-
1.
A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, comparator-controlled study to evaluate safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of V114, a 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients (PNEU-STEM)
Wilck, M., Cornely, O. A., Cordonnier, C., Velez, J. D., Ljungman, P., Maertens, J., Selleslag, D., Mullane, K. M., Nabhan, S., Chen, Q., et al
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2023
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals who receive allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) are immunocompromised and at high risk for pneumococcal infections, especially in the months following transplant. This study evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of V114 (VAXNEUVANCE™), a 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV), when given to allo-HCT recipients. METHODS Participants received 3 doses of V114 or PCV13 in one-month intervals starting 3-6 months after allo-HCT. Twelve months after HCT, participants received either PNEUMOVAXTM 23 or a fourth dose of PCV (if they experienced chronic graft versus host disease). Safety was evaluated as the proportion of participants with adverse events (AEs). Immunogenicity was evaluated by measuring serotype-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) and opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) geometric mean titers (GMTs) for all V114 serotypes in each vaccination group. RESULTS A total of 274 participants were enrolled and vaccinated in the study. The proportions of participants with AEs and serious AEs were generally comparable between intervention groups, and the majority of AEs in both groups were of short duration and mild-to-moderate intensity. For both IgG GMCs and OPA GMTs, V114 was generally comparable to PCV13 for the 13 shared serotypes, and higher for serotypes 22F and 33F at Day 90. CONCLUSIONS V114 was well tolerated in allo-HCT recipients with a generally comparable safety profile to PCV13. V114 induced comparable immune responses to PCV13 for the 13 shared serotypes, and higher for V114 serotypes 22F and 33F. Study results support use of V114 in allo-HCT recipients.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults and children who received allo-HCT 90 to 180 days prior to randomization, from 44 centres in 10 countries (n=274)
Intervention
3 doses of V114 pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in one-month intervals starting 3-6 months after transplant. For people who experienced chronic GvHD, a fourth dose of PNEUMOVAXTM 23 was given (n=139)
Comparison
Three doses of PCV13 in pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in one-month intervals starting 3-6 months after transplant. For people who experienced chronic GvHD, a fourth dose was given. (n=135)
Outcome
The proportions of participants with AEs and serious AEs were generally comparable between intervention groups, and the majority of AEs in both groups were of short duration and mild-to-moderate intensity. For both IgG GMCs and OPA GMTs, V114 was generally comparable to PCV13 for the 13 shared serotypes, and higher for serotypes 22F and 33F at Day 90.
-
2.
Defibrotide plus best standard of care compared with best standard of care alone for the prevention of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (HARMONY): a randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial
Grupp, S. A., Corbacioglu, S., Kang, H. J., Teshima, T., Khaw, S. L., Locatelli, F., Maertens, J., Stelljes, M., Stepensky, P., Lopez, P., et al
The Lancet. Haematology. 2023
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, also known as veno-occlusive disease, is a potentially life-threatening complication of haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). We aimed to compare defibrotide prophylaxis plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone for sinusoidal obstruction syndrome prevention after HSCT. METHODS This open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial was done in 104 centres in 14 countries. Patients who were at least 1 month old, were scheduled to receive allogeneic HSCT (adult [aged >16 years] or paediatric [aged >1 month to ≤16 years] patients) or autologous HSCT (paediatric patients only), and were at high risk or very high risk of developing sinusoidal obstruction syndrome were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by an interactive web response system to receive intravenous defibrotide 25 mg/kg per day (four equal doses [6·25 mg/kg per dose]) and best supportive care (determined by individual institutional guidelines; defibrotide prophylaxis group) or best supportive care only (best supportive care group). Randomisation was stratified by sinusoidal obstruction syndrome risk, age, and country. The primary endpoint, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome-free survival at day 30 after HSCT, was assessed by an independent Endpoint Adjudication Committee in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received protocol treatment. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02851407. FINDINGS Between Jan 11, 2017, and Oct 20, 2020, 372 patients (172 [46%] women and 200 [54%] men; median age 14·0 years [IQR 4·0-41·0] were randomly assigned to the defibrotide prophylaxis group (n=190) or best supportive care group (n=182; ITT population). On the basis of recommendations from the Independent Data Monitoring Committee following completion of the planned interim analysis in the first 280 recruited patients on April 29, 2020, enrolment was prematurely stopped for presumed futility. At the final analysis, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome-free survival by day 30 after HSCT was 67% (95% CI 58-74) in the defibrotide prophylaxis group and 73% (62-80) in the best supportive care group (HR 1·27 [95% CI 0·84-1·93]; p=0·85). Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between groups during the randomised prophylaxis phase; most treatment-emergent adverse events were related to the transplantation rather than to study drug. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events were stomatitis (grade 3, 52 [29%] of 181 patients in the defibrotide prophylaxis group and 56 [32%] of 174 patients in the best supportive care group; grade 4, two [1%] in the defibrotide prophylaxis group and two [1%] in the best supportive care group) and febrile neutropaenia (grade 3, 51 [28%] in the defibrotide prophylaxis group and 52 [30%] in the best supportive care group; grade 4, no patients in the defibrotide prophylaxis group and three [2%] in the best supportive care group). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 74 (41%) of 181 patients in the defibrotide prophylaxis group and 61 (35%) of 174 patients in the best supportive care group. In the rescue phase, when patients in both treatment groups received defibrotide as rescue treatment, fatal treatment-related adverse events occurred in one (4%) of 25 patients in the defibrotide prophylaxis group (intracranial haemorrhage) and one (3%) of 31 patients in the best supportive care group (sinusoidal obstruction syndrome). INTERPRETATION Defibrotide did not show a benefit in the prophylaxis of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. Additional studies of carefully selected patients at high risk of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after HSCT are warranted. FUNDING Jazz Pharmaceuticals.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults and children at least one month old who were scheduled to receive allogeneic transplant or children 1 month – 16 years scheduled to receive autologous transplant, and at high or very high risk of developing sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (n=372)
Intervention
Defibrotide prophylaxis plus best supportive care (n=190)
Comparison
Best supportive care alone (n=182)
Outcome
On the basis of recommendations from the Independent Data Monitoring Committee following completion of the planned interim analysis in the first 280 recruited patients on April 29, 2020, enrolment was prematurely stopped for presumed futility. At the final analysis, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome-free survival by day 30 after HSCT was 67% (95% CI 58-74) in the defibrotide prophylaxis group and 73% (62-80) in the best supportive care group (HR 1·27 [95% CI 0·84-1·93]; p=0·85). Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between groups during the randomised prophylaxis phase; most treatment-emergent adverse events were related to the transplantation rather than to study drug. Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 74 (41%) of 181 patients in the defibrotide prophylaxis group and 61 (35%) of 174 patients in the best supportive care group. In the rescue phase, when patients in both treatment groups received defibrotide as rescue treatment, fatal treatment-related adverse events occurred in one (4%) of 25 patients in the defibrotide prophylaxis group (intracranial haemorrhage) and one (3%) of 31 patients in the best supportive care group (sinusoidal obstruction syndrome).
-
3.
Treatment for First Cytomegalovirus Infection Post-Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in the AURORA Trial: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Phase 3 Trial Comparing Maribavir with Valganciclovir
Papanicolaou, G. A., Avery, R. K., Cordonnier, C., Duarte, R. F., Haider, S., Maertens, J., Peggs, K. S., Solano, C., Young, J. H., Fournier, M., et al
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2023
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neutropenia may limit use of valganciclovir treatment for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection following hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). A phase 2 study indicated efficacy of maribavir with fewer treatment-limiting toxicities than valganciclovir. METHODS In this multicenter, double-blind, phase 3 study, patients with first asymptomatic CMV infection post-HCT were stratified and randomized 1:1 to maribavir 400 mg twice daily or valganciclovir (dose-adjusted for renal clearance) for 8 weeks with 12 weeks follow-up. Primary endpoint was confirmed CMV viremia clearance at week 8 (primary hypothesis of non-inferiority margin of 7.0%). Key secondary endpoint was a composite of the primary endpoint with no findings of CMV tissue-invasive disease at week 8, through week 16. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed. RESULTS Among patients treated (273 maribavir; 274 valganciclovir), the primary endpoint of non-inferiority of maribavir was not met (maribavir, 69.6%; valganciclovir, 77.4%; adjusted difference [95% confidence interval (CI)]: -7.7% [-14.98, -0.36]; lower limit of 95% CI of treatment difference exceeded -7.0%). At week 16, 52.7% and 48.5% of patients treated (maribavir and valganciclovir, respectively) maintained CMV viremia clearance without tissue-invasive disease (adjusted difference [95% CI]: 4.4% [-3.91, 12.76]). With maribavir (versus valganciclovir), fewer patients experienced neutropenia (16.1% and 52.9%) or discontinued due to TEAEs (27.8% and 41.2%). Discontinuations were mostly due to neutropenia (maribavir, 4.0%; valganciclovir, 17.5%). CONCLUSIONS Although non-inferiority of maribavir to valganciclovir for the primary endpoint was not achieved based on the prespecified non-inferiority margin, maribavir demonstrated comparable CMV viremia clearance during post-treatment follow-up, with fewer discontinuations due to neutropenia. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NCT02927067 [AURORA].
-
4.
Addition of lenalidomide to intensive treatment in younger and middle-aged adults with newly diagnosed AML: the HOVON-SAKK-132 trial
Löwenberg, B., Pabst, T., Maertens, J., Gradowska, P., Biemond, B. J., Spertini, O., Vellenga, E., Griskevicius, L., Tick, L. W., Jongen-Lavrencic, M., et al
Blood advances. 2021;5(4):1110-1121
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Lenalidomide, an antineoplastic and immunomodulatory drug, has therapeutic activity in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but definitive studies about its therapeutic utility have been lacking. In a phase 3 study, we compared 2 induction regimens in newly diagnosed patients age 18 to 65 years with AML: idarubicine-cytarabine (cycle 1) and daunorubicin and intermediate-dose cytarabine (cycle 2) without or with lenalidomide (15 mg orally on days 1-21). One final consolidation cycle of chemotherapy or autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) or allogeneic SCT (allo-SCT) was provided according to a prognostic risk and minimal residual disease (MRD)-adapted approach. Event-free survival (EFS; primary end point) and other clinical end points were assessed. A second random assignment in patients in complete response or in complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery after cycle 3 or auto-SCT involved 6 cycles of maintenance with lenalidomide (10 mg on days 1-21) or observation. In all, 392 patients were randomly assigned to the control group, and 388 patients were randomly assigned to lenalidomide induction. At a median follow-up of 41 months, the study revealed no differences in outcome between the treatments (EFS, 44% ± 2% standard error and overall survival, 54% ± 2% at 4 years for both arms) although in an exploratory post hoc analysis, a lenalidomide benefit was suggested in SRSF2-mutant AML. In relation to the previous Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group and Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (HOVON-SAKK) studies that used a similar 3-cycle regimen but did not pursue an MRD-guided approach, these survival estimates compare markedly more favorably. MRD status after cycle 2 lost prognostic value in intermediate-risk AML in the risk-adjusted treatment context. Maintenance with lenalidomide showed no apparent effect on relapse probability in 88 patients randomly assigned for this part of the study.
-
5.
Therapeutic value of clofarabine in younger and middle-aged (18-65 years) adults with newly diagnosed AML
Lowenberg, B., Pabst, T., Maertens, J., van Norden, Y., Biemond, B. J., Schouten, H. C., Spertini, O., Vellenga, E., Graux, C., Havelange, V., et al
Blood. 2017;129(12):1636-1645
Abstract
Clofarabine has demonstrated antileukemic activity in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) but has yet to be critically evaluated in younger adults in the frontline with standard chemotherapy. We compared 2 induction regimens in newly diagnosed patients ages 18 to 65 with acute myeloid leukemia (AML)/high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, that is, idarubicine-cytarabine (cycle I) and amsacrine-cytarabine (cycle II) without or with clofarabine (10 mg/m2on days 1-5 of each of both cycles). Consolidation involved chemotherapy with or without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Event-free survival (EFS, primary endpoint) and other clinical endpoints and toxicities were assessed. We randomized 402 and 393 evaluable patients to the control or clofarabine induction treatment arms. Complete remission rates (89%) did not differ but were attained faster with clofarabine (66% vs 75% after cycle I). Clofarabine added grades 3 to 4 toxicities and delayed hematological recovery. At a median follow-up of 36 months, the study reveals no differences in overall survival and EFS between the control (EFS, 35% +/- 3 [standard error] at 4 years) and clofarabine treatments (38% +/- 3) but a markedly reduced relapse rate (44% +/- 3 vs 35% +/- 3) in favor of clofarabine and an increased death probability in remission (15% +/- 2 vs 22% +/- 3). In the subgroup analyses, clofarabine improved overall survival and EFS for European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2010 intermediate I prognostic risk AML (EFS, 26% +/- 4 vs 40% +/- 5 at 4 years; Cox P = .002) and for the intermediate risk genotype NPM1 wild-type/FLT3 without internal-tandem duplications (EFS, 18% +/- 5 vs 40% +/- 7; Cox P < .001). Clofarabine improves survival in subsets of intermediate-risk AML only. HOVON-102 study is registered at Netherlands Trial Registry #NTR2187. Copyright © 2017 by The American Society of Hematology.
-
6.
Letermovir Prophylaxis for Cytomegalovirus in Hematopoietic-Cell Transplantation
Marty, F. M., Ljungman, P., Chemaly, R. F., Maertens, J., Dadwal, S. S., Duarte, R. F., Haider, S., Ullmann, A. J., Katayama, Y., Brown, J., et al
New England Journal of Medicine. 2017
Abstract
Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a common complication after allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation. Letermovir is an antiviral drug that inhibits the CMV-terminase complex. Methods In this phase 3, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned CMV-seropositive transplant recipients, 18 years of age or older, in a 2:1 ratio to receive letermovir or placebo, administered orally or intravenously, through week 14 after transplantation; randomization was stratified according to trial site and CMV disease risk. Letermovir was administered at a dose of 480 mg per day (or 240 mg per day in patients taking cyclosporine). Patients in whom clinically significant CMV infection (CMV disease or CMV viremia leading to preemptive treatment) developed discontinued the trial regimen and received anti-CMV treatment. The primary end point was the proportion of patients, among patients without detectable CMV DNA at randomization, who had clinically significant CMV infection through week 24 after transplantation. Patients who discontinued the trial or had missing end-point data at week 24 were imputed as having a primary end-point event. Patients were followed through week 48 after transplantation. Results From June 2014 to March 2016, a total of 565 patients underwent randomization and received letermovir or placebo beginning a median of 9 days after transplantation. Among 495 patients with undetectable CMV DNA at randomization, fewer patients in the letermovir group than in the placebo group had clinically significant CMV infection or were imputed as having a primary end-point event by week 24 after transplantation (122 of 325 patients [37.5%] vs. 103 of 170 [60.6%], P<0.001). The frequency and severity of adverse events were similar in the two groups overall. Vomiting was reported in 18.5% of the patients who received letermovir and in 13.5% of those who received placebo; edema in 14.5% and 9.4%, respectively; and atrial fibrillation or flutter in 4.6% and 1.0%, respectively. The rates of myelotoxic and nephrotoxic events were similar in the letermovir group and the placebo group. All-cause mortality at week 48 after transplantation was 20.9% among letermovir recipients and 25.5% among placebo recipients. Conclusions Letermovir prophylaxis resulted in a significantly lower risk of clinically significant CMV infection than placebo. Adverse events with letermovir were mainly of low grade. (Funded by Merck; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02137772 ; EudraCT number, 2013-003831-31 .).