1.
Predictors of lost to follow-up among pediatric and adult hematopoietic cell transplant survivors: A report from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research
Buchbinder, D., Brazauskas, R., Bo-Subait, K., Ballen, K., Parsons, S., John, T., Hahn, T., Sharma, A., Steinberg, A., D'Souza, A., et al
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2019
Abstract
BACKGROUND Follow-up is integral for hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) care to ensure surveillance and intervention for complications. We characterized the incidence of, and predictors for, being lost to follow-up. METHODS Two-year survivors of first allogeneic (10,367 adults and 3,865 children) or autologous (7,291 adults and 467 children) HCT for malignant/non-malignant disorders from 2002-2013 reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research were selected. The cumulative incidence of being lost to follow-up (defined as having missed 2 consecutive follow-up reporting periods) was calculated. Marginal Cox models (adjusted for center effect) were fit to evaluate predictors. RESULTS The 10-year cumulative incidence of being lost to follow-up among adult allogeneic and autologous HCT survivors was 13% (95% CI, 12-14) and 15% (95% CI, 14-16), respectively. Among pediatric HCT survivors, estimates were 25% (95% CI, 24-27) and 24% (95% CI, 20-29), respectively. In adult allogeneic HCT survivors, younger age, non-malignant disease, public/no insurance (reference: private), living farther from the HCT center, and being unmarried were associated with being lost to follow-up. For adult autologous HCT survivors, older age and testicular/germ cell tumor (reference: non-Hodgkin lymphoma) were associated with greater risk of being lost to follow-up. Among pediatric allogeneic HCT survivors, older age, public/no insurance (reference: private), and non-malignant disease were associated with being lost to follow-up. Among pediatric autologous HCT survivors, older age was associated with greater risk of being lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION Follow-up focusing on minimizing attrition in high-risk groups is needed to ensure surveillance for late effects.
2.
GRFS and CRFS in alternative donor hematopoietic cell transplantation for pediatric patients with acute leukemia
Mehta, R. S., Holtan, S. G., Wang, T., Hemmer, M. T., Spellman, S. R., Arora, M., Couriel, D. R., Alousi, A. M., Pidala, J., Abdel-Azim, H., et al
Blood advances. 2019;3(9):1441-1449
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
We report graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) (a composite end point of survival without grade III-IV acute GVHD [aGVHD], systemic therapy-requiring chronic GVHD [cGVHD], or relapse) and cGVHD-free relapse-free survival (CRFS) among pediatric patients with acute leukemia (n = 1613) who underwent transplantation with 1 antigen-mismatched (7/8) bone marrow (BM; n = 172) or umbilical cord blood (UCB; n = 1441). Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards models. To account for multiple testing, P < .01 for the donor/graft variable was considered statistically significant. Clinical characteristics were similar between UCB and 7/8 BM recipients, because most had acute lymphoblastic leukemia (62%), 64% received total body irradiation-based conditioning, and 60% received anti-thymocyte globulin or alemtuzumab. Methotrexate-based GVHD prophylaxis was more common with 7/8 BM (79%) than with UCB (15%), in which mycophenolate mofetil was commonly used. The univariate estimates of GRFS and CRFS were 22% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16-29) and 27% (95% CI, 20-34), respectively, with 7/8 BM and 33% (95% CI, 31-36) and 38% (95% CI, 35-40), respectively, with UCB (P < .001). In multivariate analysis, 7/8 BM vs UCB had similar GRFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.12; 95% CI, 0.87-1.45; P = .39), CRFS (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.82-1.38; P = .66), overall survival (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.80-1.44; P = .66), and relapse (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.03-2.02; P = .03). However, the 7/8 BM group had a significantly higher risk for grade III-IV aGVHD (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.16-2.48; P = .006) compared with the UCB group. UCB and 7/8 BM groups had similar outcomes, as measured by GRFS and CRFS. However, given the higher risk for grade III-IV aGVHD, UCB might be preferred for patients lacking matched donors.