-
1.
Autologous stem cell transplant in fit patients with refractory or early relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that responded to salvage chemotherapy
Tun, A. M., Wang, Y., Maliske, S., Micallef, I., Inwards, D. J., Habermann, T. M., Porrata, L., Paludo, J., Bisneto, J. V., Rosenthal, A., et al
Haematologica. 2024
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is the new standard of care in fit patients with refractory or early relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, there may still be a role for salvage chemotherapy (ST) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in certain circumstances (eg, lack of CAR-T resources, chemosensitive relapses, etc). We retrospectively studied 230 patients with refractory or early relapsed DLBCL who underwent ST and ASCT. Median line of ST was 1 (range 1-3). Best response before ASCT was complete response (CR) in 106 (46%) and partial response (PR) in 124 (54%) patients. Median follow-up after ASCT was 89.4 months. The median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 16.1 and 43.3 months, respectively. Patients relapsing between 6 to 12 months after frontline therapy had numerically better median PFS (29.6 months) and OS (88.5 months). Patients who required 1 line of ST, compared to those requiring >1 line, had better median PFS (37.9 vs 3.9 months; P = 0.0005) and OS (68.3 vs 12.0 months; P = 0.0005). Patients who achieved CR had better median PFS (71.1 vs 6.3 months; P.
-
2.
ASTCT Clinical practice recommendations for transplant and cellular therapies in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Epperla, N., Kumar, A., Abutalib, S. A., Awan, F. T., Chen, Y. B., Gopal, A. K., Holter-Chakrabarty, J., Kekre, N., Lee, C. J., Lekakis, L., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2023
Abstract
Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) has long remained the standard approach for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) chemosensitive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, the advent of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has caused a paradigm shift in the management of R/R DLBCL patients, especially with the recent approval of CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy in the second line setting in high-risk groups (primary refractory and early relapse [≤12 months]). Consensus on the contemporary role, optimal timing, and sequencing of HCT and cellular therapies in DLBCL is lacking. Therefore, the American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) Committee on Practice Guidelines undertook this project to formulate consensus recommendations to address this unmet need. The RAND-modified Delphi method was used to generate 20 consensus statements with a few key statements as follows: 1) in the first-line setting, there is no role of auto-HCT consolidation for those achieving complete remission (CR) following R-CHOP or similar therapy in non-double hit/triple hit cases (DHL/THL) and in DHL/THL cases receiving intensive induction therapies, but auto-HCT may be considered in eligible patients receiving R-CHOP or similar therapies in DHL/THL cases. 2) Auto-HCT consolidation with thiotepa-based conditioning is standard-of-care for eligible patients with primary central nervous system achieving CR with first-line therapy. 3) In the primary refractory and early relapse setting, the preferred option is CAR T-cell therapy, while in late relapse (>12 months), consolidation with auto-HCT is recommended in those achieving chemosensitivity to salvage therapy (CR or partial response), and CAR T-cell therapy is recommended in those not achieving remission. These clinical practice recommendations will serve as a tool to guide clinicians managing patients with newly diagnosed and R/R DLBCL.
-
3.
Allogeneic transplant following CAR T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma
Zurko, J., Ramdial, J., Shadman, M., Ahmed, S., Szabo, A., Iovino, L., Tomas, A. A., Sauter, C., Perales, M. A., Shah, N. N., et al
Haematologica. 2022
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) can potentially salvage large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients experiencing treatment failure after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T). Nonetheless, data on the efficacy and toxicities of alloHCT after receipt of CAR-T are limited. We report a multicenter retrospective study assessing the safety, toxicities, and outcomes of alloHCT in LBCL patients following CAR-T failure. Eighty-eight patients with relapsed, refractory LBCL received an alloHCT following anti-CD19 CAR-T failure. The median number of lines of therapy between CAR-T infusion and alloHCT was 1 (range 0-7). Low intensity conditioning was used in 77% (n=68) and peripheral blood was the most common graft source (86%, n=76). The most common donor types were matched unrelated donor (39%), followed by haploidentical (30%) and matched related donor (26%). Median follow-up of survivors was 15 months (range 1-72). One-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and graft-versus-host disease-free relapse-free survival were 59%, 45%, and 39% respectively. One-year non-relapse mortality and progression/relapse were 22% and 33% respectively. On multivariate analysis.
-
4.
Impact of conditioning regimen intensity on the outcomes of peripheral T-cell lymphoma, anaplastic large cell lymphoma and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma patients undergoing allogeneic transplant
Savani, M., Ahn, K. W., Chen, Y., Ahmed, S., Cashen, A. F., Shadman, M., Modi, D., Khimani, F., Cutler, C. S., Zain, J., et al
British journal of haematology. 2022
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
There have been no large studies comparing reduced-intensity/non-myeloablative conditioning (RIC/NMA) to myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens in T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (T-NHL) patients undergoing allogeneic transplant (allo-HCT). A total of 803 adults with peripheral T-cell lymphoma, anaplastic large cell lymphoma and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (age 18-65 years), undergoing allo-HCT between 2008-2019 and reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research with either MAC (n = 258) or RIC/NMA regimens (n = 545) were evaluated. There were no significant differences between the two cohorts in terms of patient sex, race and performance scores. Significantly more patients in the RIC/NMA cohort had peripheral blood grafts, haematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) of ≥3 and chemosensitive disease compared to the MAC cohort. On multivariate analysis, overall survival (OS) was not significantly different in the RIC/NMA cohort compared to the MAC cohort (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.79-1.29; p = 0.95). Similarly, non-relapse mortality (NRM) (HR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.61-1.19; p = 0.34), risk of progression/relapse (HR = 1.29; 95% CI = 0.98-1.70; p = 0.07) and therapy failure (HR = 1.14; 95% CI = 0.92-1.41, p = 0.23) were not significantly different between the two cohorts. Relative to MAC, RIC/NMA was associated with a significantly lower risk of grade 3-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (HR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.46-0.99, p = 0.04). Among chemorefractory patients, there was no difference in OS, therapy failure, relapse, or NRM between RIC/NMA and MAC regimens. In conclusion, we found no association between conditioning intensity and outcomes after allo-HCT for T-cell NHL.
-
5.
Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant in patients with relapsed/refractory anaplastic large cell lymphoma
Furqan, F., Ahn, K. W., Chen, Y., Kaur, M., Abutalib, S. A., Ahmed, N., Ahmed, S., Kharfan-Dabaja, M. A., Friedberg, J., Gregory, T., et al
British journal of haematology. 2022
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
The prognosis of relapsed/refractory (R/R) anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is poor. Large studies evaluating outcomes of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in systemic R/R ALCL are not available. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database, we evaluated outcomes of 182 adults (aged ≥18 years) with R/R ALCL undergoing allo-HCT between 2008 and 2019. Non-relapse mortality (NRM), disease relapse/progression (REL), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were modelled using Cox proportional hazards models. The median (range) follow-up of survivors was 62 (3-148) months. The 1-year NRM was 18%. The 5-year REL, PFS and OS were 32%, 41% and 56% respectively. On multivariable regression analysis African American race (hazard ratio [HR] 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-4.8; p < 0.001) and refractory disease at allo-HCT (HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.6-6.2; p < 0.001) were predictive of inferior OS. Similarly, African-American race (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.4; p = 0.003), other minority race (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2-5.3; p = 0.02) and refractory disease (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-4.3; p = 0.01) were predictive of inferior PFS. These data, demonstrate that allo-HCT can result in durable disease control in a sizable proportion of patients with R/R ALCL. Refractory disease and racial minority status predicted inferior allo-HCT outcomes. Whether the inferior outcomes of racial minorities with R/R ALCL after allo-HCT are driven by differences in disease biology or disparities in post allo-HCT care, or both, requires further investigation.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults with relapsed/refractory anaplastic large cell lymphoma identified from the CIBMTR database (n=182)
Intervention
Allogeneic HSCT
Comparison
None
Outcome
The median (range) follow-up of survivors was 62 (3-148) months. The 1-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 18%. The 5-year disease relapse/progression (REL), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 32%, 41% and 56% respectively. On multivariable regression analysis African American race (hazard ratio [HR] 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-4.8) and refractory disease at allo-HCT (HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.6-6.2) were predictive of inferior OS. Similarly, African-American race (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.4), other minority race (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2-5.3) and refractory disease (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-4.3) were predictive of inferior PFS.
-
6.
ASTCT Committee on Practice Guidelines Survey on Evaluation & Management of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma after failure of Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) therapy
Ahmed, N., Kumar, A., Kharfan-Dabaja, M. A., DeFilipp, Z., Herrera, A., Hashmi, S., Dholaria, B., Perales, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., Hamadani, M.
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2022
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) is a major advance in managing aggressive relapsed and/or refractory B-cell lymphomas; however, relapses are frequent and pose a major therapeutic challenge. There is substantial variability across transplant and cellular therapy programs in assessing and managing post-CAR-T failures. METHODS The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) Committee on Practice Guidelines conducted an online cross-sectional survey between August 2021 and October 2021, to determine the U.S. lymphoma and transplant and cellular therapy physicians' practice patterns for the detection and diagnosis of CAR-T failure, and management strategies for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in this particular setting. RESULTS Email surveys were sent to 901 potential participants, of which 174 (19%) completed the survey. Responders were mainly White (51.2%), male (70.7%), and with >10 years of practice experience (51.2%). 87% of the responders were affiliated with university/teaching centers; 54.6% had general oncology practices and 45.4% had lymphoma-focused transplant/cellular therapy practices. The most common periods to perform surveillance scans were at 3 months and 12 months after CAR-T infusion. 88.5% of responders would often or always consider a biopsy to confirm relapse and 89% would routinely check for the persistence of the antigen targeted by the CAR (e.g. CD19 in the case of CD19 CAR-T). The most popular first salvage regimen for relapse or progression was an alternate CAR-T therapy (dual or alternate target) regardless of CD19 positivity. 27% of responders chose this regimen for CD19 positive relapse, while 31% of responders did so for CD19 negative relapse. 88.5% of responders favored consolidative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) after response to salvage, whereas 51.2% of physicians would consider autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (AHCT) in transplant naïve patients. CONCLUSIONS There is substantial cross-center variation in surveillance, diagnosis, and management of CAR-T failure. Prospective clinical trials evaluating novel agents in this setting are urgently needed to identify best management strategies.
-
7.
Progression-Free Survival at 24 Months as A Landmark After Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
Tun, A. M., Maliske, S., Wang, Y., Inwards, D. J., Habermann, T. M., Micallef, I., Porrata, L., Paludo, J., Bisneto, J. V., Rosenthal, A., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2022
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who achieve progression-free survival (PFS) at 24 months (PFS24) following immunochemotherapy (IC) have excellent overall survival (OS) comparable to that of the age- and sex-matched general population. However, a similar landmark has not been established for patients with relapsed or refractory (RR) DLBCL following frontline IC who are subsequently treated with salvage therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). OBJECTIVE To evaluate the role of PFS24 as a landmark after ASCT in patients with RR DLBCL. STUDY DESIGN Patients with RR DLBCL after frontline R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like IC who underwent salvage therapy and ASCT at Mayo Clinic between July 2000 and December 2017 and University of Iowa between April 2003 and April 2020 were identified from institutional lymphoma and transplant databases. Clinical characteristics, treatment information, and outcome data were abstracted. PFS, OS, and post-ASCT relapse survival (PRS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method, and cumulative incidences of relapse vs non-relapse mortality and different causes of death were compared accounting for competing events. RESULTS A total of 437 patients were identified. Median age at ASCT was 61 years (range 19-78), and 280 (64%) were male. After a median post-ASCT follow up of 8.0 years (95% CI 7.2-8.7), 215 patients had a relapse (or disease progression), 180 within 2 years and 35 after 2 years. For the entire cohort, post-ASCT relapse rate was much higher than non-relapse mortality rate (48.1 vs 9.1% at 5-years). Median PFS and OS after ASCT was 2.7 and 5.4 years, respectively. Lymphoma was the primary cause of death after ASCT. In contrast, for patients who had achieved PFS24 (n=220), rates of post-PFS24 relapse and non-relapse mortality were similar (14.8% and 12.3% at 5-years). Median PFS and OS after achieving PFS24 was 10.0 and 11.5 years, respectively. Lymphoma related and unrelated death rates were similar after achieving PFS24. For all patients who had a post-ASCT relapse, median PRS was 0.7 (95% CI 0.5-0.9) years, and late relapse (>2 vs ≤2 years after ASCT) was associated with better PRS (median 2.3 [1.7-4.8] vs 0.5 [0.3-0.7] years, p<0.001). CONCLUSION PFS24 is an important landmark associated with post-ASCT outcomes in patients with RR DLBCL following frontline IC.
-
8.
Outcomes of Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Older Patients with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
Munshi, P. N., Chen, Y., Ahn, K. W., Awan, F. T., Cashen, A., Shouse, G., Shadman, M., Shaughnessy, P., Zurko, J., Locke, F. L., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2022
Abstract
Data for outcomes after autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (auto-HCT) in DLBCL patients ≥70 years are limited OBJECTIVES : Auto-HCT is feasible on older DLBCL patients STUDY DESIGN : Using the CIBMTR database, we compared outcomes of auto-HCT in DLBCL patients aged 60-69 years (n=363) versus ≥70 years (n=103) between 2008 and 2019. Non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse/progression (REL), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were modeled using Cox proportional hazards models RESULTS : All patients received BEAM conditioning. On univariate analysis, in the 60-69 years versus ≥70 years cohorts, 100-day NRM was 3% versus 4%, 5-year REL was 47% versus 45%, 5-year PFS 40% versus 38% and 5-year OS 55% versus 41% respectively. On multivariate analysis, patients ≥70 had no significant difference in NRM (HR 1.43, 95% CI 0.85-2.39), REL (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.79-1.56), PFS (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.92-1.63) compared to patients 60-69 years. Patients ≥70 years had a higher mortality (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.05-1.85, p=0.02), likely due to inferior post-relapse OS in this cohort (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.27-2.61, p=0.001). DLBCL was the major cause of death in both cohorts (62% vs. 59%) CONCLUSION : Older patients should not be denied auto-HCT solely based on chronological age.
-
9.
Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in diffuse large B-cell limphoma after 3 or more lines of prior therapy: evidence of durable benefit
Mei, M., Hamadani, M., Ahn, K. W., Chen, Y., Kharfan-Dabaja, M. A., Sauter, C., Herrera, A. F.
Haematologica. 2022
Abstract
Not available.
-
10.
Autologous and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma-Type Richter Syndrome
Herrera, A. F., Ahn, K. W., Litovich, C. A., Chen, Y., Assal, A., Bashir, Q., Bayer, R. L., Coleman, M., DeFilipp, Z., Farhadfar, N., et al
Blood advances. 2021
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Richter syndrome (RS) represents a transformation from chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) to an aggressive lymphoma, most commonly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), associated with a dismal prognosis. Patients with DLBCL-RS have poor outcomes with DLBCL-directed therapy, thus consolidation with hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has been used with durable remissions observed. Studies reporting HCT outcomes in patients with DLBCL-RS have been small, have not evaluated the prognostic impact of cytogenetic risk factors, and were conducted prior to the era of novel, targeted therapy of CLL/SLL. We performed a CIBMTR registry study evaluating outcomes after autologous (auto, n=53) and allogeneic (allo, n=118) HCT in patients with DLBCL-RS treated in the modern era. More auto-HCT recipients were in complete response at HCT relative to allo-HCT recipients (66% versus 34%), while a higher proportion of allo-HCT recipients had 17p deletion (33% versus 7%) and had previously received novel agents (39% versus 10%). In the auto-HCT cohort, the 3-year relapse incidence, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 37%, 48%, and 57%, respectively. Among allo-HCT recipients, the 3-year relapse incidence, PFS, and OS were 30%, 43%, and 52%, respectively. In the allo-HCT cohort, deeper response at HCT was associated with outcomes (3y PFS/OS: 66%/77% CR versus 43%/57% PR versus 5%/15% resistant, p<.0001 for both), while cytogenetic abnormalities and prior novel therapy did not impact outcomes. In our study, HCT resulted in durable remissions in therapy-sensitive patients with DLBCL-RS treated in the era of targeted CLL/SLL therapy, including patients with high-risk features.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients reported to the CIBMTR registry undergoing transplant for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma-type Richter syndrome (n=171)
Intervention
Autologous transplantation (auto, n=53)
Comparison
Allogeneic transplantation (allo, n=118)
Outcome
More auto-HCT recipients were in complete response at HCT relative to allo-HCT recipients (66% versus 34%), while a higher proportion of allo-HCT recipients had 17p deletion (33% versus 7%) and had previously received novel agents (39% versus 10%). In the auto-HCT cohort, the 3-year relapse incidence, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 37%, 48%, and 57%, respectively. Among allo-HCT recipients, the 3-year relapse incidence, PFS, and OS were 30%, 43%, and 52%, respectively. In the allo-HCT cohort, deeper response at HCT was associated with outcomes (3y PFS/OS: 66%/77% CR versus 43%/57% PR versus 5%/15% resistant), while cytogenetic abnormalities and prior novel therapy did not impact outcomes.