-
1.
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is equally effective in secondary acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) compared to de-novo ALL-a report from the EBMT registry
Sadowska-Klasa, A., Zaucha, J. M., Labopin, M., Bourhis, J. H., Blaise, D., Yakoub-Agha, I., Salmenniemi, U., Passweg, J., Fegueux, N., Schroeder, T., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2024
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Secondary acute lymphoblastic leukemia (s-ALL) comprises up to 10% of ALL patients. However, data regarding s-ALL outcomes is limited. To answer what is the role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in s-ALL, a matched-pair analysis in a 1:2 ratio was conducted to compare outcomes between s-ALL and de novo ALL (dn-ALL) patients reported between 2000-2021 to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry. Among 9720 ALL patients, 351 (3.6%) were s-ALL, of which 80 were in first complete remission (CR1) with a known precedent primary diagnosis 58.8% solid tumor (ST), 41.2% hematological diseases (HD). The estimated 2-year relapse incidence (RI) was 19.1% (95%CI: 11-28.9), leukemia-free survival (LFS) 52.1% (95%CI: 39.6-63.2), non-relapse mortality (NRM) 28.8% (95%CI: 18.4-40), GvHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) 39.4% (95%CI: 27.8-50.7), and overall survival (OS) 60.8% (95%CI: 47.9-71.4), and did not differ between ST and HD patients. In a matched-pair analysis, there was no difference in RI, GRFS, NRM, LFS, or OS between s-ALL and dn-ALL except for a higher incidence of chronic GvHD (51.9% vs. 31.4%) in s-ALL. To conclude, patients with s-ALL who received HCT in CR1 have comparable outcomes to patients with dn-ALL.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, reported to the EBMT registry (n=9720)
Intervention
A detailed analysis cohort who were transplanted for secondary acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (s-ALL, n=80)
Comparison
Matched controls who were transplanted for de novo ALL (dn-ALL, n=80)
Outcome
The estimated 2-year relapse incidence (RI) was 19.1% (95%CI: 11-28.9), leukemia-free survival (LFS) 52.1% (95%CI: 39.6-63.2), non-relapse mortality (NRM) 28.8% (95%CI: 18.4-40), GvHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) 39.4% (95%CI: 27.8-50.7), and overall survival (OS) 60.8% (95%CI: 47.9-71.4), and did not differ between solid tumour and haematological disease patients. In a matched-pair analysis, there was no difference in RI, GRFS, NRM, LFS, or OS between s-ALL and dn-ALL except for a higher incidence of chronic GvHD (51.9% vs. 31.4%) in s-ALL.
-
2.
Prophylaxis and management of graft-versus-host disease after stem-cell transplantation for haematological malignancies: updated consensus recommendations of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Penack, O., Marchetti, M., Aljurf, M., Arat, M., Bonifazi, F., Duarte, R. F., Giebel, S., Greinix, H., Hazenberg, M. D., Kröger, N., et al
The Lancet. Haematology. 2024
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major factor contributing to mortality and morbidity after allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). In the last 3 years, there has been regulatory approval of new drugs and considerable change in clinical approaches to prophylaxis and management of GVHD. To standardise treatment approaches, the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) has updated its clinical practice recommendations. We formed a panel of one methodologist and 22 experts in the field of GVHD management. The selection was made on the basis of their role in GVHD management in Europe and their contributions to the field, such as publications, presentations at conferences, and other research. We applied the GRADE process to ten PICO (patient, intervention, comparator, and outcome) questions: evidence was searched for by the panel and graded for each crucial outcome. In two consensus meetings, we discussed the evidence and voted on the wording and strengths of recommendations. Key updates to the recommendations include: (1) primary use of ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory acute GVHD and steroid-refractory chronic GVHD as the new standard of care, (2) use of rabbit anti-T-cell (thymocyte) globulin or post-transplantation cyclophosphamide as standard GVHD prophylaxis in peripheral blood stem-cell transplantations from unrelated donors, and (3) the addition of belumosudil to the available treatment options for steroid-refractory chronic GVHD. The EBMT proposes to use these recommendations as the basis for routine management of GVHD during allogenic HSCT. The current recommendations favour European practice and do not necessarily represent global preferences.
PICO Summary
Population
Panel of 22 experts and one methdologist convened by the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)
Intervention
Update of the EBMT consensus recommendations
Comparison
Outcome
Key updates to the recommendations include: (1) primary use of ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory acute GVHD and steroid-refractory chronic GVHD as the new standard of care, (2) use of rabbit anti-T-cell (thymocyte) globulin or post-transplantation cyclophosphamide as standard GVHD prophylaxis in peripheral blood stem-cell transplantations from unrelated donors, and (3) the addition of belumosudil to the available treatment options for steroid-refractory chronic GVHD.
-
3.
Fludarabine versus cyclophospamide in combination with myeloablative total body irradiation as conditioning for patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. A study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Giebel, S., Labopin, M., Schroeder, T., Swoboda, R., Maertens, J., Bourhis, J. H., Grillo, G., Salmenniemi, U., Hilgendorf, I., Kröger, N., et al
American journal of hematology. 2023
-
-
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Total body irradiation (TBI) at a dose of 12 Gy combined with cyclophosphamide (CyTBI12Gy) is one of the standard myeloablative regimens for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). In clinical practice, cyclophosphamide may be substituted with fludarabine (FluTBI12Gy) to reduce toxicity. We retrospectively compared outcomes of CyTBI12Gy with FluTBI12Gy for patients with AML treated in complete remission (CR) with allo-HCT from either a matched sibling or unrelated donor. Of 1684 adults who met inclusion criteria, 109 patients in each group were included in a matched-pair analysis. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years was 25% in the FluTBI12Gy compared to 28% in the CyTBI12Gy group (p = .44) while non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 17% versus 19%, (p = .89) respectively. The rates of leukemia-free survival and overall survival were 65% versus 54% (p = .28) and 70% versus 60.5% (p = .17). Cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was significantly lower for FluTBI12Gy than CyTBI12Gy (16% vs. 34%, p = .005), while the incidences of grade 3-4 acute GVHD and chronic GVHD did not differ significantly. The probability of GVHD and relapse-free survival was 49% in the FluTBI12Gy and 41% in the CyTBI12Gy group (p = .17). We conclude that for patients with AML treated with allo-HCT in CR, cyclophosphamide may be substituted with fludarabine in a regimen based on TBI at a dose of 12 Gy without negative impact on the efficacy. FluTBI12Gy is associated with reduced risk of grade 2-4 acute GVHD and encouraging survival rates.
PICO Summary
Population
Matched pairs identified from the EBMT registry: adults with AML treated in complete remission treated with allo-HCT from either a matched sibling or unrelated donor (n=218)
Intervention
Total body irradiation at a dose of 12 Gy combined with cyclophosphamide (CyTBI12Gy, n=109)
Comparison
Total body irradiation at a dose of 12 Gy combined with fludarabine (FluTBI12Gy, n=109)
Outcome
The cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years was 25% in the FluTBI12Gy compared to 28% in the CyTBI12Gy group while non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 17% versus 19%, respectively. The rates of leukemia-free survival and overall survival were 65% versus 54% and 70% versus 60.5%. Cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was significantly lower for FluTBI12Gy than CyTBI12Gy (16% vs. 34%), while the incidences of grade 3-4 acute GVHD and chronic GVHD did not differ significantly. The probability of GVHD and relapse-free survival was 49% in the FluTBI12Gy and 41% in the CyTBI12Gy group.
-
4.
Posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based anti-graft-vs-host disease prophylaxis in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated in complete remission with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation from human leukocyte antigen-mismatched unrelated donors versus haploidentical donors: A study on behalf of the ALWP of the EBMT
Nagler, A., Labopin, M., Arat, M., Reményi, P., Koc, Y., Blaise, D., Angelucci, E., Vydra, J., Kulagin, A., Socié, G., et al
Cancer. 2022
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) and haploidentical (haplo) transplantation are valid options in patients with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) lacking a matched donor. METHODS The study compared the outcomes of adult patients with ALL in complete remission (CR) who underwent 9/10 MMUD versus haplo transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in 2010-2020. RESULTS The study included 781 patients (MMUD, 103; haplo, 678). The median age was 40 (19-73) and 38 (18-75) years, respectively (p = .51). The most frequent immunosuppression agents added to PTCy were mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/cyclosporine A and MMF/tacrolimus. In vivo T-cell depletion (anti-thymocyte globulin) was administered to 21% and 8% of the transplants, respectively (p < .0001). Neutrophil (absolute neutrophil count >0.5 × 10(9) /L) recovery was achieved in 97.1% versus 96.7% versus (p = 1) in MMUD and haplo, respectively. Nonrelapse mortality and relapse incidence were not significantly different between MMUD and haplo, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.45 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-2.62; p = .21) and HR = 0.81 (95% CI, 0.52-1.28, p = .38), respectively. HRs for leukemia-free survival, overall survival, and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival were respectively, HR = 1.05 (95% CI, 0.73-1.50, p = .8), HR = 1.17 (95% CI, 0.77-1.76, p = .46), and HR = 1.07 (95% CI, 0.78-1.46, p = .7) for haplo compared to MMUD. Acute (a)GVHD grade 2-4 was significantly higher with haplo, HR = 1.73 (95% CI, 1.08-2.76, p = .023), whereas aGVHD grade 3-4 and chronic GVHD did not differ significantly between the two transplant groups. CONCLUSION Outcomes of MMUD and haplo transplants with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis for ALL patients in CR are similar, apart from a higher incidence of aGVHD with haplo transplants.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in complete remission, lacking a matched donor (n=781)
Intervention
9/10 mismatched unrelated donor transplantation (MMUD, n=103)
Comparison
Haploidentical transplantation (haplo, n=678)
Outcome
Neutrophil (absolute neutrophil count >0.5 × 10(9) /L) recovery was achieved in 97.1% versus 96.7% versus in MMUD and haplo, respectively. Nonrelapse mortality and relapse incidence were not significantly different between MMUD and haplo, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.45 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-2.62) and HR = 0.81 (95% CI, 0.52-1.28), respectively. HRs for leukemia-free survival, overall survival, and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival were respectively, HR = 1.05 (95% CI, 0.73-1.50), HR = 1.17 (95% CI, 0.77-1.76), and HR = 1.07 (95% CI, 0.78-1.46) for haplo compared to MMUD. Acute (a)GVHD grade 2-4 was significantly higher with haplo, HR = 1.73 (95% CI, 1.08-2.76), whereas aGVHD grade 3-4 and chronic GVHD did not differ significantly between the two transplant groups.
-
5.
Longitudinal outcome over two decades of unrelated allogeneic stem cell transplantation for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: an ALWP/EBMT analysis
Nagler, A., Ngoya, M., Galimard, J. E., Labopin, M., Bornhäuser, M., Stelljes, M., Finke, J., Ganser, A., Einsele, H., Kröger, N., et al
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2022
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We evaluated outcome of unrelated transplantation for primary refractory/relapsed (ref/rel) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) comparing two cohorts according to the year of transplant, 2000-2009 and 2010-2019. METHODS Multivariable analyses were performed using the Cox proportional-hazards regression model. RESULTS 3430 patients were included, 876 underwent a transplant between 2000-2009 and 2554 in 2010-2019. Median follow up was 8.7 (95% CI: 7.8-9.4) and 3.4 (95% CI: 3.1-3.6) years (p<0.001). Median age was 52 (18-77) and 56 (18-79) years (p<0.0001). 45.5% and 55.5% had refractory AML while 54.5% and 44.5 % had relapsed AML. Conditioning was myeloablative in 60% and 52%, respectively. Neutrophil recovery, day 100 incidence of acute and 2-year incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were similar between the two periods. Two-year relapse incidence was higher for patients transplanted in the 2000-2009 period vs. those transplanted in 2010-2019; 50.2% vs. 45.1%; (hazard ratio (HR)=0.85 (95% CI: 0.74-0.97), p=0. 002). Leukemia-free survival, overall survival and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival were lower for the 2000-2009 period, 26% vs. 32.1% (HR=0.87 (95% CI: 0.78-0.97), p=0.01), 32.1% vs. 38.1% (HR=0.86 (95% CI: 0.77-0.96), p=0.01) and 21.5% vs. 25.3% (HR=0.89 (95% CI: 0.81-0.99), p=0.03, respectively. Two-year non-relapse mortality was not significantly different, 23.8% vs. 23.7% (HR=0.91 (95% CI: 0.76-1.11), p=0.34. CONCLUSION Outcome of unrelated transplantation for patients with ref/rel AML has improved in the last two decades, rescuing about one third of the patients.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults transplanted for refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and reported to the EBMT registry (n=3430)
Intervention
Transplantation between the years 2000-2009 (n=876)
Comparison
Transplantation between the years 2010-2019 (n=2554
Outcome
Median follow up was 8.7 (95% CI: 7.8-9.4) and 3.4 (95% CI: 3.1-3.6) years (2000-2009 and 2010-2019 respectively). Median age was 52 (18-77) and 56 (18-79) years. 45.5% and 55.5% had refractory AML while 54.5% and 44.5 % had relapsed AML. Conditioning was myeloablative in 60% and 52%, respectively. Neutrophil recovery, day 100 incidence of acute and 2-year incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were similar between the two periods. Two-year relapse incidence was higher for patients transplanted in the 2000-2009 period vs. those transplanted in 2010-2019; 50.2% vs. 45.1%; (hazard ratio (HR)=0.85 (95% CI: 0.74-0.97)). Leukemia-free survival, overall survival and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival were lower for the 2000-2009 period, 26% vs. 32.1% (HR=0.87 (95% CI: 0.78-0.97), 32.1% vs. 38.1% (HR=0.86 (95% CI: 0.77-0.96)) and 21.5% vs. 25.3% (HR=0.89 (95% CI: 0.81-0.99), respectively. Two-year non-relapse mortality was not significantly different, 23.8% vs. 23.7% (HR=0.91 (95% CI: 0.76-1.11).
-
6.
Total body irradiation plus fludarabine versus thiotepa, busulfan plus fludarabine as a myeloablative conditioning for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation. A study by the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT
Swoboda, R., Labopin, M., Giebel, S., Angelucci, E., Arat, M., Aljurf, M., Sica, S., Pavlu, J., Socié, G., Bernasconi, P., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2022
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Optimal conditioning for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) and post-transplant cyclophosphamide has not been established so far. We retrospectively compared outcomes for two myeloablative regimens: fludarabine + total body irradiation (Flu-TBI, n = 117) and thiotepa + iv. busulfan + fludarabine (TBF, n = 119). Patients transplanted either in complete remission (CR) or with active disease were included in the analysis. The characteristics of both groups were comparable except for patients treated with TBF were older. In univariate analysis the incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 2 years was increased for TBF compared to Flu-TBI (31% vs. 19.5%, p = 0.03). There was a tendency towards reduced incidence of relapse after TBF (p = 0.11). Results of multivariate analysis confirmed a reduced risk of NRM using Flu-TBI (HR = 0.49, p = 0.03). In the analysis restricted to patients treated in CR1 or CR2, the use of Flu-TBI was associated with a decreased risk of NRM (HR = 0.34, p = 0.009) but an increased risk of relapse (HR = 2.59, p = 0.01) without significant effect on survival and graft-versus-host disease. We conclude that for haplo-HCT recipients with ALL, Flu-TBI may be preferable for individuals at high risk of NRM while TBF should be considered in cases at high risk of relapse.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with haploidentical (n=haematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (n=236)
Intervention
Fludarabine + total body irradiation conditioning (Flu-TBI, n=117)
Comparison
Thiotepa + iv. busulfan + fludarabine conditioning (TBF, n=119)
Outcome
In univariate analysis the incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 2 years was increased for TBF compared to Flu-TBI (31% vs. 19.5%). There was a tendency towards reduced incidence of relapse after TBF. Results of multivariate analysis confirmed a reduced risk of NRM using Flu-TBI (HR = 0.49). In the analysis restricted to patients treated in CR1 or CR2, the use of Flu-TBI was associated with a decreased risk of NRM (HR = 0.34) but an increased risk of relapse (HR = 2.59) without significant effect on survival and graft-versus-host disease.
-
7.
Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide versus Cyclosporine A and Methotrexate in Matched Sibling Donor Transplantation
Nagler, A., Labopin, M., Dholaria, B., Wu, D., Choi, G., Aljurf, M., Ciceri, F., Gedde-Dahl, T., Meijer, E., Niittyvuopio, R., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2021
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Cyclosporine A and methotrexate (CSA/MTX) is the standard graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimen for matched sibling donor (MSD) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Recently, post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has been shown to be effective in GVHD prevention. In this registry-based study, we compared outcomes of 118 patients with PTCy and 1202 patients with CSA/MTX who underwent MSD allo-HCT for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In a matched-pair analysis, PTCy was associated with a higher incidence of relapse at 2-year (41.1% versus 21.3%, p=0.039) compared to CSA/MTX. The incidence of day 180 grade II-IV acute GVHD (25.2% versus 25.4%, p=0.90) and 2-year chronic GVHD (42.6% versus 42.6%, p=0.84) were comparable between PTCy and CSA/MTX, respectively. Similarly, 2-year leukemia-free survival (LFS, 54.4% versus 74.32%, p=0.052), overall survival (OS, 70.6% versus 79.7%, p=0.15) and GVHD-free-relapse-free survival (GRFS, 38.1% versus 52.5%, p=0.49) were not statistically different between PTCy versus CSA/MTX. In conclusion, GVHD prophylaxis with PTCy is feasible, resulting in similar incidences of GVHD, GRFS, LFS, and OS compared to conventional CSA/MTX in patients undergoing allo-HCT from MSD. The higher relapse observed with PTCy needs further evaluation in a prospective study.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients who underwent matched sibling donor (MSD) allogeneic transplant for acute myeloid leukemia, (AML) reported to the EBMT registry (n=1320)
Intervention
Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy, n=118)
Comparison
Cyclosporine A and methotrexate (CSA/MTX, n=1202)
Outcome
In a matched-pair analysis, PTCy was associated with a higher incidence of relapse at 2-year (41.1% versus 21.3%) compared to CSA/MTX. The incidence of day 180 grade II-IV acute GVHD (25.2% versus 25.4%) and 2-year chronic GVHD (42.6% versus 42.6%) were comparable between PTCy and CSA/MTX, respectively. Similarly, 2-year leukemia-free survival (LFS, 54.4% versus 74.32%), overall survival (OS, 70.6% versus 79.7%) and GVHD-free-relapse-free survival (GRFS, 38.1% versus 52.5%) were not statistically different between PTCy versus CSA/MTX. In conclusion, GVHD prophylaxis with PTCy is feasible, resulting in similar incidences of GVHD, GRFS, LFS, and OS compared to conventional CSA/MTX in patients undergoing allo-HCT from MSD. The higher relapse observed with PTCy needs further evaluation in a prospective study.
-
8.
Outcome of T-cell-replete haploidentical stem cell transplantation improves with time in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Nagler, A., Labopin, M., Koc, Y., Angelucci, E., Tischer, J., Arat, M., Pioltelli, P., Bernasconi, P., Chiusolo, P., Diez-Martin, J. L., et al
Cancer. 2021
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide prophylaxis is gaining traction in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). METHODS The Acute Leukemia Working Party/European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry was used to evaluate the outcomes of adult patients with ALL who underwent haplo-HCT during 2011 through 2015 and compared them with the outcomes of those who underwent transplantation during 2016 through 2018. RESULTS The analysis consisted of 195 patients, including 79 who underwent transplantation during 2011 through 2015 and 116 who underwent transplantation during 2016 through 2018. Overall, the 2-year leukemia-free survival and relapse incidence rates were 56.5% and 21%, respectively. The 100-day incidence of grade 2 through 4 acute graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) was 34.5%. The rates of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS) were 22.5% and 64.7%, respectively. Patients who underwent transplantation during 2016 through 2018 experienced improved rates of leukemia-free survival (64.9% vs 47.3%; P = .019) and OS (75.5% vs 53.5%; P = .006). Patients who underwent transplantation during 2016 through 2018 developed more grade 2 through 4 acute GVHD (42% vs 26.4%; P = .047). The incidence of relapse, GVHD-free/relapse-free survival, grade 3 and 4 acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, and extensive chronic GVHD did not differ significantly between groups. In multivariate analysis, more recently transplanted patients had a significantly reduced risk of NRM (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22-0.89; P = .022) and improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.26-0.86; P = .014). A comparable analysis of patients who had acute myeloid leukemia during the same timeframes did not reveal any statistically significant differences in any outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The outcome of adult patients with ALL who receive posttransplant cyclophosphamide has improved over time, with an impressive 2-year OS of 75% and, most recently, an NRM rate of only 17%.
PICO Summary
Population
Adult patients undergoing haploidentical transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia reported to the EBMT registry (n=195)
Intervention
Haploidentical transplantation between 2016-2018 (n=116)
Comparison
Haploidentical transplantation between 2011-2015 (n=79)
Outcome
For the entire cohort, the 2-year leukemia-free survival and relapse incidence rates were 56.5% and 21%, respectively. The 100-day incidence of grade 2 through 4 acute graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) was 34.5%. The rates of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS) were 22.5% and 64.7%, respectively. Patients who underwent transplantation during 2016 through 2018 experienced improved rates of leukemia-free survival (64.9% vs 47.3%) and OS (75.5% vs 53.5%). Patients who underwent transplantation during 2016 through 2018 developed more grade 2 through 4 acute GVHD (42% vs 26.4%). The incidence of relapse, GVHD-free/relapse-free survival, grade 3 and 4 acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, and extensive chronic GVHD did not differ significantly between groups. In multivariate analysis, more recently transplanted patients had a significantly reduced risk of NRM (hazard ratio, 0.44) and improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.47). A comparable analysis of patients who had acute myeloid leukemia during the same timeframes did not reveal any statistically significant differences in any outcomes.
-
9.
Development and validation of a disease risk stratification system for patients with haematological malignancies: a retrospective cohort study of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry
Shouval, R., Fein, J. A., Labopin, M., Cho, C., Bazarbachi, A., Baron, F., Bug, G., Ciceri, F., Corbacioglu, S., Galimard, J. E., et al
The Lancet. Haematology. 2021;8(3):e205-e215
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnosis and remission status at the time of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) are the principal determinants of overall survival following transplantation. We sought to develop a contemporary disease-risk stratification system (DRSS) that accounts for heterogeneous transplantation indications. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study we included 55 histology and remission status combinations across haematological malignancies, including acute leukaemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and myeloproliferative and myelodysplastic disorders. A total of 47?265 adult patients (aged =18 years) who received an allogeneic HSCT between Jan 1, 2012, and Dec 31, 2016, and were reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry were included. We divided EBMT patients into derivation (n=25?534), tuning (n=18?365), and geographical validation (n=3366) cohorts. Disease combinations were ranked in a multivariable Cox regression for overall survival in the derivation cohort, cutoff for risk groups were evaluated for the tuning cohort, and the selected system was tested on the geographical validation cohort. An independent single-centre US cohort of 660 patients transplanted between Jan 1, 2010, and Dec 31, 2015 was used to externally validate the results. FINDINGS The DRSS model stratified patients in the derivation cohort (median follow-up was 2·1 years [IQR 1·0-3·2]) into five risk groups with increasing mortality risk: low risk (reference group), intermediate-1 (hazard ratio for overall survival 1·26 [95% CI 1·17-1·36], p<0·0001), intermediate-2 (1·53 [1·42-1·66], p<0·0001), high (2·03 [1·86-2·22], p<0·0001), and very high (2·87 [2·63-3·13], p<0·0001). DRSS levels were also associated with a stepwise increase in risk across the tuning and geographical validation cohort. In the external validation cohort (median follow-up was 5·7 years [IQR 4·5-7·1]), the DRSS scheme separated patients into 4 risk groups associated with increasing risk of mortality: intermediate-2 risk (hazard ratio [HR] 1·34 [95% CI 1·04-1·74], p=0·025), high risk (HR 2·03 [95% CI 1·39-2·95], p=0·00023) and very-high risk (HR 2·26 [95% CI 1·62-3·15], p<0·0001) patients compared with the low risk and intermediate-1 risk group (reference group). Across all cohorts, between 64% and 65% of patients were categorised as having intermediate-risk disease by a previous prognostic system (ie, the disease-risk index [DRI]). The DRSS reclassified these intermediate-risk DRI patients, with 855 (6%) low risk, 7111 (51%) intermediate-1 risk, 5700 (41%) intermediate-2 risk, and 375 (3%) high risk or very high risk of 14?041 patients in a subanalysis combining the tuning and internal geographic validation cohorts. The DRI projected 2-year overall survival was 62·1% (95% CI 61·2-62·9) for these 14?041 patients, while the DRSS reclassified them into finer prognostic groups with overall survival ranging from 45·7% (37·4-54·0; very high risk patients) to 73·1% (70·1-76·2; low risk patients). INTERPRETATION The DRSS is a novel risk stratification tool including disease features related to histology, genetic profile, and treatment response. The model should serve as a benchmark for future studies. This system facilitates the interpretation and analysis of studies with heterogeneous cohorts, promoting trial-design with more inclusive populations. FUNDING The Varda and Boaz Dotan Research Center for Hemato-Oncology Research, Tel Aviv University.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults with haematological malignancies who received an allogeneic HSCT reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry (n=47,265)
Intervention
Disease Risk Stratification System (DRSS)
Comparison
Disease Risk Index (DRI)
Outcome
The DRSS scheme separated patients into 4 risk groups associated with increasing risk of mortality: intermediate-2 risk (hazard ratio [HR] 1·34), high risk (HR 2·03]) and very-high risk (HR 2·26) patients compared with the low risk and intermediate-1 risk group (reference group). Across all cohorts, between 64% and 65% of patients were categorised as having intermediate-risk disease by a previous prognostic system (ie, the disease-risk index [DRI]). The DRSS reclassified these intermediate-risk DRI patients, with 855 (6%) low risk, 7111 (51%) intermediate-1 risk, 5700 (41%) intermediate-2 risk, and 375 (3%) high risk or very high risk of 14,041 patients in a subanalysis combining the tuning and internal geographic validation cohorts. The DRI projected 2-year overall survival was 62·1% for these 14,041 patients, while the DRSS reclassified them into finer prognostic groups with overall survival ranging from 45·7% (37·4-54·0; very high risk patients) to 73·1% (70·1-76·2; low risk patients).
-
10.
Long-term results and GvHD after prophylactic and preemptive donor lymphocyte infusion after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute leukemia
Schmid, C., Labopin, M., Schaap, N., Veelken, H., Brecht, A., Stadler, M., Finke, J., Baron, F., Collin, M., Bug, G., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2021
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
We report on 318 patients with acute leukemia, receiving donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in complete hematologic remission (CHR) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). DLI were applied preemptively (preDLI) for minimal residual disease (MRD, n?=?23) or mixed chimerism (MC, n?=?169), or as prophylaxis in high-risk patients with complete chimerism and molecular remission (proDLI, n?=?126). Median interval from alloSCT to DLI1 was 176 days, median follow-up was 7.0 years. Five-year cumulative relapse incidence (CRI), non-relapse mortality (NRM), leukemia-free and overall survival (LFS/OS) of the entire cohort were 29.1%, 12.7%, 58.2%, and 64.3%. Cumulative incidences of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) grade II-IV°/chronic GvHD were 11.9%/31%. Nineteen patients (6%) died from DLI-induced GvHD. Age =60 years (p?=?0.046), advanced stage at transplantation (p?=?0.003), shorter interval from transplantation (p?=?0.018), and prior aGvHD =II° (p?=?0.036) were risk factors for DLI-induced GvHD. GvHD did not influence CRI, but was associated with NRM and lower LFS/OS. Efficacy of preDLI was demonstrated by decreasing MRD/increasing blood counts in 71%, and increasing chimerism in 70%. Five-year OS after preDLI for MRD/MC was 51%/68% among responders, and 37% among non-responders. The study describes response and outcome of DLI in CHR and helps to identify candidates without increased risk of severe GvHD.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with acute leukaemia in complete remission after allogeneic transplant (n=318)
Intervention
Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) for minimal residual disease (MRD, n=23) or mixed chimerism (MC, n=169), or as prophylaxis in high-risk patients with complete chimerism and molecular remission (proDLI, n=126).
Comparison
None
Outcome
Median interval from alloSCT to DLI1 was 176 days, median follow-up was 7.0 years. Five-year cumulative relapse incidence (CRI), non-relapse mortality (NRM), leukemia-free and overall survival (LFS/OS) of the entire cohort were 29.1%, 12.7%, 58.2%, and 64.3%. Cumulative incidences of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) grade II-IV°/chronic GvHD were 11.9%/31%. Nineteen patients (6%) died from DLI-induced GvHD. Age >/=60 years, advanced stage at transplantation, shorter interval from transplantation, and prior aGvHD =II° were risk factors for DLI-induced GvHD. GvHD did not influence cumulative relapse incidence, but was associated with NRM and lower LFS/OS. Efficacy of preDLI was demonstrated by decreasing MRD/increasing blood counts in 71%, and increasing chimerism in 70%. Five-year OS after preDLI for MRD/MC was 51%/68% among responders, and 37% among non-responders