-
1.
Long-term complications after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for pediatric patients with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome given either a Treosulfan- or a Busulfan-based conditioning regimen: results of an AIEOP (Associazione Italiana Ematologia Oncologia Pediatrica) retrospective study
Saglio, F., Pagliara, D., Zecca, M., Balduzzi, A., Cattoni, A., Prete, A., Tambaro, F. P., Faraci, M., Calore, E., Locatelli, F., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2024
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients given hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) during their childhood for hematological malignancies have an increased risk of developing long-term sequelae that are in part attributable to the conditioning regimen. OBJECTIVE The present study aimed to assess the occurrence of long-term toxicities in a population of children undergone to HSCT for hematological malignancies using either Treosulfan or Busulfan in the conditioning regimen. STUDY DESIGN Cumulative Incidence of growth impairment, alteration of gonadal function, alteration of the thyroid function, cataract, incidence of secondary malignant neoplasia and alteration of pulmonary function were retrospectively evaluated by univariable and multivariable analysis in a population of 521 pediatric patients affected by acute leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes treated in 20 Italian Transplant Centers affiliated to AIEOP (Associazione Italiana Ematologia ed Oncologia Pediatrica) RESULTS The median duration of the follow up of the entire study population was of 7,1 years (range 1 -16 years). Overall, patients given Busulfan developed long-term toxicities in a larger proportion of cases compared to patients treated with Treosulfan (34% versus 20% p=0.01). In univariable analysis, patients having received Treosulfan developed gonadal toxicity in 10% (95%CI: 3-15) of the cases compared with 38% (95%CI: 24-39) of Bu-treated patients (p=0,02) and this finding was confirmed by multivariable analysis (Relative Risk: 0,51 95%CI: 0,34-0,76 p=0.0009). For all the other long-term toxicities our study did not show a statistically significant association between their occurrence and the use of either Busulfan or Treosulfan. CONCLUSIONS This study provides evidence that the use of Treosulfan is correlated with a reduced incidence of gonadal toxicity in children undergoing HSCT for hematological malignancies.
-
2.
Busulfan-fludarabine- or treosulfan-fludarabine-based conditioning before allogeneic HSCT from matched sibling donors in paediatric patients with sickle cell disease: A study on behalf of the EBMT Paediatric Diseases and Inborn Errors Working Parties
Cseh, A., Galimard, J. E., de la Fuente, J., Isgro, A., Zecca, M., Garwer, B., Biffi, A., Aljurf, M., Sundin, M., Belendez, C., et al
British journal of haematology. 2023
-
-
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
How important is choice of conditioning regimen in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for sickle cell disease (SCD)? We compared HSCT outcomes by conditioning regimen in paediatric patients with SCD from the EBMT registry. In 2010-2020, 251 patients aged <18 years underwent a first matched sibling donor (MSD) HSCT with conditioning based on busulfan-fludarabine (bu-flu; n = 89) or treosulfan-fludarabine (treo-flu; n = 162). In the bu-flu and treo-flu groups, 51.7% and 99.4% of patients, respectively, received thiotepa. Median follow-up was 2.7 years. Two-year overall survival (OS) was 98.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 90.9-99.8) with bu-flu and 99.3% (95% CI: 95.2-99.9) with treo-flu (p = 0.63). Grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at 100 days was 2.4% (95% CI: 0.4-7.5) and 0.6% (0.1%-3.2%) for bu-flu and treo-flu respectively (p = 0.25). The 2-year incidence of extensive chronic GVHD was 1.5% (95% CI: 0.1-7.3) with bu-flu and 8.0% (95% CI: 4.1-13.3) with treo-flu (p = 0.057). These multinational data confirm the excellent curative capacity of MSD HSCT with myeloablative conditioning. Both conditioning regimens yielded excellent OS, low rates of acute and chronic GVHD, and low rates of graft failure.
PICO Summary
Population
Children who underwent transplant for sickle cell disease, identified from the EBMT registry (n=251)
Intervention
Conditioning based on busulfan-fludarabine (bu-flu, n=89)
Comparison
Conditoning based on treosulfan-fludarabine (treo-flu, n=162).
Outcome
Median follow-up was 2.7 years. Two-year overall survival (OS) was 98.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 90.9-99.8) with bu-flu and 99.3% (95% CI: 95.2-99.9) with treo-flu. Grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at 100 days was 2.4% (95% CI: 0.4-7.5) and 0.6% (0.1%-3.2%) for bu-flu and treo-flu respectively. The 2-year incidence of extensive chronic GVHD was 1.5% (95% CI: 0.1-7.3) with bu-flu and 8.0% (95% CI: 4.1-13.3) with treo-flu.
-
3.
Thyroid disorders following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in childhood: the impact of the conditioning regimen on thyroid dysfunction, volume changes and occurrence of nodules
Cattoni, A., Molinari, S., Gaiero, A., De Lorenzo, P., Fichera, G., Riva, B., Di Marco, S., Tommesani, C., Mariani, E., Medici, F., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2022
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thyroid late effects are among the most frequent sequelae reported after pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Though the detrimental effects of radiotherapy on the developing thyroid gland have been extensively assessed, the role of chemotherapy-only conditioning regimens is still controversial. OBJECTIVE We aimed at describing the occurrence, monitoring and management of thyroid function disorders (i.e. Graves' disease, Hashimoto thyroiditis and non-autoimmune hypothyroidism), nodules and volumetric changes over a 20-year observation period in a single pediatric transplant unit. In addition, we assessed the impact of different conditioning regimens on thyroid health. STUDY design Retrospective observational analysis. The study population included 244 patients transplanted for pediatric malignant or non-malignant diseases between 1999 and 2018 and for whom at least four thyroid function tests and one or more thyroid ultrasound(s) assessed sequentially after HSCT were available. RESULTS The 15-year cumulative incidence (CI) of either autoimmune or non-autoimmune thyroid dysfunctions (34%, SE 5.3%) did not statistically differ between total body irradiation- (TBI-) and chemo-based regimens (p 0.23). Indeed, the CI after busulfan (BU) was overall superimposable to that recorded after TBI (10-year CI: 22.2% versus 25.9%, respectively). Nevertheless, the CI of non-autoimmune hypothyroidism was statistically higher after BU- (12.4%, SE 3.7%) than after other chemotherapy only-based-conditionings (3.1%, SE 3.1%; p 0.02, 5-year CI), treosulfan included. The overall CI of nodules was low for the first 5 years after HSCT (1.9%, SE 0.9%), but it showed a subsequent steep increase over time, with a 15-year CI as high as 52.1% (SE 7.5%). TBI-conditioned patients experienced a higher 15-year CI of nodules (66.8%, SE 9.1%) compared to those receiving chemo-only regimens (33.6%, SE 9.5%; p 0.02), whereas age > 10 years upon transplantation showed a protective effect (HR 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.2-0.88). Finally, a systematic sonographic follow-up highlighted a progressive statistically significant reduction in thyroid antero-posterior diameter among patients conditioned with TBI (p 0.005), but not after chemo-only regimens. CONCLUSIONS TBI and younger age upon HSCT play a remarkable and statistically demonstrated detrimental role on the occurrence of thyroid nodules, both benign and malignant. TBI and BU expose patients to a higher cumulative incidence of thyroid dysfunctions than other chemo-only regimens, treosulfan included. Accordingly, BU can be regarded as the most thyrotoxic agent among those administered as a part of a chemo-only conditioning regimen. Finally, patients conditioned with TBI, but not with other regimens, show a progressive decrease in thyroid volume over time, as assessed by sequential ultrasounds.
-
4.
Occurrence of long-term effects after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children affected by acute leukemia receiving either busulfan or total body irradiation: results of an AIEOP (Associazione Italiana Ematologia Oncologia Pediatrica) retrospective study
Saglio, F., Zecca, M., Pagliara, D., Giorgiani, G., Balduzzi, A., Calore, E., Favre, C., Faraci, M., Prete, A., Tambaro, F. P., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2020
Abstract
Patients given allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) present an increased incidence of long-term toxicities that can be attributed to the preparative regimen. We retrospectively analyzed in a population of 670 children receiving allo-HSCT for acute leukemia the occurrence of different late effects in function of the choice made between total body irradiation (TBI) and busulfan, as part of the preparative regimen. In univariable analysis, we found that patients treated with TBI developed cataract in 24% of the cases compared with 4% in patients treated with BU (p = 0.0001) and that the incidence of secondary malignant neoplasia (SMN) was higher in patients treated with TBI (18%) as compared with those prepared to the allograft with a Bu-based regimen (0%) (p = 0.019). Conditioning regimen did not show a statistically significant correlation with the occurrence of all the other investigated late effects. In multivariable analysis, TBI remained associated with the occurrence of cataracts (Relative Risk: 0.33 p = 0.012) and secondary malignancies (Relative Risk 3.96 x 10e-6 p < 0.001); however, other variables, as GvHD and disease type, were also correlated with these long-term sequels, indicating that in our study population the preparative regimen is not the only factor influencing the incidence of these complications.
-
5.
Myeloablative conditioning for allo-HSCT in pediatric ALL: FTBI or chemotherapy?-A multicenter EBMT-PDWP study
Willasch, A. M., Peters, C., Sedlacek, P., Dalle, J. H., Kitra-Roussou, V., Yesilipek, A., Wachowiak, J., Lankester, A., Prete, A., Hamidieh, A. A., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2020
Abstract
Although most children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) receive fractionated total body irradiation (FTBI) as myeloablative conditioning (MAC) for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), it is an important matter of debate if chemotherapy can effectively replace FTBI. To compare outcomes after FTBI versus chemotherapy-based conditioning (CC), we performed a retrospective EBMT registry study. Children aged 2-18 years after MAC for first allo-HSCT of bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) from matched-related (MRD) or unrelated donors (UD) in first (CR1) or second remission (CR2) between 2000 and 2012 were included. Propensity score weighting was used to control pretreatment imbalances of the observed variables. 3.054 patients were analyzed. CR1 (1.498): median follow-up (FU) after FTBI (1.285) and CC (213) was 6.8 and 6.1 years. Survivals were not significantly different. CR2 (1.556): median FU after FTBI (1.345) and CC (211) was 6.2 years. Outcomes after FTBI were superior as compared with CC with regard to overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), relapse incidence (RI), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). However, we must emphasize the preliminary character of the results of this retrospective "real-world-practice" study. These findings will be prospectively assessed in the ALL SCTped 2012 FORUM trial.
-
6.
Total Body Irradiation or Chemotherapy Conditioning in Childhood ALL: A Multinational, Randomized, Noninferiority Phase III Study
Peters, C., Dalle, J. H., Locatelli, F., Poetschger, U., Sedlacek, P., Buechner, J., Shaw, P. J., Staciuk, R., Ifversen, M., Pichler, H., et al
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2020;:Jco2002529
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
PURPOSE Total body irradiation (TBI) before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is efficacious, but long-term side effects are concerning. We investigated whether preparative combination chemotherapy could replace TBI in such patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS FORUM is a randomized, controlled, open-label, international, multicenter, phase III, noninferiority study. Patients = 18 years at diagnosis, 4-21 years at HSCT, in complete remission pre-HSCT, and with an HLA-compatible related or unrelated donor were randomly assigned to myeloablative conditioning with fractionated 12 Gy TBI and etoposide versus fludarabine, thiotepa, and either busulfan or treosulfan. The noninferiority margin was 8%. With 1,000 patients randomly assigned in 5 years, 2-year minimum follow-up, and one-sided alpha of 5%, 80% power was calculated. A futility stopping rule would halt random assignment if chemoconditioning was significantly inferior to TBI (EudraCT: 2012-003032-22; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01949129). RESULTS Between April 2013 and December 2018, 543 patients were screened, 417 were randomly assigned, 212 received TBI, and 201 received chemoconditioning. The stopping rule was applied on March 31, 2019. The median follow-up was 2.1 years. In the intention-to-treat population, 2-year overall survival (OS) was significantly higher following TBI (0.91; 95% CI, 0.86 to 0.95; P < .0001) versus chemoconditioning (0.75; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.81). Two-year cumulative incidence of relapse and treatment-related mortality were 0.12 (95% CI, 0.08 to 0.17; P < .0001) and 0.02 (95% CI, < 0.01 to 0.05; P = .0269) following TBI and 0.33 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.40) and 0.09 (95% CI, 0.05 to 0.14) following chemoconditioning, respectively. CONCLUSION Improved OS and lower relapse risk were observed following TBI plus etoposide compared with chemoconditioning. We therefore recommend TBI plus etoposide for patients > 4 years old with high-risk ALL undergoing allogeneic HSCT.
Clinical Commentary
Dr. Julia Wolf, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
What is known?
Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) provides a potential curative treatment option for paediatric patients with high risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Pre-transplant conditioning regimes with total body irradiation (TBI) have resulted in encouraging overall and relapse-free survival but may cause serious long-term side effects. As a result, several studies have investigated TBI-free regimes. A large meta-analysis (1) which included seven randomised controlled trials comparing TBI-based with chemoconditioning regimes demonstrated significantly lower treatment related mortality (TRM) but no overall survival (OS) advantage with TBI-based regimes. A further small randomised study (2) found significantly higher event-free survival (EFS) with TBI-based regimes in patients with unrelated donors, but a non-significant difference only in patients with matched sibling donors. Concerns about late effects of TBI on growth, cognitive function and secondary malignancy however remain. A single centre retrospective study (3) in paediatric ALL concluded that triosulphan based regimes were safe and efficacious while a similar review (4) in adult patients suggested that busulphan and clofarabine could provide an alternative to TBI. This paper reports on the FORUM study. It compares TBI with chemoconditioning regimes to investigate whether optimal chemoconditioning regimens could replace TBI in paediatric patients with high-risk ALL.
What did this paper set out to examine?
This is the largest randomised, controlled, open-label, international, multicentre, phase III trial comparing TBI plus etoposide with chemoconditioning (fludarabine, thiotepa and busulfan or triosulfan) in paediatric ALL to date. It investigates whether chemoconditioning is non-inferior to TBI-based regimes with the primary endpoint of OS. It is also the first study to directly and prospectively compare these regimes in terms of disease-free survival and short- and long-term adverse events. The study aimed to recruit 1000 patients.
What did they show?
Improved OS and lower relapse risk were observed following TBI plus etoposide compared with chemoconditioning. Patients ≤18 years old at diagnosis and aged 4-21 at HSCT with high risk ALL in complete morphological remission with HLA compatible related or unrelated donor were included in the study. Patients were randomised 1:1 to 12Gy TBI with etoposide versus fludarabine, thiotepa and busulfan or triosulphan conditioning. Patients were well matched for baseline characteristics and demographics. Randomisation was stopped early due significant inferiority of chemoconditioning compared with TBI-based regime.
Results
Following randomisation of 417 patients, a futility stopping rule was applied because patients receiving chemoconditioning with fludarabine, thiotepa, and busulfan or treosulfan had inferior OS to those receiving TBI plus etoposide. Two-year OS was 0.91 (95% CI, P <.0001) following TBI versus 0.75 (95% CI) following chemoconditioning. Median follow up was 2.1 years. Relapse was the commonest reason for treatment failure and out of 67 patients who relapsed, there was no difference in OS between conditioning regimes. There was no difference in serious adverse events or GvHD rates between the groups.
What are the implications for practice and for future work?
While TBI is associated with potentially serious long-term side effects, this study supports growing evidence demonstrating improved outcomes for patients undergoing TBI-based conditioning. Here patients receiving TBI-based conditioning had a significantly lower risk of relapse and TRM than those given chemoconditioning.
Of note, TRM in this trial was low compared to previously reported studies. FOCUS reported a 2-year OS and EFS rate of 0.91 and 0.91 respectively, which is the lowest documented TRM in HSCT for high-risk paediatric ALL to date. Additionally, other risk factors thought to impact on outcomes (e.g. leukaemia phenotype, MRD pre-transplant, donor type, etc) were not found to be significant in FOCUS. Only remission status (CR1 vs CR2) and conditioning regime influenced OS and EFS. This may be in part explained by the strong attempts within this study to reduce MRD prior to HSCT in all patients.
This was a noninferiority study which required a sample size of 1000 patients with 2-year minimum follow-up to make analysis of primary outcomes feasible. As the majority of relapses in paediatric ALL occur in the first 24 months, it is unlikely that longer follow up would result in dramatic changes to outcomes.
Non-randomised recruitment in FORUM to assess long-term side effects of TBI, such as secondary malignancy, in FORUM is ongoing. However, no difference in adverse events or incidence of GvHD was found between study groups. The study reports a composite end point of 2-year GVHD-free, relapse-free survival of 72% (95% CI) following TBI plus etoposide and 51% (95% CI, p= .0003) following chemoconditioning which might be a benchmark for future investigations.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia at or before 18 years of age, who underwent HSCT aged 4-21 years (n=413)
Intervention
TBI conditioning (n=212)
Comparison
Chemoconditioning: fludarabine, thiotepa, and either busulfan or treosulfan (n=201)
Outcome
The median follow-up was 2.1 years. In the intention-to-treat population, 2-year overall survival (OS) was significantly higher following TBI (0.91) versus chemoconditioning (0.75). Two-year cumulative incidence of relapse and treatment-related mortality were 0.12 and 0.02 following TBI and 0.33 and 0.09 following chemoconditioning, respectively.