-
1.
Cost-Effectiveness of Unrelated Umbilical Cord Blood vs. HLA Haploidentical Related Bone Marrow Transplant: Evidence from BMT CTN 1101
Ramsey, S. D., Bansal, A., Li, L., O'Donnell, P. V., Fuchs, E. J., Brunstein, C. G., Eapen, M., Thao, V., Roth, J. A., Steuten, L.
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2023
Abstract
BACKGROUND BMT CTN 1101 was a Phase III randomized controlled trial comparing reduced intensity conditioning followed by double unrelated umbilical cord blood (UCB) versus HLA-haploidentical related donor bone marrow (haplo-BM) transplantation for patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to report the results of a parallel cost-effectiveness analysis. STUDY DESIGN Three hundred sixty-eight patients were randomized to unrelated UCB (n=186) or haplo-BM (n=182) transplant. We estimated healthcare utilization and costs using propensity score-matched BMT patients from the OptumLabs(Ⓡ) Data Warehouse for trial participants <65 years and Medicare claims for participants ≥65 years. Weibull models were used to estimate 20-year survival. EQ-5D surveys by trial participants were used estimate Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). RESULTS At 5-year follow-up, survival was 42% for haplo-BM versus 36% for UCB (P=.06). Over a 20-year time horizon, haplo-BM is expected to be more effective (+0.63 QALY) and more costly +$118,953) for persons under 65. For those over 65, haplo-BM is expected to be more effective and less costly. In one-way uncertainty analyses, for persons <65, the cost per QALY result was most sensitive to life years and health state utilities. For persons ≥65, life years were more influential than costs and health state utilities. CONCLUSION Compared to UCB, haplo-BM was moderately cost-effective for patients aged <65 years, and less costly and more effective for persons ≥65 years. Haplo-BM is a fair value choice for commercially insured patients with high-risk leukemia and lymphoma who require HCT. For Medicare enrollees, haplo-BM is a preferred choice when considering costs and outcomes.
-
2.
Allogeneic Blood or Marrow Transplantation with Post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma: The Importance of Graft Source
Sterling, C. H., Hughes, M. S., Tsai, H. L., Yarkony, K., Fuchs, E. J., Swinnen, L. J., Paul, S., Bolaños-Meade, J., Luznik, L., Imus, P. H., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2022
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for graft-versus host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis has revolutionized allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (alloBMT), but there is limited published experience in peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). OBJECTIVES We sought to assess outcomes in patients with PTCL who underwent alloBMT with PTCy. STUDY DESIGN We reviewed the charts of all adult patients aged 18 years or older who underwent alloBMT with non-myeloablative conditioning and PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis at the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center between January 2004 and December 2020. RESULTS Sixty-five patients were identified. The median age was 59 years (range, 24-75 years). Lymphoma histology included PTCL-not otherwise specified (n=24), ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma (n=14), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (n=7), enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (n=6), hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma (n=4), and other (n=10). Eleven patients were in first complete remission (CR1, 17%). The remaining patients were in first partial remission (PR1) or underwent salvage therapy to at least PR prior to transplant. Forty-eight patients received an alloBMT from a haploidentical related donor (74%), 10 from a fully matched donor (15%), and 7 from a mismatched unrelated donor (mMUD, 11%). All patients received fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and total body irradiation (TBI). The graft source was bone marrow (BM) in 46 patients (71%) and peripheral blood (PB) in 19 patients (29%); all patients in the BM cohort received 200 cGy TBI, and most in the PB cohort (15/19) received 400 cGy TBI. GVHD prophylaxis was PTCy, mycophenolate mofetil, and a calcineurin inhibitor or sirolimus. With a median follow up of 2.8 years (range, 290 days-14.2 years), the 2-year PFS for the entire cohort was 49% (95% confidence interval [CI] 38-64%), and the 2-year OS was 55% (95% CI 44-69%). Outcomes were significantly improved in those receiving PB compared to BM, including 2-year PFS of 79% (95% CI 63-100%) vs. 39% (95% CI 27-56%), 2-year OS of 84% (95% CI 69-100%) vs. 46% (95% CI 33-63%), and 1-year cumulative incidence of (CuI) relapse of 5% (95% CI 0-16%) vs. 33% (95% CI 19-46%), with no difference in GVHD or non-relapse mortality (NRM). CONCLUSIONS AlloBMT with PTCy is safe and well-tolerated in patients with PTCL. Our data suggest increasing TBI dose to 400 cGy and using PB allografts may offer improved disease control and better survival outcomes, though additional studies are needed to confirm these findings.
-
3.
Allogeneic Blood or Marrow Transplantation with High-Dose Post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Patients Aged ≥55
Webster, J. A., Reed, M., Tsai, H. L., Ambinder, A., Jain, T., Dezern, A. E., Levis, M. J., Showel, M. M., Prince, G. T., Hourigan, C. S., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2022
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients ≥55 years-old with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) fare poorly with conventional chemotherapy with 5-year overall survival of ∼20%. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors and novel B-cell targeted therapies improve outcomes, but rates of relapse and death in remission remain high. Allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (AlloBMT) provides an alternative consolidation strategy, and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) facilitates HLA-mismatched transplants with low rates of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). METHODS The transplant database at Johns Hopkins was queried for patients ≥ 55 years old who received alloBMT for ALL using PTCy. FINDINGS The database included 77 such patients. Most received reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) (88.3%), were in first remission (CR1) (85.7%), and had B-lineage disease (90.9%). For the entire cohort, 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 46% (95% CI 34-57) and 49% (95% CI 37-60). Grade 3-4 acute GVHD occurred in only 3% of patients and chronic GVHD in 13%. In multivariable analysis, myeloablative conditioning led to worse RFS (HR 4.65, p=0.001); while transplant in CR1 (HR 0.30, p=0.004), and transplant for Ph+ ALL vs. T ALL (HR 0.29, p=0.03) improved RFS. Of the 54 patients who received RIC alloBMT in CR1 for B ALL, 5-year RFS and OS were 62% (95% CI 47-74) and 65% (95% CI 51-77), respectively, with a 5-year relapse incidence of 16% (95% CI 7-27) and NRM of 24% (95% CI 13-36). INTERPRETATION RIC AlloBMT with PTCy in CR1 represents a promising consolidation strategy for B ALL patients ≥ 55 years old. FUNDING NIH grants P01 CA225618 and P30 CA06973.
-
4.
"Allogeneic blood or marrow transplant with non-myeloablative conditioning and high dose cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis for secondary central nervous system lymphoma"
Sterling, C. H., Tsai, H. L., Holdhoff, M., Bolaños-Meade, J., Luznik, L., Fuchs, E. J., Huff, C. A., Gocke, C. B., Ali, S. A., Borrello, I. M., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2021
Abstract
Secondary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma is a rare and often fatal complication of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Treatment options include radiation therapy, high-dose systemic chemotherapy, intrathecal chemotherapy, and high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue, but outcomes remain poor. Allogeneic blood or marrow transplant (alloBMT) is widely used in relapsed/refractory systemic NHL. We sought to understand whether a graft-versus-lymphoma effect could maintain remission in CNS disease. Here we review outcomes in 20 consecutive patients with secondary CNS lymphoma who underwent alloBMT with non-myeloablative conditioning using fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and 200cGy total-body irradiation. For graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, all patients received post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy), mycophenolate mofetil, and a calcineurin inhibitor. With a median follow up of 4.1 years, the median overall survival for the entire cohort was not reached. Median progression-free survival was 3.8 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.3 months - not reached). The cumulative incidence of relapse was 25% (95% CI 5-45%), and non-relapse mortality was 30% (95% CI 5-54%) at 4 years. Of the 5 patients who relapsed, 2 were CNS only, 1 was systemic only, and 2 were combined CNS / systemic. The use of alloBMT in CNS lymphoma deserves further investigation.
-
5.
Umbilical cord blood or HLA-haploidentical transplantation: Real world outcomes vs randomized trial outcomes
O'Donnell, P. V., Brunstein, C. G., Fuchs, E. J., Zhang, M. J., Allbee-Johnson, M., Antin, J. H., Leifer, E. S., Elmariah, H., Grunwald, M. R., Hashmi, H., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2021
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomized clinical trials offer the highest quality data for modifying clinical practice. Results of a phase III randomized trial of non-myeloablative transplantation for adults with high- risk hematologic malignancies with two umbilical cord blood (UCB) units (n=183) or HLA-haploidentical relative bone marrow (Haplo-BM) (n=154) revealed 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 41% and 35% after Haplo-BM and two-unit UCB transplantation, respectively (p=0.41); overall survival was 57% and 46%, respectively (p=0.04), BMT CTN 1101; NCT01597778. OBJECTIVES We sought to examine the generalizability of BMT CTN 1101 to a contemporaneous cohort beyond the trial's pre-specified 2-year outcomes. All transplantation occurred between June 2012 and June 2018 in the United States. We hypothesized that the results of a rigorous phase III randomized trial will be generalizable. Changes in graft selection for HLA-haploidentical relative transplantation during the trial period allowed comparison of outcomes after transplantation with Haplo-BM to those after haploidentical peripheral blood (Haplo-PB). STUDY DESIGN The trial's broad eligibility criteria were applied to the data source of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research to select non-trial subjects. Extended follow up of trial subjects was obtained from this data source. Three separate analyses were performed: 1) trial subjects beyond the trial's 2-year endpoint 2) comparison of trial subjects to a contemporaneous cohort of non-trial subjects (195 two-unit UCB, 358 Haplo-BM, 403 Haplo-PB) and 3) comparison of non-trial subjects by donor and graft type. Multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards models for comparison of outcomes by treatment groups. RESULTS With longer follow up of the trial cohorts, 5-year PFS (37% versus 29%, p=0.08) and overall survival (42% versus 36%, p=0.06) were not significantly different between treatment groups. We then compared the trial results to comparable real-world transplantations. Five-year overall survival after trial and non-trial two-unit UCB (36% versus 41%, p=0.48) and trial and non-trial Haplo-BM (42% versus 47%, p=0.80) transplantation were not different confirming generalizability. The randomized trial did not accrue as planned and therefore lacked the statistical power to detect a 15% difference in progression-free survival. With substantially larger numbers of non-trial Haplo-BM transplantations, 5-year survival was higher after non-trial Haplo-BM compared to trial two-unit UCB (47% versus 36%, p=0.012). Non-trial patients who received Haplo-PB transplantation had higher 5-year survival (54%) compared to trial (HR 0.76, p=0.044) and non-trial (HR 0.78, p=0.026) Haplo-BM. Similarly, survival was higher after Haplo-PB compared to trial (HR 0.57, p<0.0001) and non-trial UCB (HR 0.63, p=0.0002). CONCLUSION When considering alternative donor low intensity conditioning regimen transplantation, a haploidentical relative is preferred. Further, PB is the preferred graft.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients enrolled on the BMT CTN 1101 trial (n=337), and non-trial patients identified from the CIBMTR database (n=956), who met the criteria for BMT CTN 11001 but were not enrolled (total n=1293)
Intervention
two umbilical cord blood (UCB) units (trial: n=183, non-trial: n=195; total n=378)
Comparison
HLA-haploidentical relative bone marrow (Haplo-BM, trial: n=154, non-trial: n=358; total n=512); Non-trial cohort undergoing peripheral blood haploidentical transplant (Haplo-PB, n=403)
Outcome
With longer follow up of the trial cohorts, 5-year PFS (37% versus 29%, p=0.08) and overall survival (42% versus 36%) were not significantly different between treatment groups. We then compared the trial results to comparable real-world transplantations. Five-year overall survival after trial and non-trial two-unit UCB (36% versus 41%) and trial and non-trial Haplo-BM (42% versus 47%) transplantation were not different confirming generalizability. The randomized trial did not accrue as planned and therefore lacked the statistical power to detect a 15% difference in progression-free survival. With substantially larger numbers of non-trial Haplo-BM transplantations, 5-year survival was higher after non-trial Haplo-BM compared to trial two-unit UCB (47% versus 36%). Non-trial patients who received Haplo-PB transplantation had higher 5-year survival (54%) compared to trial (HR 0.76) and non-trial (HR 0.78) Haplo-BM. Similarly, survival was higher after Haplo-PB compared to trial (HR 0.57) and non-trial UCB (HR 0.63).
-
6.
Non-Myeloablative Allogeneic Transplantation with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide after Immune Checkpoint Inhibition for Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma: a Retrospective Cohort Study
Paul, S., Zahurak, M., Luznik, L., Ambinder, R. F., Fuchs, E. J., Bolanos-Meade, J., Wagner-Johnston, N., Swinnen, L. J., Schoch, L., Varadhan, R., et al
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2020
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved in relapsed classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). The safety and effectiveness of allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (alloBMT) in ICI pre-treated cHL patients remain unclear. The aim of this study is to assess outcomes of cHL patients receiving ICIs before alloBMT using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. METHODS We performed a retrospective study of relapsed/refractory cHL patients undergoing alloBMT with PTCy at Johns Hopkins between Nov 2004 and Sept 2019. Engraftment, GVHD incidence, non-relapse mortality (NRM), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients receiving pre-alloBMT ICI or standard salvage chemotherapy. FINDINGS We identified 105 consecutive relapsed/refractory cHL patients, of which 37 (35.2%) received ICIs and 68 (64.7%) received chemotherapy without ICIs (no-ICI) before alloBMT. ICI and no-ICI patients experienced a 3-year estimated OS of 94% versus 78%, [hazard ratio (HR) 0.35 (95% CI: 0.08-1.56), P=0.17) and a 3-year estimated PFS of 90% and 65% [HR 0.3 (95 % CI: 0.09-1), P=0.05], respectively. We observed no statically significant difference in the 12-month cumulative incidence of acute grade II-IV GVHD or in the 24-month incidence of chronic GVHD. INTERPRETATION ICIs do not increase acute or chronic GVHD incidence compared to salvage chemotherapy. cHL patients receiving ICIs prior to alloBMT experienced outstanding PFS and OS. Thus ICI therapy is safe in cHL patients when undergoing alloBMT with PTCy and may improve post-alloBMT disease progression and survival. FUNDING National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute grants.
-
7.
Myeloablative haploidentical BMT with posttransplant cyclophosphamide for hematologic malignancies in children and adults
Symons, H. J., Zahurak, M., Cao, Y., Chen, A., Cooke, K., Gamper, C., Klein, O., Llosa, N., Zambidis, E. T., Ambinder, R., et al
Blood advances. 2020;4(16):3913-3925
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Promising results have been reported for patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies undergoing HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation (haploBMT) with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), but there are few data on outcomes with myeloablative conditioning in this context. We report the results of a single-institution, prospective phase 2 trial of myeloablative haploBMT using busulfan-based or total body irradiation-based conditioning in 96 children or adults (median age, 42 years; range, 1-65 years) with high-risk hematologic malignancies. Recovery of neutrophils and platelets occurred at a median of 24 and 29 days. Engraftment of donor cells with chimerism >95% was achieved in 91%. The cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grades II to IV and grades III to IV at day 100 was 11% and 4%, and of chronic GVHD at 6 and 12 months was 4% and 15%, with 6% moderate to severe. The cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 6% at 100 days and 11% at 1 year (19% in those aged >55 years). The cumulative incidence of relapse at 1 year was 35%; at 3 years, it was 43%. In multivariable analysis, relapse was associated with increased age (P = .02 for age 20-55 years and P = .02 for age >55 years) and with minimal residual disease before transplantation (P = .05). The overall survival at 1 and 3 years is 73% and 54%, and event-free survival at 1 and 3 years is 57% and 49%. We show that haploBMT with PTCy after myeloablative conditioning is safe and efficacious for adult and pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies. Careful consideration must be given to using myeloablative conditioning in patients age >55 years. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00796562.
-
8.
Shortened-duration immunosuppressive therapy after nonmyeloablative, related HLA-haploidentical or unrelated peripheral blood grafts and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide
DeZern, A. E., Elmariah, H., Zahurak, M., Rosner, G. L., Gladstone, D. E., Ali, S. A., Huff, C. A., Swinnen, L. J., Imus, P., Borrello, I., et al
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2020
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
With post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, nonmyeloablative (NMA) HLA-haploidentical (haplo) and HLA-matched blood or marrow (BMT) have comparable outcomes. Previous reports showed that discontinuation of immunosuppression (IS) as early as day 60 after infusion of bone marrow (BM) haplo allograft with PTCy is feasible. There are certain diseases in which peripheral blood (PB) may be favored over BM, but, given the higher rates of GVHD with PB, excessive GVHD becomes an increased concern. We present a completed, prospective single-center trial of stopping IS at days 90 and 60 after NMA PB transplantation. Between 12/2015-7/2018, 117 consecutive patients with hematologic malignancies associated with higher rates of graft failure after NMA conditioned BM transplantation and PTCy, received NMA PB allografts on trial. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of reduced-duration IS (from Day 5 through Day 90 in cohort 1 and through Day 60 in cohort 2). Of the 117 patients (median age 64 years, range 22-78), the most common diagnoses were myelodysplastic syndrome (33%), acute myeloid leukemia (with minimal residual disease or arising from antecedent disorder) (32%), myeloproliferative neoplasms (19%) myeloma (9%), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (7%). Shortened IS was feasible in 75 pts (64%) overall. Ineligibility for shortened IS resulted most commonly from GVHD (17 pts), followed by early relapse (11 pts), non-relapse mortality (NRM) (7 pts), patient/ physician preference (4 pts) or graft failure (3 pts). Of the 57 patients in the D90 cohort, 33 (58%) stopped IS early as planned. Of the 60 patients in the D60 cohort, 42 (70%) stopped IS early as planned. The graft failure rate was 2.6%. After IS cessation, the median time to diagnosis of grade II-IV GVHD was 21 days and 32 days in the day 90 and day 60 cohorts respectively, with almost all cases developing within 40 days. Approximately one-third of these patients did restart IS. All outcome measures were similar in the 2 cohorts and to our historical outcomes with 180 days of IS. The cumulative incidence of grade 3-4 acute GVHD were low at 2 and 7% in D90 and D60, respectively. Severe chronic GVHD was 9% (D90) and 5% (D60) at 2 years. The two year overall survival was 67% for both the D90 and D60 cohorts, The two year progression free survival was 47% for the Day 90 cohort and 52% for the Day 60 cohort with the GVHD-free relapse-free survival less than 35% for both cohorts. These data suggest that reduced-duration IS in pts receiving NMA PB grafts with PTCy is feasible and carries an acceptable safety profile.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with hematologic malignancies associated with higher rates of graft failure (n=117)
Intervention
Non-myeloablative haploidentical transplant with immunosuppression days 5-90 (D90 cohort, n=57)
Comparison
Non-myeloablative haploidentical transplant, with immunosuppression days 5-60 (D60 cohort, n=60)
Outcome
Shortened immunosuppression (IS) was feasible in 75 pts (64%) overall. Ineligibility for shortened IS resulted most commonly from GVHD (17 pts), followed by early relapse (11 pts), non-relapse mortality (NRM) (7 pts), patient/ physician preference (4 pts) or graft failure (3 pts). Of the 57 patients in the D90 cohort, 33 (58%) stopped IS early as planned. Of the 60 patients in the D60 cohort, 42 (70%) stopped IS early as planned. The graft failure rate was 2.6%. After IS cessation, the median time to diagnosis of grade II-IV GVHD was 21 days and 32 days in the day 90 and day 60 cohorts respectively, with almost all cases developing within 40 days. Approximately one-third of these patients did restart IS. All outcome measures were similar in the 2 cohorts and to our historical outcomes with 180 days of IS. The cumulative incidence of grade 3-4 acute GVHD were low at 2 and 7% in D90 and D60, respectively. Severe chronic GVHD was 9% (D90) and 5% (D60) at 2 years. The two year overall survival was 67% for both the D90 and D60 cohorts, The two year progression free survival was 47% for the Day 90 cohort and 52% for the Day 60 cohort with the GVHD-free relapse-free survival less than 35% for both cohorts.
-
9.
Double unrelated umbilical cord blood versus HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation (BMT CTN 1101)
Fuchs, E. J., O'Donnell, P. V., Eapen, M., Logan, B. R., Antin, J. H., Dawson, P., Devine, S. M., Horowitz, M. M., Horwitz, M. E., Karanes, C., et al
Blood. 2020
-
-
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Results of two parallel phase II trials of transplantation of unrelated umbilical cord blood or bone marrow from HLA-haploidentical relatives provided equipoise for direct comparison of these donor sources. Between June 2012 and June 2018, 368 patients aged 18-70 years with chemotherapy-sensitive lymphoma or acute leukemia in remission were randomly assigned to undergo cord blood (n=186) or haploidentical (n=182) transplant. Reduced intensity conditioning comprised total body irradiation with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine for both donor types. Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis for cord blood transplantation was cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil and for haploidentical transplantation, post-transplant cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival. Treatment groups had similar age, sex, self-reported ethnic origin, performance status, disease and disease status at randomization. Two-year progression-free survival was 35% (95% CI, 28-42%) compared to 41% (95% CI, 34-48%) after cord blood and haploidentical transplants, respectively (p=0.41). Pre-specified analysis of secondary endpoints recorded higher 2-year non-relapse mortality after cord blood, 18% (95% CI, 13-24%) compared to haploidentical transplantation, 11% (95% CI, 6-16%), p=0.04. This led to lower 2-year overall survival after cord blood compared to haploidentical transplantation, 46% (95% CI, 38-53) and 57% (95% CI 49-64%), respectively (p=0.04). The trial did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint, 2-year progression-free survival, between the donor sources. While both donor sources extend access to reduced intensity transplantation, analyses of secondary endpoints, including overall survival, favor haploidentical bone marrow donors. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-National Cancer Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01597778).
Clinical Commentary
Dr. Julia Wolf, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
What is known?
Allogeneic stem cell transplant is a potentially curative treatment option for patients with poor risk or relapsed acute leukaemia or lymphoma. Transplant outcomes are, amongst other factors, dependent on optimal donor selection; despite recent advances, donor availability remains an area of unmet need for many patients. Fully HLA matched sibling donors are the preferred choice but are available in <30% of patients, while fully matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplants are available in <20% of non-Caucasian patients. For patients who lack a HLA matched donor, alternative stem cell sources include double umbilical cord transplant (DUCT) and haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HaploSCT). DUCT is associated with low immunogenicity and non-invasive harvesting, but utility is limited by lack of further cell availability, e.g. for donor lymphocyte infusions, as well as cost. A small (n = 45) randomised trial (Sanz, J. et al, 2020) comparing DUCT and HaploSCT in the myeloablative setting showed increased non-relapse mortality in the DUCT group but no significant difference in terms of relapse rates or overall survival (OS). While other data is extensive it is often registry based and retrospective. Prospective data in the reduced intensity setting is limited.
What did this paper set out to examine?
This randomised multi-centre phase III trial set in the United States is the first randomised trial to compare DUCT and HaploSCT for the treatment of leukaemia and lymphoma in adults in the setting of reduced intensity conditioning. It aims to compare the two donor sources in terms of 2-year progression free survival (PFS) as primary endpoint and engraftment, acute and chronic Graft versus Host Disease (GvHD), non-relapse mortality, relapse/progression and OS as secondary endpoints.
What did they show?
The authors compared data from 368 patients (DUCT = 186 vs HaploSCT = 182) enrolled from 33 centres over a 6-year period from 2012 to 2016. The cohort represents 90% of the planned accrual of 410 patients – the trial closed early due to slow accrual. Patients aged 18-70 years with high risk acute leukaemia and lymphoma with good performance score, adequate organ function and available haploidentical donor or double umbilical cord unit were included. Exclusion criteria were fairly selected. Patients were well matched in terms of age, sex, self-reported ethnic origin, performance status, disease and disease status at randomisation. Reduced intensity conditioning comprised cyclophosphamide and fludarabine with total body irradiation for both donor types. GvHD prophylaxis for cord blood transplantation was cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and PtCy, tacrolimus and MMF for HaploSCT.
RESULTS: DUCT and HaploSCT were comparable for the primary endpoint of 2-year PFS (35% vs 41%; p=0.41). Analysis of secondary endpoints reached statistical significance for some of the chosen parameters: DUCT was associated with higher 2-year non-relapse mortality (18% vs 11%; p=0.04) and lower OS (46% vs 57%; p=0.04). Death was most commonly attributed to recurrent disease and relapse rates were comparable in both groups (47% in DUCT vs 48% in HaploSCT; p=0.968). HaploSCT showed higher cumulative incidence of neutrophil recovery at day 56 while no difference was seen in platelet recovery. Similar rates of acute and chronic GvHD were observed.
What are the implications for practice and for future work?
While this study didn’t demonstrate a significant difference in its’ primary end point, it showed an OS benefit and lower non-relapse mortality in the HaploSCT arm. Higher non-relapse mortality associated with DUCT may be explained by lack of immunologic memory and associated higher rates of infection, especially in the early post-transplant period. A recent meta-analysis (Poonsombudlert, et al. 2019) concurs that HaploSCT is associated with improved OS but also demonstrated lower relapse rates, lower rates of acute GvHD and higher rates of chronic GvHD in HaploSCT compared with DUCT. These findings were not replicated in this study. Lower non-relapse mortality and improved OS were also reported in a retrospective study of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (Kosuri, S. et al, 2017) which also demonstrated improved 4-year PFS in HaploSCT compared with DUCT.
While both donor sources improve access to reduced intensity transplantation, improved overall survival and lower non-relapse mortality with comparable GvHD rates shown in this study make HaploSCT an increasingly attractive option for patients without matched sibling transplant.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients aged 18-70 years with chemotherapy-sensitive lymphoma or acute leukaemia in remission (n=368)
Intervention
Cord blood transplantation (n=186)
Comparison
Haploidentical transplantation (n=182)
Outcome
Two-year progression-free survival was 35% compared to 41% after cord blood and haploidentical transplants, respectively. Pre-specified analysis of secondary endpoints recorded higher 2-year non-relapse mortality after cord blood, 18% compared to haploidentical transplantation, 11%. This led to lower 2-year overall survival after cord blood compared to haploidentical transplantation, 46% and 57%, respectively. The trial did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint, 2-year progression-free survival, between the donor sources.
-
10.
Allogeneic transplantation for Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide
Webster, J. A., Luznik, L., Tsai, H. L., Imus, P. H., DeZern, A. E., Pratz, K. W., Levis, M. J., Gojo, I., Showel, M. M., Prince, G., et al
Blood advances. 2020;4(20):5078-5088
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (alloBMT) is standard of care for adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) in first complete remission (CR1). The routine pretransplant and posttransplant use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has dramatically improved outcomes, but the optimal conditioning regimen, donor type, and TKI remain undefined. The bone marrow transplant database at Johns Hopkins was queried for adult patients with de novo Ph+ ALL who received alloBMT using posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as a component of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis from 2008 to 2018. Among transplants for Ph+ ALL, 69 (85%) were performed in CR1, and 12 (15%) were performed in second or greater remission (CR2+). The majority of transplants (58%) were HLA haploidentical. Nearly all patients (91.4%) initiated TKI posttransplant. For patients in CR1, the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 66%. The use of nonmyeloablative conditioning, absence of measurable residual disease (MRD) according to flow cytometry at transplant, and the use of dasatinib vs imatinib at diagnosis were associated with improved overall survival (OS) and RFS. Neither donor type nor recipient age ≥60 years affected RFS. When analyzing all transplants, alloBMT in CR1 (vs CR2+) and the absence of pretransplant MRD were associated with improved RFS. Most relapses were associated with the emergence of kinase domain mutations. The cumulative incidence of grade 3 to 4 acute GVHD at 1 year was 9%, and moderate to severe chronic GVHD at 2 years was 8%. Nonmyeloablative alloBMT with PTCy for Ph+ ALL in an MRD-negative CR1 after initial treatment with dasatinib yields favorable outcomes.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) undergoing allogeneic transplantation (n=76)
Intervention
Myeloablative conditioning in first complete remission (CR1 MAC, n=26); Non-myeloablative conditioning in first complete remission (CR1 NMAC, n=43)
Comparison
Patients in second or subsequent remission (CR2+, n=12)
Outcome
For patients in CR1, the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 66%. The use of nonmyeloablative conditioning, absence of measurable residual disease (MRD) according to flow cytometry at transplant, and the use of dasatinib vs imatinib at diagnosis were associated with improved overall survival (OS) and RFS. Neither donor type nor recipient age ≥60 years affected RFS. When analyzing all transplants, alloBMT in CR1 (vs CR2+) and the absence of pretransplant MRD were associated with improved RFS. Most relapses were associated with the emergence of kinase domain mutations. The cumulative incidence of grade 3 to 4 acute GVHD at 1 year was 9%, and moderate to severe chronic GVHD at 2 years was 8%.