholaria, B., Labopin, M., Bruno, B., Rambaldi, A., Pioltelli, P., La Nasa, G., Socie, G., Mielke, S., Ruggeri, M., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2020
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
A mismatched unrelated (MMUD) donor represents an alternative therapeutic option for patients who need allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and do not have a human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched donor. We studied outcomes of patients with acute leukemia transplanted from ≥2 HLA allele MMUD. The study population consisted of 465 patients. The median follow-up period was 63 and 75 months in the AML and ALL groups, respectively. The incidence of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute (a) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) during the first 100 days was 37% and 16%, respectively. Total and extensive chronic (c) GVHD rates at 2 years were 38% and 17%, respectively. In the entire population, the 5-year relapse incidence (RI), non-relapse mortality (NRM), leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival and refined GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 33%, 31%, 37%, 41%, and 27%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, HLA-DR mismatch was a poor prognostic factor, giving a significantly higher NRM [hazard ratio (HR), 1.67, p = 0.02]; poorer LFS (HR, 1.42, p = 0.03); OS (HR, 1.46, p = 0.03) and higher aGVHD grade II-IV (HR, 1.46, p = 0.05). In this study, allo-HCT from ≤6/8 HLA allele MMUD in acute leukemia patients resulted in acceptable LFS and refined GRFS. HLA-DR mismatch was a poor prognostic factor.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with acute leukaemia (n=465, of which AML n=320, ALL n=145)
Intervention
Transplantation with >/=2 HLA allele mismatched unrelated donor
Comparison
None
Outcome
The incidence of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute (a) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) during the first 100 days was 37% in AML patients and 16% in ALL patients. Total and extensive chronic (c) GVHD rates at 2 years were 38% and 17%, respectively. In the entire population, the 5-year relapse incidence (RI), non-relapse mortality (NRM), leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival and refined GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 33%, 31%, 37%, 41%, and 27%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, HLA-DR mismatch was a poor prognostic factor, giving a significantly higher NRM [hazard ratio (HR), 1.67]; poorer LFS (HR, 1.42); OS (HR, 1.46) and higher aGVHD grade II-IV (HR, 1.46).
-
6.
Comparable outcomes of haploidentical transplant with TBF conditioning versus matched unrelated donor with fludarabine/busulfan conditioning for acute myeloid leukemia
Bazarbachi, A., Labopin, M., Blaise, D., Forcade, E., Socié, G., Berceanu, A., Angelucci, E., Bulabois, C. E., Kröger, N., Rambaldi, A., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2020
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
We compared transplant outcomes of 708 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients receiving haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation using thiotepa/busulfan/fludarabine (TBF) conditioning with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (ptCy), to 2083 patients receiving matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplantation using fludarabine/busulfan (FB) conditioning and in vivo T-cell depletion. For intermediate cytogenetic risk AML transplanted in first complete remission (CR1), multivariate analysis revealed that haplo-TBF significantly increased nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (HR 2.1; p?=?0.0006) but did not affect relapse incidence (RI), leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS), or graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS). For high cytogenetic risk AML transplanted in CR1, haplo-TBF significantly increased NRM (HR?=?2.7; p?=?0.02), decreased RI (HR?=?0.45; p?=?0.03) but had no influence on LFS, OS, or GRFS. For AML transplanted in CR2, haplo-TBF significantly increased NRM (HR?=?2.36; p?=?0.008), decreased RI (HR?=?0.38; p?=?0.005), but had no influence on LFS, OS, or GRFS. Finally, for AML patients transplanted with active disease, haplo-TBF had no influence on transplant outcomes. In conclusion, compared to MUD-FB, haplo-TBF increased NRM, reduced RI in high-risk AML in CR, resulting in similar LFS, OS, and GRFS. These results comparing two different approaches support the use of a haploidentical family donor for high-risk AML patients lacking a matched sibling donor.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (n=2791)
Intervention
Haploidentical transplantation with thiotepa/busulfan/fludarabine (haplo-TBF) conditioning (n=708)
Comparison
Matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplantation (n=2083)
Outcome
For intermediate cytogenetic risk AML transplanted in first complete remission (CR1), multivariate analysis revealed that haplo-TBF significantly increased nonrelapse mortality (NRM) but did not affect relapse incidence (RI), leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS), or graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS). For high cytogenetic risk AML transplanted in CR1, haplo-TBF significantly increased NRM, decreased RI but had no influence on LFS, OS, or GRFS. For AML transplanted in CR2, haplo-TBF significantly increased NRM, decreased RI but had no influence on LFS, OS, or GRFS. Finally, for AML patients transplanted with active disease, haplo-TBF had no influence on transplant outcomes.
-
7.
Treatment of steroid resistant acute graft versus host disease with an anti-CD26 monoclonal antibody-Begelomab
Bacigalupo, A., Angelucci, E., Raiola, A. M., Varaldo, R., Di Grazia, C., Gualandi, F., Benedetti, E., Risitano, A., Musso, M., Zallio, F., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2020
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
We have treated 69 patients with steroid refractory acute graft versus host disease (SR-aGvHD), with an anti-CD26 monoclonal antibody (Begelomab): 28 patients in two prospective studies (EudraCT No. 2007-005809-21; EudraCT No. 2012-001353-19), and 41 patients on a compassionate use study. The median age of patients was 42 and 44 years; the severity of GvHD was as follows: grade II in 8 patients, grade III in 33, and grade IV in 28 patients. There were no adverse events directly attributable to the antibody. Day 28 response was 75% in the prospective studies and 61% in the compassionate use patients, with complete response rates of 11 and 12%. Response for grade III GvHD was 83 and 73% in the two groups; response in grade IV GvHD was 66 and 56% in the two groups. Non relapse mortality (NRM) at 6 months was 28 and 38%. Overall there were 64, 56, 68% responses for skin, liver, and gut stage 3-4 GvHD. The overall survival at 1 year was 50% for the prospective studies and 33% for the compassionate use patients. In conclusion, Begelomab induces over 60% responses in SR-aGvHD, including patients with severe gut and liver GvHD, having failed one or more lines of treatment.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with steroid refractory acute graft versus host disease (n=69)
Intervention
Begelomab, an anti-CD26 monoclonal antibody in prospective study (n=28)
Comparison
Begelomab, an anti-CD26 monoclonal antibody in compassionate use (n=41)
Outcome
Day 28 response was 75% in the prospective studies and 61% in the compassionate use patients, with complete response rates of 11 and 12%. Response for grade III GvHD was 83 and 73% in the two groups; response in grade IV GvHD was 66 and 56% in the two groups. Non relapse mortality (NRM) at 6 months was 28 and 38%. Overall there were 64, 56, 68% responses for skin, liver, and gut stage 3-4 GvHD. The overall survival at 1 year was 50% for the prospective studies and 33% for the compassionate use patients. There were no adverse events directly attributable to the antibody
-
8.
Treosulfan or busulfan plus fludarabine as conditioning treatment before allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation for older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (MC-FludT.14/L): a randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial
Beelen, D. W., Trenschel, R., Stelljes, M., Groth, C., Masszi, T., Remenyi, P., Wagner-Drouet, E. M., Hauptrock, B., Dreger, P., Luft, T., et al
The Lancet. Haematology. 2019
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Further improvement of preparative regimens before allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an unmet medical need for the growing number of older or comorbid patients with acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of conditioning with treosulfan plus fludarabine compared with reduced-intensity busulfan plus fludarabine in this population. METHODS We did an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial in 31 transplantation centres in France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, and Poland. Eligible patients were 18-70 years, had acute myeloid leukaemia in first or consecutive complete haematological remission (blast counts <5% in bone marrow) or myelodysplastic syndrome (blast counts <20% in bone marrow), Karnofsky index of 60% or higher, and were indicated for allogeneic HSCT but considered at an increased risk for standard myeloablative preparative regimens based on age (≥50 years), an HSCT-specific comorbidity index of more than 2, or both. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either intravenous 10 g/m(2) treosulfan daily applied as a 2-h infusion for 3 days (days -4 to -2) or 0.8 mg/kg busulfan applied as a 2-h infusion at 6-h intervals on days -4 and -3. Both groups received 30 mg/m(2) intravenous fludarabine daily for 5 days (days -6 to -2). The primary outcome was event-free survival 2 years after HSCT. The non-inferiority margin was a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.3. Efficacy was assessed in all patients who received treatment and completed transplantation, and safety in all patients who received treatment. The study is registered with EudraCT (2008-002356-18) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00822393). FINDINGS Between June 13, 2013, and May 3, 2016, 476 patients were enrolled (240 in the busulfan group received treatment and transplantation, and in the treosulfan group 221 received treatment and 220 transplanation). At the second preplanned interim analysis (Nov 9, 2016), the primary endpoint was met and trial was stopped. Here we present the final confirmatory analysis (data cutoff May 31, 2017). Median follow-up was 15.4 months (IQR 8.8-23.6) for patients treated with treosulfan and 17.4 months (6.3-23.4) for those treated with busulfan. 2-year event-free survival was 64.0% (95% CI 56.0-70.9) in the treosulfan group and 50.4% (42.8-57.5) in the busulfan group (HR 0.65 [95% CI 0.47-0.90]; p<0.0001 for non-inferiority, p=0.0051 for superiority). The most frequently reported grade 3 or higher adverse events were abnormal blood chemistry results (33 [15%] of 221 patients in the treosulfan group vs 35 [15%] of 240 patients in the busulfan group) and gastrointestinal disorders (24 [11%] patients vs 39 [16%] patients). Serious adverse events were reported for 18 (8%) patients in the treosulfan group and 17 (7%) patients in the busulfan group. Causes of deaths were generally transplantation-related. INTERPRETATION Treosulfan was non-inferior to busulfan when used in combination with fludarabine as a conditioning regimen for allogeneic HSCT for older or comorbid patients with acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. The improved outcomes in patients treated with the treosulfan-fludarabine regimen suggest its potential to become a standard preparative regimen in this population. FUNDING medac GmbH.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with acute myeloid leukaemia in first or consecutive complete haematological remission or myelodysplastic syndrome considered at an increased risk for standard myeloablative preparative regimens based on age (>/=50 years), an HSCT-specific comorbidity index of more than 2, or both. (n=460)
Intervention
Intravenous 10 g/m(2) treosulfan daily for 3 days followed by intravenous fludarabine daily for 5 days (n=221)
Comparison
0.8 mg/kg busulfan at 6-h intervals on days -4 and -3, followed by 30 mg/m(2) intravenous fludarabine daily for 5 days (n=240)
Outcome
Median follow-up was 15.4 months for patients treated with treosulfan and 17.4 months for those treated with busulfan. 2-year event-free survival was 64.0% in the treosulfan group and 50.4% in the busulfan group. The most frequently reported grade 3 or higher adverse events were abnormal blood chemistry results (15% patients in the treosulfan group vs 15% in the busulfan group) and gastrointestinal disorders (11% patients vs 16% patients). Serious adverse events were reported for 8% of patients in the treosulfan group and 7% of patients in the busulfan group. Causes of deaths were generally transplantation-related.
-
9.
Allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplants in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) prepared with Busulfan Fludarabine (BUFLU) or Thiotepa Busulfan Fludarabine (TBF): a retrospective study
Sora, F., Grazia, C. D., Chiusolo, P., Raiola, A. M., Bregante, S., Mordini, N., Olivieri, A., Iori, A. P., Patriarca, F., Grisariu, S., et al
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2019
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
PURPOSE This is a multicenter retrospective comparison of two myeloablative conditioning regimens in 454 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in remission: busulfan (4 days) and fludarabine (BUFLU) versus thiotepa, busulfan and fludarabine(TBF). PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible for this study were patients allografted between January 2008 and December 2018 in 10 transplant Centers, with AML in first or second remission: 201 patients received BUFLU whereas 253 received TBF. The two groups (BUFLU and TBF) were comparable for age (p=0.13), and adverse AML risk factors (p=0.3). The TBF group had more second remissions and more haploidentical grafts. The donor type included HLA identical siblings, unrelated donors and family haploidentical donors. RESULTS The 5-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 19% for BUFLU and 22% for TBF (p=0.8), and the 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 30% and 15% respectively (P =0.0004). The 5-year actuarial survival was 51% for BUFLU and 68% for TBF (p=0.002). In a multivariate Cox analysis, after correcting for confounding factors, the use of TBF reduced the risk of relapse compared to BUFLU (p=0.03) and the risk of death (p=0.03). In a matched pair analysis of 108 BUFLU patients matched with 108 TBF patients, with the exclusion of HAPLO grafts, TBF reduced the risk of relapse (p=0.006) and there was a trend for improved survival (p=0.07). CONCLUSIONS Superior survival of patients receiving TBF, as compared to BUFLU is due to a reduced risk of relapse, with comparable NRM. The survival advantage is independent of donor type and AML risk factors.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in remission (n=454)
Intervention
Busulfan (4 days) and fludarabine (BUFLU, n=201)
Comparison
Thiotepa, busulfan and fludarabine (TBF, n=253)
Outcome
The 5-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 19% for BUFLU and 22% for TBF, and the 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 30% and 15% respectively. The 5-year actuarial survival was 51% for BUFLU and 68% for TBF. In a multivariate Cox analysis, after correcting for confounding factors, the use of TBF reduced the risk of relapse compared to BUFLU and the risk of death. In a matched pair analysis of 108 BUFLU patients matched with 108 TBF patients, with the exclusion of HAPLO grafts, TBF reduced the risk of relapse and there was a trend for improved survival.
-
10.
Busulfan or thiotepa based conditioning in myelofibrosis: a phase II multicenter randomized study from the GITMO group
Patriarca, F., Masciulli, A., Bacigalupo, A., Bregante, S., Pavoni, C., Finazzi, M. C., Bosi, A., Russo, D., Narni, F., Messina, G., et al
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2018
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
We are reporting a randomized study comparing fludarabine in combination with busulfan (FB) or thiotepa (FT), as conditioning regimen for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with myelofibrosis. The primary study endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Sixty patients were enrolled with a median age of 56 years and an intermediate-2 or high-risk score in 65%, according to the Dynamic International Prognostic Staging System (DIPSS). Donors were HLA-identical sibling (n=25), matched unrelated (n=25) or single allele mismatched unrelated (n=10). With a median follow-up of 22 months (range 1-68), the following outcomes at 2 years after HSCT in the FB vs. the FT arm were as follows: PFS 43% vs 55%, (P=.28), overall survival (OS) 54% vs. 70% (P=.17), relapse/progression 36% vs 24% (P=.24), non-relapse mortality (NRM) 21% in both arms (P=.99) and graft failure 14% vs. 10% (P=.96). A better PFS was observed in patients with intermediate-1 DIPSS score (P=.03). Neutrophil and platelet engraftment was significantly influenced by prior splenectomy [HR 2.28 (95% CI, 1.16-4.51) P=.02] and splenomegaly at transplant [HR 0.51 (95% CI, 0.27-0.94) P=.03]. In conclusion, the clinical outcome after HSCT was comparable when using either a busulfan or thiotepa based conditioning regimen.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with myelofibrosis
Intervention
Fludarabine in combination with busulfan (FB) as conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)
Comparison
Fludarabine in combination with thiotepa (FT), as conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)
Outcome
At 2 years after HSCT in the FB vs. the FT arm were as follows: PFS 43% vs 55%, (P=.28), overall survival (OS) 54% vs. 70% (P=.17), relapse/progression 36% vs 24% (P=.24), non-relapse mortality (NRM) 21% in both arms (P=.99) and graft failure 14% vs. 10% (P=.96). In conclusion, the clinical outcome after HSCT was comparable when using either a busulfan or thiotepa based conditioning regimen.