-
1.
Impact of spleen size and splenectomy on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: A retrospective analysis by the chronic malignancies working party on behalf of European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)
Polverelli, N., Mauff, K., Kröger, N., Robin, M., Beelen, D., Beauvais, D., Chevallier, P., Mohty, M., Passweg, J., Rubio, M. T., et al
American Journal of Hematology. 2021;96(1):69-79
Abstract
The role of spleen size and splenectomy for the prediction of post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) outcome in myelofibrosis remains under debate. In EBMT registry, we identified a cohort of 1195 myelofibrosis patients transplanted between 2000-2017 after either fludarabine-busulfan or fludarabine-melphalan regimens. Overall, splenectomy was performed in 202 (16.9%) patients and its use decreased over time (28.3% in 2000-2009 vs 14.1% in 2010-2017 period). By multivariate analysis, splenectomy was associated with less NRM (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44-0.93, P = .018) but increased risk of relapse (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.01-2.02, P = .042), with no significant impact on OS (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.67-1.12, P = .274). However, in subset analysis comparing the impact of splenectomy vs specific spleen sizes, for patients with progressive disease, an improved survival was seen in splenectomised subjects compared to those patients with a palpable spleen length ≥ 15 cm (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.69, P < .001), caused by a significant reduction in NRM (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.14-0.49, P < .001), without significantly increased relapse risk (HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.87-2.49, P = .147). Overall, despite the possible biases typical of retrospective cohorts, this study highlights the potential detrimental effect of massive splenomegaly in transplant outcome and supports the role of splenectomy for myelofibrosis patients with progressive disease and large splenomegaly.
-
2.
Thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine (TBF) conditioning regimen in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: an outcome analysis from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT
Battipaglia, G., Mauff, K., Wendel, L., Angelucci, E., Mohty, M., Arcese, W., Santarone, S., Rubio, M. T., Kroger, N., Fox, M. L., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2021
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only curative option in MF. There is no consensus on the optimal conditioning regimen. We report outcomes of 187 patients with MF transplanted between 2010 and 2017 conditioned with TBF. Median age was 58 years. Median interval from diagnosis to allo-HCT was 44 months. Donors were haploidentical (41%), unrelated (36%) or HLA-identical siblings (23%). Stem cell source was PB in 60%. Conditioning was myeloablative in 48% of cases. Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) was used in 41% of patients. At 100 days, neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 91% and 63% after a median of 21 and 34 days, respectively. Grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD occurred in 24% and 12%, while at 3 years, all grade chronic GVHD and chronic extensive GVHD had been diagnosed in 38% and 11%. At 3 years, OS, RFS and GRFS were 55%, 49% and 43%, respectively. RI and NRM were 17% and 33%. On multivariate analysis, poor KPS and the use of unrelated donors were associated with worse GRFS and a higher grade II-IV acute GVHD, respectively. Neither donor type nor intensity of the conditioning regimen influenced survival outcomes. TBF is a feasible conditioning regimen in allo-HCT for MF in all donor settings although longer term outcomes are required.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with myelofibrosis (MF, n=187)
Intervention
Thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine (TBF) conditioning regimen and allogeneic transplant
Comparison
None
Outcome
At 100 days, neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 91% and 63% after a median of 21 and 34 days, respectively. Grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD occurred in 24% and 12%, while at 3 years, all grade chronic GVHD and chronic extensive GVHD had been diagnosed in 38% and 11%. At 3 years, OS, RFS and GRFS were 55%, 49% and 43%, respectively. RI and NRM were 17% and 33%. On multivariate analysis, poor KPS and the use of unrelated donors were associated with worse GRFS and a higher grade II-IV acute GVHD, respectively. Neither donor type nor intensity of the conditioning regimen influenced survival outcomes.
-
3.
Splenectomy before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: a French nationwide study
Bossard, J. B., Beuscart, J. B., Robin, M., Mohty, M., Barraco, F., Chevallier, P., Marchand, T., Rubio, M. T., Charbonnier, A., Blaise, D., et al
American journal of hematology. 2020
Abstract
The value of pretransplant splenectomy in patients with myelofibrosis (MF) is subject to debate, since the procedure may preclude subsequent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). To determine the impact of pretransplant splenectomy on the incidence of allo-HCT, we conducted a comprehensive retrospective study of all patients with MF for whom an unrelated donor search had been initiated via the French bone marrow transplantation registry (RFGM) between January 1(st) , 2008, and January 1(st) , 2017. Additional data were collected from the patients' medical files and a database held by the French-Language Society for Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cell Therapy (SFGM-TC). We used a multistate model with four states ("RFGM registration"; "Splenectomy"; "Death before allo-HCT", and "Allo-HCT") to evaluate the association between splenectomy and the incidence of allo-HCT. The study included 530 patients from 57 centers. With a median follow-up time of 6 years, we observed 81 splenectomies, 99 deaths before allo-HCT (90 without splenectomy and 9 after), and 333 allo-HCTs (268 without splenectomy and 65 after). In a bivariable analysis, the hazard ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] for the association of splenectomy with allo-HCT was 7.2 [5.1-10.3] in the first 4 months and 1.18 [0.69-2.03] thereafter. The hazard ratio [95%CI] for death associated with splenectomy was 1.58 [0.79-3.14]. These reassuring results suggest that splenectomy does not preclude allo-HCT in patients with MF. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
-
4.
Thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine as a conditioning regimen for patients with myelofibrosis undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation: a single center experience
Memoli, M., Paviglianiti, A., Malard, F., Battipaglia, G., Brissot, E., Médiavilla, C., Bianchessi, A., Banet, A., Van de Wyngaert, Z., Ledraa, T., et al
Leukemia & lymphoma. 2020;:1-9
Abstract
We assessed the outcomes associated with thiotepa, busulfan and fludarabine (TBF) conditioning regimen in a cohort of 29 consecutive patients allografted for myelofibrosis (MF). The median age was 56 (range 42-70) years. According to the refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS-plus), 15 (52%) patients were classified as high risk. Graft source was peripheral blood stem cells in 27 patients. Donor type was HLA-matched related (n?=?5), matched unrelated (n?=?16), mismatched unrelated (n?=?1), and haploidentical (n?=?7). All but 2 patients engrafted. The cumulative incidence (CI) of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 21% (95% CI, 10-42) at day 100. The CI of chronic GVHD was 39% (95% CI, 23-65) at 3?years. The median follow-up period was 39 (range 14-60) months. Overall survival was 69% (95% CI, 50-83) at 3?years. No relapse was observed. TBF is a valid conditioning strategy in patients with MF.
-
5.
Comparison of DIPSS and MYSEC-PM for prediction of outcome in post-PV and ET myelofibrosis after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation
Gagelmann, N., Eikema, D. J., de Wreede, L. C., Koster, L., Wolschke, C., Arnold, R., Kanz, L., McQuaker, G., Marchand, T., Socie, G., et al
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2019
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
We aimed to validate the MYelofibrosis SECondary to PV and ET prognostic model (MYSEC- PM) in 159 patients with myelofibrosis secondary to polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry undergoing transplantation from matched siblings or unrelated donors. Furthermore, we aimed to test its prognostic performance in comparison with the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS). Score performance was analyzed using the concordance index (C): the probability that a patient who experienced an event had a higher risk score than a patient who did not (C >0.5 suggesting predictive ability). Median follow-up of the total cohort was 41 months (34-54 months) being different in post-PV (45 months) and post-ET myelofibrosis (38 months). Survival at one, two, and four years was 70% (63-77%), 61% (53- 69%) and 52% (43-61%) for the total cohort, 70% (59-80%), 61% (49-73%) and 51% (38-64%) for post-PV, and 71% (61-81%), 61% (50-72%) and 54% (42-66%) for post-ET myelofibrosis (p=0.78). Overall, the DIPSS was not significantly predictive of outcome (p=0.28). With respect to the MYSEC-PM, overall survival at four years was 69% for the low-risk, 55% for the intermediate-1-risk, 47% for the intermediate-2-risk, and 22% (0-45%) for the high-risk group. The prognostic model was predictive of survival overall (p=0.05) while groups with intermediate-2 and high risk showed no significant difference (p=0.44). Assessment of prognostic utility yielded C-index of 0.575 (0.502-0.648) for the DIPSS while assessment of the MYSEC-PM resulted in C-statistics of 0.636 (0.563-0.708) indicating improvement in prediction of posttransplant survival using the new MYSEC-PM. In addition, transplantations from an unrelated donor in comparison with an HLA-identical sibling showed worse outcome (p=0.04) and transplant recipients seropositive for cytomegalovirus in comparison with seronegative recipients (p=0.01) showed worse survival. In conclusion, incorporating transplant-specific as well as clinical and mutational information together with the MYSEC-PM may enhance risk stratification.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with myelofibrosis secondary to polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry undergoing transplantation from matched siblings or unrelated donors. (n=159)
Intervention
MYelofibrosis SECondary to PV and ET prognostic model (MYSEC- PM)
Comparison
Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS)
Outcome
Overall, the DIPSS was not significantly predictive of outcome. MYSEC-PM was predictive of survival overall, while groups with intermediate-2 and high risk showed no significant difference. Assessment of prognostic utility yielded C-index of 0.575 for the DIPSS while assessment of the MYSEC-PM resulted in C-statistics of 0.636, indicating improvement in prediction of posttransplant survival using the new MYSEC-PM.
-
6.
Unrelated cord blood transplantation in patients with acquired refractory aplastic anemia: a nationwide phase II study
Peffault de Latour, R., Chevret, S., Jubert, C., Sirvent, A., Galambrun, C., Ruggeri, A., Gandemer, V., Cornillon, J., Rialland, F., Dalle, J. H., et al
Blood. 2018
Abstract
Outcomes remain poor for patients with refractory severe aplastic anemia (SAA). Alternative donor transplantation may be considered, but results from previous studies have not been encouraging. We conducted a prospective nationwide phase II study to assess the efficacy and safety of unrelated cord blood transplantation (CBT) in patients with refractory SAA (APCORD protocol, NCT 01343953). To demonstrate a significant difference in one-year survival from 20% (null hypothesis) to 50% (alternative hypothesis), we needed to include 25 transplanted patients. Twenty-six patients (median age: 16 years) were therefore included. Eligibility criteria required one or two unrelated CB units, containing separately or together more than 4x10(7) frozen nucleated cells/kg recipient body weight. The conditioning regimen comprised fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, thymoglobulin and 2-Gy total body irradiation. With a median follow-up of 38.8 months, engraftment occurred in 23 patients (88%); cumulative incidences of grade II-IV acute and chronic GvHD were 45.8% and 36%, respectively. Twenty-three patients were alive at one year, with an overall survival rate of 88.5%, differing significantly from the expected 20% (p<0.0001) (84% overall survival at 2 years). CBT with units containing at least 4x10(7) frozen nucleated cells/kg is therefore a valuable curative option for young adults with refractory SAA and no available matched unrelated donors.
-
7.
Is allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis still indicated at the time of molecular markers and JAK inhibitors era?
Lestang, E., Peterlin, P., Le Bris, Y., Dubruille, V., Delaunay, J., Godon, C., Theisen, O., Blin, N., Mahe, B., Gastinne, T., et al
European Journal of Haematology. 2017;99(1):60-69
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The role of allogenic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is still debated in myelofibrosis (MF). METHODS A retrospective analyzed was performed to compare the outcome of 71 patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk Dynamic International Prognosis Scoring System+ (DIPSS+) primary (PMF) or secondary (SMF) myelofibrosis with an indication of ASCT as they ultimately underwent the procedure (n=34) or not (n=37). RESULTS Five-year overall survival (OS) was not statistically different between both groups (allograft: 52% vs no allograft: 34%, P=.12). However, progression to myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia at 5 years was significantly lower in transplanted patients (14% vs 50%, P=.01). In univariate analysis, 5-year OS was significantly higher for transplanted vs non-transplanted patients with unfavorable karyotype (75% vs 0%, P=.001), SMF (71% vs 20%, P=.001) or high DIPSS+ score (46% vs 15%, P=.03). There was also a trend for better 5-year OS in allografted patients with high JAK2V617Fburden (>65%) (75% vs 8%, P=.07). Interestingly, the survival of patients who did not proceed to ASCT was dramatically increased by the use of ruxolitinib. CONCLUSIONS Not all intermediate-2/high-risk DIPSS+ MF patients benefit from ASCT, especially since the introduction of JAK2 inhibitors. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
-
8.
Management of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Relapsing after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Study by the French Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cell Therapies
Guieze, R., Damaj, G., Pereira, B., Robin, M., Chevallier, P., Michallet, M., Vigouroux, S., Beguin, Y., Blaise, D., El Cheikh, J., et al
Biology of Blood & Marrow Transplantation. 2016;22(2):240-7
Abstract
To find out prognostic factors and to investigate different therapeutic approaches, we report on 147 consecutive patients who relapsed after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Sixty-two patients underwent immunotherapy (IT group, second allo-HSCT or donor lymphocyte infusion), 39 received cytoreductive treatment alone (CRT group) and 46 were managed with palliative/supportive cares (PSC group). Two-year rates of overall survival (OS) were 32%, 6%, and 2% in the IT, CRT, and PSC groups, respectively (P < .001). In multivariate analysis, 4 factors adversely influenced 2-year rates of OS: history of acute graft-versus-host disease (hazard ratio [HR], 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26 to 2.67; P = .002), relapse within 6 months (HR, 2.69; 95% CI, .82 to 3.98; P < .001), progression to acute myeloid leukemia (HR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.75 to 3.83; P < .001), and platelet count < 50 G/L at relapse (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.44; P = .007). A prognostic score based on those factors discriminated 2 risk groups with median OSs of 13.2 versus 2.4 months, respectively (P < .001). When propensity score, prognostic score, and treatment strategy were included in Cox model, immunotherapy was found to be an independent factor that favorably impacts OS (HR, .40; 95% CI, .26 to .63; P < .001). In conclusion, immunotherapy should be considered when possible for MDS patients relapsing after allo-HSCT. Copyright © 2016 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.