1.
International society for cell & gene therapy stem cell engineering committee: Cellular therapies for the treatment of graft-versus-host-disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplant
Garcia-Rosa, M., Abraham, A., Bertaina, A., Bhoopalan, S. V., Bonfim, C., Cohen, S., DeZern, A., Louis, C., Oved, J., Pavel-Dinu, M., et al
Cytotherapy. 2023
Abstract
BACKGROUND AIMS Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant is a curative approach for many malignant and non-malignant hematologic conditions. Despite advances in its prevention and treatment, the morbidity and mortality related to graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains. The mechanisms by which currently used pharmacologic agents impair the activation and proliferation of potentially alloreactive T cells reveal pathways essential for the detrimental activities of these cell populations. Importantly, these same pathways can be important in mediating the graft-versus-leukemia effect in recipients transplanted for malignant disease. This knowledge informs potential roles for cellular therapies such as mesenchymal stromal cells and regulatory T cells in preventing or treating GVHD. This article reviews the current state of adoptive cellular therapies focused on GVHD treatment. METHODS We conducted a search for scientific literature in PubMed® and ongoing clinical trials in clinicaltrial.gov with the keywords "Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD)," "Cellular Therapies," "Regulatory T cells (Tregs)," "Mesenchymal Stromal (Stem) Cells (MSCs)," "Natural Killer (NK) Cells," "Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs)," and "Regulatory B-Cells (B-regs)." All the published and available clinical studies were included. RESULTS Although most of the existing clinical data focus on cellular therapies for GVHD prevention, there are observational and interventional clinical studies that explore the potential for cellular therapies to be safe modalities for GVHD treatment while maintaining the graft-versus-leukemia effect in the context of malignant diseases. However, there are multiple challenges that limit the broader use of these approaches in the clinical scenario. CONCLUSIONS There are many ongoing clinical trials to date with the promise to expand our actual knowledge on the role of cellular therapies for GVHD treatment in an attempt to improve GVHD-related outcomes in the near future.
2.
Treatment of steroid resistant acute graft versus host disease with an anti-CD26 monoclonal antibody-Begelomab
Bacigalupo, A., Angelucci, E., Raiola, A. M., Varaldo, R., Di Grazia, C., Gualandi, F., Benedetti, E., Risitano, A., Musso, M., Zallio, F., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2020
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
We have treated 69 patients with steroid refractory acute graft versus host disease (SR-aGvHD), with an anti-CD26 monoclonal antibody (Begelomab): 28 patients in two prospective studies (EudraCT No. 2007-005809-21; EudraCT No. 2012-001353-19), and 41 patients on a compassionate use study. The median age of patients was 42 and 44 years; the severity of GvHD was as follows: grade II in 8 patients, grade III in 33, and grade IV in 28 patients. There were no adverse events directly attributable to the antibody. Day 28 response was 75% in the prospective studies and 61% in the compassionate use patients, with complete response rates of 11 and 12%. Response for grade III GvHD was 83 and 73% in the two groups; response in grade IV GvHD was 66 and 56% in the two groups. Non relapse mortality (NRM) at 6 months was 28 and 38%. Overall there were 64, 56, 68% responses for skin, liver, and gut stage 3-4 GvHD. The overall survival at 1 year was 50% for the prospective studies and 33% for the compassionate use patients. In conclusion, Begelomab induces over 60% responses in SR-aGvHD, including patients with severe gut and liver GvHD, having failed one or more lines of treatment.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with steroid refractory acute graft versus host disease (n=69)
Intervention
Begelomab, an anti-CD26 monoclonal antibody in prospective study (n=28)
Comparison
Begelomab, an anti-CD26 monoclonal antibody in compassionate use (n=41)
Outcome
Day 28 response was 75% in the prospective studies and 61% in the compassionate use patients, with complete response rates of 11 and 12%. Response for grade III GvHD was 83 and 73% in the two groups; response in grade IV GvHD was 66 and 56% in the two groups. Non relapse mortality (NRM) at 6 months was 28 and 38%. Overall there were 64, 56, 68% responses for skin, liver, and gut stage 3-4 GvHD. The overall survival at 1 year was 50% for the prospective studies and 33% for the compassionate use patients. There were no adverse events directly attributable to the antibody
3.
Remestemcel-L for the treatment of graft versus host disease
Locatelli, F., Algeri, M., Trevisan, V., Bertaina, A.
Expert Review of Clinical Immunology. 2017;13(1):43-56
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Remestemcel-L, a third-party, off-the-shelf preparation of bone-marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), has been developed for experimental use in acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) and other immune-mediated conditions. Several preclinical and clinical studies have indeed suggested the potential of human mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) as an effective treatment for steroid-refractory aGvHD. However, an unambiguous demonstration of efficacy is still lacking. Areas covered: This review critically examines the biologic rationale supporting MSCs use in aGvHD and analyzes the results of published clinical trials in this setting, with a particular focus on the potential benefits and drawbacks of Remestemcel-L. For this purpose, a systematic literature search was performed in PubMed using the following keywords: 'mesenchymal stromal cells', 'mesenchymal progenitor cells', 'multipotent stromal cells', 'mesenchymal cells', 'MSC', 'Remestemcel-L', 'Prochymal', and 'graft-versus-host disease' or 'GvHD'. Expert commentary: Remestemcel-L represents a promising alternative to second-line immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of steroid-refractory aGvHD. Despite the safety and the favorable risk/benefit profile of this cell product, which has been demonstrated in several phase I-II studies, large and prospective randomized trials are required to confirm its efficacy in aGvHD and to define the optimal schedule of administration in terms of infusion timing, cell dose and pharmacological synergism.