1.
Upfront stem cell transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with del(17p) and t(4;14): a study from the CMWP-EBMT
Gagelmann, N., Eikema, D. J., de Wreede, L. C., Rambaldi, A., Iacobelli, S., Koster, L., Caillot, D., Blaise, D., Remémyi, P., Bulabois, C. E., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2020
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
We analyzed newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients with del(17p) and/or t(4;14) undergoing either upfront single autologous (auto), tandem autologous (auto-auto) or tandem autologous/reduced-intensity allogeneic (auto-allo) stem cell transplantation. 623 patients underwent either auto (n?=?446), auto-auto (n?=?105), or auto-allo (n?=?72) between 2000 and 2015. 46% of patients had t(4;14), 45% had del(17p) while 9% were reported having both abnormalities. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 51% (95% confidence interval [CI], 45-58%) for single auto, 60% (95% CI, 49-72%) for auto-auto, and 67% (95% CI, 53-80%) for auto-allo (p?=?0.187). Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 17% (95% CI, 12-22%), 33% (95% CI, 22-43%), and 34% (95% CI, 21-38%; p?=?0.048). Five-year relapse rate was 82, 63, and 56%, while non-relapse mortality was 1, 4, and 10%. In multivariable analysis, in t(4;14) with single auto as reference, auto-auto (hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; p?=?0.007) and auto-allo (HR, 0.45; p?=?0.018) were associated with better PFS. In terms of t(4;14) and OS, auto-auto appeared to improve outcome compared with single auto (HR, 0.49; p?=?0.096). In del(17p), outcome in PFS was similar between single auto and auto-auto, while auto-allo appeared to improve PFS (HR, 0.65; p?=?0.097). No significant difference in OS was identified between the groups in patients with del(17p).
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with newly diagnosed myeloma with del(17p) and/or t(4;14) (n=623)
Intervention
Autologous transplant (auto, n=446), tandem autologous (auto-auto, n=105)
Comparison
tandem autologous/reduced intensity allogeneic transplant (auto-allo, n=72)
Outcome
Five-year overall survival (OS) was 51% for single auto, 60% for auto-auto, and 67% for auto-allo Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 17%, 33%, and 34%. Five-year relapse rate was 82, 63, and 56%, while non-relapse mortality was 1, 4, and 10%. In multivariable analysis, in t(4;14) with single auto as reference, auto-auto (hazard ratio [HR], 0.44) and auto-allo (HR, 0.45) were associated with better PFS. In terms of t(4;14) and OS, auto-auto appeared to improve outcome compared with single auto (HR, 0.49;). In del(17p), outcome in PFS was similar between single auto and auto-auto, while auto-allo appeared to improve PFS (HR, 0.65).