-
1.
Late relapse after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute leukemia: a retrospective study by SFGM-TC
Kaphan, E., Bettega, F., Forcade, E., Labussière-Wallet, H., Fegueux, N., Robin, M., De Latour, R. P., Huynh, A., Lapierre, L., Berceanu, A., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2023
Abstract
Late relapse (LR) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) for acute leukemia is a rare event (nearly 4.5%) and raises the questions of prognosis and outcome after salvage therapy. We performed a retrospective multicentric study between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2016, considering data from the French national retrospective register ProMISe (SFGM-TC (French Society for Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy)). We included patients presenting LR, defined as a relapse occurring at least two years after AHSCT. We used the Cox model to identify prognosis factors associated with LR. During the study period, 7,582 AHSCT were performed in 29 centers and 33.8% of patients relapsed. Among them, 319 (12.4%) were considered as LR, representing an incidence of 4.2% from the entire cohort. The full dataset was available for 290 patients, including 250 (86.2%) with acute myeloid leukemia, and 40 (13.8%) with acute lymphoid leukemia. Median delay from AHSCT to LR was 38.2 months (29.2-49.7) and 27.2% of patients had extramedullary involvement at LR (17.2% exclusively and 10% associated with medullary involvement). One-third of patients had persistent full donor chimerism at LR. Median overall survival (OS) after LR was 19.9 months (5.6-46.4). The most common salvage therapy was induction regimen (55.5%), with complete remission being obtained for 50.7%. Ninety-four patients (38.5%) underwent a second AHSCT, with a median OS of 20.4 months (7.1-49.1). Non-relapse mortality after second AHSCT was 18.2%. We identified in the Cox model some of the associated factors with delay of LR: the disease status not in first complete remission at first HSCT (odds ratio (OR) 1.31, 1.04-1.64, p=0.02) and the use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (OR 2.23, 1.21-4.14, p=0.01). Chronic GVHD appeared to be a protective factor (OR 0.64, 0.42-0.96, p=0.04). Prognosis of LR is better than early relapses, with a median OS after LR of 19.9 months. Salvage therapy associated with a second AHSCT improves outcome and is feasible, without creating excess toxicity.
-
2.
Outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation with haploidentical versus HLA-matched donors in patients with higher-risk MDS
Michel, C., Robin, M., Morisset, S., Blaise, D., Maertens, J., Chevalier, P., Castilla-Llorente, C., Forcade, E., Ceballos, P., Yakoug-Agha, I., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2023;58(5):534-543
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the best curative option for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. The presence of monosomal karyotype and/or complex karyotype abnormalities predicts inferior survival after allo-SCT in MDS patients. Haploidentical allo-SCT has been increasingly used in acute leukemia (AL) and has similar results as using HLA-matched donors, but data on higher-risk MDS is sparse. We compared outcomes in 266 patients with higher-risk MDS after HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD, n = 79), HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD, n = 139) and HLA haploidentical donor (HID, n = 48) from 2010 to 2019. Median donor age differed between the three groups (p < 0.001). The overall survival was significantly different between the three groups with a better OS observed in the MUD group (p = 0.014). This observation could be explained by a higher progression-free survival with MUD (p = 0.014). The cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 acute GvHD was significantly higher in the HID group (p = 0.051). However, in multivariable analysis, patients transplanted using an HID had comparable mortality to patients transplanted using a MUD (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR]: 0.58 [0.32-1.07]; p = 0.080) and a MSD ([sHR]: 0.56 [0.28-1.11]; p = 0.094). MUD do not remain a significant positive predictor of survival, suggesting that beyond the donor-recipient HLA matching, the donor age might impact recipient outcome.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with higher-risk MDS undergoing allogeneic transplant in centres in France (n=266)
Intervention
HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD, n=79), HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD, n=139)
Comparison
and HLA haploidentical donor (HID, n=48)
Outcome
The overall survival was significantly different between the three groups with a better OS observed in the MUD group. This observation could be explained by a higher progression-free survival with MUD. The cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 acute GvHD was significantly higher in the HID group. However, in multivariable analysis, patients transplanted using an HID had comparable mortality to patients transplanted using a MUD (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR]: 0.58 [0.32-1.07]) and a MSD ([sHR]: 0.56 [0.28-1.11]).
-
3.
Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells as treatment for poor graft function after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: A multicenter prospective analysis
Servais, S., Baron, F., Lechanteur, C., Seidel, L., Baudoux, E., Briquet, A., Selleslag, D., Maertens, J., Poire, X., Schroyens, W., et al
Frontiers in immunology. 2023;14:1106464
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Poor graft function (PGF) is a rare but serious complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Due to their hematopoietic supporting properties and immune regulatory effects, multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) could be considered a good candidate to help to restore bone marrow (BM) niches homeostasis and facilitate hematopoiesis after alloHCT. METHODS We prospectively assessed the efficacy and safety of ex-vivo expanded BM-derived MSC from third-party donor in a series of 30 patients with prolonged severe cytopenia and PGF after alloHCT. This multicenter trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (#NTC00603330). RESULTS Within 90 days post-MSC infusion, 53% (95% CI, 35 - 71%) of patients improved at least one cytopenia (overall response, OR) and 37% (95% CI, 19 - 54%) achieved a complete hematological response (CR: absolute neutrophil count, ANC >0.5 x 10(9)/L, Hb > 80g/L and platelet count > 20 x 10(9)/L with transfusion independence). Corresponding response rates increased to 67% (95% CI, 50 - 84%) OR and 53% (95% CI, 35 - 71%) CR within 180 days after MSC infusion. A significant decrease in red blood cells and platelets transfusion requirement was observed after MSC (median of 30-days transfusion requirement of 0.5 and 0 from d90-120 post-MSC versus 5 and 6.5 before MSC, respectively, p ≤0.001). An increase in ANC was also noted by day +90 and +180, with 3/5 patients with severe neutropenia having recovered an ANC > 1 x 10(9)/L within the 90-120 days after MSC infusion. Overall survival at 1 year post-MSC was 70% (95% CI, 55.4 - 88.5), with all but one of the patients who achieved CR being alive. A single infusion of third-party MSC appeared to be safe, with the exception of one deep vein thrombotic event possibly related to the intervention. DISCUSSION In conclusion, a single i.v. infusion of BM-derived MSC from third party donor seemed to improve hematological function after alloHCT, although spontaneous amelioration cannot be excluded. Comparative studies are warranted to confirm these encouraging results.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults with prolonged severe cytopenia and poor graft function (PGF) after allogeneic transplant in eight centres in Belgium (n=30).
Intervention
Single infusion of third-party donor mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC)
Comparison
None
Outcome
Within 90 days post-MSC infusion, 53% (95% CI, 35 - 71%) of patients improved at least one cytopenia (overall response, OR) and 37% (95% CI, 19 - 54%) achieved a complete hematological response (CR: absolute neutrophil count, ANC >0.5 x 10(9)/L, Hb > 80g/L and platelet count > 20 x 10(9)/L with transfusion independence). Corresponding response rates increased to 67% (95% CI, 50 - 84%) OR and 53% (95% CI, 35 - 71%) CR within 180 days after MSC infusion. A significant decrease in red blood cells and platelets transfusion requirement was observed after MSC (median of 30-days transfusion requirement of 0.5 and 0 from d90-120 post-MSC versus 5 and 6.5 before MSC, respectively). An increase in ANC was also noted by day +90 and +180, with 3/5 patients with severe neutropenia having recovered an ANC > 1 x 10(9)/L within the 90-120 days after MSC infusion. Overall survival at 1 year post-MSC was 70% (95% CI, 55.4 - 88.5), with all but one of the patients who achieved CR being alive.
-
4.
Prognostic impact of early-versus-late responses to different induction regimens in patients with myeloma undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation: results from the CALM study by the CMWP of the EBMT
Garderet, L., Sbianchi, G., Iacobelli, S., Blaise, D., Byrne, J. L., Remenyi, P., Apperley, J. F., Touzeau, C., Isaksson, C., Browne, P., et al
European journal of haematology. 2021
Abstract
BACKGROUND In autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT)-eligible myeloma patients, prolonged induction does not necessarily improve the depth of response. METHOD We analysed 1,222 ASCT patients who were classified based on (1) the interval between induction and stem cell collection, (2) the type of induction regimen: BID (Bortezomib, IMiDs and Dexamethasone), Bortezomib-based, or CTD (Cyclophosphamide, Thalidomide and Dexamethasone), and (3) the time to best response (Early i.e. best response within 4 or 5 months, depending on the regimen vs Late; Good i.e. VGPR or better vs Poor) RESULTS The length of induction treatment required to achieve a Good response did not affect PFS (p=0.65) or OS (p=0.61) post-ASCT. The three types of regimen resulted in similar outcomes: median PFS 31, 27.7 and 30.8 months (p=0.31), and median OS 81.7, 92.7, and 77.4 months, respectively (p=0.83). On multivariate analysis, neither the type nor the duration of the induction regimen affected OS and PFS, except for Early Good Responders who had a better PFS compared to Early Poor Responders (HR = 1.21, p value = 0.02). However, achieving a Good response at induction was associated with a better response (= VGPR) post-transplant CONCLUSION The kinetics of response did not affect outcomes.
-
5.
Use of chimerism analysis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: Belgian guidelines and review of the current literature
Delie, A., Verlinden, A., Beel, K., Deeren, D., Mazure, D., Baron, F., Breems, D., De Becker, A., Graux, C., Lewalle, P., et al
Acta clinica Belgica. 2020;:1-9
Abstract
Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a curative treatment option in both adult and pediatric patients with malignant and non-malignant hematological diseases. Chimerism analysis, which determines the donor or recipient origin of hematopoietic cells in HSCT recipients, is an essential aspect of post-HSCT follow-up.Objectives: To review the current literature and develop Belgian consensus guidelines for the use of chimerism analysis in the standard of care after allogeneic HSCT.Methods: Non-systematic review of the literature in consultancy with the members of the BHS transplantation committee.Results: Clinical application with regards to prediction of graft failure or relapse as well as cell source are reviewed. A consensus guideline on the use of chimerism analysis after HSCT is presented.Conclusion: Monitoring of the dynamics or kinetics of a patient's chimerism status by serial analysis at fixed time points, as well as on suspicion of relapse or graft failure, is needed to monitor engraftment levels, as well as disease control and possible relapse.
-
6.
Second autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma after a previous autograft: a study of the lymphoma working party of the EBMT
Martinez, C., Boumendil, A., Romejko-Jarosinska, J., Anagnostopoulos, A., Faber, E., Poire, X., Yakoub-Agha, I., Akhtar, S., Gurman, G., Pavone, V., et al
Leukemia & lymphoma. 2020;:1-8
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze the results of second autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT2) for patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) after a first transplantation (ASCT1). Outcomes for 56 patients receiving an ASCT2 registered in the EBMT database were analyzed. The 4-year cumulative incidences of non-relapse mortality and disease relapse/progression were 5% and 67%, respectively. The 4-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 62% and 28%. In univariate analysis, relapse of HL within 12 months of ASCT1 was associated with a worse OS (35% versus 76%, p = 0.01) and PFS (19% versus 29%, p = 0.059). Chemosensitivity at ASCT2 predicted better outcomes (4-year OS 72% versus 29%, p = 0.002; PFS 31% versus 12%, p = 0.015). This series shows that ASCT2 is a safe procedure and a relatively effective option for patients with late relapses after ASCT1 and with chemosensitive disease who are not eligible for an allogeneic transplant.
-
7.
Tandem autologous stem cell transplantation improves outcome in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with extramedullary disease and high-risk cytogenetics: a study from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of EBMT
Gagelmann, N., Eikema, D. J., Koster, L., Caillot, D., Pioltelli, P., Lleonart, J. B., Remenyi, P., Blaise, D., Schaap, N., Trneny, M., et al
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2019
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Although high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation combined with novel agents is still the hallmark of first-line treatment in newly diagnosed transplant-eligible multiple myeloma, the impact of tandem autologous or autologous/reduced-intensity allogeneic transplant for patients with extramedullary disease and high-risk cytogenetics is not defined yet. Here, we analyzed clinical and cytogenetic data from 488 adult myeloma patients with extramedullary disease undergoing single autologous (n=373), tandem autologous (n=84), or autologous-allogeneic transplantation (n=31) between 2003 and 2015. At least one high-risk abnormality was present in 41% (n=202), with del(17p) (40%) and t(4;14) (45%) being the most frequent. More than one high-risk abnormality was found in 54%. High-risk cytogenetics showed worse 4-year overall survival and progression-free survival of 54% and 29% vs. 78% and 49% for standard-risk (p<0.001, respectively). Co-segregation of high-risk abnormalities did not seem to affect outcome. Regarding transplant regimen, overall and progression-free survival were 70% and 43% for single autologous vs. 83% and 52% for tandem autologous and 88% and 58% for autologous-allogeneic (p=0.06 and p=0.30). In multivariate analysis, high-risk cytogenetics were associated with worse survival (HR, 2.00; p=0.003) while tandem autologous significantly improved outcome vs. single autologous transplant (hazard ratios, 0.46 and 0.64; p=0.02 and p=0.03). Autologous-allogeneic transplant did not significantly differ in outcome but appeared to improve survival while results were limited due to small population (hazard ratio, 0.31). In conclusion, high-risk cytogenetics is frequently observed in newly diagnosed myeloma with extramedullary disease and significantly worsens outcome after single autologous while tandem autologous transplant strategy may overcome onset poor prognosis.
PICO Summary
Population
Adult myeloma patients with extramedullary disease (n=488).
Intervention
Tandem autologous transplantation (n=84) or autologous-allogeneic transplantation (n=31)
Comparison
Single autologous transplantation (n=373)
Outcome
Overall and progression-free survival were 70% and 43% for single autologous vs. 83% and 52% for tandem autologous and 88% and 58% for autologous-allogeneic. In multivariate analysis, high-risk cytogenetics were associated with worse survival, while tandem autologous significantly improved outcome vs. single autologous transplant. Autologous-allogeneic transplant did not significantly differ in outcome but appeared to improve survival while results were limited due to small population.
-
8.
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation using HLA-matched donors for acute myeloid leukemia with deletion 5q or monosomy 5: a study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT
Poire, X., Labopin, M., Polge, E., Forcade, E., Ganser, A., Volin, L., Michallet, M., Blaise, D., Yakoub-Agha, I., Maertens, J., et al
Haematologica. 2019
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Deletion 5q or monosomy 5 (-5/5q-) in acute myeloid leukemia is a common high-risk feature referred to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, -5/5q- is frequently associated with other high-risk cytogenetic aberrations such as complex karyotype, monosomal karyotype, monosomy 7 (-7), or 17p abnormalities (abn (17p)), the significance of which is unknown. In order to address this question, we studied adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia harboring -5/5q- having their first allogeneic transplantation between 2000 and 2015. Five hundred and one patients with -5/5q- have been analyzed. Three hundred thirty-eight patients (67%) were in first remission and 142 (28%) had an active disease at time of allogeneic transplantation. The 2-year probabilities of overall survival and leukemia-free survival were 27% and 20%, respectively. The 2-year probability of treatment-related mortality was 20%. We identified 4 different cytogenetic groups according to additional abnormalities with prognostic impact: -5/5q- without complex karyotype, monosomal karyotype or abn(17p), -5/5q- within a complex karyotype, -5/5q- within a monosomal karyotype and the combination of -5/5q- with abn(17p). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with worse overall survival and leukemia-free survival across the 4 groups were active disease, age, monosomal karyotype and abn(17p). The presence of -5/5q- without monosomal karyotype or abn(17p) was associated with a significantly better survival rate while -5/5q- in conjunction with monosomal karyotype or abn(17p) translated into a worse outcome. The patients harboring the combination of -5/5q- with abn(17p) showed very limited benefit from allogeneic transplantation.
PICO Summary
Population
Adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia harboring deletion 5q or monosomy 5 (-5/5q-) (n=501)
Intervention
First allogeneic transplantation between 2000 and 2015
Comparison
None
Outcome
The 2-year probabilities of overall survival and leukemia-free survival were 27% and 20%, respectively. The 2-year probability of treatment-related mortality was 20%. The presence of -5/5q- without monosomal karyotype or abn(17p) was associated with a significantly better survival rate while -5/5q- in conjunction with monosomal karyotype or abn(17p) translated into a worse outcome. The patients harboring the combination of -5/5q- with abn(17p) showed very limited benefit from allogeneic transplantation.
-
9.
The impact of concomitant cytogenetic abnormalities on acute myeloid leukemia with monosomy 7 or deletion 7q after HLA-matched allogeneic stem cell transplantation
Poire, X., Labopin, M., Polge, E., Volin, L., Finke, J., Ganser, A., Blaise, D., Yakoub-Agha, I., Beelen, D., Forcade, E., et al
American journal of hematology. 2019
Abstract
Monosomy 7 or deletion 7q (-7/7q-) is the most frequent adverse cytogenetic features reported in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and is a common indication for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Nevertheless, -7/7q- occurs frequently with other high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities such as complex karyotype (CK), monosomal karyotype (MK), monosomy 5 or deletion 5q (-5/5q-), 17p abnormalities (abn(17p)) or inversion of chromosome 3 (inv(3)), the presence of which may influence the outcomes after SCT. A total of 1,109 patients has been allocated to this study. Two-year probability of leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) were 30% and 36%, respectively. Two-year probability of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 20%. We defined 5 different cytogenetic subgroups: the "-7/7q- +/- CK group- designated group1", the "MK group-designated group 2", the "-5/5q- group- designated group 3", the 'abn(17p) group- designated group 4" and the "inv(3) group- designated group 5". The 2-year probability of LFS in first remission was 48% for group 1, 36.4% for group 2, 28.4% for group 3, 19.1% for group 4 and 17.3% for group 5, respectively (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed those significant differences across groups. SCT in -7/7q- AML provides durable response in one third of the patients. The presence of -7/7q- with or without CK in the absence of MK, abn(17p) or inv(3) is associated with a better survival after SCT. On the contrary, addition of MK, -5/5q-, abn(17p) or inv(3) identifies a sub-group of patients with poor prognosis even after SCT. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
-
10.
Providing both autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) may have a stronger impact on the outcome of autologous HSCT in adult patients than activity levels or implementation of JACIE at Belgian transplant centres
Poirel, H. A., Vanspauwen, M., Macq, G., De Geyndt, A., Maertens, J., Willems, E., Selleslag, D., Poire, X., Theunissen, K., Graux, C., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2019
Abstract
While performance since the introduction of the JACIE quality management system has been shown to be improved for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT), impact on autologous-HSCT remains unclear in Europe. Our study on 2697 autologous-HSCT performed in adults in 17 Belgian centres (2007-2013) aims at comparing the adjusted 1 and 3-yr survival between the different centres & investigating the impact of 3 centre-related factors on performance (time between JACIE accreditation achievement by the centre and the considered transplant, centre activity volume and type of HSCT performed by centres: exclusively autologous vs both autologous & allogeneic). We showed a relatively homogeneous performance between Belgian centres before national completeness of JACIE implementation. The 3 centre-related factors had a significant impact on the 1-yr survival, while activity volume and type of HSCT impacted the 3-yr survival of autologous-HSCT patients in univariable analyses. Only activity volume (impact on 1-yr survival only) and type of HSCT (impact on 1 and 3-yr survivals) remained significant in multivariable analysis. This is explained by the strong relationship between these 3 variables. An extended transplantation experience, i.e., performing both auto & allo-HSCT, appears to be a newly informative quality indicator potentially conveying a multitude of underlying complex factors.