-
1.
Romidepsin-CHOEP followed by high-dose chemotherapy and stem-cell transplantation in untreated Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: results of the PTCL13 phase Ib/II study
Chiappella, A., Dodero, A., Evangelista, A., Re, A., Orsucci, L., Usai, S. V., Castellino, C., Stefoni, V., Pinto, A., Zanni, M., et al
Leukemia. 2023
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
The standard treatment for young patients with untreated PTCLs is based on anthracycline containing-regimens followed by high-dose-chemotherapy and stem-cell-transplantation (HDT + SCT), but only 40% of them can be cured. Romidepsin, a histone-deacetylase inhibitor, showed promising activity in relapsed PTCLs; in first line, Romidepsin was added with CHOP. We designed a study combining romidepsin and CHOEP as induction before HDT + auto-SCT in untreated PTCLs (PTCL-NOS, AITL/THF, ALK-ALCL), aged 18-65 years. A phase Ib/II trial was conducted to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Ro-CHOEP, and to assess efficacy and safety of 6 Ro-CHOEP as induction before HDT. The study hypothesis was to achieve a 18-month PFS of 70%. Twenty-one patients were enrolled into phase Ib; 7 dose-limiting toxicities were observed, that led to define the MTD at 14 mg/ms. Eighty-six patients were included in the phase II. At a median follow-up of 28 months, the 18-month PFS was 46.2% (95%CI:35.0-56.7), and the 18-month overall survival was 73.1% (95%CI:61.6-81.7). The overall response after induction was 71%, with 62% CRs. No unexpected toxicities were reported. The primary endpoint was not met; therefore, the enrollment was stopped at a planned interim analysis. The addition of romidepsin to CHOEP did not improve the PFS of untreated PTCL patients.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults aged 18-65 years with untreated peripheral T-cell lymphomas, aged 18-65 years from 26 centres in Italy (n=86)
Intervention
Romidepsin + CHOP (Ro-CHOEP) induction prior to auto-SCT
Comparison
None
Outcome
At a median follow-up of 28 months, the 18-month progression-free survival was 46.2% (95%CI:35.0-56.7), and the 18-month overall survival was 73.1% (95%CI:61.6-81.7). The overall response after induction was 71%, with 62% CRs. No unexpected toxicities were reported. The primary endpoint was not met; therefore, the enrollment was stopped at a planned interim analysis.
-
2.
Radioimmunotherapy versus autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in relapse/refractory follicular lymphoma: a Fondazione Italiana Linfomi multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial
Ladetto, M., Tavarozzi, R., Zanni, M., Evangelista, A., Ferrero, S., Tucci, A., Botto, B., Bolis, S., Volpetti, S., Zilioli, V. R., et al
Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology. 2023
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimal consolidation for young patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) remains uncertain in the rituximab era, with an unclear benefit of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The multicenter, randomized, phase 3 FLAZ12 (NCT01827605) trial compared anti-CD20 radioimmunotherapy (RIT) to ASCT as consolidation after chemoimmunotherapy, both followed by rituximab maintenance (RM). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients (age 18-65 years) with R/R FL and without significant comorbidities were enrolled and treated with three courses of conventional, investigator-chosen chemoimmunotherapies. Those experiencing at least a partial response were randomized 1:1 to ASCT or RIT before CD34+ collection, and all received post-consolidation RM. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. The target sample size was 210 (105/group). RESULTS During Aug 2012-Sept 2019, of 164 screened patients, 159 were enrolled (median age 57 [49-62] years, 55% male, 57% stage IV, 20% bulky disease). The study was closed prematurely because of low accrual. Data were analyzed on June 8, 2023, on an intention-to-treat basis, with a 77-month median follow-up from enrollment. Of 141 patients (89%), 70 were randomized to ASCT and 71 to RIT. Estimated 3-yrs PFS in both groups was 62% (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.69-1.80, P = 0.6662). Three-year overall survival also was similar between the two groups. Rates of grade ≥3 hematological toxicity were 94% with ASCT vs 46% with RIT (P < 0.001), and grade ≥3 neutropenia occurred in 94% vs 41%, respectively (P < 0.001). Second cancers occurred in nine patients after ASCT and three after radioimmunotherapy (P = 0.189). CONCLUSION Even if prematurely discontinued, our study did not demonstrate superiority of ASCT vs RIT. ASCT was more toxic and demanding for patients and health service. Both strategies yielded similar, favorable long-term outcomes, suggesting that consolidation programs milder than ASCT require further investigation in R/R FL.
-
3.
A prospective, multicenter study on hematopoietic stem-cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and 'on-demand' plerixafor in multiple myeloma patients treated with novel agents
Mina, R., Petrucci, M. T., Bonello, F., Bongarzoni, V., Saccardi, R., Bertuglia, G., Mengarelli, A., Spadaro, A., Lisi, C., Curci, P., et al
Haematologica. 2023
Abstract
High-dose melphalan plus autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is a standard of care for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), and adequate hematopoietic stem-cell (HSC) collection is crucial to ensure hematologic recovery after ASCT. In this prospective, observational study we evaluated HSC mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), cyclophosphamide, and 'on-demand' plerixafor (in patients with.
-
4.
Carfilzomib with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone or lenalidomide and dexamethasone plus autologous transplantation or carfilzomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone, followed by maintenance with carfilzomib plus lenalidomide or lenalidomide alone for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (FORTE): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial
Gay, F., Musto, P., Rota-Scalabrini, D., Bertamini, L., Belotti, A., Galli, M., Offidani, M., Zamagni, E., Ledda, A., Grasso, M., et al
The Lancet. Oncology. 2021
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bortezomib-based induction followed by high-dose melphalan (200 mg/m(2)) and autologous stem-cell transplantation (MEL200-ASCT) and maintenance treatment with lenalidomide alone is the current standard of care for young and fit patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different carfilzomib-based induction and consolidation approaches with or without transplantation and of maintenance treatment with carfilzomib plus lenalidomide versus lenalidomide alone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. METHODS UNITO-MM-01/FORTE was a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial done in 42 Italian academic and community practice centres. We enrolled transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma aged 65 years or younger with a Karnofsky Performance Status of 60% or higher. Patients were stratified according to International Staging System stage (I vs II/III) and age (<60 years vs 60-65 years) and randomly assigned (1:1:1) to KRd plus ASCT (four 28-day induction cycles with carfilzomib plus lenalidomide plus dexamethasone [KRd], melphalan at 200 mg/m(2) and autologous stem-cell transplantation [MEL200-ASCT], followed by four 28-day KRd consolidation cycles), KRd12 (12 28-day KRd cycles), or KCd plus ASCT (four 28-day induction cycles with carfilzomib plus cyclophosphamide plus dexamethasone [KCd], MEL200-ASCT, and four 28-day KCd consolidation cycles). Carfilzomib 36 mg/m(2) was administered intravenously on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16; lenalidomide 25 mg administered orally on days 1-21; cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m(2) administered orally on days 1, 8, and 15; and dexamethasone 20 mg administered orally or intravenously on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23. Thereafter, patients were stratified according to induction-consolidation treatment and randomly assigned (1:1) to maintenance treatment with carfilzomib plus lenalidomide or lenalidomide alone. Carfilzomib 36 mg/m(2) was administered intravenously on days 1-2 and 15-16 every 28 days for up to 2 years; lenalidomide 10 mg was administered orally on days 1-21 every 28 days until progression or intolerance in both groups. The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients with at least a very good partial response after induction with KRd versus KCd and progression-free survival with carfilzomib plus lenalidomide versus lenalidomide alone as maintenance treatment, both assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02203643. Study recruitment is complete, and all patients are in the follow-up or maintenance phases. FINDINGS Between Feb 23, 2015, and April 5, 2017, 474 patients were randomly assigned to one of the induction-intensification-consolidation groups (158 to KRd plus ASCT, 157 to KRd12, and 159 to KCd plus ASCT). The median duration of follow-up was 50·9 months (IQR 45·7-55·3) from the first randomisation. 222 (70%) of 315 patients in the KRd group and 84 (53%) of 159 patients in the KCd group had at least a very good partial response after induction (OR 2·14, 95% CI 1·44-3·19, p=0·0002). 356 patients were randomly assigned to maintenance treatment with carfilzomib plus lenalidomide (n=178) or lenalidomide alone (n=178). The median duration of follow-up was 37·3 months (IQR 32·9-41·9) from the second randomisation. 3-year progression-free survival was 75% (95% CI 68-82) with carfilzomib plus lenalidomide versus 65% (58-72) with lenalidomide alone (hazard ratio [HR] 0·64 [95% CI 0·44-0·94], p=0·023). During induction and consolidation, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (21 [13%] of 158 patients in the KRd plus ASCT group vs 15 [10%] of 156 in the KRd12 group vs 18 [11%] of 159 in the KCd plus ASCT group); dermatological toxicity (nine [6%] vs 12 [8%] vs one [1%]); and hepatic toxicity (13 [8%] vs 12 [8%] vs none). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 18 (11%) of 158 patients in the KRd-ASCT group, 29 (19%) of 156 in the KRd12 group, and 17 (11%) of 159 in the KCd plus ASCT group; the most common serious adverse event was pneumonia, in seven (4%) of 158, four (3%) of 156, and five (3%) of 159 patients. Treatment-emergent deaths were reported in two (1%) of 158 patients in the KRd plus ASCT group, two (1%) of 156 in the KRd12 group, and three (2%) of 159 in the KCd plus ASCT group. During maintenance, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (35 [20%] of 173 patients on carfilzomib plus lenalidomide vs 41 [23%] of 177 patients on lenalidomide alone); infections (eight [5%] vs 13 [7%]); and vascular events (12 [7%] vs one [1%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 24 (14%) of 173 patients on carfilzomib plus lenalidomide versus 15 (8%) of 177 on lenalidomide alone; the most common serious adverse event was pneumonia, in six (3%) of 173 versus five (3%) of 177 patients. One patient died of a treatment-emergent adverse event in the carfilzomib plus lenalidomide group. INTERPRETATION Our data show that KRd plus ASCT showed superiority in terms of improved responses compared with the other two treatment approaches and support the prospective randomised evaluation of KRd plus ASCT versus standards of care (eg, daratumumab plus bortezomib plus thalidomide plus dexamethasone plus ASCT) in transplant-eligible patients with multiple myeloma. Carfilzomib plus lenalidomide as maintenance therapy also improved progression-free survival compared with the standard-of-care lenalidomide alone. FUNDING Amgen, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb. TRANSLATION For the Italian translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
-
5.
Outcome of Allogeneic Transplantation for Mature T-cell Lymphomas: Impact of Donor Source and Disease Characteristics
Hamadani, M., Ngoya, M., Sureda, A., Bashir, Q., Litovich, C. A., Finel, H., Chen, Y., Boumendil, A., Zain, J., Castagna, L., et al
Blood advances. 2021
Abstract
Mature T-cell lymphomas constitute the most common indication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in lymphomas. Large studies evaluating contemporary outcomes of allo-HCT in mature T-cell lymphomas, relative to commonly used donor sources are not available. Included in this registry study were adult patients who had undergone allo-HCT for anaplastic large cell lymphoma, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), or peripheral T-cell lymphoma-NOS (PTCL-NOS) between 2008 and 2018. HCT platforms compared were post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based haploidentical (haplo-) HCT, matched sibling donor (MSD) HCT, matched unrelated donor HCT with in-vivo T-cell depletion (MUD TCD+), and MUD HCT without TCD (MUD TCD-). Co-primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included non-relapse mortality (NRM), and relapse/progression incidence (RI). 1942 patients were eligible (haplo-HCT 237; MSD 911; MUD-TCD+ 468; MUD TCD- 326). Cohorts were comparable for baseline characteristics except higher proportions of patients with decreased performance status (PS) and marrow graft recipients in the haplo-HCT group. On univariate and multivariate comparisons, OS and PFS, RI, and NRM were not significantly different between haplo-HCT, MSD, MUD-TCD+, and MUD-TCD- cohorts, with 3-year OS and PFS of 60%, 63%, 59%, and 64%; and 50%, 50%, 48%, and 52%, respectively. Significant predictors of inferior OS and PFS on multivariate analysis were active disease status at HCT and decreased PS. AITL was associated with significantly reduced relapse risk and better PFS compared to PTCL-NOS. Allo-HCT can provide durable PFS in patients with mature T-cell lymphoma. Outcomes of haplo-HCT were comparable to that of matched donor allo-HCT.
-
6.
Multicenter Phase II Study on Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplantation Using a Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimen and Posttransplantation Cyclophosphamide in Patients with Poor-Prognosis Lymphomas
Castagna, L., Dodero, A., Patriarca, F., Onida, F., Olivieri, A., Russo, D., Giordano, L., Majolino, I., Bramanti, S., Mariotti, J., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2021;27(4):328.e1-328.e6
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation from haploidentical donors using unmanipulated bone marrow and posttransplantation cyclophosphamide has been largely employed to cure high-risk lymphomas. However, the increased incidence of relapse associated with the use of a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen is still considered a concerning issue. The aim of our study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen, including thiotepa, cyclophosphamide, and fludarabine, in high-risk lymphoma patients. This was a prospective multicenter study. We enrolled 49 patients, of whom 47 were evaluable. Graft source (bone marrow) and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis were the same for all patients. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients free of disease progression at 1 year. The primary endpoint was met, as 29 out of 47 patients were alive and free of disease at 1 year (1-year progression-free survival, 60%). Forty-five recipients engrafted and achieved full donor chimerism at day 100. The cumulative incidences (CIs) of ANC engraftment at 30 days and platelet engraftment at 60 days were 89% and 83%, respectively. Two patients experienced graft failure. The CIs of day 100 grades 2 to 4 acute GVHD and 2-year moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD were 26% and 16%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 47.5 months (range, 22 to 74), the 4-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 54% and 64%, respectively. The 4-year CI of relapse was 28%, and the 4-year nonrelapse mortality was 15%. Thiotepa-based reduced-intensity conditioning was well tolerated with encouraging survival in a cohort of patients with poor-prognosis lymphoma. Both the incidence of relapse and nonrelapse mortality were acceptable.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with high-risk lymphoma (n=47)
Intervention
Haploidentical stem cell transplantation with a reduced intensity conditioning regimen, including thiotepa, cyclophosphamide, and fludarabine
Comparison
None
Outcome
The primary endpoint was met, as 29 out of 47 patients were alive and free of disease at 1 year (1-year progression-free survival, 60%). Forty-five recipients engrafted and achieved full donor chimerism at day 100. The cumulative incidences (CIs) of ANC engraftment at 30 days and platelet engraftment at 60 days were 89% and 83%, respectively. Two patients experienced graft failure. The CIs of day 100 grades 2 to 4 acute GVHD and 2-year moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD were 26% and 16%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 47.5 months (range, 22 to 74), the 4-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 54% and 64%, respectively. The 4-year CI of relapse was 28%, and the 4-year nonrelapse mortality was 15%.
-
7.
Addition of Rituximab in Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimens for B-Cell Malignancies Does Not Influence Transplant Outcomes: EBMT Registry Analyses Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for B-Cell Malignancies
Tomaszewska, A., Jagasia, M., Beohou, E., van der Werf, S., Blaise, D., Kanfer, E., Milpied, N., Reményi, P., Ciceri, F., Bourhis, J. H., et al
Frontiers in immunology. 2020;11:613954
Abstract
Rituximab (R) is increasingly incorporated in reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) in patients with B-cell malignancies, not only to improve disease control, but also to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). There are no randomized prospective data to validate this practice, although single center data and the CIBMTR analysis have shown promising results. We aimed at validation of these findings in a large registry study. We conducted a retrospective analysis using the EBMT registry of 3,803 adult patients with B-cell malignancies undergoing alloHCT (2001-2013) with either rituximab (R-RIC-9%) or non-rituximab (RIC-91%) reduced intensity regimens respectively. Median age and median follow up were 55 years (range 19.1-77.3) and 43.2 months (range 0.3-179.8), respectively. There was no difference in transplant outcomes (R-RIC vs RIC), including 1-year overall survival (69.9% vs 70.7%), 1-year disease-free survival (64.4% vs 62.2%), 1-year non-relapse mortality (21% vs 22%), and day-100 incidence of acute GVHD 2-4° (12% vs 12%). In summary, we found that addition of rituximab in RIC regimens for B-cell malignancies had no significant impact on major transplant outcome variables. Of note, data on chronic GVHD was not available, limiting the conclusions that can be drawn from the present study.
-
8.
Refractory and 17p-deleted chronic lymphocytic leukemia: improving survival with pathway inhibitors and allogeneic stem cell transplantation
Farina, L., Barretta, F., Scarfo, L., Bruno, B., Patriarca, F., Frustaci, A. M., Coscia, M., Salvetti, C., Quaresmini, G., Fanin, R., et al
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2020
Abstract
Refractory/early relapsed and 17p deletion/p53 mutation (del(17p)/TP53mut)-positive chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has been conventionally considered a high-risk disease, potentially eligible for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). In this multicenter retrospective analysis of 157 patients, we compared the outcomes of high-risk CLL treated with alloSCT or B-cell receptor pathway inhibitors (BCRis) or both. Seventy-one patients were treated with BCRis, 67 patients underwent reduced intensity alloSCT, and 19 received alloSCT with BCRis before and/or after transplant. An inverse probability of treatment weighting analyses were performed to compare alloSCT versus no-alloSCT groups: 5-year OS, PFS, and cumulative incidence of NRM and relapse were 40%/60% (p=0.096), 34%/17% (p=0.638), 28%/5% (p=0.016), and 38%/83% (p=0.005), respectively. Patients treated with alloSCT+BCRis showed a 3-year OS of 83%. Three -year OS and NRM by year of alloSCT, including patients treated with BCRis, were 53% and 17% in 2000-2007, 55% and 30% in 2008-2012 and 72% and 18% in 2013-2018. In conclusion, the combination of pathway inhibitors and alloSCT is feasible and may further improve the outcome of high-risk CLL patients.
-
9.
Haploidentical related donor compared to HLA-identical donor transplantation for chemosensitive Hodgkin lymphoma patients
Castagna, L., Busca, A., Bramanti, S., Raiola Anna, M., Malagola, M., Ciceri, F., Arcese, W., Vallisa, D., Patriarca, F., Specchia, G., et al
BMC cancer. 2020;20(1):1140
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allogeneic stem cell transplantation from haploidentical donor using an unmanipulated graft and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is growing. Haploidentical transplantation with PT-Cy showed a major activity in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), reducing the relapse incidence. The most important predictive factor of survival and toxicity was disease status before transplantation, which was better in patients with well controlled disease. METHODS We included 198 HL in complete (CR) or partial remission (PR) before transplantation. Sixty-five patients were transplanted from haploidentical donor and 133 from a HLA identical donor (both sibling and unrelated donors). Survival analysis was defined according to the EBMT criteria. Survival curves were generated by using Kaplan-Meier method and differences between groups were compared by the log rank test or by the log rank test for trend when appropriated. RESULTS The PFS, OS, and RI were significantly better in patients in CR compared to PR (55% vs 29% p?=?0.001, 74% vs 55% p?=?0.03, 27% vs 55% p? 0.001, respectively). The 2-year PFS was significantly better for HAPLO than HLA-id (63% vs 37%, p?=?0.03), without difference in OS. The 1-year NRM was not different. The 2-year relapse incidence (RI) was lower in the HAPLO group (24% vs 44%, p?=?0.008). Patients in CR receiving haplo HSCT showed higher 2-year PFS and lower 2-year RI than those allografted with HLA-id donor (75% vs 47%, p? 0.001 and 11% vs 34%, p?0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, donor type and disease status before transplantation were independent predictors of PFS as well as they predict the risk of relapse. Disease status at transplantation and age were independently associated to OS. CONCLUSIONS Nonetheless this is a retrospective study, limiting the wide applicability of results, data from this analysis suggest that HLA mismatch can induce a strong graft versus lymphoma effect leading to an enhanced PFS.
-
10.
PTCy-based haploidentical vs matched related or unrelated donor reduced-intensity conditioning transplant for DLBCL
Dreger, P., Sureda, A., Ahn, K. W., Eapen, M., Litovich, C., Finel, H., Boumendil, A., Gopal, A., Herrera, A. F., Schmid, C., et al
Blood advances. 2019;3(3):360-369
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
This study retrospectively compared long-term outcomes of nonmyeloablative/reduced intensity conditioning (NMC/RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) from a haploidentical family donor (haplo-HCT) using posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) with those of matched sibling donor (MSD) and matched unrelated donor (MUD) with or without T-cell depletion (TCD+/TCD-) in patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Adult patients with DLBCL who had undergone their first NMC/RIC allo-HCT between 2008 and 2015 were included. Recipients of haplo-HCT were limited to those receiving graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with PTCy. GVHD prophylaxis in MSD was limited to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based approaches without in vivo TCD, while MUD recipients received CNI-based prophylaxis with or without TCD. Outcome analyses for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and disease relapse/progression were calculated. A total of 1438 patients (haplo, 132; MSD, 525; MUD TCD+, 403; and MUD TCD-, 378) were included. Patients with haplo donors were significantly older, had a better performance status and had more frequently received total body irradiation-based conditioning regimens and bone marrow grafts than MSD and MUD TCD+ or TCD-. 3-year OS, PFS, NRM and relapse/progression incidence after haplo-HCT was 46%, 38%, 22%, and 41%, respectively, and not significantly different from outcomes of matched donor transplants on multivariate analyses. Haplo-HCT was associated with a lower cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD compared with MSD, MUD TCD+/TCD-. NMC/RIC haplo-HCT with PTCy seems to be a valuable alternative for patients with DLBCL considered for allo-HCT but lacking a matched donor.