-
1.
A Simple Prognostic System in Myelofibrosis Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant: A CIBMTR/EBMT analysis
Tamari, R., McLornan, D. P., Ahn, K. W., Estrada-Merly, N., Hernandez-Boluda, J. C., Giralt, S. A., Palmer, J. M., Gale, R. P., DeFilipp, Z., Marks, D., et al
Blood advances. 2023
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
To develop a prognostic model for patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for myelofibrosis (MF). We examined 623 patients undergoing allo-HCT between 2000 - 2016 in the USA (CIBMTR cohort). A Cox multivariable model was used to identify factors prognostic of mortality. A weighted score using these factors was assigned to patients transplanted in Europe (EBMT cohort) (n = 623). Age above 50 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98 -1.96), and HLA matched unrelated donor (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.98-1.7) were associated with increased hazard of death and were assigned 1 point. Hemoglobin lower than 100g/L at time of transplant (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.2- 2.19), and a mismatched unrelated donor (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.25- 2.52), were assigned 2 points. The 3-year overall survival (OS) in patients with a low (1-2 points), intermediate (3-4 points) and high score (5 points) were 69% (95% CI, 61% -76 %), 51 % (95% CI, 46% -56.4 %), and 34% (95% CI, 21% - 49%), respectively (P. < 0.001). Increasing score was predictive of increased transplant related mortality (TRM) (P .0017) but not for relapse (P. 0.12). The derived score was predictive for OS (P. < 0.001) and TRM (P. 0.002) but not relapse (P. 17) in the EBMT cohort as well. The proposed system was prognostic of survival in two large cohorts, CIBMTR and EBMT, and can easily be applied by clinicians consulting patients with MF on transplant outcomes.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults aged 40 or over undergoing allogeneic transplantation for myelofibrosis and reported to the CIBMTR or EBMT registries (n=1246)
Intervention
Cox regression model of prognostic factors developed with patients from the CIBMTR registry (n=623)
Comparison
Validation of the model using a cohort from the EBMT registry (n=623)
Outcome
Age above 50 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98 -1.96), and HLA matched unrelated donor (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.98-1.7) were associated with increased hazard of death and were assigned 1 point. Hemoglobin lower than 100g/L at time of transplant (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.2- 2.19), and a mismatched unrelated donor (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.25- 2.52), were assigned 2 points. The 3-year overall survival (OS) in patients with a low (1-2 points), intermediate (3-4 points) and high score (5 points) were 69% (95% CI, 61% -76 %), 51 % (95% CI, 46% -56.4 %), and 34% (95% CI, 21% - 49%), respectively. Increasing score was predictive of increased transplant related mortality (TRM) but not for relapse. The derived score was predictive for OS and TRM but not relapse in the EBMT cohort as well.
-
2.
Association between the choice of the conditioning regimen and outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis
Murthy, G. S. G., Kim, S., Estrada-Merly, N., Abid, M. B., Aljurf, M., Assal, A., Badar, T., Badawy, S. M., Ballen, K., Beitinjaneh, A., et al
Haematologica. 2023
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only curative treatment for myelofibrosis. However, the optimal conditioning regimen either with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) or myeloablative conditioning (MAC) is not well known. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database, we identified adults aged ≥18 years with myelofibrosis undergoing allo-HCT between 2008-2019 and analyzed the outcomes separately in the RIC and MAC cohorts based on the conditioning regimens used. Among 872 eligible patients, 493 underwent allo-HCT using RIC (Fludarabine/busulfan=166, Fludarabine/melphalan=327) and 379 using MAC (Fludarabine/busulfan=247, Busulfan/cyclophosphamide=132). In multivariable analysis with RIC, Fludarabine/melphalan was associated with inferior overall survival (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.15-2.81, p=0.009), higher early non-relapse mortality (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.12-2.91, p=0.01) and higher acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) (grade II-IV- HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.03-2.03, p=0.03; grade III-IV HR 2.21, 95%CI 1.28-3.83, p=0.004) compared to Fludarabine/busulfan. In the MAC setting, Busulfan/cyclophosphamide was associated with a higher acute GVHD (grade II-IV HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.67-3.25, p<0.001; grade III-IV HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.52-3.52, p<0.001) and inferior GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.49-2.53, p<0.001) as compared to Fludarabine/busulfan. Hence, our study suggests that Fludarabine/busulfan is associated with better outcomes in RIC (better overall survival, lower early non-relapse mortality, lower acute GVHD) and MAC (lower acute GVHD and better GRFS) in myelofibrosis.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults with myelofibrosis undergoing allogeneic HSCT between 2008-2019 and reported to the CIBMTR database (n=872)
Intervention
Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens (n=493): fludarabine/busulfan (n=166) or fludarabine/melphalan (n=327)
Comparison
Myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens (n=379): fludarabine/busulfan (n=247) or busulfan/cyclophosphamide (n=132).
Outcome
In multivariable analysis with RIC, fludarabine/melphalan was associated with inferior overall survival (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.15-2.81), higher early non-relapse mortality (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.12-2.91,) and higher acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) (grade II-IV- HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.03-2.03; grade III-IV HR 2.21, 95%CI 1.28-3.83) compared to fludarabine/busulfan. In the MAC setting, busulfan/cyclophosphamide was associated with a higher acute GVHD (grade II-IV HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.67-3.25; grade III-IV HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.52-3.52) and inferior GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.49-2.53) as compared to fludarabine/busulfan.
-
3.
Posttransplantation Cyclophosphamide-based Graft versus Host Disease Prophylaxis with Non-myeloablative Conditioning for Blood or Marrow Transplantation for Myelofibrosis
Jain, T., Tsai, H. L., DeZern, A. E., Gondek, L. P., Elmariah, H., Bolaños-Meade, J., Luznik, L., Fuchs, E., Ambinder, R., Gladstone, D. E., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2022
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
We describe outcomes with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide and non-myeloablative conditioning based allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation for myelofibrosis using matched or mismatched, family or unrelated donors. The conditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation. Forty-two patients, with a median age of 63 years, were included, of whom 19% had intermediate-1, 60% had intermediate-2, and 21% had high-risk DIPSS-plus disease, and 60% had atleast one high-risk somatic mutation. Over 90% patients engrafted neutrophils at a median of 19.5 days and 7% had graft failure. At 1 and 3-years, respectively, the overall survival was 65% and 60%, relapse-free survival was 65% and 31%, relapse was 5% and 40%, and non-relapse mortality was 30% and 30%. Acute graft versus host disease grade 3-4 was noted in 17% at 1 year and chronic graft versus host disease requiring systemic therapy in 12% patients. Spleen size ≥ 17 cm or prior splenectomy was associated with inferior relapse-free survival (HR 3.50, 95% CI 1.18-10.37, P=0.02) and higher relapse rate (SDHR not calculable, P=0.01). Age > 60 years (SDHR 0.26, 95% CI: 0.08-0.80, P=0.02) and peripheral blood graft (SDHR 0.34, 95% CI 0.11-0.99, P=0.05) was associated with lower risk of relapse. In our limited sample, the presence of a high-risk mutation was not statistically significantly associated with an inferior outcome although ASXL1 was suggestive of inferior survival (SDHR 2.36. 95% CI 0.85-6.6, P=0.09). Overall, this approach shows comparable outcomes as previously reported and underscores the importance of spleen size in evaluation of transplant candidates.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with high-risk Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS)-plus myelofibrosis (n=42)
Intervention
Matched or mismatched allogeneic transplantation with non-myeloablative conditioning, and post-transplant cyclophosphamide
Comparison
None
Outcome
Over 90% patients engrafted neutrophils at a median of 19.5 days and 7% had graft failure. At 1 and 3-years, respectively, the overall survival was 65% and 60%, relapse-free survival was 65% and 31%, relapse was 5% and 40%, and non-relapse mortality was 30% and 30%. Acute graft versus host disease grade 3-4 was noted in 17% at 1 year and chronic graft versus host disease requiring systemic therapy in 12% patients. Spleen size ≥ 17 cm or prior splenectomy was associated with inferior relapse-free survival (HR 3.50, 95% CI 1.18-10.37) and higher relapse rate (SDHR not calculable). Age > 60 years (SDHR 0.26, 95% CI: 0.08-0.80) and peripheral blood graft (SDHR 0.34, 95% CI 0.11-0.99) was associated with lower risk of relapse. In our limited sample, the presence of a high-risk mutation was not statistically significantly associated with an inferior outcome although ASXL1 was suggestive of inferior survival (SDHR 2.36. 95% CI 0.85-6.6).
-
4.
HLA-Matching with PTCy: A Reanalysis of a CIBMTR Dataset with Propensity Score Matching and Donor Age
Ambinder, A. J., Jain, T., Tsai, H. L., Horowitz, M. M., Jones, R. J., Varadhan, R.
Blood advances. 2022
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Blood or marrow transplantation (BMT) outcomes using haploidentical donors (Haplo) and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis compare favorably to using HLA-matched donors with calcineurin inhibitor-based GVHD prophylaxis. A recent CIBMTR analysis of patients receiving homogenous PTCy-based prophylaxis found that, with reduced intensity conditioning, Haplo BMTs had worse outcomes than matched unrelated donor (MUD) BMTs. Due to significant differences in characteristics between the groups, we reanalyzed the dataset using propensity score matching and, additionally, added a donor age variable. MUD BMTs were matched to Haplo BMTs in a 1:5 ratio. After matching, no significant differences were found between groups across all measured baseline characteristics. Outcomes analyses demonstrated no significant differences in overall survival (HR of mortality with MUD vs Haplo [95% CI], 0.95[0.65-1.16], P=0.75), disease free survival (HR of relapse or death, 0.98[0.73-1.18], P=0.89), relapse rate (HR, 1.06[0.77-1.38], P=0.69), or non-relapse mortality (HR, 0.85[0.42-1.13], P=0.49) between the two groups. After stratification by conditioning intensity, MUD BMTs in the RIC cohort had a lower risk of NRM (HR, 0.56 [0.14-0.99], P=0.05), with no significant difference in other clinical outcomes. These results suggest that the effect of HLA matching on BMT outcomes with PTCy is less meaningful than previously reported and observed differences resulted in part from differences in donor age. Timely identification of a young, at least half-matched (related or unrelated) donor may be more important than finding a matched donor, if the latter leads to a substantial delay in BMT or use of an older donor.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults with acute myeloid leukaemia, acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in first or second complete remission, or myelodysplastic syndromes attending 111 bone marrow transplantation (BMT) centres across the USA and reported to the CIBMTR registry (n=837)
Intervention
BMT from haploidentical donors (Haplo, n=637, subset receiving reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) n=341)
Comparison
BMT from matched unrelated donors (MUD, n=200, subset receiving RIC n=114)
Outcome
After matching, no significant differences were found between groups across all measured baseline characteristics. Outcomes analyses demonstrated no significant differences in overall survival (HR of mortality with MUD vs Haplo [95% CI], 0.95[0.65-1.16]), disease free survival (HR of relapse or death, 0.98[0.73-1.18]), relapse rate (HR, 1.06[0.77-1.38]), or non-relapse mortality (HR, 0.85[0.42-1.13]) between the two groups. After stratification by conditioning intensity, MUD BMTs in the RIC cohort had a lower risk of non-relapse mortality (HR, 0.56 [0.14-0.99]), with no significant difference in other clinical outcomes.
-
5.
Fludarabine and Melphalan Compared with Reduced Doses of Busulfan and Fludarabine Improves Transplant Outcomes in Older MDS Patients
Oran, B., Ahn, K. W., Fretham, C., Beitinjaneh, A., Bashey, A., Pawarode, A., Wirk, B., Scott, B. L., Savani, B. N., Bredeson, C., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2021
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens developed to extend allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) to older patients have resulted in encouraging outcomes. We aimed to compare the two most commonly used RIC regimens, intravenous use of fludarabine with busulfan (FluBu) and fludarabine with melphalan (FluMel), in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Through CIBMTR, we identified 1045 MDS patients aged = 60 years who underwent first HSCT with a matched related or matched (8/8) unrelated donor using RIC. CIBMTR's definition of RIC was used: a regimen that incorporated an intravenous busulfan total dose = 7.2 mg/kg, or a low-dose melphalan total dose of = 150 mg/m(2). The two groups, FluBu (n=697) and FluMel (n=448), were comparable for disease and transplant-related characteristics except for the more frequent use of anti-thymocyte globulin or alemtuzumab in the FluBu group (39% vs. 31%). The median age was 67 in both groups. FluMel was associated with a reduced relapse incidence (RI) compared with FluBu, with a 1-year adjusted incidence of 26% vs. 44% (p=0.0001). Transplant-related mortality (TRM) was higher with FluMel compared with FluBu (26% vs. 16%, p=0.0001). Since the magnitude of improvement with FluMel in RI was greater than the improvement in TRM with FluBu, disease-free survival (DFS) was improved at 1-year and beyond with FluMel compared with FluBu (48% vs. 40% at 1 year, p=0.02, and 35% vs. 27% at 3 years, p=0.01). Overall survival (OS) was comparable at 1 year (63% vs. 61%, p=0.4) but significantly improved with FluMel compared with FluBu at 3 years (46% vs. 39%, p=0.03). Our results suggest that FluMel is associated with superior DFS compared with FluBu due to reduced RI in older MDS patients.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with myelodysplastic syndrome aged >/=60 years who underwent first HSCT with a matched related or matched (8/8) unrelated donor, and were reported to the CIBMTR registry (n=1045)
Intervention
Reduced intensity regimen incorporating an intravenous busulfan total dose = 7.2 mg/kg (FluBu, n=697)
Comparison
Reduced intensity regimen incorporating a low-dose melphalan total dose of = 150 mg/m(2) (FluMel, n=448)
Outcome
The two groups were comparable for disease and transplant-related characteristics except for the more frequent use of anti-thymocyte globulin or alemtuzumab in the FluBu group (39% vs. 31%). The median age was 67 in both groups. FluMel was associated with a reduced relapse incidence (RI) compared with FluBu, with a 1-year adjusted incidence of 26% vs. 44%. Transplant-related mortality (TRM) was higher with FluMel compared with FluBu (26% vs. 16%). Since the magnitude of improvement with FluMel in RI was greater than the improvement in TRM with FluBu, disease-free survival (DFS) was improved at 1-year and beyond with FluMel compared with FluBu (48% vs. 40% at 1 year, and 35% vs. 27% at 3 years). Overall survival (OS) was comparable at 1 year (63% vs. 61%) but significantly improved with FluMel compared with FluBu at 3 years (46% vs. 39%). Our results suggest that FluMel is associated with superior DFS compared with FluBu due to reduced RI in older MDS patients.
-
6.
Reduced intensity conditioning for acute myeloid leukemia using melphalan- vs busulfan-based regimens: a CIBMTR report
Zhou, Z., Nath, R., Cerny, J., Wang, H. L., Zhang, M. J., Abdel-Azim, H., Agrawal, V., Ahmed, G., Al-Homsi, A. S., Aljurf, M., et al
Blood advances. 2020;4(13):3180-3190
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
There is a lack of large comparative study on the outcomes of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) transplantation using fludarabine/busulfan (FB) and fludarabine/melphalan (FM) regimens. Adult AML patients from Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research who received first RIC allo-transplant between 2001 and 2015 were studied. Patients were excluded if they received cord blood or identical twin transplant, total body irradiation in conditioning, or graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with in vitro T-cell depletion. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS), secondary end points were leukemia-free survival (LFS), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), relapse, and GVHD. Multivariate survival model was used with adjustment for patient, leukemia, and transplant-related factors. A total of 622 patients received FM and 791 received FB RIC. Compared with FB, the FM group had fewer transplant in complete remission (CR), fewer matched sibling donors, and less usage of anti-thymocyte globulin or alemtuzumab. More patients in the FM group received marrow grafts and had transplantation before 2005. OS was significantly lower within the first 3 months posttransplant in the FM group (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.82, P < .001), but was marginally superior beyond 3 months (HR = 0.87, P = .05). LFS was better with FM compared with FB (HR = 0.89, P = .05). NRM was significantly increased in the FM group during the first 3 months of posttransplant (HR = 3.85, P < .001). Long-term relapse was lower with FM (HR = 0.65, P < .001). Analysis restricted to patients with CR showed comparable results. In conclusion, compared with FB, the FM RIC showed a marginally superior long-term OS and LFS and a lower relapse rate. A lower OS early posttransplant within 3 months was largely the result of a higher early NRM.
PICO Summary
Population
Adult AML patients from Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research who received first RIC allo-transplant between 2001 and 2015 (n=1413)
Intervention
Fludarabine/busulfan reduced intensity conditioning regimen (FB, n=791)
Comparison
Fludarabine/melphalan reduced intensity conditioning regimen (FM, n=622)
Outcome
Compared with FB, the FM group had fewer transplant in complete remission (CR), fewer matched sibling donors, and less usage of anti-thymocyte globulin or alemtuzumab. More patients in the FM group received marrow grafts and had transplantation before 2005. OS was significantly lower within the first 3 months posttransplant in the FM group (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.82), but was marginally superior beyond 3 months (HR = 0.87). LFS was better with FM compared with FB (HR = 0.89). NRM was significantly increased in the FM group during the first 3 months of posttransplant (HR = 3.85). Long-term relapse was lower with FM (HR = 0.65). Analysis restricted to patients with CR showed comparable results.
-
7.
Allogeneic transplantation for Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide
Webster, J. A., Luznik, L., Tsai, H. L., Imus, P. H., DeZern, A. E., Pratz, K. W., Levis, M. J., Gojo, I., Showel, M. M., Prince, G., et al
Blood advances. 2020;4(20):5078-5088
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (alloBMT) is standard of care for adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) in first complete remission (CR1). The routine pretransplant and posttransplant use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has dramatically improved outcomes, but the optimal conditioning regimen, donor type, and TKI remain undefined. The bone marrow transplant database at Johns Hopkins was queried for adult patients with de novo Ph+ ALL who received alloBMT using posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as a component of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis from 2008 to 2018. Among transplants for Ph+ ALL, 69 (85%) were performed in CR1, and 12 (15%) were performed in second or greater remission (CR2+). The majority of transplants (58%) were HLA haploidentical. Nearly all patients (91.4%) initiated TKI posttransplant. For patients in CR1, the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 66%. The use of nonmyeloablative conditioning, absence of measurable residual disease (MRD) according to flow cytometry at transplant, and the use of dasatinib vs imatinib at diagnosis were associated with improved overall survival (OS) and RFS. Neither donor type nor recipient age ≥60 years affected RFS. When analyzing all transplants, alloBMT in CR1 (vs CR2+) and the absence of pretransplant MRD were associated with improved RFS. Most relapses were associated with the emergence of kinase domain mutations. The cumulative incidence of grade 3 to 4 acute GVHD at 1 year was 9%, and moderate to severe chronic GVHD at 2 years was 8%. Nonmyeloablative alloBMT with PTCy for Ph+ ALL in an MRD-negative CR1 after initial treatment with dasatinib yields favorable outcomes.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) undergoing allogeneic transplantation (n=76)
Intervention
Myeloablative conditioning in first complete remission (CR1 MAC, n=26); Non-myeloablative conditioning in first complete remission (CR1 NMAC, n=43)
Comparison
Patients in second or subsequent remission (CR2+, n=12)
Outcome
For patients in CR1, the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 66%. The use of nonmyeloablative conditioning, absence of measurable residual disease (MRD) according to flow cytometry at transplant, and the use of dasatinib vs imatinib at diagnosis were associated with improved overall survival (OS) and RFS. Neither donor type nor recipient age ≥60 years affected RFS. When analyzing all transplants, alloBMT in CR1 (vs CR2+) and the absence of pretransplant MRD were associated with improved RFS. Most relapses were associated with the emergence of kinase domain mutations. The cumulative incidence of grade 3 to 4 acute GVHD at 1 year was 9%, and moderate to severe chronic GVHD at 2 years was 8%.
-
8.
Choosing a Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation, Fludarabine Busulfan versus Fludarabine Melphalan: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Jain, T., Alahdab, F., Firwana, B., Sonbol, M. B., Almader-Douglas, D., Palmer, J.
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2018
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Fludarabine with busulfan (FB) or melphalan (FM) are two more commonly used reduced intensity conditioning regimens for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HCT).We present a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing these two RIC regimens. We searched electronic databases from inception through November 1(st), 2017 for literature search to identify relevant studies. DerSimonian random effects model was used to measure efficacy outcomes; hazard ratios and corresponding 95% confidence interval are reported. Seven studies, including a total of 1,955 patients, met criteria for inclusion of which 6 were included in the overall pooled analysis due to repetition of some patients in two studies. Three studies were included in the subgroup analysis of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML)/ myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and two in the subgroup analysis of lymphoid malignancies. Overall survival and progression free survival were not statistically significantly different between the two RIC regimens in analysis of all studies. However, overall survival was better with FM in subgroup analysis of AML/MDS studies (HR 0.83; 95% CI .73 - .95). Non relapse mortality was lower with FB (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.46 - 0.89) while relapse was lower with FM (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.13 - 2.06) in the analysis of all studies. This meta-analysis shows that FB and FM are associated with a similar overall survival in patients undergoing HCT. Relapse rates are lower with FM but at the cost of higher non-relapse mortality.
-
9.
Evaluation of Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) for transplant-eligible multiple myeloma patients
Gonzalez-Calle, V., Slack, A., Keane, N., Luft, S., Pearce, K. E., Ketterling, R. P., Jain, T., Chirackal, S., Reeder, C., Mikhael, J., et al
Annals of hematology. 2018
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
The International Myeloma Working Group has proposed the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) for risk stratification of multiple myeloma (MM) patients. There are a limited number of studies that have validated this risk model in the autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) setting. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the applicability and value for predicting survival of the R-ISS model in 134 MM patients treated with new agents and ASCT at the Mayo Clinic in Arizona and the University Hospital of Salamanca in Spain. The patients were reclassified at diagnosis according to the R-ISS: 44 patients (33%) had stage I, 75 (56%) had stage II, and 15 (11%) had stage III. After a median follow-up of 60 months, R-ISS assessed at diagnosis was an independent predictor for overall survival (OS) after ASCT, with median OS not reached, 111 and 37 months for R-ISS I, II and III, respectively (P < 0.001). We also found that patients belonging to R-ISS II and having high-risk chromosomal abnormalities (CA) had a significant shorter median OS than those with R-ISS II without CA: 70 vs. 111 months, respectively. Therefore, this study lends further support for the R-ISS as a reliable prognostic tool for estimating survival in transplant myeloma patients and suggests the importance of high-risk CA in the R-ISS II group.