1.
Hematopoietic cell transplantation in severe combined immunodeficiency: the SCETIDE 2006-2014 European cohort
Lankester, A. C., Neven, B., Mahlaoui, N., von Asmuth, E. G., Courteille, V., Alligon, M., Albert, M. H., Serra, I. B., Bader, P., Balashov, D., et al
The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology. 2021
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) represents a curative treatment for patients with severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), a group of monogenic immune disorders with an otherwise fatal outcome. OBJECTIVE To perform a comprehensive multicenter analysis of genotype-specific HSCT outcome including detailed analysis of immune reconstitution (IR) and the predictive value for clinical outcome. METHODS HSCT outcome was studied in 338 patients with genetically confirmed SCID, transplanted in 2006-2014 and registered in the SCETIDE registry. In a representative subgroup of n=152 patients data on IR and long-term clinical outcome were analyzed. RESULTS 2-years OS was similar with matched family and unrelated donors and superior to mismatched donor HSCT (p < 0.001). The 2-year EFS was similar in matched and mismatched unrelated donor and less favorable in mismatched related donor (MMRD) HSCT (p < 0.001). Genetic subgroups did not differ in 2-year OS (p=0.1) and EFS (p=0.073). In multivariate analysis, pretransplant infections and use of MMRD were associated with less favorable OS and EFS. With a median follow-up of 6.2 years [range 2.0-11.8 years], 73/152 IR cohort patients were alive and well without immunoglobulin dependency. IL2R?-JAK3-IL7R deficient SCID, myeloablative conditioning, matched donor HSCT, and naïve CD4 T lymphocytes > 0.5x10e3/µL at +1-year were identified as independent predictors of favorable clinical and immunological outcome. CONCLUSION Recent advances in HSCT in SCID patients have resulted in improved OS and EFS in all genotypes and donor types. To achieve a favorable long term outcome, treatment strategies should aim for optimal naïve CD4 T lymphocyte regeneration.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) transplanted in the years 2006-2014 and reported to the SCETIDE registry (n=338) Long-term outcomes were assessed in a representative subgroup (n=152)
Intervention
Assessment of the impact of donor source and SCID genetic diagnosis on transplant outcomes
Comparison
None
Outcome
2-years OS was similar with matched family and unrelated donors and superior to mismatched donor HSCT. The 2-year EFS was similar in matched and mismatched unrelated donor and less favorable in mismatched related donor (MMRD) HSCT. Genetic subgroups did not differ in 2-year OS and EFS. In multivariate analysis, pretransplant infections and use of MMRD were associated with less favorable OS and EFS. With a median follow-up of 6.2 years [range 2.0-11.8 years], 73/152 IR cohort patients were alive and well without immunoglobulin dependency IL-2 receptor gamma chain/Janus kinase 3/IL-7 receptor–deficient SCID, myeloablative conditioning, matched donor HSCT, and naïve CD4 T lymphocytes > 0.5x10e3/µL at +1-year were identified as independent predictors of favorable clinical and immunological outcome.
2.
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in leukocyte adhesion deficiency type I and III
Bakhtiar, S., Salzmann-Manrique, E., Blok, H. J., Eikema, D. J., Hazelaar, S., Ayas, M., Toren, A., Goldstein, G., Moshous, D., Locatelli, F., et al
Blood advances. 2021;5(1):262-273
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Type I and III leukocyte adhesion deficiencies (LADs) are primary immunodeficiency disorders resulting in early death due to infections and additional bleeding tendency in LAD-III. The curative treatment of LAD-I and LAD-III is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). In this retrospective multicenter study, data were collected using the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry; we analyzed data from 84 LAD patients from 33 centers, all receiving an allo-HSCT from 2007 to 2017. The 3-year overall survival estimate (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 83% (74-92) for the entire cohort: 84% (75-94) and 75% (50-100) for LAD-I and LAD-III, respectively. We observed cumulative incidences (95% CI) of graft failure (GF) at 3 years of 17% (9%-26%) and grade II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) at 100 days of 24% (15%-34%). The estimate (95% CI) at 3 years for GF- and GVHD-II to IV-free survival as event-free survival (EFS) was 56% (46-69) for the entire cohort; 58% (46-72) and 56% (23-88) for LAD-I and LAD-III, respectively. Grade II to IV acute GVHD was a relevant risk factor for death (hazard ratio 3.6; 95% CI 1.4-9.1; P = .006). Patients' age at transplant =13 months, transplantation from a nonsibling donor, and any serological cytomegalovirus mismatch in donor-recipient pairs were significantly associated with severe acute GVHD and inferior EFS. The choice of busulfan- or treosulfan-based conditioning, type of GVHD prophylaxis, and serotherapy did not impact overall survival, EFS, or aGVHD. An intrinsic inflammatory component of LAD may contribute to inflammatory complications during allo-HSCT, thus providing the rationale for considering anti-inflammatory therapy pretreatment.