-
1.
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in older myelofibrosis patients: a study of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of EBMT and the Spanish Myelofibrosis Registry
Hernández-Boluda, J. C., Pereira, A., Kröger, N., Cornelissen, J. J., Finke, J., Beelen, D., de Witte, M., Wilson, K., Platzbecker, U., Sengeloev, H., et al
American journal of hematology. 2021
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is increasingly used in older myelofibrosis (MF) patients, but its risk/benefit ratio compared to non-transplant approaches has not been evaluated in this population. We analyzed the outcomes of allo-HCT in 556 MF patients aged > 65?years from the EBMT registry, and determined the excess mortality over the matched general population of MF patients > 65?years managed with allo-HCT (n=556) or conventional drug treatment (n=176). The non-transplant cohort included patients with intermediate-2 or high risk DIPSS from the Spanish Myelofibrosis Registry. After a median follow-up of 3.4?years, the estimated 5-year survival rate, non-relapse mortality (NRM), and relapse incidence after transplantation was 40%, 37%, and 25%, respectively. Busulfan-based conditioning was associated with decreased mortality (HR: 0.7, 95% CI: 0.5-0.9) whereas the recipient CMV+/donor CMV- combination (HR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.2-2.4) and the JAK2 mutated genotype (HR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.1-3.5) predicted higher mortality. Busulfan-based conditioning correlated with improved survival due to less NRM, despite its higher relapse rate when compared with melphalan-based regimens. Excess mortality was higher in transplanted patients than in the non-HCT cohort in the first year of follow-up (ratio: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.13-2.80), whereas the opposite occurred between the 4th and 8th follow-up years (ratio: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.18-0.53). Comparing the excess mortality of the two treatments, male patients seemed to benefit more than females from allo-HCT, mainly due to their worse prognosis with non-transplant approaches. These findings could potentially enhance counseling and treatment decision-making in elderly transplant-eligible MF patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
-
2.
Trends in allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis in Europe between 1995 and 2018: a CMWP of EBMT retrospective analysis
McLornan, D., Eikema, D. J., Czerw, T., Kröger, N., Koster, L., Reinhardt, H. C., Angelucci, E., Robin, M., Bornhäuser, M., Passweg, J., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2021
Abstract
We performed a retrospective assessment of patient- and transplant-specific characteristics and outcomes for 4142 patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant for myelofibrosis between 1995 and 2018 across 278 centres. Activity increased steadily across the four analysed eras (<2006, 2006-2010, 2011-2014 and 2015-2018). Median recipient age increased over time between the earliest and most recent cohort (49.4 years (range, 20.1-68) versus 59.3 years (range, 18.1-78.1). Increasing number of patients with a Karnofsky performance status <90 underwent transplant over time. Increased utilisation of matched unrelated donors was apparent (<2006, 22.5% versus 2015-18, 45.2%; p?0.001). Decreased use of myeloablative conditioning, increased use of busulphan-based platforms and anti-thymocyte globulin was evident. Of note, rates of acute (a)GVHD grade II-IV by day +100 decreased over time (p?=?0.027) as did rates of chronic (c) GVHD, predominantly extensive cGVHD (<2006, 36% (31-41%) versus 2015-18, 23% (21-25%); p?=?0.001). Overall, significant factors associated with worse overall survival and non-relapse mortality (NRM) remained older age, use of donors other than matched sibling, recipient CMV seropositivity and a lower Karnofsky performance status (<90). Multivariable analysis demonstrated improvements in overall survival and reductions in relapse risk over time with stable NRM rates despite increasing numbers of older, less fit patients and use of unrelated donors.
-
3.
Determinants of survival in myelofibrosis patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation
Hernandez-Boluda, J. C., Pereira, A., Kroger, N., Beelen, D., Robin, M., Bornhauser, M., Angelucci, E., Vitek, A., Blau, I. W., Niittyvuopio, R., et al
Leukemia. 2020
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the determinants of survival in myelofibrosis patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and to describe factors predicting the main post-HCT complications. This retrospective study by the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation included 2916 myelofibrosis patients who underwent first allo-HCT from an HLA-identical sibling or unrelated donor between 2000 and 2016. After a median follow-up of 4.7 years from transplant, projected median survival of the series was 5.3 years. Factors independently associated with increased mortality were age ≥ 60 years and Karnofsky Performance Status <90% at transplant, and occurrence of graft failure, grades III-IV acute graft-vs.-host disease (aGVHD), and disease progression/relapse during follow-up. The opposing effects of chronic graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) on non-relapse mortality and relapse incidence resulted in a neutral influence on survival. Graft failure increased in unrelated donor recipients and decreased with myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and negative donor/recipient cytomegalovirus serostatus. Risk of grades III-IV aGVHD was higher with unrelated donors and decreased with MAC. Relapse incidence tended to be higher in patients with intermediate-2/high-risk DIPSS categories and to decrease in CALR-mutated patients. Acute and chronic GVHD reduced the subsequent risk of relapse. This information has potential implications for patient counseling and clinical decision-making.
PICO Summary
Population
Myelofibrosis patients (n=2916)
Intervention
First allo-HCT from an HLA-identical sibling or unrelated donor between 2000 and 2016
Comparison
None
Outcome
After a median follow-up of 4.7 years from transplant, projected median survival of the series was 5.3 years. Factors independently associated with increased mortality were age >/= 60 years and Karnofsky Performance Status <90% at transplant, and occurrence of graft failure, grades III-IV acute graft-vs.-host disease (aGVHD), and disease progression/relapse during follow-up. The opposing effects of chronic graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) on non-relapse mortality and relapse incidence resulted in a neutral influence on survival. Graft failure increased in unrelated donor recipients and decreased with myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and negative donor/recipient cytomegalovirus serostatus. Risk of grades III-IV aGVHD was higher with unrelated donors and decreased with MAC. Relapse incidence tended to be higher in patients with intermediate-2/high-risk DIPSS categories and to decrease in CALR-mutated patients. Acute and chronic GVHD reduced the subsequent risk of relapse.
-
4.
Comparison of DIPSS and MYSEC-PM for prediction of outcome in post-PV and ET myelofibrosis after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation
Gagelmann, N., Eikema, D. J., de Wreede, L. C., Koster, L., Wolschke, C., Arnold, R., Kanz, L., McQuaker, G., Marchand, T., Socie, G., et al
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2019
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
We aimed to validate the MYelofibrosis SECondary to PV and ET prognostic model (MYSEC- PM) in 159 patients with myelofibrosis secondary to polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry undergoing transplantation from matched siblings or unrelated donors. Furthermore, we aimed to test its prognostic performance in comparison with the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS). Score performance was analyzed using the concordance index (C): the probability that a patient who experienced an event had a higher risk score than a patient who did not (C >0.5 suggesting predictive ability). Median follow-up of the total cohort was 41 months (34-54 months) being different in post-PV (45 months) and post-ET myelofibrosis (38 months). Survival at one, two, and four years was 70% (63-77%), 61% (53- 69%) and 52% (43-61%) for the total cohort, 70% (59-80%), 61% (49-73%) and 51% (38-64%) for post-PV, and 71% (61-81%), 61% (50-72%) and 54% (42-66%) for post-ET myelofibrosis (p=0.78). Overall, the DIPSS was not significantly predictive of outcome (p=0.28). With respect to the MYSEC-PM, overall survival at four years was 69% for the low-risk, 55% for the intermediate-1-risk, 47% for the intermediate-2-risk, and 22% (0-45%) for the high-risk group. The prognostic model was predictive of survival overall (p=0.05) while groups with intermediate-2 and high risk showed no significant difference (p=0.44). Assessment of prognostic utility yielded C-index of 0.575 (0.502-0.648) for the DIPSS while assessment of the MYSEC-PM resulted in C-statistics of 0.636 (0.563-0.708) indicating improvement in prediction of posttransplant survival using the new MYSEC-PM. In addition, transplantations from an unrelated donor in comparison with an HLA-identical sibling showed worse outcome (p=0.04) and transplant recipients seropositive for cytomegalovirus in comparison with seronegative recipients (p=0.01) showed worse survival. In conclusion, incorporating transplant-specific as well as clinical and mutational information together with the MYSEC-PM may enhance risk stratification.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with myelofibrosis secondary to polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry undergoing transplantation from matched siblings or unrelated donors. (n=159)
Intervention
MYelofibrosis SECondary to PV and ET prognostic model (MYSEC- PM)
Comparison
Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS)
Outcome
Overall, the DIPSS was not significantly predictive of outcome. MYSEC-PM was predictive of survival overall, while groups with intermediate-2 and high risk showed no significant difference. Assessment of prognostic utility yielded C-index of 0.575 for the DIPSS while assessment of the MYSEC-PM resulted in C-statistics of 0.636, indicating improvement in prediction of posttransplant survival using the new MYSEC-PM.
-
5.
Optimized EBMT transplant-specific risk score in myelodysplastic syndromes after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation
Gagelmann, N., Eikema, D. J., Stelljes, M., Beelen, D., de Wreede, L., Mufti, G., Knelange, N. S., Niederwieser, D., Friis, L. S., Ehnninger, G., et al
Haematologica. 2019
Abstract
Here, we aimed to develop and validate a clinical and transplant-specific prognostic score in a large cohort of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry. A Cox model was fitted to detect clinical and transplant-related variables prognostic of outcome. Then, cross-validation was assessed to evaluate the validity and consistency of the model. Seven independent risk factors for survival were identified: age ≥50 years, matched unrelated donor, Karnofsky performance status < 90%, very poor cytogenetics or monosomal karyotype, positive cytomegalovirus status of the recipient, blood blasts >1%, and platelet count ≤50 x 109/L prior to transplantation. Incorporating these factors into a four-level risk score yielded hazard ratios for death (with low-risk [score of 0-1] as reference) of 2.02 (95% CI, 1.41-2.90) for the intermediate-risk (score of 2-3), 3.49 (95% CI, 2.45-4.97) for the high-risk (score of 4-5), and 5.90 (95% CI, 4.01-8.67) for the very high-risk group (score of >5). The score was predictive of survival, relapse-free survival, relapse, and non-relapse mortality (p<0.001, respectively). Cross-validation yielded significant and reproducible improvement in prognostic ability with C-statistics being 0.609 (95% CI, 0.588-0.629) vs. 0.555 for the Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo registry and 0.579 for the Center for Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry. Prediction was even augmented after applying a nomogram using age and platelets as continuous variables showing C-statistics of 0.628 (95% CI, 0.616-0.637). In conclusion, this proposed transplant-specific risk score offers improved performance with respect to posttransplant risk stratification in myelodysplastic syndromes compared with existing prognostic systems.
-
6.
Antilymphocyte Globulin for matched sibling donor transplantation in patients with myelofibrosis
Robin, M., Chevret, S., Koster, L., Wolschke, C., Yakoub-Agha, I., Bourhis, J. H., Chevallier, P., Cornelissen, J. J., Remenyi, P., Maertens, J., et al
Haematologica. 2019
Abstract
Antihuman T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin is still much debated in the setting of transplant from an HLA matched related donor. Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease are the main cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell in patients with myelofibrosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of antihuman T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin in a large cohort of patients with myelofibrosis. 287 patients were included in the study. Cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 acute graft-versus-host disease was 26% and 41% with or without antihuman T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin. Chronic graft-versus-host disease incidence was 52% and 55%. Non-adjusted overall Survival, Disease Free Survival and non-relapse mortality were 55% vs 53%, 49% vs 45%, and 32% vs 31%, respectively with or without antihuman T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin. An adjusted model confirmed that acute graft-versus-host disease risk was lower following antihuman T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin (Hazard ratio : 0.54, p=0.010) whilst it did not decrease the risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Hazard ratio for overall survival and non-relapse mortality were 0.66 and 0.64, with p-value at 0.05 and 0.09, respectively. Antihuman T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin did not influence disease-free survival, graft-versus-host disease and relapse free survival and relapse risk. In conclusion, in the setting of matched related transplantation in myelofibrosis patients, this study demonstrates that antihuman T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin decreases acute graft-versus-host disease risk without increasing relapse risk.
-
7.
Outcome after relapse of myelodysplastic syndrome and secondary acute myeloid leukemia following allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a retrospective registry analysis on 698 patients by the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Schmid, C., de Wreede, L. C., van Biezen, A., Finke, J., Ehninger, G., Ganser, A., Volin, L., Niederwieser, D., Beelen, D., Alessandrino, P., et al
Haematologica. 2018;103(2):237-245
Abstract
No standard exists for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome relapsing after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. We performed a retrospective registry analysis of outcomes and risk factors in 698 patients, treated with different strategies. The median overall survival from relapse was 4.7 months (95% confidence interval: 4.1-5.3) and the 2-year survival rate was 17.7% (95% confidence interval: 14.8-21.2%). Shorter remission after transplantation (P<0.001), advanced disease (P=0.001), older age (P=0.007), unrelated donor (P=0.008) and acute graft-versus-host disease before relapse (P<0.001) adversely influenced survival. At 6 months from relapse, patients had received no cellular treatment, (i.e. palliative chemotherapy or best supportive care, n=375), donor lymphocyte infusion (n=213), or a second transplant (n=110). Treatment groups were analyzed separately because of imbalanced characteristics and difficulties in retrospectively evaluating the reason for individual treatments. Of the patients who did not receive any cellular therapy, 109 were alive at 6 months after relapse, achieving a median overall survival from this landmark of 8.9 months (95% confidence interval: 5.1-12.6). Their 2-year survival rate was 29.7%. Recipients of donor lymphocytes achieved a median survival from first infusion of 6.0 months (95% confidence interval: 3.7-8.3) with a 2-year survival rate of 27.6%. Longer remission after first transplantation (P<0.001) and younger age (P=0.009) predicted better outcome. Among recipients of a second transplant, the median survival from second transplantation was 4.2 months (95% confidence interval: 2.5-5.9), and their 2-year survival rate was 17.0%. Longer remission after first transplantation (P<0.001), complete remission at second transplant (P=0.008), no prior chronic graft-versus-host disease (P<0.001) and change to a new donor (P=0.04) predicted better outcome. The data enabled identification of patients benefiting from donor lymphocyte infusion and second transplantation, and may serve as a baseline for prospective trials.