-
1.
Cost-Effectiveness of Unrelated Umbilical Cord Blood vs. HLA Haploidentical Related Bone Marrow Transplant: Evidence from BMT CTN 1101
Ramsey, S. D., Bansal, A., Li, L., O'Donnell, P. V., Fuchs, E. J., Brunstein, C. G., Eapen, M., Thao, V., Roth, J. A., Steuten, L.
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2023
Abstract
BACKGROUND BMT CTN 1101 was a Phase III randomized controlled trial comparing reduced intensity conditioning followed by double unrelated umbilical cord blood (UCB) versus HLA-haploidentical related donor bone marrow (haplo-BM) transplantation for patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to report the results of a parallel cost-effectiveness analysis. STUDY DESIGN Three hundred sixty-eight patients were randomized to unrelated UCB (n=186) or haplo-BM (n=182) transplant. We estimated healthcare utilization and costs using propensity score-matched BMT patients from the OptumLabs(Ⓡ) Data Warehouse for trial participants <65 years and Medicare claims for participants ≥65 years. Weibull models were used to estimate 20-year survival. EQ-5D surveys by trial participants were used estimate Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). RESULTS At 5-year follow-up, survival was 42% for haplo-BM versus 36% for UCB (P=.06). Over a 20-year time horizon, haplo-BM is expected to be more effective (+0.63 QALY) and more costly +$118,953) for persons under 65. For those over 65, haplo-BM is expected to be more effective and less costly. In one-way uncertainty analyses, for persons <65, the cost per QALY result was most sensitive to life years and health state utilities. For persons ≥65, life years were more influential than costs and health state utilities. CONCLUSION Compared to UCB, haplo-BM was moderately cost-effective for patients aged <65 years, and less costly and more effective for persons ≥65 years. Haplo-BM is a fair value choice for commercially insured patients with high-risk leukemia and lymphoma who require HCT. For Medicare enrollees, haplo-BM is a preferred choice when considering costs and outcomes.
-
2.
Alternative donor BMT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide as initial therapy for acquired severe aplastic anemia
DeZern, A., Zahurak, M. L., Symons, H. J., Cooke, K. R., Huff, C. A., Jain, T., Swinnen, L. J., Imus, P. H., Wagner-Johnston, N. D., Ambinder, R. F., et al
Blood. 2023
Abstract
Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a marrow failure disorder with high morbidity and mortality. It is treated with bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for those with fully matched donors or immunosuppressive therapy (IST) for those who lack such a donor, which is often the case for underrepresented minorities. We conducted a prospective phase II trial of reduced-intensity conditioning HLA-haplo BMT and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based graft-versus-host (GVHD) prophylaxis as initial therapy for patients with SAA. The median age was 25 (range 3-63) years and the median follow-up was 40.9 months (95% CI: 29.4, 55.7 mos). Over 35% of enrollment was from underrepresented racial/ethnic groups. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD at day 100 is 7% (95% CI: NA, 17%) and chronic GVHD at 2 years is 4% (95% CI: NA, 11%). The overall survival for 27 patients is 92% (95% CI: 83,100%) at one, two, and three years. The first 7 patients received lower dose total body irradiation (200 versus 400 cGY), but these patients were more likely to have graft failure, 3 of 7, compared to 0 out of 20 patients in the higher dose group (p=0.01, Fisher exact). HLA-haploidentical BMT with PTCy using 400cGY total body irradiation resulted in 100% overall survival with minimal GVHD in 20 consecutive patients. Not only does this approach avoid the ramifications of IST and its low failure-free survival, but also the use of haploidentical donors expands access to BMT across all populations. Clinical trial: NCT02833805.
-
3.
Allogeneic Blood or Marrow Transplantation with Post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma: The Importance of Graft Source
Sterling, C. H., Hughes, M. S., Tsai, H. L., Yarkony, K., Fuchs, E. J., Swinnen, L. J., Paul, S., Bolaños-Meade, J., Luznik, L., Imus, P. H., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2022
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for graft-versus host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis has revolutionized allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (alloBMT), but there is limited published experience in peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). OBJECTIVES We sought to assess outcomes in patients with PTCL who underwent alloBMT with PTCy. STUDY DESIGN We reviewed the charts of all adult patients aged 18 years or older who underwent alloBMT with non-myeloablative conditioning and PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis at the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center between January 2004 and December 2020. RESULTS Sixty-five patients were identified. The median age was 59 years (range, 24-75 years). Lymphoma histology included PTCL-not otherwise specified (n=24), ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma (n=14), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (n=7), enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (n=6), hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma (n=4), and other (n=10). Eleven patients were in first complete remission (CR1, 17%). The remaining patients were in first partial remission (PR1) or underwent salvage therapy to at least PR prior to transplant. Forty-eight patients received an alloBMT from a haploidentical related donor (74%), 10 from a fully matched donor (15%), and 7 from a mismatched unrelated donor (mMUD, 11%). All patients received fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and total body irradiation (TBI). The graft source was bone marrow (BM) in 46 patients (71%) and peripheral blood (PB) in 19 patients (29%); all patients in the BM cohort received 200 cGy TBI, and most in the PB cohort (15/19) received 400 cGy TBI. GVHD prophylaxis was PTCy, mycophenolate mofetil, and a calcineurin inhibitor or sirolimus. With a median follow up of 2.8 years (range, 290 days-14.2 years), the 2-year PFS for the entire cohort was 49% (95% confidence interval [CI] 38-64%), and the 2-year OS was 55% (95% CI 44-69%). Outcomes were significantly improved in those receiving PB compared to BM, including 2-year PFS of 79% (95% CI 63-100%) vs. 39% (95% CI 27-56%), 2-year OS of 84% (95% CI 69-100%) vs. 46% (95% CI 33-63%), and 1-year cumulative incidence of (CuI) relapse of 5% (95% CI 0-16%) vs. 33% (95% CI 19-46%), with no difference in GVHD or non-relapse mortality (NRM). CONCLUSIONS AlloBMT with PTCy is safe and well-tolerated in patients with PTCL. Our data suggest increasing TBI dose to 400 cGy and using PB allografts may offer improved disease control and better survival outcomes, though additional studies are needed to confirm these findings.
-
4.
Impact of Center Experience with Donor Type on Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis BMT CTN 1101Open for Accrual June 2012Open for Accrual June 2012
Brunstein, C. G., O'Donnell, P. V., Logan, B., Dawson, P., Costa, L., Cutler, C., Craig, M., Hogan, W., M. Horowitz M, Horwitz, M. E., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2022
Abstract
BACKGROUND We reported on the results of Blood and Marrow Transplant (BMT) Clinical Trials Network (CTN) 1101, a randomized comparison between double umbilical cord blood (dUCB) and haploidentical (haplo) bone marrow (BM) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in the nonmyeloablative setting that showed similar progression free survival (PFS) between the two treatment groups, but lower non-relapse mortality (NRM) and better of survival (OS) in the haplo arm. In this secondary analysis, we sought to investigate whether transplant center experience with haplo BM and/or dUCB hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) had an impact on outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients randomized in BMT CTN 1101 were included. Center experience was assigned based on the number transplants with each platform in the year prior to initiation of the study according to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). Centers were then grouped as a dUCB-center (>10 dUCB, n=117, 10 centers), a haplo center (>10 haplo and ≤10 dUCB, n=110, 2 centers), or other-center (≤10 haplo and ≤10 dUCB HCTs, n=140, 21 centers). RESULTS After adjusting for age, Karnofsky performance score, and disease risk index, we found that haplo centers had lower overall mortality with this donor type, as compared to dUCB (HR 2.56, 95%CI, 1.44-4.56). In contrast, there were no differences in overall mortality between haplo and dUCB in centers that were experienced with dUCB (HR 1.02, 95%CI 0.59-1.79) or had limited-to-no experience with either dUCB or haplo (HR 1.36, 95%CI, 0.83-2.21). The higher risk of treatment failure and overall mortality in dUCB in haplo-experienced centers was driven by a significantly higher risk of relapse (HR 1.78, 95%CI, 1.07-2.97). CONCLUSION With the exception of worse outcomes among dUCB recipients in haplo-BM centers, the transplant center experience on the year prior to the initiation of BMT CTN 1101 had limited impact on the outcomes of this randomized clinical trial.
-
5.
Allogeneic Blood or Marrow Transplantation with High-Dose Post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Patients Aged ≥55
Webster, J. A., Reed, M., Tsai, H. L., Ambinder, A., Jain, T., Dezern, A. E., Levis, M. J., Showel, M. M., Prince, G. T., Hourigan, C. S., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2022
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients ≥55 years-old with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) fare poorly with conventional chemotherapy with 5-year overall survival of ∼20%. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors and novel B-cell targeted therapies improve outcomes, but rates of relapse and death in remission remain high. Allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (AlloBMT) provides an alternative consolidation strategy, and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) facilitates HLA-mismatched transplants with low rates of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). METHODS The transplant database at Johns Hopkins was queried for patients ≥ 55 years old who received alloBMT for ALL using PTCy. FINDINGS The database included 77 such patients. Most received reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) (88.3%), were in first remission (CR1) (85.7%), and had B-lineage disease (90.9%). For the entire cohort, 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 46% (95% CI 34-57) and 49% (95% CI 37-60). Grade 3-4 acute GVHD occurred in only 3% of patients and chronic GVHD in 13%. In multivariable analysis, myeloablative conditioning led to worse RFS (HR 4.65, p=0.001); while transplant in CR1 (HR 0.30, p=0.004), and transplant for Ph+ ALL vs. T ALL (HR 0.29, p=0.03) improved RFS. Of the 54 patients who received RIC alloBMT in CR1 for B ALL, 5-year RFS and OS were 62% (95% CI 47-74) and 65% (95% CI 51-77), respectively, with a 5-year relapse incidence of 16% (95% CI 7-27) and NRM of 24% (95% CI 13-36). INTERPRETATION RIC AlloBMT with PTCy in CR1 represents a promising consolidation strategy for B ALL patients ≥ 55 years old. FUNDING NIH grants P01 CA225618 and P30 CA06973.
-
6.
"Allogeneic blood or marrow transplant with non-myeloablative conditioning and high dose cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis for secondary central nervous system lymphoma"
Sterling, C. H., Tsai, H. L., Holdhoff, M., Bolaños-Meade, J., Luznik, L., Fuchs, E. J., Huff, C. A., Gocke, C. B., Ali, S. A., Borrello, I. M., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2021
Abstract
Secondary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma is a rare and often fatal complication of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Treatment options include radiation therapy, high-dose systemic chemotherapy, intrathecal chemotherapy, and high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue, but outcomes remain poor. Allogeneic blood or marrow transplant (alloBMT) is widely used in relapsed/refractory systemic NHL. We sought to understand whether a graft-versus-lymphoma effect could maintain remission in CNS disease. Here we review outcomes in 20 consecutive patients with secondary CNS lymphoma who underwent alloBMT with non-myeloablative conditioning using fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and 200cGy total-body irradiation. For graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, all patients received post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy), mycophenolate mofetil, and a calcineurin inhibitor. With a median follow up of 4.1 years, the median overall survival for the entire cohort was not reached. Median progression-free survival was 3.8 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.3 months - not reached). The cumulative incidence of relapse was 25% (95% CI 5-45%), and non-relapse mortality was 30% (95% CI 5-54%) at 4 years. Of the 5 patients who relapsed, 2 were CNS only, 1 was systemic only, and 2 were combined CNS / systemic. The use of alloBMT in CNS lymphoma deserves further investigation.
-
7.
Umbilical cord blood or HLA-haploidentical transplantation: Real world outcomes vs randomized trial outcomes
O'Donnell, P. V., Brunstein, C. G., Fuchs, E. J., Zhang, M. J., Allbee-Johnson, M., Antin, J. H., Leifer, E. S., Elmariah, H., Grunwald, M. R., Hashmi, H., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2021
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomized clinical trials offer the highest quality data for modifying clinical practice. Results of a phase III randomized trial of non-myeloablative transplantation for adults with high- risk hematologic malignancies with two umbilical cord blood (UCB) units (n=183) or HLA-haploidentical relative bone marrow (Haplo-BM) (n=154) revealed 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 41% and 35% after Haplo-BM and two-unit UCB transplantation, respectively (p=0.41); overall survival was 57% and 46%, respectively (p=0.04), BMT CTN 1101; NCT01597778. OBJECTIVES We sought to examine the generalizability of BMT CTN 1101 to a contemporaneous cohort beyond the trial's pre-specified 2-year outcomes. All transplantation occurred between June 2012 and June 2018 in the United States. We hypothesized that the results of a rigorous phase III randomized trial will be generalizable. Changes in graft selection for HLA-haploidentical relative transplantation during the trial period allowed comparison of outcomes after transplantation with Haplo-BM to those after haploidentical peripheral blood (Haplo-PB). STUDY DESIGN The trial's broad eligibility criteria were applied to the data source of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research to select non-trial subjects. Extended follow up of trial subjects was obtained from this data source. Three separate analyses were performed: 1) trial subjects beyond the trial's 2-year endpoint 2) comparison of trial subjects to a contemporaneous cohort of non-trial subjects (195 two-unit UCB, 358 Haplo-BM, 403 Haplo-PB) and 3) comparison of non-trial subjects by donor and graft type. Multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards models for comparison of outcomes by treatment groups. RESULTS With longer follow up of the trial cohorts, 5-year PFS (37% versus 29%, p=0.08) and overall survival (42% versus 36%, p=0.06) were not significantly different between treatment groups. We then compared the trial results to comparable real-world transplantations. Five-year overall survival after trial and non-trial two-unit UCB (36% versus 41%, p=0.48) and trial and non-trial Haplo-BM (42% versus 47%, p=0.80) transplantation were not different confirming generalizability. The randomized trial did not accrue as planned and therefore lacked the statistical power to detect a 15% difference in progression-free survival. With substantially larger numbers of non-trial Haplo-BM transplantations, 5-year survival was higher after non-trial Haplo-BM compared to trial two-unit UCB (47% versus 36%, p=0.012). Non-trial patients who received Haplo-PB transplantation had higher 5-year survival (54%) compared to trial (HR 0.76, p=0.044) and non-trial (HR 0.78, p=0.026) Haplo-BM. Similarly, survival was higher after Haplo-PB compared to trial (HR 0.57, p<0.0001) and non-trial UCB (HR 0.63, p=0.0002). CONCLUSION When considering alternative donor low intensity conditioning regimen transplantation, a haploidentical relative is preferred. Further, PB is the preferred graft.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients enrolled on the BMT CTN 1101 trial (n=337), and non-trial patients identified from the CIBMTR database (n=956), who met the criteria for BMT CTN 11001 but were not enrolled (total n=1293)
Intervention
two umbilical cord blood (UCB) units (trial: n=183, non-trial: n=195; total n=378)
Comparison
HLA-haploidentical relative bone marrow (Haplo-BM, trial: n=154, non-trial: n=358; total n=512); Non-trial cohort undergoing peripheral blood haploidentical transplant (Haplo-PB, n=403)
Outcome
With longer follow up of the trial cohorts, 5-year PFS (37% versus 29%, p=0.08) and overall survival (42% versus 36%) were not significantly different between treatment groups. We then compared the trial results to comparable real-world transplantations. Five-year overall survival after trial and non-trial two-unit UCB (36% versus 41%) and trial and non-trial Haplo-BM (42% versus 47%) transplantation were not different confirming generalizability. The randomized trial did not accrue as planned and therefore lacked the statistical power to detect a 15% difference in progression-free survival. With substantially larger numbers of non-trial Haplo-BM transplantations, 5-year survival was higher after non-trial Haplo-BM compared to trial two-unit UCB (47% versus 36%). Non-trial patients who received Haplo-PB transplantation had higher 5-year survival (54%) compared to trial (HR 0.76) and non-trial (HR 0.78) Haplo-BM. Similarly, survival was higher after Haplo-PB compared to trial (HR 0.57) and non-trial UCB (HR 0.63).
-
8.
HLA Informs Risk Predictions after Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide
Fuchs, E. J., McCurdy, S. R., Solomon, S. R., Wang, T., Herr, M. M., Modi, D., Grunwald, M. R., Nishihori, T., Kuxhausen, M., Fingerson, S., et al
Blood. 2021
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Hematopoietic cell transplantation from HLA-haploidentical related donors is increasingly used to treat hematologic cancers; however, characteristics of the optimal haploidentical donor have not been established. We studied the role of donor HLA mismatching in graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), disease recurrence and survival after haploidentical donor transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for 1434 acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome patients reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. The impact of mismatching in the graft-versus-host vector for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1 alleles, the HLA-B leader, and HLA-DPB1 T-cell epitope (TCE) were studied using multivariable regression methods. Outcome was associated with HLA (mis)matches at individual loci rather than the total number of HLA mismatches. HLA-DRB1 mismatches were associated with lower risk of disease recurrence. HLA-DRB1-mismatching with HLA-DQB1-matching correlated with improved disease-free survival. HLA-B leader matching and HLA-DPB1 TCE-non-permissive mismatching were each associated with improved overall survival. HLA-C matching lowered chronic GVHD risk, and the level of HLA-C expression correlated with transplant-related mortality. Matching status at the HLA-B leader and HLA-DRB1, -DQB1 and -DPB1 predicted disease-free survival, as did patient and donor CMV serostatus, patient age and co-morbidity index. A web-based tool was developed to facilitate selection of the best haploidentical related donor by calculating disease-free survival based on these characteristics. In conclusion, HLA factors influence the success of haploidentical transplantation with PTCy. HLA-DRB1 and -DPB1 mismatching and HLA-C, -B leader, and -DQB1 matching are favorable. Consideration of HLA factors may help to optimize the selection of haploidentical related donors.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients undergoing transplant for acute leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome at centres reporting to the CIBMTR (n=1434)
Intervention
The impact of mismatching in the graft-versus-host vector for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1 alleles, the HLA-B leader, and HLA-DPB1 T-cell epitope (TCE) were studied using multivariable regression methods.
Comparison
None
Outcome
Outcome was associated with HLA (mis)matches at individual loci rather than the total number of HLA mismatches. HLA-DRB1 mismatches were associated with lower risk of disease recurrence. HLA-DRB1-mismatching with HLA-DQB1-matching correlated with improved disease-free survival. HLA-B leader matching and HLA-DPB1 TCE-non-permissive mismatching were each associated with improved overall survival. HLA-C matching lowered chronic GVHD risk, and the level of HLA-C expression correlated with transplant-related mortality. Matching status at the HLA-B leader and HLA-DRB1, -DQB1 and -DPB1 predicted disease-free survival, as did patient and donor CMV serostatus, patient age and co-morbidity index. A web-based tool was developed to facilitate selection of the best haploidentical related donor by calculating disease-free survival based on these characteristics.
-
9.
Double unrelated umbilical cord blood vs HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation: the BMT CTN 1101 trial
Fuchs, E. J., O'Donnell, P. V., Eapen, M., Logan, B., Antin, J. H., Dawson, P., Devine, S., Horowitz, M. M., Horwitz, M. E., Karanes, C., et al
Blood. 2021;137(3):420-428
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Results of 2 parallel phase 2 trials of transplantation of unrelated umbilical cord blood (UCB) or bone marrow (BM) from HLA-haploidentical relatives provided equipoise for direct comparison of these donor sources. Between June 2012 and June 2018, 368 patients aged 18 to 70 years with chemotherapy-sensitive lymphoma or acute leukemia in remission were randomly assigned to undergo UCB (n = 186) or haploidentical (n = 182) transplant. Reduced-intensity conditioning comprised total-body irradiation with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine for both donor types. Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis for UCB transplantation was cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and for haploidentical transplantation, posttransplant cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, and MMF. The primary end point was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS). Treatment groups had similar age, sex, self-reported ethnic origin, performance status, disease, and disease status at randomization. Two-year PFS was 35% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28% to 42%) compared with 41% (95% CI, 34% to 48%) after UCB and haploidentical transplants, respectively (P = .41). Prespecified analysis of secondary end points recorded higher 2-year nonrelapse mortality after UCB, 18% (95% CI, 13% to 24%), compared with haploidentical transplantation, 11% (95% CI, 6% to 16%), P = .04. This led to lower 2-year overall survival (OS) after UCB compared with haploidentical transplantation, 46% (95% CI, 38-53) and 57% (95% CI 49% to 64%), respectively (P = .04). The trial did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in the primary end point, 2-year PFS, between the donor sources. Although both donor sources extend access to reduced-intensity transplantation, analyses of secondary end points, including OS, favor haploidentical BM donors. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01597778.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients aged 18 to 70 years with chemotherapy-sensitive lymphoma or acute leukaemia in remission (n=368)
Intervention
Cord blood transplantation (UCB, n=186)
Comparison
Haploidentical transplantation (n=182)
Outcome
Two-year PFS was 35% after UCB compared with 41% haploidentical transplant. Prespecified analysis of secondary end points recorded higher 2-year nonrelapse mortality after UCB: 18%, compared with 11% for haploidentical transplantation. This led to lower 2-year overall survival (OS) after UCB compared with haploidentical transplantation, 46% and 57%, respectively. The trial did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in the primary end point, 2-year PFS, between the donor sources.
-
10.
Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is Associated with Increased Cytomegalovirus Infection: A CIBMTR Analysis
Goldsmith, S. R., Abid, M. B., Auletta, J. J., Bashey, A., Beitinjaneh, A., Castillo, P., Chemaly, R. F., Chen, M., Ciurea, S. O., Dandoy, C. E., et al
Blood. 2021
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Prior studies suggest increased CMV infection following haploidentical donor transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (HaploCy). The role of allograft source and PTCy in CMV infection and disease is unclear. We analyzed the effect of graft source and PTCy on incidence of CMV infection as well as transplant outcomes as it relates to CMV serostatus and occurrence of CMV infection by d180. We examined patients reported to CIBMTR between 2012-2017 who had received HaploCy (n = 757), Sib with PTCy (SibCy, n=403), or Sib with calcineurin inhibitor-based prophylaxis (SibCNI, n=1605) for AML/ALL/MDS. Cumulative incidences of CMV infection by d180 were 42% (99% CI, 37-46), 37% (31 - 43), and 23% (20 - 26), respectively [p<0.001]. CMV end-organ disease was statistically comparable. CMV infection risk was highest for CMV-Seropositive recipients (R+), but significantly higher in PTCy recipients regardless of donor [HaploCy (n=545): HR 50.3 (14.4 - 175.2); SibCy (n=279): HR 47.7 (13.3 - 171.4); SibCNI (n=1065): HR 24.4 (7.2 - 83.1); p<0.001]. D+/R- patients also had increased risk for CMV infection. Among seropositive recipients or those developing CMV infection, HaploCy had worse OS and NRM. Relapse was unaffected by CMV infection or serostatus. PTCy was associated with lower chronic GVHD overall, but CMV infection in PTCy recipients was associated with higher cGVHD (p=0.006). PTCy, regardless of donor, is associated with higher incidence of CMV infection, augmenting the risk of seropositivity. Additionally CMV infection may negate the cGVHD protection of PTCy. This study supports aggressive prevention strategies in all patients receiving PTCy.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with acute myeloid leukaemia, acute lymphoblastic leukaemia or myelodysplastic synrome (n=2765)
Intervention
Haploidentical transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (HaploCy, n=757),
Comparison
Sibling donor with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (SibCy, n=403), or Sibling donor with calcineurin inhibitor-based prophylaxis (SibCNI, n=1605)
Outcome
Cumulative incidences of CMV infection by day 180 were 42% (HaploCy), 37% (SibCy), and 23% (SibCNI), respectively. CMV end-organ disease was statistically comparable. CMV infection risk was highest for CMV-Seropositive recipients (R+), but significantly higher in PTCy recipients regardless of donor [HaploCy (n=545): HR 50.3; SibCy (n=279): HR 47.7; SibCNI (n=1065): HR 24.4. D+/R- patients also had increased risk for CMV infection. Among seropositive recipients or those developing CMV infection, HaploCy had worse OS and NRM. Relapse was unaffected by CMV infection or serostatus. PTCy was associated with lower chronic GVHD overall, but CMV infection in PTCy recipients was associated with higher cGVHD. PTCy, regardless of donor, is associated with higher incidence of CMV infection, augmenting the risk of seropositivity. Additionally CMV infection may negate the cGVHD protection of PTCy.