-
1.
Myeloablative Fractionated Busulfan for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant in Older Patients or Patients with Comorbidities
Popat, U. R., Pasvolsky, O., Bassett, R., Mehta, R. S., Olson, A. L., Chen, J., Alousi, A. M., Al-Atrash, G., Bashir, Q., Gulbis, A. M., et al
Blood advances. 2023
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Traditional conditioning regimens for patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) provide suboptimal outcomes, especially for older patients and those with comorbidities. We hypothesized that a fractionated myeloablative busulfan dose delivered over an extended period would reduce non-relapse mortality (NRM), while retaining anti-leukemic effects. Here, we performed a phase II trial for adults with hematological malignancies receiving matched related or unrelated alloHCT. Participants received busulfan 80mg/m2 outpatient on days -20 and -13 before transplant. Fludarabine 40mg/m2 was given on days -6 to -2 followed by busulfan dosed to achieve a target area under the curve of 20,000mol/min for the whole course. The primary endpoint was day 100 NRM. Seventy-eight patients were included, with a median age of 61 (range 39-70) years, transplanted for acute leukemia (24%), MDS (27%), or MPD/CML (44%). HCT specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) was >3 in 34 (44%). With a median follow-up of 36.4 (range 2.9-51.5) months, 100-day, 1-year and 3-year NRM was 3.8% (95%CI, 0-8.1%), 8% (95%CI, 2-14%), and 9.3% (95%CI, 2.6-15.9%), without a significant difference by age or HCT-CI score. One-year and 3-year relapse incidence was 10% (95%CI, 4-17%) and 18% (95%CI, 9-27%), respectively. Three-year overall survival was 80% (95%CI, 72-90%) and was similar for patients >60 and <60 years of age, as well as those with HCT-CI>3 and HCT-CI<3. Overall, we found that a myeloablative fractionated busulfan regimen has low NRM without an increase in relapse rate, resulting in promising survival, even in older patients or in patients with comorbidities.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults with haematological malignancies receiving matched related or unrelated allogeneic transplant, from a single centre in USA (n=78).
Intervention
Busulfan 80mg/m2 outpatient on days -20 and -13 before transplant, fludarabine 40mg/m2 on days -6 to -2 followed by busulfan dosed to achieve a target area under the curve of 20,000mol/min for the whole course
Comparison
None
Outcome
With a median follow-up of 36.4 (range 2.9-51.5) months, 100-day, 1-year and 3-year non-relapse mortality was 3.8% (95%CI, 0-8.1%), 8% (95%CI, 2-14%), and 9.3% (95%CI, 2.6-15.9%), without a significant difference by age or HCT-CI score. One-year and 3-year relapse incidence was 10% (95%CI, 4-17%) and 18% (95%CI, 9-27%), respectively. Three-year overall survival was 80% (95%CI, 72-90%) and was similar for patients >60 and <60 years of age, as well as those with HCT-CI>3 and HCT-CI<3.
-
2.
Transplant Outcomes of Myelofibrosis with Busulfan and Fludarabine Myeloablative Conditioning
Joseph, J., Srour, S. A., Milton, D. R., Ramdial, J. L., Saini, N. Y., Olson, A. L., Bashir, Q., Oran, B., Alousi, A. M., Hosing, C., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2023
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Outcomes of myelofibrosis with allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) have improved over the past decade and are partly related to advances in supportive treatments and conditioning regimens. Several factors are known to predict transplant outcomes. However, most studies lack homogeneity in the conditioning regimen used, which limits their ability to assess prognostic factors on transplant outcomes. OBJECTIVE We aimed to determine the risk factors that predict transplant outcomes in patients with myelofibrosis who underwent matched or mismatched allo-SCT using a uniform myeloablative conditioning regimen consisting of busulfan and fludarabine with tacrolimus and methotrexate-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. STUDY DESIGN This single-center study included patients with myelofibrosis who underwent allo-SCT with a matched unrelated donor (MUD), matched related donor (MRD), or mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) and received busulfan and fludarabine conditioning with methotrexate/tacrolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis. RESULTS Sixty-five patients with myelofibrosis met the criteria and were included in the study. At a median follow-up of 35.6 months, the 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and overall survival (OS) for all study patients were 27%, 20%, and 65%, respectively. In a multivariable analysis for CIR, prior use of JAK inhibitors was significantly associated with a decreased risk of relapse (HR [95% CI], 0.33 [0.11-0.99]; p = 0.048). For NRM, HCT-CI (≥3 vs. <3, 10.09 [2.09-48.76]; p=0.004) and donor type (MUD vs. MRD, 5.38 [1.14-25.30]; p=0.033 and MMUD vs. MRD, 10.73 [1.05-109.4]; p=0.045) were associated with an increased risk of mortality. Likewise for OS, HCT-CI (≥3 vs. <3, 3.31 [1.22-8.99]; p = 0.019) and donor type (MMUD vs. MRD, 5.20 [1.35-19.98]; p = 0.016) were significantly associated with inferior survival. Longer time from diagnosis to allo-SCT seemed to confer worse survival but this didn't reach statistical significance (>12 months vs. ≤12 months: NRM, 7.20 [0.96-53.94]; p=0.055 and OS, 2.60 [0.95-7.14]; p=0.06). CONCLUSIONS In a homogenous cohort of myelofibrosis patients uniformly treated with busulfan/fludarabine myeloablative conditioning and methotrexate-based GVHD prophylaxis, we showed that donor choice and HCT-CI are the two strongest predictors for improved survival after allo-SCT.
PICO Summary
Population
People with myelofibrosis who underwent allo-SCT with a matched unrelated donor (MUD), matched related donor (MRD), or mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) at a single centre in USA (n=176)
Intervention
Cohort for analysis: all who received myeloablative conditioning regimen consisting of busulfan and fludarabine with tacrolimus and methotrexate-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis (n=65)
Comparison
None
Outcome
At a median follow-up of 35.6 months, the 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and overall survival (OS) for all study patients were 27%, 20%, and 65%, respectively. In a multivariable analysis for CIR, prior use of JAK inhibitors was significantly associated with a decreased risk of relapse (HR [95% CI], 0.33 [0.11-0.99]). For NRM, HCT-CI (>/=3 vs. <3, 10.09 [2.09-48.76]) and donor type (MUD vs. MRD, 5.38 [1.14-25.30] and MMUD vs. MRD, 10.73 [1.05-109.4]) were associated with an increased risk of mortality. Likewise for OS, HCT-CI (>/=3 vs. <3, 3.31 [1.22-8.99];) and donor type (MMUD vs. MRD, 5.20 [1.35-19.98]) were significantly associated with inferior survival. Longer time from diagnosis to allo-SCT seemed to confer worse survival but this didn't reach statistical significance (>12 months vs. </=12 months: NRM, 7.20 [0.96-53.94] and OS, 2.60 [0.95-7.14]).
-
3.
High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplant for relapsed or refractory primary mediastinal b-cell lymphoma
Alkhaldi, H., Reinhardt, A., Barnett, M., Kundu, S., Hosing, C., Ramdial, J., Saini, N., Srour, S., Alousi, A., Kebriaei, P., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2023
Abstract
Primary mediastinal large B cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is an uncommon aggressive type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Rituximab-containing chemoimmunotherapy ± radiation therapy (RT) is standard first-line treatment. Relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease has long been treated with salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in appropriate patients. We retrospectively analyzed all patients with R/R PMBCL treated with HDC/ASCT at our center between January 2000 and August 2022. Sixty patients received rituximab-BEAM (N=37) or rituximab-gemcitabine/busulfan/melphalan (R-GemBuMel) ± vorinostat (N=23), with ASCT. Forty-six patients received mediastinal RT, either as prior consolidation of frontline therapy or following ASCT. At median follow-up of 6 years (range, 0.3-21), the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of the whole group are 58% and 77%, respectively, 51% and 65%, respectively, for R-BEAM patients, and 69% and 82%, respectively, for R-vorinostat/GemBuMel patients. Multivariable analyses showed that negative PET at ASCT [hazard ratio (HR), 0.28)] and involvement of only 1 organ (HR, 0.33) were independently associated with improved PFS. In addition, receiving R-vorinostat/GemBuMel (HR, 0.23) was an independent favorable predictor of OS. In conclusion, HDC/ASCT is effective in R/R PMBCL, with improved outcomes in patients receiving R-vorinostat/GemBuMel.
-
4.
Impact of pre-transplant induction and consolidation cycles on AML allogeneic transplant outcomes: a CIBMTR analysis in 3113 AML patients
Boyiadzis, M., Zhang, M. J., Chen, K., Abdel-Azim, H., Abid, M. B., Aljurf, M., Bacher, U., Badar, T., Badawy, S. M., Battiwalla, M., et al
Leukemia. 2022
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
We investigated the impact of the number of induction/consolidation cycles on outcomes of 3113 adult AML patients who received allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) between 2008 and 2019. Patients received allo-HCT using myeloablative (MAC) or reduced-intensity (RIC) conditioning in first complete remission (CR) or with primary induction failure (PIF). Patients who received MAC allo-HCT in CR after 1 induction cycle had 1.3-fold better overall survival (OS) than 2 cycles to CR and 1.47-fold better than ≥3 cycles. OS after CR in 2 or ≥3 cycles was similar. Relapse risk was 1.65-fold greater in patients receiving ≥3 cycles to achieve CR. After RIC allo-HCT, the number of induction cycles to CR did not affect OS. Compared to CR in 1 cycle, relapse risk was 1.24-1.41-fold greater in patients receiving 2 or ≥3 cycles. For patients receiving only 1 cycle to CR, consolidation therapy prior to MAC allo-HCT was associated with improved OS vs. no consolidation therapy. Detectable MRD at the time of MAC allo-HCT did not impact outcomes while detectable MRD preceding RIC allo-HCT was associated with an increased risk of relapse. For allo-HCT in PIF, OS was significantly worse than allo-HCT in CR after 1-3 cycles.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia who received allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in 450 centres worldwide (n=3113)
Intervention
Patients achieving complete remission (CR) after 1 induction cycle (n=862)
Comparison
Patients requiring 2 cycles to CR (n=454) or 3 or more cycles to CR (n=157).
Outcome
Patients who received myeloablative (MAC) allo-HCT in CR after 1 induction cycle had 1.3-fold better overall survival (OS) than 2 cycles to CR and 1.47-fold better than ≥3 cycles. OS after CR in 2 or ≥3 cycles was similar. Relapse risk was 1.65-fold greater in patients receiving ≥3 cycles to achieve CR. After reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allo-HCT, the number of induction cycles to CR did not affect OS. Compared to CR in 1 cycle, relapse risk was 1.24-1.41-fold greater in patients receiving 2 or ≥3 cycles. For patients receiving only 1 cycle to CR, consolidation therapy prior to MAC allo-HCT was associated with improved OS vs. no consolidation therapy. Detectable MRD at the time of MAC allo-HCT did not impact outcomes while detectable MRD preceding RIC allo-HCT was associated with an increased risk of relapse. For allo-HCT in PIF, OS was significantly worse than allo-HCT in CR after 1-3 cycles.
-
5.
A randomized phase III study of pretransplant conditioning for AML/MDS with fludarabine and once daily IV busulfan ± clofarabine in allogeneic stem cell transplantation
Andersson, B. S., Thall, P. F., Ma, J., Valdez, B. C., Bassett, R., Jr., Chen, J., Ahmed, S., Alousi, A., Bashir, Q., Ciurea, S., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2022
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Pretransplant conditioning with Fludarabine (Flu)-Busulfan (Bu) is safe, but clofarabine (Clo) has improved antileukemic activity. Hypothesis: Flu+Clo-Bu (FCB) yields superior progression-free survival (PFS) after allogeneic transplantation. We randomized 250 AML/MDS patients aged 3-70, Karnofsky Score ≥80, with matched donors, to FCB (n = 120) or Flu-Bu (n = 130), stratifying complete remission (CR) vs. No CR, (NCR). HCT-CI scores varied, from 0 to 10. All evaluable patients engrafted. Median follow-up was 66 months (interquartile range: 58-80). Three-year relapse incidence (RI), 25% with FCB, vs. 39% with Flu-Bu (p = 0.018), offset by higher non-relapse mortality, 22.6% (95%CI: 16-30.2%) vs. 12.3% (95%CI: 6.5-19%). Three-year PFS was 52% (95%CI: 44-62%) (FCB), vs. 48% (95%CI: 41-58%) (Flu-Bu). FCB benefited CR patients less, NCR patients age ≤ 60 had 3-year 34% RI (95%CI: 19-49%) (FCB) vs. 56% (95%CI: 38-70%) after Flu-Bu (p = 0.037). NCR patients >60 years had 3-year RI 10.0% (FCB), vs. 56.0%, after Flu-Bu (p = 0.003). Bayesian regression analysis including treatment-covariate interactions showed FCB superiority in NCR patients with low HCT-CI (0-2). Serious adverse event profiles were similar for the regimens. Conditioning with FCB did not improve PFS overall, but improved disease control in NCR patients, mandating confirmatory trials. Remission status and HCT-CI should be considered when using FCB.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults and children with acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndromes undergoing allogeneic transplant in a single centre in the USA (n=250)
Intervention
Conditioning with Fludarabine + Busulfan + Clofarabine regimen (FCB, n = 120)
Comparison
Conditioning with Fludarabine + Busulfan regimen (Flu-Bu, n = 130),
Outcome
Median follow-up was 66 months (interquartile range: 58-80). Three-year relapse incidence (RI), 25% with FCB, vs. 39% with Flu-Bu, offset by higher non-relapse mortality, 22.6% (95%CI: 16-30.2%) vs. 12.3% (95%CI: 6.5-19%). Three-year progression free survival (PFS) was 52% (95%CI: 44-62%) (FCB), vs. 48% (95%CI: 41-58%) (Flu-Bu). FCB benefited complete remission (CR) patients less, no complete remission (NCR) patients age ≤ 60 had 3-year 34% RI (95%CI: 19-49%) (FCB) vs. 56% (95%CI: 38-70%) after Flu-Bu (p = 0.037). NCR patients >60 years had 3-year RI 10.0% (FCB), vs. 56.0%, after Flu-Bu. Bayesian regression analysis including treatment-covariate interactions showed FCB superiority in NCR patients with low HCT-CI (0-2). Serious adverse event profiles were similar for the regimens.
-
6.
Vorinostat combined with Busulfan, Fludarabine, and Clofarabine Conditioning Regimen for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Acute Leukemia: Long-term Study Outcomes
Alatrash, G., Saberian, C., Bassett, R., Thall, P. F., Ledesma, C., Lu, Y., Daher, M., Valdez, B. C., Kawedia, J., Popat, U., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2022
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conditioning regimens play a major role in determining disease outcomes following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The use of intravenous (IV) busulfan (Bu) as part of the conditioning chemotherapy has been shown to be effective in controlling disease relapse. However, disease relapse remains a major cause of death following allo-HSCT. OBJECTIVE To determine the long-term outcomes of vorinostat with IV Bu plus dual nucleoside analogs clofarabine (Clo) and fludarabine (Flu) in the conditioning regimen for patients undergoing allo-HSCT. STUDY DESIGN This was a rapid dose escalation phase I/II study designed to determine whether the addition of vorinostat would improve the efficacy of standard IV Bu Flu Clo conditioning regimen. This report presents the long-term disease outcomes of this combination in 68 patients with high risk leukemia, including 31 (46%) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and 37 (54%) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). RESULTS Fifty-eight patients (85%) were in morphologic complete remission at time of transplant and 38 patients (56%) received matched unrelated donor grafts. Over the median follow up of 37.6 months, among the 68 patients, 29 (43%) died, and the non-relapse mortality (NRM) rate was 22% (n=15). Median overall survival (OS) and median NRM were not reached. Nineteen patients (28%) experienced disease progression. Median PFS was 36.8 months. Thirty-seven patients (57%) developed grade 2-4 acute GVHD and 20 patients (31%) developed chronic GVHD. CONCLUSION Our results suggest a lack of benefit from adding a short course of vorinostat to IV Bu/Flu/Clo conditioning regimen for leukemia patients undergoing allo- HSCT.
-
7.
KRD vs. VRD as induction before autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation for high-risk multiple myeloma
Gaballa, M. R., Ma, J., Rauf, M., Bassett, R., Pasvolsky, O., Tanner, M. R., Bashir, Q., Srour, S. A., Saini, N., Ramdial, J., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2022
Abstract
Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD) induction is standard prior to autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) in newly diagnosed, high-risk multiple myeloma (ND-HRMM). Carfilzomib (K) is another proteasome inhibitor approved for MM. In this single-center, retrospective analysis, we compared outcomes in ND-HRMM with pre-transplant KRD or VRD induction. High-risk was defined by t(4:14), t(14:16), 1q21 gain/amplification, or del(17p). Primary endpoints were progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Of 121 ND-HRMM patients, 63 received KRD, and 58 received VRD. Post-induction, complete (CR), very good partial (VGPR), partial response (PR), and overall response (ORR) rates were 23.8%/49.2%/25.4%/98.4% with KRD, and 19%/46.6%/27.6%/93.1% with VRD. At day 100 post-auto-HCT, these were 38.1%/42.9%/19%/100% with KRD, versus 35.1%/49.1%/12.3%/94.8% with VRD. Pre-auto-HCT, 11 (18.3%) KRD and 7 (12.5%) VRD patients had minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative CR (p = 0.45). Post-auto-HCT, 14 (41.2%) and 13 (43.3%) patients had MRD-negative CR (p = 1.000). Median PFS was 38.2 (95%CI 28.7-NA) and 45.9 months (95%CI 43.2-NA) for KRD and VRD, respectively (p = 0.25). Respective 3-year PFS and OS were 53.5% (95%CI 41.1-69.6) and 95.2% (95%CI 90-100) for KRD and 64% (95%CI 51.6-79.5) and 84.2% (95%CI 73.5-96.3, p = 0.30) for VRD. Overall, KRD induction pre-auto-HCT does not improve outcomes. Prospective, randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings.
-
8.
Real-world long-term outcomes in multiple myeloma with VRD induction, Mel200-conditioned auto-HCT, and lenalidomide maintenance
Gaballa, M. R., Ma, J., Tanner, M. R., Al-Juhaishi, T., Bashir, Q., Srour, S. A., Saini, N. Y., Ramdial, J. L., Nieto, Y., Murphy, R., et al
Leukemia & lymphoma. 2022;63(3):710-721
Abstract
Standard-of-care for newly-diagnosed, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT)-eligible, multiple myeloma (MM) patients includes bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD) induction followed by melphalan 200 mg/m(2) (Mel200)-conditioned auto-HCT and lenalidomide maintenance. We completed a retrospective case series assessing outcomes of 187 MM patients who received this regimen at our institution. The 100-day non-relapse mortality incidence was zero. Before auto-HCT, 9.6 and 52.9% of patients achieved a complete response (CR) or ≥ very good partial response (VGPR), respectively. At day-100 post-transplant, 29.4 and 74.9% had achieved a CR/stringent-CR (sCR) or ≥ VGPR, respectively. At the last evaluation, 57.2% of patients had CR/sCR and 87.1% had ≥ VGPR. Median follow-up, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 63.2, 50, and 101.7 months, respectively. The 5-year PFS and OS were 43.1 and 79%. High-risk cytogenetics was associated with worse outcomes. This study illustrates that VRD induction, Mel200-conditioned auto-HCT, and lenalidomide maintenance are associated with good outcomes in MM.
-
9.
Impact of Induction with VCD vs. VRD on the Outcome of Patients with Multiple Myeloma After an Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Afrough, A., Pasvolsky, O., Ma, J., Srour, S., Bashir, Q., Saini, N., Hosing, C., Popat, U. R., Kebriaei, P., Delgado, R., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2022
Abstract
BACKGROUND Induction therapy with a triplet regimen, followed by high-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) is the standard of care for newly diagnosed, transplant-eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Bortezomib-dexamethasone with cyclophosphamide (VCD) or lenalidomide (VRD) are the most used induction regimens. However, previous studies comparing VCD and VRD showed disparate results. OBJECTIVES The goal of this retrospective study was to compare the "real world" results of VCD and VRD, in transplant-eligible MM patients outside of a clinical trial. METHODS/RESULTS We identified 322 patients who received VRD or VCD induction before auto-HCT at our institution. All patients received melphalan conditioning and single-agent lenalidomide maintenance therapy. Overall, 114 patients received VCD and 208 received VRD. The median age at auto-HCT was 61.9 years (range, 33.9-79.6), with 35.4% (114/322) of the cohort being 65 years or older. The overall response rate was 99.7% post-auto-HCT, with a significantly lower complete remission rate as the final response in the VCD compared to the VRD group (34% vs. 53%, p=0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the best response rate of VGPR or better in the VCD compared to the VRD group (92% vs. 85%, p=0.078). The median duration of ≥VGPR was 50.0 months (95%CI: 42.0-69.1) for both cohorts and there was no difference between VCD and VRD (p=0.769; HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.69-1.31). Median follow-up of survivors was 73 months. There was no difference in the relapse rate between VCD and VRD (p=0.749). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 48.7 months in the VCD and 44.6 months in the VRD group (p=0.858). Median overall survival (OS) was 103.8 months with VCD and 101.7 months with VRD (p=0.891). At 5 years, the PFS and OS were 38.1% and 76.9% for the VCD group, respectively, and 40.7% and 74.6% for the VRD group, respectively. On multivariate analysis for OS in the entire cohort, R-ISS I and post-auto-HCT best response of stringent complete response (sCR)/CR emerged as significant predictors of superior OS. There was no impact of the type of induction regimen on the OS in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Induction therapy with VCD compared to VRD was associated with a lower CR rate, but there was no difference in PFS or OS between the two regimens.
-
10.
Improved outcomes of high-risk relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma patients after high-dose chemotherapy: a 15-year analysis
Nieto, Y., Gruschkus, S., Valdez, B. C., Jones, R. B., Anderlini, P., Hosing, C., Popat, U., Qazilbash, M., Kebriaei, P., Alousi, A., et al
Haematologica. 2021
Abstract
High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplant (HDC/ASCT) is standard treatment of chemosensitive relapsed classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), although outcomes of high-risk relapse (HRR) patients remain suboptimal. We retrospectively analyzed all HRR cHL patients treated with HDC/ASCT at our institution between 01/01/2005-12/31/2019. HRR criteria included primary refractory disease/relapse within 1 year, extranodal extension, B symptoms, requiring > 1 salvage line, or PET+ disease at ASCT. All patients met the same ASCT eligibility criteria. We treated 501 patients with BEAM (N=146), BuMel (N=38), GemBuMel (N=189) and vorinostat/GemBuMel (N=128). The GemBuMel and vorinostat/GemBuMel cohorts had more HRR criteria and more patients with PET+ disease at ASCT. Pre-ASCT BV, anti-PD1, PET-negative disease at ASCT, and maintenance BV increased over time. BEAM and BuMel predominated in earlier years (2005-2007), GemBuMel and BEAM in middle years (2008-2015), and vorinostat/GemBuMel and BEAM in later years (2016-2019). Median follow-up is 50 months (6-186). Outcomes improved over time, with 2-year PFS/OS rates of 58%/82% (2005-2007), 59%/83% (2008-2011), 71%/94% (2012-2015) and 86%/99% (2016-2019) (P.