-
1.
Donor cell-derived genetic abnormalities after sex mismatched allogeneic cell transplantation: a unique challenge of donor cell leukemia
Klausner, M., Phan, B., Morsberger, L., Parish, R., Shane, A., Park, R., Gocke, C. D., Xian, R. R., Jones, R. J., BolaƱos-Meade, J., et al
Blood cancer journal. 2023;13(1):163
-
2.
HLA-Matching with PTCy: A Reanalysis of a CIBMTR Dataset with Propensity Score Matching and Donor Age
Ambinder, A. J., Jain, T., Tsai, H. L., Horowitz, M. M., Jones, R. J., Varadhan, R.
Blood advances. 2022
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Blood or marrow transplantation (BMT) outcomes using haploidentical donors (Haplo) and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis compare favorably to using HLA-matched donors with calcineurin inhibitor-based GVHD prophylaxis. A recent CIBMTR analysis of patients receiving homogenous PTCy-based prophylaxis found that, with reduced intensity conditioning, Haplo BMTs had worse outcomes than matched unrelated donor (MUD) BMTs. Due to significant differences in characteristics between the groups, we reanalyzed the dataset using propensity score matching and, additionally, added a donor age variable. MUD BMTs were matched to Haplo BMTs in a 1:5 ratio. After matching, no significant differences were found between groups across all measured baseline characteristics. Outcomes analyses demonstrated no significant differences in overall survival (HR of mortality with MUD vs Haplo [95% CI], 0.95[0.65-1.16], P=0.75), disease free survival (HR of relapse or death, 0.98[0.73-1.18], P=0.89), relapse rate (HR, 1.06[0.77-1.38], P=0.69), or non-relapse mortality (HR, 0.85[0.42-1.13], P=0.49) between the two groups. After stratification by conditioning intensity, MUD BMTs in the RIC cohort had a lower risk of NRM (HR, 0.56 [0.14-0.99], P=0.05), with no significant difference in other clinical outcomes. These results suggest that the effect of HLA matching on BMT outcomes with PTCy is less meaningful than previously reported and observed differences resulted in part from differences in donor age. Timely identification of a young, at least half-matched (related or unrelated) donor may be more important than finding a matched donor, if the latter leads to a substantial delay in BMT or use of an older donor.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults with acute myeloid leukaemia, acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in first or second complete remission, or myelodysplastic syndromes attending 111 bone marrow transplantation (BMT) centres across the USA and reported to the CIBMTR registry (n=837)
Intervention
BMT from haploidentical donors (Haplo, n=637, subset receiving reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) n=341)
Comparison
BMT from matched unrelated donors (MUD, n=200, subset receiving RIC n=114)
Outcome
After matching, no significant differences were found between groups across all measured baseline characteristics. Outcomes analyses demonstrated no significant differences in overall survival (HR of mortality with MUD vs Haplo [95% CI], 0.95[0.65-1.16]), disease free survival (HR of relapse or death, 0.98[0.73-1.18]), relapse rate (HR, 1.06[0.77-1.38]), or non-relapse mortality (HR, 0.85[0.42-1.13]) between the two groups. After stratification by conditioning intensity, MUD BMTs in the RIC cohort had a lower risk of non-relapse mortality (HR, 0.56 [0.14-0.99]), with no significant difference in other clinical outcomes.
-
3.
Relationship of donor age and relationship to outcomes of haploidentical transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide
DeZern, A. E., Franklin, C., Tsai, H. L., Imus, P. H., Cooke, K. R., Varadhan, R., Jones, R. J.
Blood advances. 2021;5(5):1360-1368
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (BMT) physicians seek to optimize all possible variables to improve outcomes. Selectable factors include conditioning, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, graft source, and donor. Many patients, especially those with eligible haploidentical (haplo) donors, will have multiple donor options. We seek to identify factors to optimize the choice of haplo donors when using posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) GVHD prophylaxis. We evaluated the effect of modifiable donor characteristics (donor age and relationship) on outcomes following haplo BMT with a uniform nonmyeloablative conditioning and PTCy. From 2002 to 2017, 889 consecutive adult patients underwent nonmyeloablative haplo BMT with PTCy. Median follow-up among survivors was 2.5 years after BMT. Median recipient age was 59 (range: 18 to 76) years and median donor age was 40 (range: 13 to 79) years. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that increasing donor age by decade was associated with poorer overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.13 [1.05, 1.22; P = .0015]), worse progression-free survival (HR, 1.09 [1.02, 1.16; P = .015]), and a higher risk for grade 2 to 4 and grade 3 to 4 GVHD (1.3 [1.06, 1.61; P = .013]), but not for chronic GVHD (HR, 1.06 [0.94, 1.2]; P = .37). These less-favorable results with older donors were attributable to worse nonrelapse mortality (HR, 1.19 [1.05, 1.34]; P = .006), not relapse. Parents were associated with inferior outcomes compared with sibling donors, whereas no significant differences were observed between parental donors. These data suggest that the youngest, adult-sized donors should be preferred when multiple haplo donors are available.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients undergoing non-myeloablative haploidentical transplantation (n=889)
Intervention
Evaluation of the effect of modifiable donor characteristics (donor age and relationship) on outcomes.
Comparison
None
Outcome
Median follow-up among survivors was 2.5 years after BMT. Median recipient age was 59 (range: 18 to 76) years and median donor age was 40 (range: 13 to 79) years. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that increasing donor age by decade was associated with poorer overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.13), worse progression-free survival (HR, 1.09), and a higher risk for grade 2 to 4 and grade 3 to 4 GVHD (HR, 1.3), but not for chronic GVHD (HR, 1.06). These less-favourable results with older donors were attributable to worse non-relapse mortality (HR, 1.19), not relapse. Parents were associated with inferior outcomes compared with sibling donors, whereas no significant differences were observed between parental donors.
-
4.
Donor Clonal Hematopoiesis and Recipient Outcomes After Transplantation
Gibson, C. J., Kim, H. T., Zhao, L., Murdock, H. M., Hambley, B., Ogata, A., Madero-Marroquin, R., Wang, S., Green, L., Fleharty, M., et al
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2021;:Jco2102286
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
PURPOSE Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) can be transmitted from a donor to a recipient during allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Exclusion of candidate donors with CH is controversial since its impact on recipient outcomes and graft alloimmune function is uncertain. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed targeted error-corrected sequencing on samples from 1,727 donors age 40 years or older and assessed the effect of donor CH on recipient clinical outcomes. We measured long-term engraftment of 102 donor clones and cytokine levels in 256 recipients at 3 and 12 months after transplant. RESULTS CH was present in 22.5% of donors, with DNMT3A (14.6%) and TET2 (5.2%) mutations being most common; 85% of donor clones showed long-term engraftment in recipients after transplantation, including clones with a variant allele fraction < 0.01. DNMT3A-CH with a variant allele fraction = 0.01, but not smaller clones, was associated with improved recipient overall (hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; P = .042) and progression-free survival (HR, 0.72; P = .003) after adjustment for significant clinical variables. In patients who received calcineurin-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, donor DNMT3A-CH was associated with reduced relapse (subdistribution HR, 0.59; P = .014), increased chronic graft-versus-host disease (subdistribution HR, 1.36; P = .042), and higher interleukin-12p70 levels in recipients. No recipient of sole DNMT3A or TET2-CH developed donor cell leukemia (DCL). In seven of eight cases, DCL evolved from donor CH with rare TP53 or splicing factor mutations or from donors carrying germline DDX41 mutations. CONCLUSION Donor CH is closely associated with clinical outcomes in transplant recipients, with differential impact on graft alloimmune function and potential for leukemic transformation related to mutated gene and somatic clonal abundance. Donor DNMT3A-CH is associated with improved recipient survival because of reduced relapse risk and with an augmented network of inflammatory cytokines in recipients. Risk of DCL in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is driven by somatic myelodysplastic syndrome-associated mutations or germline predisposition in donors.
-
5.
Double unrelated umbilical cord blood vs HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation: the BMT CTN 1101 trial
Fuchs, E. J., O'Donnell, P. V., Eapen, M., Logan, B., Antin, J. H., Dawson, P., Devine, S., Horowitz, M. M., Horwitz, M. E., Karanes, C., et al
Blood. 2021;137(3):420-428
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Results of 2 parallel phase 2 trials of transplantation of unrelated umbilical cord blood (UCB) or bone marrow (BM) from HLA-haploidentical relatives provided equipoise for direct comparison of these donor sources. Between June 2012 and June 2018, 368 patients aged 18 to 70 years with chemotherapy-sensitive lymphoma or acute leukemia in remission were randomly assigned to undergo UCB (n = 186) or haploidentical (n = 182) transplant. Reduced-intensity conditioning comprised total-body irradiation with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine for both donor types. Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis for UCB transplantation was cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and for haploidentical transplantation, posttransplant cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, and MMF. The primary end point was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS). Treatment groups had similar age, sex, self-reported ethnic origin, performance status, disease, and disease status at randomization. Two-year PFS was 35% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28% to 42%) compared with 41% (95% CI, 34% to 48%) after UCB and haploidentical transplants, respectively (P = .41). Prespecified analysis of secondary end points recorded higher 2-year nonrelapse mortality after UCB, 18% (95% CI, 13% to 24%), compared with haploidentical transplantation, 11% (95% CI, 6% to 16%), P = .04. This led to lower 2-year overall survival (OS) after UCB compared with haploidentical transplantation, 46% (95% CI, 38-53) and 57% (95% CI 49% to 64%), respectively (P = .04). The trial did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in the primary end point, 2-year PFS, between the donor sources. Although both donor sources extend access to reduced-intensity transplantation, analyses of secondary end points, including OS, favor haploidentical BM donors. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01597778.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients aged 18 to 70 years with chemotherapy-sensitive lymphoma or acute leukaemia in remission (n=368)
Intervention
Cord blood transplantation (UCB, n=186)
Comparison
Haploidentical transplantation (n=182)
Outcome
Two-year PFS was 35% after UCB compared with 41% haploidentical transplant. Prespecified analysis of secondary end points recorded higher 2-year nonrelapse mortality after UCB: 18%, compared with 11% for haploidentical transplantation. This led to lower 2-year overall survival (OS) after UCB compared with haploidentical transplantation, 46% and 57%, respectively. The trial did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in the primary end point, 2-year PFS, between the donor sources.
-
6.
Prospective study of nonmyeloablative, HLA-mismatched unrelated BMT with high-dose posttransplantation cyclophosphamide
Kasamon, Y. L., Ambinder, R. F., Fuchs, E. J., Zahurak, M., Rosner, G. L., Bolanos-Meade, J., Levis, M. J., Gladstone, D. E., Huff, C. A., Swinnen, L. J., et al
Blood Advances. 2017;1(4):288-292
Abstract
Allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (BMT) candidates may lack HLA-matched, related haploidentical, and unrelated umbilical cord options. Barriers to partially HLA-mismatched, unrelated donor (mMUD) BMT include excess graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), graft failure, and death. We prospectively studied nonmyeloablative (NMA) mMUD BMT with high-dose posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for patients with hematologic malignancies. Three transplants were performed with busulfan/fludarabine conditioning, with subsequent change to fludarabine/Cy/total body irradiation (flu/Cy/TBI). Twenty mMUD transplants are reported using flu/Cy/TBI, T-cell replete bone marrow grafts, and PTCy, mycophenolate mofetil, and sirolimus or tacrolimus (1 patient) for GVHD prophylaxis. The median patient age was 56. Ofthese unrelated grafts, 45% had >=2 mismatched HLA loci, 25% had >=3 mismatched loci, and 50% had HLA-C mismatches. No graft failure or grades 3-4 acute GVHD occurred. The median times to neutrophil recovery (>=500/muL) and platelet recovery (>=20 000/muL) were 19 days and 31 days, respectively. Full-donor chimerism was achieved in 95% of evaluable patients by day 60. The 180-day probability of grades 2-4 acute GVHD (all grade 2) was 25%, and the 1-year probability of any chronic GVHD was 16% (none severe). The 2-year nonrelapse mortality probability was 6%. With 4-year median follow-up, the 1-year progression-free and overall survival probabilities were 65% and 75%, respectively. NMA, T-cell replete mMUD BMT is thus a potentially viable option for patients without other suitable donors. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01203722. Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.
-
7.
Major Histocompatibility Mismatch and Donor Choice for Second Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation
Imus, P. H., Blackford, A. L., Bettinotti, M., Iglehart, B., Dietrich, A., Tucker, N., Symons, H., Cooke, K. R., Luznik, L., Fuchs, E. J., et al
Biology of Blood & Marrow Transplantation. 2017;23(11):1887-1894
Abstract
Large alternative donor pools provide the potential for selecting a different donor for a second allogeneic (allo) bone or marrow transplant (BMT). As HLA disparity may contribute to the graft-versus-tumor effect, utilizing new mismatched haplotype donors may potentially improve the antitumor activity for relapsed hematologic malignancies despite a previous alloBMT. Data from patients who received a second alloBMT for relapsed hematologic malignancies at Johns Hopkins were analyzed. Outcomes were compared between patients who received a second allograft with the same MHC composition and those who received an allograft with a new mismatched haplotype. Loss of heterozygosity analysis was performed for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) whose first allograft was haploidentical. Between 2005 and 2015, 40 patients received a second BMT for a relapsed hematologic malignancy. The median follow-up is 750 (range, 26 to 2950) days. The median overall survival (OS) in the cohort is 928 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 602 to not reached [NR]); median event-free survival (EFS) for the cohort is 500 days (95% CI, 355 to NR). The 4-year OS is 40% (95% CI, 25% to 64%), and the 4-year EFS is 36% (95% CI, 24% to 55%). The cumulative incidence of nonrelapsed mortality by 2 years was 27% (95% CI, 13% to 42%). The cumulative incidence of grade 3 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at 100 days was 15% (95% CI, 4% to 26%); the cumulative incidence of extensive chronic GVHD at 2 years was 22% (95% CI, 9% to 36%). The median survival was 552 days (95% CI, 376 to 2950+) in the group who underwent transplantation with a second allograft that did not harbor a new mismatched haplotype, while it was not reached in the group whose allograft contained a new mismatched haplotype (hazard ratio [HR], .36; 95% CI, .14 to .9; P=.02). EFS was also longer in the group who received an allograft containing a new mismatched haplotype, (NR versus 401 days; HR, .50; 95% CI, .22 to 1.14; P=.09). Although the allograft for this patient's second BMT contained a new mismatched haplotype, AML nevertheless relapsed a second time. Second BMTs are feasible and provide a reasonable chance of long-term survival. An allograft with a new mismatched haplotype may improve outcomes after second BMTs for relapsed hematologic malignancies.Copyright © 2017 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.