-
1.
Prognostic impact of early-versus-late responses to different induction regimens in patients with myeloma undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation: results from the CALM study by the CMWP of the EBMT
Garderet, L., Sbianchi, G., Iacobelli, S., Blaise, D., Byrne, J. L., Remenyi, P., Apperley, J. F., Touzeau, C., Isaksson, C., Browne, P., et al
European journal of haematology. 2021
Abstract
BACKGROUND In autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT)-eligible myeloma patients, prolonged induction does not necessarily improve the depth of response. METHOD We analysed 1,222 ASCT patients who were classified based on (1) the interval between induction and stem cell collection, (2) the type of induction regimen: BID (Bortezomib, IMiDs and Dexamethasone), Bortezomib-based, or CTD (Cyclophosphamide, Thalidomide and Dexamethasone), and (3) the time to best response (Early i.e. best response within 4 or 5 months, depending on the regimen vs Late; Good i.e. VGPR or better vs Poor) RESULTS The length of induction treatment required to achieve a Good response did not affect PFS (p=0.65) or OS (p=0.61) post-ASCT. The three types of regimen resulted in similar outcomes: median PFS 31, 27.7 and 30.8 months (p=0.31), and median OS 81.7, 92.7, and 77.4 months, respectively (p=0.83). On multivariate analysis, neither the type nor the duration of the induction regimen affected OS and PFS, except for Early Good Responders who had a better PFS compared to Early Poor Responders (HR = 1.21, p value = 0.02). However, achieving a Good response at induction was associated with a better response (= VGPR) post-transplant CONCLUSION The kinetics of response did not affect outcomes.
-
2.
Second autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma after a previous autograft: a study of the lymphoma working party of the EBMT
Martinez, C., Boumendil, A., Romejko-Jarosinska, J., Anagnostopoulos, A., Faber, E., Poire, X., Yakoub-Agha, I., Akhtar, S., Gurman, G., Pavone, V., et al
Leukemia & lymphoma. 2020;:1-8
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze the results of second autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT2) for patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) after a first transplantation (ASCT1). Outcomes for 56 patients receiving an ASCT2 registered in the EBMT database were analyzed. The 4-year cumulative incidences of non-relapse mortality and disease relapse/progression were 5% and 67%, respectively. The 4-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 62% and 28%. In univariate analysis, relapse of HL within 12 months of ASCT1 was associated with a worse OS (35% versus 76%, p = 0.01) and PFS (19% versus 29%, p = 0.059). Chemosensitivity at ASCT2 predicted better outcomes (4-year OS 72% versus 29%, p = 0.002; PFS 31% versus 12%, p = 0.015). This series shows that ASCT2 is a safe procedure and a relatively effective option for patients with late relapses after ASCT1 and with chemosensitive disease who are not eligible for an allogeneic transplant.
-
3.
Tandem autologous stem cell transplantation improves outcome in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with extramedullary disease and high-risk cytogenetics: a study from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of EBMT
Gagelmann, N., Eikema, D. J., Koster, L., Caillot, D., Pioltelli, P., Lleonart, J. B., Remenyi, P., Blaise, D., Schaap, N., Trneny, M., et al
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2019
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Although high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation combined with novel agents is still the hallmark of first-line treatment in newly diagnosed transplant-eligible multiple myeloma, the impact of tandem autologous or autologous/reduced-intensity allogeneic transplant for patients with extramedullary disease and high-risk cytogenetics is not defined yet. Here, we analyzed clinical and cytogenetic data from 488 adult myeloma patients with extramedullary disease undergoing single autologous (n=373), tandem autologous (n=84), or autologous-allogeneic transplantation (n=31) between 2003 and 2015. At least one high-risk abnormality was present in 41% (n=202), with del(17p) (40%) and t(4;14) (45%) being the most frequent. More than one high-risk abnormality was found in 54%. High-risk cytogenetics showed worse 4-year overall survival and progression-free survival of 54% and 29% vs. 78% and 49% for standard-risk (p<0.001, respectively). Co-segregation of high-risk abnormalities did not seem to affect outcome. Regarding transplant regimen, overall and progression-free survival were 70% and 43% for single autologous vs. 83% and 52% for tandem autologous and 88% and 58% for autologous-allogeneic (p=0.06 and p=0.30). In multivariate analysis, high-risk cytogenetics were associated with worse survival (HR, 2.00; p=0.003) while tandem autologous significantly improved outcome vs. single autologous transplant (hazard ratios, 0.46 and 0.64; p=0.02 and p=0.03). Autologous-allogeneic transplant did not significantly differ in outcome but appeared to improve survival while results were limited due to small population (hazard ratio, 0.31). In conclusion, high-risk cytogenetics is frequently observed in newly diagnosed myeloma with extramedullary disease and significantly worsens outcome after single autologous while tandem autologous transplant strategy may overcome onset poor prognosis.
PICO Summary
Population
Adult myeloma patients with extramedullary disease (n=488).
Intervention
Tandem autologous transplantation (n=84) or autologous-allogeneic transplantation (n=31)
Comparison
Single autologous transplantation (n=373)
Outcome
Overall and progression-free survival were 70% and 43% for single autologous vs. 83% and 52% for tandem autologous and 88% and 58% for autologous-allogeneic. In multivariate analysis, high-risk cytogenetics were associated with worse survival, while tandem autologous significantly improved outcome vs. single autologous transplant. Autologous-allogeneic transplant did not significantly differ in outcome but appeared to improve survival while results were limited due to small population.
-
4.
Providing both autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) may have a stronger impact on the outcome of autologous HSCT in adult patients than activity levels or implementation of JACIE at Belgian transplant centres
Poirel, H. A., Vanspauwen, M., Macq, G., De Geyndt, A., Maertens, J., Willems, E., Selleslag, D., Poire, X., Theunissen, K., Graux, C., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2019
Abstract
While performance since the introduction of the JACIE quality management system has been shown to be improved for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT), impact on autologous-HSCT remains unclear in Europe. Our study on 2697 autologous-HSCT performed in adults in 17 Belgian centres (2007-2013) aims at comparing the adjusted 1 and 3-yr survival between the different centres & investigating the impact of 3 centre-related factors on performance (time between JACIE accreditation achievement by the centre and the considered transplant, centre activity volume and type of HSCT performed by centres: exclusively autologous vs both autologous & allogeneic). We showed a relatively homogeneous performance between Belgian centres before national completeness of JACIE implementation. The 3 centre-related factors had a significant impact on the 1-yr survival, while activity volume and type of HSCT impacted the 3-yr survival of autologous-HSCT patients in univariable analyses. Only activity volume (impact on 1-yr survival only) and type of HSCT (impact on 1 and 3-yr survivals) remained significant in multivariable analysis. This is explained by the strong relationship between these 3 variables. An extended transplantation experience, i.e., performing both auto & allo-HSCT, appears to be a newly informative quality indicator potentially conveying a multitude of underlying complex factors.
-
5.
Outcome in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who relapse after autologous stem cell transplantation and receive active therapy. A retrospective analysis of the Lymphoma Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)
Gonzalez-Barca, E., Boumendil, A., Blaise, D., Trneny, M., Masszi, T., Finel, H., Michieli, M. G., Bittenbring, J. T., Gritti, G., Snowden, J. A., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2019
Abstract
Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) is the standard of care for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who relapse/progress after first line chemoimmunotherapy. Long-term outcome of those who relapse after transplant is poor. We present the results of a retrospective study of 256 adult patients reported to the EBMT registry with DLBCL who relapsed after auto-HSCT performed between 2003 and 2013, and who received active salvage strategies. One hundred and fifty-four (60%) were male; median age was 53 years. Median time to relapse was 7 months, 65% relapsed during the first year. Overall response rate after salvage therapy was 46%. Median follow-up after first salvage therapy was 40 months (IQR 23-63 months). Overall survival (OS) at 3 years was 27% (95% CI 22-33). OS at 3 years of patients relapsing longer than 1 year after auto-HSCT was 41% (95% CI 31-53) compared with 20% (95% CI 14-24) in those who relapsed in less than 1 year. Eighty-two patients (32%) had a second HSCT, an allogeneic HSCT (allo-HSCT) in 69 cases, at a median time of 6.5 months after relapse. OS at 3 years after allo-HSCT was 36% (95% CI 25-51). In conclusion, the prognosis of patients with DLBCL that relapse after auto-HSCT is dismal. Patients who relapse in less than 1 year remain an unmet need, and should be considered for CAR T cell therapy or clinical trials. Patients who relapse after 1 year can be rescued with salvage therapies and a second HSCT. These results provide a benchmark to compare data of new prospective studies.
-
6.
Radioimmunotherapy-augmented BEAM chemotherapy vs BEAM alone as the high-dose regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in relapsed follicular lymphoma (FL): a retrospective study of the EBMT Lymphoma Working Party
Bento, L., Boumendil, A., Finel, H., Le Gouill, S., Amorim, S., Monjanel, H., Bouabdallah, R., Bay, J. O., Nicolas-Virelizier, E., McQuaker, G., et al
Bone Marrow Transplantation. 2017;52(8):1120-1125
Abstract
Relapse remains the most common cause of treatment failure in patients receiving autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for follicular lymphoma (FL). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding radioimmunotherapy or rituximab (R) to BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, ara-c, melphalan) high-dose therapy for ASCT in patients with relapsed FL. Using the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry, we conducted a cohort comparison of BEAM (n=1973), Zevalin-BEAM (Z-BEAM) (n=207) and R-BEAM (n=179) and also a matched-cohort analysis of BEAM vs Z-BEAM including 282 and 154 patients, respectively. BEAM, Z-BEAM and R-BEAM groups were well balanced for age, time from diagnosis to ASCT and disease status at ASCT. The cumulative incidences of relapse (IR) at 2 years were 34, 34 and 32% for Z-BEAM, R-BEAM and BEAM, respectively. By multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences with Z-BEAM or R-BEAM compared with BEAM for IR, non-relapse mortality, event-free survival or overall survival. With the caveat that the limitations of registry analyses have to be taken into account, this study does not support adding radioimmunotherapy or R to BEAM in ASCT for relapsed FL. However, we cannot rule out the existence a particular subset of patients who could benefit from Z-BEAM conditioning that cannot be identified in our series, and this should be tested in a randomized trial.
-
7.
Autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: efficacy in the rituximab era and comparison to first allogeneic transplants. A report from the EBMT Lymphoma Working Party
Robinson, S. P., Boumendil, A., Finel, H., Blaise, D., Poire, X., Nicolas-Virelizier, E., Or, R., Malladi, R., Corby, A., Fornecker, L., et al
Bone Marrow Transplantation. 2016;51(3):365-71
Abstract
In the era of chemoimmunotherapy, the optimal treatment paradigm for relapsed and refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma has been challenged. We reviewed the outcome of standard salvage therapy with an autologous stem cell transplant (autoSCT) over the last two decades and the outcome of allogeneic SCT (alloSCT) in the most recent decade. AutoSCT recipients diagnosed between 1992 and 2002 (n=2737) were compared with those diagnosed between 2002 and 2010 (n=3980). Patients diagnosed after 2002 had a significantly lower non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse incidence (RI) and a superior PFS and overall survival (OS). A total of 4210 patients diagnosed between 2002 and 2010 underwent either an autoSCT or an alloSCT as their first transplant procedure. Two-hundred and thirty patients received an alloSCT (myeloablative (MACalloSCT) n=132, reduced intensity (RICalloSCT) n=98). The 4-year NRM rates were 7%, 20% and 27% for autoSCT, RICalloSCT and MACalloSCT, respectively. The 4-year RI was 45%, 40% and 38% for autoSCT, RICalloSCT and MACalloSCT, respectively (NS). The 4-year PFS were 48%, 52% and 35% for autoSCT, RICalloSCT and MACalloSCT, respectively. The 4-year OS was 60%, 52% and 38% for autoSCT, RIC alloSCT and MACalloSCT, respectively. After adjustment for confounding factors NRM was significantly worse for patients undergoing alloSCT whilst there was no difference in the RI.