-
1.
The outcome of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma and early relapse after autologous stem cell transplant has improved in recent years
Bazarbachi, A., Boumendil, A., Finel, H., Khvedelidze, I., Romejko-Jarosinska, J., Tanase, A., Akhtar, S., Ben Othman, T., Ma'koseh, M., Afanasyev, B., et al
Leukemia. 2022
Abstract
Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients who relapse after autologous-stem-cell- transplantation (auto-SCT) have traditionally had a poor prognosis. We analyzed 1781 adult HL patients who relapsed between 2006 and 2017 after a first auto-SCT. The 4-year overall survival (OS) after relapse continuously increased from 32% for patients relapsing in 2006-2008, to 63% for patients relapsing in 2015-2017 (p = 0.001). The improvement over time was predominantly noted in patients who had an early relapse (within 12 months) after auto-SCT (p = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, patients who relapsed in more recent years and those with a longer interval from transplant to relapse had a better OS, whereas increasing age, poor performance status, bulky disease, extranodal disease and presence of B symptoms at relapse were associated with a worse OS. Brentuximab vedotin (BV), checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) and second transplant (SCT2; 86% allogeneic) were used in 233, 91 and 330 patients respectively. The 4-year OS from BV, CPI, and SCT2 use was 55%, 48% and 55% respectively. In conclusion, the outcome after post-transplant relapse has improved significantly in recent years, particularly in the case of early relapse. These large-scale real-world data can serve as benchmark for future studies in this setting.
-
2.
Improved outcome of patients with graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies over time: an EBMT mega-file study
Greinix, H. T., Eikema, D. J., Koster, L., Penack, O., Yakoub-Agha, I., Montoto, S., Chabannon, C., Styczynski, J., Nagler, A., Robin, M., et al
Haematologica. 2021
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) remains a major threat to successful outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Advances in prophylaxis and supportive care have taken place over the years. The aim of this study is to test whether incidence and mortality of aGvHD have been reduced over time. 102 557 patients with a median age of 47.6 years with malignancies after first allogeneic sibling or unrelated donor (URD) transplant were studied in the following periods: 1990-1995, 1996-2000, 2001-2005, 2006-2010, 2011-2015. Findings: 100-day-incidences of aGvHD grades II-IV decreased from 40%, to 38%, 32%, 29% and 28% over calendar time (p.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients undergoing first allogeneic sibling or unrelated donor transplant (URD) between 1990 and 2015 (n=102 557)
Intervention
Registry data study assessing incidence of acute GvHD (aGvHD)
Comparison
Patients were compared in the following time periods: 1990-1995, 1996-2000, 2001-2005, 2006-2010, 2011-2015
Outcome
In multivariate analysis URD, not in CR at transplant or untreated, and female donor for male recipient were associated with increased risk whereas use of ATG/alemtuzumab decreased aGvHD incidence. Median follow-up was 214, 169, 127, 81 and 30 months for periods analyzed. 3-year-survival after aGvHD grades II-IV increased significantly from 38% to 40%, 43%, 44%, and 45%. In multivariate analysis URD, not in CR at transplant, peripheral blood as stem cell source, female donor for male recipient, and use of ATG/alemtuzumab were associated with increased mortality whereas reduced-intensity conditioning with lower one. Mortality increased with increasing patients‘ age but decreased in the recent cohorts.
-
3.
Development and validation of a disease risk stratification system for patients with haematological malignancies: a retrospective cohort study of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry
Shouval, R., Fein, J. A., Labopin, M., Cho, C., Bazarbachi, A., Baron, F., Bug, G., Ciceri, F., Corbacioglu, S., Galimard, J. E., et al
The Lancet. Haematology. 2021;8(3):e205-e215
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnosis and remission status at the time of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) are the principal determinants of overall survival following transplantation. We sought to develop a contemporary disease-risk stratification system (DRSS) that accounts for heterogeneous transplantation indications. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study we included 55 histology and remission status combinations across haematological malignancies, including acute leukaemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and myeloproliferative and myelodysplastic disorders. A total of 47?265 adult patients (aged =18 years) who received an allogeneic HSCT between Jan 1, 2012, and Dec 31, 2016, and were reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry were included. We divided EBMT patients into derivation (n=25?534), tuning (n=18?365), and geographical validation (n=3366) cohorts. Disease combinations were ranked in a multivariable Cox regression for overall survival in the derivation cohort, cutoff for risk groups were evaluated for the tuning cohort, and the selected system was tested on the geographical validation cohort. An independent single-centre US cohort of 660 patients transplanted between Jan 1, 2010, and Dec 31, 2015 was used to externally validate the results. FINDINGS The DRSS model stratified patients in the derivation cohort (median follow-up was 2·1 years [IQR 1·0-3·2]) into five risk groups with increasing mortality risk: low risk (reference group), intermediate-1 (hazard ratio for overall survival 1·26 [95% CI 1·17-1·36], p<0·0001), intermediate-2 (1·53 [1·42-1·66], p<0·0001), high (2·03 [1·86-2·22], p<0·0001), and very high (2·87 [2·63-3·13], p<0·0001). DRSS levels were also associated with a stepwise increase in risk across the tuning and geographical validation cohort. In the external validation cohort (median follow-up was 5·7 years [IQR 4·5-7·1]), the DRSS scheme separated patients into 4 risk groups associated with increasing risk of mortality: intermediate-2 risk (hazard ratio [HR] 1·34 [95% CI 1·04-1·74], p=0·025), high risk (HR 2·03 [95% CI 1·39-2·95], p=0·00023) and very-high risk (HR 2·26 [95% CI 1·62-3·15], p<0·0001) patients compared with the low risk and intermediate-1 risk group (reference group). Across all cohorts, between 64% and 65% of patients were categorised as having intermediate-risk disease by a previous prognostic system (ie, the disease-risk index [DRI]). The DRSS reclassified these intermediate-risk DRI patients, with 855 (6%) low risk, 7111 (51%) intermediate-1 risk, 5700 (41%) intermediate-2 risk, and 375 (3%) high risk or very high risk of 14?041 patients in a subanalysis combining the tuning and internal geographic validation cohorts. The DRI projected 2-year overall survival was 62·1% (95% CI 61·2-62·9) for these 14?041 patients, while the DRSS reclassified them into finer prognostic groups with overall survival ranging from 45·7% (37·4-54·0; very high risk patients) to 73·1% (70·1-76·2; low risk patients). INTERPRETATION The DRSS is a novel risk stratification tool including disease features related to histology, genetic profile, and treatment response. The model should serve as a benchmark for future studies. This system facilitates the interpretation and analysis of studies with heterogeneous cohorts, promoting trial-design with more inclusive populations. FUNDING The Varda and Boaz Dotan Research Center for Hemato-Oncology Research, Tel Aviv University.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults with haematological malignancies who received an allogeneic HSCT reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry (n=47,265)
Intervention
Disease Risk Stratification System (DRSS)
Comparison
Disease Risk Index (DRI)
Outcome
The DRSS scheme separated patients into 4 risk groups associated with increasing risk of mortality: intermediate-2 risk (hazard ratio [HR] 1·34), high risk (HR 2·03]) and very-high risk (HR 2·26) patients compared with the low risk and intermediate-1 risk group (reference group). Across all cohorts, between 64% and 65% of patients were categorised as having intermediate-risk disease by a previous prognostic system (ie, the disease-risk index [DRI]). The DRSS reclassified these intermediate-risk DRI patients, with 855 (6%) low risk, 7111 (51%) intermediate-1 risk, 5700 (41%) intermediate-2 risk, and 375 (3%) high risk or very high risk of 14,041 patients in a subanalysis combining the tuning and internal geographic validation cohorts. The DRI projected 2-year overall survival was 62·1% for these 14,041 patients, while the DRSS reclassified them into finer prognostic groups with overall survival ranging from 45·7% (37·4-54·0; very high risk patients) to 73·1% (70·1-76·2; low risk patients).
-
4.
Outcome of Allogeneic Transplantation for Mature T-cell Lymphomas: Impact of Donor Source and Disease Characteristics
Hamadani, M., Ngoya, M., Sureda, A., Bashir, Q., Litovich, C. A., Finel, H., Chen, Y., Boumendil, A., Zain, J., Castagna, L., et al
Blood advances. 2021
Abstract
Mature T-cell lymphomas constitute the most common indication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in lymphomas. Large studies evaluating contemporary outcomes of allo-HCT in mature T-cell lymphomas, relative to commonly used donor sources are not available. Included in this registry study were adult patients who had undergone allo-HCT for anaplastic large cell lymphoma, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), or peripheral T-cell lymphoma-NOS (PTCL-NOS) between 2008 and 2018. HCT platforms compared were post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based haploidentical (haplo-) HCT, matched sibling donor (MSD) HCT, matched unrelated donor HCT with in-vivo T-cell depletion (MUD TCD+), and MUD HCT without TCD (MUD TCD-). Co-primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included non-relapse mortality (NRM), and relapse/progression incidence (RI). 1942 patients were eligible (haplo-HCT 237; MSD 911; MUD-TCD+ 468; MUD TCD- 326). Cohorts were comparable for baseline characteristics except higher proportions of patients with decreased performance status (PS) and marrow graft recipients in the haplo-HCT group. On univariate and multivariate comparisons, OS and PFS, RI, and NRM were not significantly different between haplo-HCT, MSD, MUD-TCD+, and MUD-TCD- cohorts, with 3-year OS and PFS of 60%, 63%, 59%, and 64%; and 50%, 50%, 48%, and 52%, respectively. Significant predictors of inferior OS and PFS on multivariate analysis were active disease status at HCT and decreased PS. AITL was associated with significantly reduced relapse risk and better PFS compared to PTCL-NOS. Allo-HCT can provide durable PFS in patients with mature T-cell lymphoma. Outcomes of haplo-HCT were comparable to that of matched donor allo-HCT.
-
5.
How much has allogeneic stem cell transplant-related mortality improved since the 1980s? A retrospective analysis from the EBMT
Penack, O., Peczynski, C., Mohty, M., Yakoub-Agha, I., Styczynski, J., Montoto, S., Duarte, R. F., Kröger, N., Schoemans, H., Koenecke, C., et al
Blood advances. 2020;4(24):6283-6290
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
We performed a study to find out how advances in modern medicine have improved the mortality risk of allogeneic stem cell transplantation. We analyzed major transplantation outcome parameters in adult patients on the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry who had hematologic malignancies and had received transplants from matched sibling donors. We performed multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional-hazards model including known risk factors for nonrelapse mortality and a matched-pairs analysis. We identified 38?800 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Considerable changes in patient characteristics have occurred in the past decades, such as older age, different underlying diseases, and a higher proportion of patients with advanced disease. Major reasons for transplantation-related death in the 1980s were infectious complications and graft-versus-host disease. Nonrelapse mortality, measured at 1 year after transplantation, has decreased over time: 29.7% from 1980 through 1989, 24.4% from 1990 through 1999, 14.8% from 2000 through 2009, and 12.2% from 2010 through 2016. On multivariate analysis, the year of transplantation was associated with reduced nonrelapse mortality (P < .0001; hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval (CI)], 0.8 [0.79-0.82], for 5-year intervals) and decreased overall mortality (P < .0001; HR [95% CI], 0.87 [0.86-0.88]. In the matched-pairs analysis of 3718 patients in each group, nonrelapse mortality at 1 year was 24.4% in the 1990s and 9.5% from 2013 through 2016 (P < .0001; HR [95% CI], 0.39 [0.34-0.43]). Transplantation-related mortality has decreased significantly in the past 40 years. These favorable data facilitate evidence-based treatment decisions on transplantation indications in the context of the availability of novel immunotherapies.
-
6.
Changes in patients population and characteristics of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: an analysis of the Lymphoma Working Party of the EBMT
Sureda, A., Genadieva Stavrik, S., Boumendil, A., Finel, H., Khvedelidze, I., Dietricht, S., Dreger, P., Hermine, O., Kyriakou, C., Robinson, S., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2020
Abstract
Indications for autologous (auto-HCT) and allogeneic transplantation (allo-HCT) in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (rrHL) have been long established. The expectation is that long-term outcomes have significantly improved over time with increased experience in these procedures. The objective of this study was to assess whether this is the case and to identify further areas of improvement. A total of 13,639 adult patients receiving an auto-HCT or allo-HCT for rrHL were reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) over a 25-year period. Regarding auto-HCT, recipients are younger, interval between diagnosis and transplant shorter, peripheral blood has become the universal stem cell source and the use of total body irradiation is almost non-existent in recent years. Allo-HCT is currently mostly used as a second transplant; recipients are younger, fitter and less frequently, chemorefractory. Reduced intensity conditioning protocols have vastly replaced myeloablative protocols. Increasing numbers of haplo-HCT have been reported. Both in auto-HCT and allo-HCT, NRM, PFS and OS have significantly improved but relapse remains the main cause of treatment failure. A better selection of patients and improvements in the supportive care has resulted in a reduction in the NRM. Relapse after HCT remains unchanged and further research is needed.
-
7.
Tandem autologous-reduced intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation in high-risk relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma: a retrospective study of the Lymphoma Working Party-EBMT
Bento, L., Boumendil, A., Finel, H., Khvedelidze, I., Blaise, D., Fegueux, N., Castagna, L., Forcade, E., Chevallier, P., Mordini, N., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2020
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is curative for a proportion of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). However, there is a small group of patients with high-risk of relapse after ASCT that might benefit from other approaches. We conducted a retrospective analysis on 126 patients treated with tandem ASCT-reduced intensity conditioning (RIC)-allogeneic-SCT and reported to the EBMT registry to analyze the efficacy and safety of this approach. Patients were included if they had received an ASCT followed by a planned RIC-SCT in <6 months without relapse between the procedures. The median time between diagnosis and ASCT was 16 months (2-174). The median number of lines prior to ASCT was two (33% of the patients received >3 lines). Forty-one percent were transplanted with active disease. The median follow-up was 44 months (6-130). Three-year-progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), incidence of relapse (IR), and non-relapse mortality (NRM) after the tandem were 53% (45-64), 73% (65-81), 34% (24-42), and 13% (8-21), respectively. This is the largest series analyzing the efficacy and safety of a tandem approach in R/R HL. The low NRM and IR with promising PFS and OS suggest that this might be an effective procedure for a high-risk population.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with high-risk Hodgkin lymphoma (n=126)
Intervention
Tandem procedure of autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) followed by a planned allogeneic transplant with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC-SCT), in <6 months without relapse between the procedures
Comparison
None
Outcome
The median time between diagnosis and ASCT was 16 months (2-174). The median number of lines prior to ASCT was two (33% of the patients received >3 lines). Forty-one percent were transplanted with active disease. The median follow-up was 44 months (6-130). Three-year-progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), incidence of relapse (IR), and non-relapse mortality (NRM) after the tandem were 53% (45-64), 73% (65-81), 34% (24-42), and 13% (8-21), respectively.
-
8.
Analysis of data collected in the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Registry on a cohort of lymphoma patients receiving plerixafor
Sureda, A., Chabannon, C., Masszi, T., Pohlreich, D., Scheid, C., Thieblemont, C., Wahlin, B. E., Sakellari, I., Russell, N., Janikova, A., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2019
Abstract
Plerixafor + granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is administered to patients with lymphoma who are poor mobilizers of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in Europe. This international, multicenter, non-interventional registry study (NCT01362972) evaluated long-term follow-up of patients with lymphoma who received plerixafor for HSC mobilization versus other mobilization methods. Propensity score matching was conducted to balance baseline characteristics between comparison groups. The following mobilization regimens were compared: G-CSF + plerixafor (G + P) versus G-CSF alone; G + P versus G-CSF + chemotherapy (G + C); and G-CSF + plerixafor + chemotherapy (G + P + C) versus G + C. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). Overall, 313/3749 (8.3%) eligible patients were mobilized with plerixafor-containing regimens. After propensity score matching, 70 versus 36 patients were matched in the G + P versus G-CSF alone cohort, 124 versus 124 in the G + P versus G + C cohort, and 130 versus 130 in the G + P + C versus G + C cohort. For both PFS and OS, the upper bound of confidence interval for the hazard ratio was >1.3 for all comparisons, implying that non-inferiority was not demonstrated. No major differences in PFS, OS, and CIR were observed between the plerixafor and comparison groups.
-
9.
The Disease-Risk Stratification Scheme (DRSS), a Contemporary Risk-Stratification System for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation
Shouval, R., Fein, J. A., Labopin, M., Bazarbachi, A., Baron, F., Bug, G., Ciceri, F., Corbacioglu, S., Giebel, S., Gilleece, M. H., et al
Blood. 2019;134(Supplement_1):43
Abstract
DISCLOSURES Labopin: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Bug:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Hexal: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead Sciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grants; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants; Sanofi: Other: travel grants; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene Neovii: Other: travel grant. Mohty:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding.
-
10.
Outcomes of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation from HLA-matched and alternative donors: a European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry retrospective analysis
Shouval, R., Fein, J. A., Labopin, M., Kroger, N., Duarte, R. F., Bader, P., Chabannon, C., Kuball, J., Basak, G. W., Dufour, C., et al
The Lancet. Haematology. 2019
Abstract
BACKGROUND The introduction of donors other than HLA-matched siblings has been a pivotal change in stem cell transplantation. We aimed to assess the evolution of outcomes within donor groups over time and explore whether donor-recipient HLA disparity might be advantageous in patients with aggressive disease. METHODS In this retrospective, multicentre study, we assessed the outcomes for adult patients (≥18 years) with haematological malignancies who underwent their first allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) between Jan 3, 2001, and Dec 31, 2015, and were reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. The donor types studied were matched sibling, matched unrelated, mismatched unrelated, haploidentical, and cord blood donors. Unrelated non-cord-blood donors and recipients were typed at the allelic level for HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, and HLA-DRB1. We evaluated trends in overall survival, non-relapse mortality, relapse incidence, progression-free survival, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and GVHD-free and relapse-free survival following transplantation from various donor types (matched sibling, matched unrelated, mismatched unrelated, haploidentical, and umbilical cord blood), and compared transplantation outcomes across three epochs (epoch 1: 2001-05; epoch 2: 2006-10; and epoch 3: 2011-15). We used Kaplan-Meier estimators for survival probabilities and cumulative incidence functions accounting for competing risks for probabilities of GHVD, relapse, and non-relapse mortality, using multiple imputations by chained equations to deal with missing data. In epoch 3, we directly compared outcomes by donor group, stratified by a novel three-level disease-risk scheme. FINDINGS We included 106 188 patients in our analysis. The median follow-up was 4.1 years (IQR 1.7-7.7). Overall survival at 3 years increased with all donor groups between epochs 2 and 3 (matched sibling: 54.0% [95% CI 53.1-54.8] to 54.6% [53.6-55.6]; matched unrelated: 49.1% [48.0-50.2] to 51.6% [50.7-52.6]; mismatched unrelated: 37.4% [35.7-39.2] to 41.3% [39.5-43.1]; haploidentical: 34.5% [31.4-37.9] to 44.2% [42.1-46.3]; and cord blood 36.3% [33.9-39] to 43.7% [40.8-46.8]). Improvement in overall survival seems to be driven by a reduction in non-relapse mortality, except in cord blood HSCT recipients, who had a lower relapse incidence. Comparing donor groups across disease-risk strata using the novel disease-risk scheme, overall survival among recipients of matched sibling transplantations remained better than other donor groups except in high-risk disease, where overall survival with matched unrelated transplantations was not different. INTERPRETATION Overall survival following allogeneic stem cell transplantation is improving with substantial progress among recipients of haploidentical and cord blood HSCT. Nonetheless, the traditional donor hierarchy of matched sibling donors followed by matched unrelated donors and then other donors holds. Our findings warrant further investigation and could inform decision making and the development of donor-selection algorithms. FUNDING The Varda and Boaz Dotan Research Center in Haemato-Oncology, Tel Aviv University, and the Shalvi Foundation for Research.