-
1.
Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide-Based Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis
Bolaños-Meade, J., Hamadani, M., Wu, J., Al Malki, M. M., Martens, M. J., Runaas, L., Elmariah, H., Rezvani, A. R., Gooptu, M., Larkin, K. T., et al
The New England journal of medicine. 2023;388(25):2338-2348
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT), a calcineurin inhibitor plus methotrexate has been a standard prophylaxis against graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). A phase 2 study indicated the potential superiority of a post-transplantation regimen of cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. METHODS In a phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned adults with hematologic cancers in a 1:1 ratio to receive cyclophosphamide-tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil (experimental prophylaxis) or tacrolimus-methotrexate (standard prophylaxis). The patients underwent HSCT from an HLA-matched related donor or a matched or 7/8 mismatched (i.e., mismatched at only one of the HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, and HLA-DRB1 loci) unrelated donor, after reduced-intensity conditioning. The primary end point was GVHD-free, relapse-free survival at 1 year, assessed in a time-to-event analysis, with events defined as grade III or IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD warranting systemic immunosuppression, disease relapse or progression, and death from any cause. RESULTS In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, GVHD-free, relapse-free survival was significantly more common among the 214 patients in the experimental-prophylaxis group than among the 217 patients in the standard-prophylaxis group (hazard ratio for grade III or IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, disease relapse or progression, or death, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.83; P = 0.001). At 1 year, the adjusted GVHD-free, relapse-free survival was 52.7% (95% CI, 45.8 to 59.2) with experimental prophylaxis and 34.9% (95% CI, 28.6 to 41.3) with standard prophylaxis. Patients in the experimental-prophylaxis group appeared to have less severe acute or chronic GVHD and a higher incidence of immunosuppression-free survival at 1 year. Overall and disease-free survival, relapse, transplantation-related death, and engraftment did not differ substantially between the groups. CONCLUSIONS Among patients undergoing allogeneic HLA-matched HSCT with reduced-intensity conditioning, GVHD-free, relapse-free survival at 1 year was significantly more common among those who received cyclophosphamide-tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil than among those who received tacrolimus-methotrexate. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; BMT CTN 1703 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03959241.).
PICO Summary
Population
Adults with hematologic cancers undergoing HLA-matched related donor or a matched or 7/8 mismatched unrelated donor transplant, enrolled in an RCT in multiple centres in USA (n=431)
Intervention
Cyclophosphamide-tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil (experimental prophylaxis, n=214)
Comparison
Tacrolimus-methotrexate (standard prophylaxis (standard prophylaxis, n=217)
Outcome
GVHD-free, relapse-free survival was significantly more common among patients in the experimental-prophylaxis group than among the standard-prophylaxis group (hazard ratio for grade III or IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, disease relapse or progression, or death, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.83). At 1 year, the adjusted GVHD-free, relapse-free survival was 52.7% (95% CI, 45.8 to 59.2) with experimental prophylaxis and 34.9% (95% CI, 28.6 to 41.3) with standard prophylaxis. Patients in the experimental-prophylaxis group appeared to have less severe acute or chronic GVHD and a higher incidence of immunosuppression-free survival at 1 year. Overall and disease-free survival, relapse, transplantation-related death, and engraftment did not differ substantially between the groups.
-
2.
Phase 2 study of natalizumab plus standard corticosteroid treatment for high-risk acute graft-versus-host disease
Al Malki, M. M., London, K., Baez, J., Akahoshi, Y., Hogan, W. J., Etra, A. M., Choe, H. K., Hexner, E. O., Langston, A., Abhyankar, S. H., et al
Blood advances. 2023
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
GVHD of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is the main cause of non-relapse mortality following allogeneic HCT. Ann Arbor (AA) scores derived from serum biomarkers at onset of GVHD quantify GI crypt damage; AA 2/3 scores correlate with resistance to treatment and higher non-relapse mortality (NRM). We conducted a multicenter, phase 2 study using natalizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks T cell trafficking to the GI tract through the α4 subunit of α4β7 integrin, combined with corticosteroids as primary treatment for patients with new onset AA 2/3 GVHD. Seventy-five evaluable patients were enrolled and treated; 81% received natalizumab within 2 days of starting corticosteroids. Therapy was well tolerated with no treatment emergent adverse events (AEs) in more than 10% of patients. Outcomes for patients treated with natalizumab plus corticosteroids were compared to 150 well matched controls from the MAGIC database whose primary treatment was corticosteroids alone. There were no significant differences in overall or complete response between patients treated with natalizumab plus corticosteroids and corticosteroids alone controls (60% vs. 58%; P=0.67 and 48% vs. 48%; P=1.0, respectively) including relevant subgroups. There were also no significant differences in NRM or overall survival (OS) at 12 months in patients treated with natalizumab plus corticosteroids compared to controls treated with corticosteroids alone (38% vs 39%, P=0.80 and 46% vs 54%, P=0.48, respectively). In this multicenter biomarker-based phase 2 study, natalizumab combined with corticosteroids failed to improve outcome of patients with newly diagnosed high risk GVHD.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults with new onset high risk GvHD from 12 centres in USA (n=75)
Intervention
Natalizumab combined with corticosteroids (n=75)
Comparison
Matched controls from the MAGIC database whose primary treatment was corticosteroids alone (n=150)
Outcome
There were no significant differences in overall or complete response between patients treated with natalizumab plus corticosteroids and corticosteroids alone controls (60% vs. 58% and 48% vs. 48%, respectively) including relevant subgroups. There were also no significant differences in NRM or overall survival (OS) at 12 months in patients treated with natalizumab plus corticosteroids compared to controls treated with corticosteroids alone (38% vs 39% and 46% vs 54%, respectively).
-
3.
Effective treatment of low risk acute GVHD with itacitinib monotherapy
Etra, A. M., Capellini, A., Alousi, A. M., Al Malki, M. M., Choe, H. K., DeFilipp, Z., Hogan, W. J., Kitko, C. L., Ayuk, F. A., Baez, J., et al
Blood. 2022
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
The standard primary treatment for acute graft vs host disease (GVHD) requires prolonged, high dose systemic corticosteroids (SCS) that delay reconstitution of the immune system. We used validated clinical and biomarker staging criteria to identify a group of patients with low risk (LR) GVHD that is very likely to respond to SCS. We hypothesized that itacitinib, a selective JAK1 inhibitor, would effectively treat LR GVHD without SCS. We treated 70 patients with LR GVHD in a multicenter, phase 2 trial (NCT03846479) with 28 days of itacitinib 200 mg/day (responders could receive a second 28-day cycle) and compared their outcomes to 140 contemporaneous, matched control patients treated with SCS. More patients responded to itacitinib within 7 days (81% vs 66%, p=0.02) and response rates at day 28 were very high for both groups (89% vs 86%, p=0.67) with few symptomatic flares (11% vs 12%, p=0.88). Fewer itacitinib treated patients developed a serious infection within 90 days (27% vs 42%, p=0.04) due to fewer viral and fungal infections. Grade ≥3 cytopenias were similar between groups except for less severe leukopenia with itacitinib (16% vs 31%, p=0.02). No other grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in >10% of itacitinib treated patients. There were no significant differences between groups at 1-year for non-relapse mortality (4% vs 11%, p=0.21), relapse (18% vs 21%, p=0.64), chronic GVHD (28% vs 33%, p=0.33) or survival (88% vs 80%, p=0.11). Itacitinib monotherapy seems to be a safe and effective alternative to SCS treatment for LR GVHD that deserves further investigation.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults with low risk GVHD enrolled in a phase 2 trial NCT03846479 (n=210)
Intervention
28 days of itacitinib 200 mg/day (responders could receive a second 28-day cycle) (n=70)
Comparison
Contemporaneous, matched control patients treated with systemic corticosteroids (n=140)
Outcome
More patients responded to itacitinib within 7 days (81% vs 66%) and response rates at day 28 were very high for both groups (89% vs 86%) with few symptomatic flares (11% vs 12%). Fewer itacitinib treated patients developed a serious infection within 90 days (27% vs 42%) due to fewer viral and fungal infections. Grade ≥3 cytopenias were similar between groups except for less severe leukopenia with itacitinib (16% vs 31%). No other grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in >10% of itacitinib treated patients. There were no significant differences between groups at 1-year for non-relapse mortality (4% vs 11%), relapse (18% vs 21%), chronic GVHD (28% vs 33%) or survival (88% vs 80%).
-
4.
The Role of Allogeneic Transplant for Adult Ph+ ALL in CR1 with Complete Molecular Remission: A Retrospective Analysis
Ghobadi, A., Slade, M., Kantarjian, H. M., Alvarenga, J., Aldoss, I., Mohammed, K., Jabbour, E. J., Faramand, R. G., Shah, B. D., Locke, F. L., et al
Blood. 2022
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Historically, Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has been associated with poor outcomes and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is recommended in first complete remission (CR1). However, in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) era, rapid attainment of a complete molecular remission (CMR) is associated with excellent outcomes without allo-HCT, suggesting transplant may not be required for these patients. To test this hypothesis, we retrospectively identified adult patients with Ph+ ALL treated with induction therapy including TKIs and attained CMR within 90 days of diagnosis at 5 transplant centers in the United States. We compared outcomes of those who did and did not receive allo-HCT in first remission. We identified 230 patients (Allo-HCT: 98, non-HCT: 132). The allo-HCT cohort was younger with better performance status. On multivariable analysis (MVA), allo-HCT was not associated with improved overall survival (aHR 1.05, 95% C.I. 0.63 - 1.73) or relapse-free survival (aHR: 0.86, 95% C.I. 0.54 - 1.37) compared to non-HCT treatment. Allo-HCT was associated with a lower cumulative incidence of relapse (aHR 0.32, 95% C.I. 0.17 - 0.62) but higher non-relapse mortality (aHR: 2.59, 95% C.I. 1.37 - 4.89). Propensity score matching analysis confirmed results of MVA. Comparison of reduced-intensity HCT to non-HCT showed no statistically significant difference in any of the above endpoints. In conclusion, adult patients with Ph+ ALL who achieved CMR within 90 days of starting treatment did not derive a survival benefit from allo-HCT in CR1 in this retrospective study.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (Ph+ALL) from five centres in the USA (n=230)
Intervention
Allogeneic transplant in first remission (Allo-HCT, n=98)
Comparison
No allogeneic transplant in first remission (non-HCT, n=132)
Outcome
The allo-HCT cohort was younger with better performance status. On multivariable analysis (MVA), allo-HCT was not associated with improved overall survival (aHR 1.05, 95% C.I. 0.63 - 1.73) or relapse-free survival (aHR: 0.86, 95% C.I. 0.54 - 1.37) compared to non-HCT treatment. Allo-HCT was associated with a lower cumulative incidence of relapse (aHR 0.32, 95% C.I. 0.17 - 0.62) but higher non-relapse mortality (aHR: 2.59, 95% C.I. 1.37 - 4.89). Propensity score matching analysis confirmed results of MVA. Comparison of reduced-intensity HCT to non-HCT showed no statistically significant difference in any of the above endpoints.
-
5.
Treatment of Allosensitized Patients Receiving Allogeneic Transplantation
Ciurea, S. O., Al Malki, M. M., Kongtim, P., Zou, J., Aung, F. M., Rondon, G., Chen, J., Taniguchi, M., Otoukesh, S., Nademanee, A., et al
Blood advances. 2021
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are a major cause of engraftment failure in patients receiving haploidentical stem cell transplantation (HaploSCT). Effective treatments are needed for these patients who often have no other donor options and/or are in need to proceed urgently to transplantation. We studied a multimodality treatment with alternate day plasma exchange, rituximab, intravenous gamma globulin (IvIg) and an irradiated donor buffy coat for patients with DSA at two institutions. Thirty-seven patients with a median age of 51 years were treated with this desensitization protocol. Treatment outcomes were compared with a control group of HaploSCT patients without DSA (N=345). Majority of patients in the DSA group were females (83.8% vs. 37.1% in controls, p<0.001) and received stem cells from a child as donor (67.6% vs. 44.1%, p=0.002). Mean DSA level before and after desensitization was 10,198 and 5,937 MFI, respectively with mean differences of 4,030 MFI. Fourteen of 30 tested patients (46.7%) had C1q positivity while 8 of 29 tested patients (27.6%) remained positive after desensitization. In multivariable analysis, patients with initial DSA >20,000 MFI and with persistent C1q+ after desensitization had a significantly lower engraftment rate, resulted in a significantly higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) and worse overall survival (OS) than controls whereas graft outcome and survivals of patients with initial DSA <20,000 MFI and those with negative C1q after treatment were comparable with controls. In conclusion, treatment with plasma exchange, rituximab, IvIg and donor buffy coat is effective in promoting engraftment in patients with DSA up to 20,000 MFI.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with donor specific antibodies (DSAs) from two US centres, receiving allogeneic transplantation (DSA group, n=37)
Intervention
Desensitisation protocol: alternate day plasma exchange, rituximab, intravenous gamma globulin (IvIg) and an irradiated donor buffy coat (n=37)
Comparison
Patients without DSAs undergoing haploidentical transplantation (Control, n=345)
Outcome
The majority of patients in the DSA group were female (83.8% vs 37.1% in controls,) and received stem cells from a child as the donor (67.6% vs 44.1%). Mean DSA level before and after desensitization was 10 198 and 5937 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), respectively, with mean differences of 4030 MFI. Fourteen of 30 tested patients (46.7%) had C1q positivity, while 8 of 29 tested patients (27.6%) remained positive after desensitization. In multivariable analysis, patients with initial DSA > 20 000 MFI and persistent positive C1q after desensitization had a significantly lower engraftment rate, which resulted in significantly higher non-relapse mortality and worse overall survival (OS) than controls, whereas graft outcome and survival of patients with initial DSA < 20 000 MFI and those with negative C1q after treatment were comparable with controls.
-
6.
HLA Haploidentical versus Matched Unrelated Donor Transplants with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide based prophylaxis
Gooptu, M., Romee, R., St Martin, A., Arora, M., Al Malki, M. M., Antin, J. H., Bredeson, C. N., Brunstein, C. G., Chhabra, S., Fuchs, E. J., et al
Blood. 2021
-
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Post transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis has allowed haploidentical (Haplo) transplantation to be performed with results similar to that after matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplantation with traditional prophylaxis. The relative value of transplantation with MUD versus Haplo donors when both groups receive PTCy/calcineurin inhibitor/mycophenolate containing GVHD prophylaxis is not known. We compared outcomes after 2036 Haplo and 284 MUD transplantations with PTCy GVHD prophylaxis for acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome in adults between 2011 and 2018. Cox regression models were built to compare outcomes between donor types. Recipients of myeloablative and reduced intensity regimens were analyzed separately. Among recipients of reduced intensity regimens, 2-year graft failure (3% versus 11%), acute grade II-IV GVHD (HR 0.70, p=0.022), acute grade III-IV GVHD (HR 0.41, p=0.016) and non-relapse mortality (HR 0.43, p=0.0008) were lower after MUD compared to Haplo transplantation. Consequently, disease-free (HR 0.74, p=0.008; 55% versus 41%) and overall survival (HR 0.65, p=0.001; 67% versus 54%) were higher after MUD compared to Haplo transplants. Among recipients of myeloablative regimens, day-100 platelet recovery (95% versus 88%) was higher and grade III-IV acute (HR 0.39, p=0.07) and chronic GVHD (HR 0.66, p=0.05) were lower after MUD compared to Haplo transplantation. There were no differences in graft failure, relapse, non-relapse mortality, disease-free and overall survival between donor types with myeloablative conditioning regimens. These data extend and confirm the importance of donor-recipient HLA matching for allogeneic transplantation. A MUD is the preferred donor, especially for transplantations with reduced intensity conditioning regimens.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults with acute leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome, undergoing transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (n=2320)
Intervention
Matched unrelated donor transplantation (n=284)
Comparison
Haploidentical transplantation (n=2036)
Outcome
Among recipients of reduced intensity regimens, 2-year graft failure (3% versus 11%), acute grade II-IV GVHD (HR 0.70), acute grade III-IV GVHD (HR 0.41) and non-relapse mortality (HR 0.43) were lower after MUD compared to Haplo transplantation. Consequently, disease-free (HR 0.74 55% versus 41%) and overall survival (HR 0.65, 67% versus 54%) were higher after MUD compared to Haplo transplants. Among recipients of myeloablative regimens, day-100 platelet recovery (95% versus 88%) was higher and grade III-IV acute (HR 0.39) and chronic GVHD (HR 0.66) were lower after MUD compared to Haplo transplantation. There were no differences in graft failure, relapse, non-relapse mortality, disease-free and overall survival between donor types with myeloablative conditioning regimens.
-
7.
Comparing transplant outcomes in ALL patients after haploidentical with PTCy or matched unrelated donor transplantation
Al Malki, M. M., Yang, D., Labopin, M., Afanasyev, B., Angelucci, E., Bashey, A., Socie, G., Karduss-Urueta, A., Helbig, G., Bornhauser, M., et al
Blood advances. 2020;4(9):2073-2083
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
We compared outcomes of 1461 adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) receiving hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from a haploidentical (n = 487) or matched unrelated donor (MUD; n = 974) between January 2005 and June 2018. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy), calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for haploidentical, and CNI with MMF or methotrexate with/without antithymoglobulin for MUDs. Haploidentical recipients were matched (1:2 ratio) with MUD controls for sex, conditioning intensity, disease stage, Philadelphia-chromosome status, and cytogenetic risk. In the myeloablative setting, day +28 neutrophil recovery was similar between haploidentical (87%) and MUD (88%) (P = .11). Corresponding rates after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) were 84% and 88% (P = .47). The 3-month incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) and 3-year chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was similar after haploidentical compared with MUD: myeloablative conditioning, 33% vs 34% (P = .46) for aGVHD and 29% vs 31% for cGVHD (P = .58); RIC, 31% vs 30% (P = .06) for aGVHD and 24% vs 29% for cGVHD (P = .86). Among patients receiving myeloablative regimens, 3-year probabilities of overall survival were 44% and 51% with haploidentical and MUD (P = .56). Corresponding rates after RIC were 43% and 42% (P = .6). In this large multicenter case-matched retrospective analysis, despite the limitations of a registry-based study (ie, unavailability of key elements such as minimal residual disease testing), our analysis indicated that outcomes of patients with ALL undergoing HCT from a haploidentical donor were comparable with 8 of 8 MUD transplantations.
Clinical Commentary
Dr. Julia Wolf, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
What is known?
Allogeneic stem cell transplant is a potentially curative treatment option for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Transplant outcomes are, amongst other factors, dependent on optimal donor selection; despite a plethora of recent advances, donor availability is an area of unmet need for many patients. A fully HLA matched sibling donor is the preferred donor choice but is available in <30% of patients. Several studies have shown that comparable results can be achieved with a fully matched unrelated donor (MUD), but availability can be as low as 20% in non-Caucasian individuals. Haploidentical donor options are available for the vast majority of patients but historically their utility was limited by high rates of GvHD, treatment related morbidity and mortality and graft rejection. The addition of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PtCy), calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and mycofenolate mofetil (MMF) as GvHD prophylaxis has reduced these risks and is now a frequently employed approach for haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HaploSCT) making it an attractive alternative to conventional donor transplant.
Several recent studies have compared MUD alloSCT and HaploSCT approaches in ALL in recent years. Most notably this has included an analysis of the European Bone Marrow Transplant (EBMT) group registry which included 1234 patients with ALL and shows comparable outcomes between HaploSCT and MUD alloSCT.
What did this paper set out to examine?
This retrospective multicentre cohort study aims to compare outcomes of HaploSCT & PtCy with MUD alloSCT in ALL in terms of engraftment, acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GvHD) incidence and severity, relapse free survival (RFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS).
It is the first study to explicitly compare haploidentical allogeneic stem cell transplant (HaploSCT) with matched unrelated donor allogeneic stem cell transplant (MUD alloSCT) in terms of conditioning intensity, Philadelphia chromosome status and graft source. It also provides additional extensive, multinational data with matched pair analysis on outcomes of patients in both groups.
What did they show?
The authors compared data from 1461 adult patients (HaploSCT = 487 vs MUD = 974). Data from two separate registries was used: the EBMT registry alone was used for MUD alloSCT while the Haploidentical Transplant and Cellular Therapy Research Consortium (TCT-RC) was used in combination with Acute Leukaemia Working Party subgroup of the EBMT registry data for assessment of HaploSCT. The reason for using two databases is not explicitly stated although it is believed that this was done to increase sample size in the HaploSCT cohort.
Patients >18 years old with ALL over a 13.5-year period from January 2005 to June 2018 receiving their first alloSCT were included in the analysis. Exclusion criteria were fairly selected. GvHD prophylaxis was with PtCy, CNI and MMF in the HaploSCT group and with CNI and methotrexate or MMF in the MUD group. 64% of MUD patients also received ATG. Cohorts were matched at 1:2 (HaploSCT : MUD) for sex, cytogenetic risk, Philadelphia chromosome status, disease stage and intensity of conditioning (reduced intensity vs myeloablative). Statistical analysis was appropriate for the question to be answered.
RESULTS: HaploSCT and MUD alloSCT were comparable in terms of neutrophil engraftment, RFS and OS regardless of conditioning intensity, Philadelphia chromosome status and graft source. 3-year OS was 44% in the HaploSCT group vs 51% in the MUD group using myeloablative conditioning (p=5.56) with rates of 43% (HaploSCT) and 42% (MUD) for reduced intensity conditioning (p=5.6).
The overall incidence of acute and chronic GvHD was similar between the groups but there was an increased incidence in grade III-IV GvHD in HaploSCT when peripheral blood stem cells were used. Additionally, mortality form GvHD was higher in the MUD group. This is in keeping with results reported in the literature.
What are the implications for practice and for future work?
HaploSCT is becoming an increasingly attractive option for patients without matched sibling transplant. The comparable overall survival and now much more manageable GvHD risk will afford a previously difficult to manage cohort of patients a further option of curative treatment.
This study adds to the growing evidence base but did have some limitations. Firstly, the study is retrospective and uses registry-based data. While the registries used are of high quality, there are inherent concerns about missing data points and differences between the two databases used. The authors agreed that the variability of the condition regimes used added a further layer of complexity.
Prospective data with intention to treat analysis is required to further assess the comparability of HaploSCT and MUD for ALL patients.
PICO Summary
Population
Adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (n=1461)
Intervention
HSCT from a haploidentical donor (n = 487)
Comparison
HSCT from a matched unrelated donor (n = 974)
Outcome
In the myeloablative setting, day +28 neutrophil recovery was similar between haploidentical (87%) and MUD (88%). Corresponding rates after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) were 84% and 88%. The 3-month incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) and 3-year chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was similar after haploidentical compared with MUD: myeloablative conditioning, 33% vs 34% for aGVHD and 29% vs 31% for cGVHD; RIC, 31% vs 30% for aGVHD and 24% vs 29% for cGVHD. Among patients receiving myeloablative regimens, 3-year probabilities of overall survival were 44% and 51% with haploidentical and MUD. Corresponding rates after RIC were 43% and 42%.
-
8.
Poxvirus Vectored Cytomegalovirus Vaccine to Prevent Cytomegalovirus Viremia in Transplant Recipients: A Phase 2, Randomized Clinical Trial
Aldoss, I., La Rosa, C., Baden, L. R., Longmate, J., Ariza-Heredia, E. J., Rida, W. N., Lingaraju, C. R., Zhou, Q., Martinez, J., Kaltcheva, T., et al
Annals of internal medicine. 2020
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Background: Triplex vaccine was developed to enhance cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T cells and prevent CMV reactivation early after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT). Objective: To determine the safety and efficacy of Triplex. Design: First-in-patient, phase 2 trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02506933). Setting: 3 U.S. HCT centers. Participants: 102 CMV-seropositive HCT recipients at high risk for CMV reactivation. Intervention: Intramuscular injections of Triplex or placebo were given on days 28 and 56 after HCT. Triplex is a recombinant attenuated poxvirus (modified vaccinia Ankara) expressing immunodominant CMV antigens. Measurements: The primary outcomes were CMV events (CMV DNA level ≥1250 IU/mL, CMV viremia requiring antiviral treatment, or end-organ disease), nonrelapse mortality, and severe (grade 3 or 4) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), all evaluated through 100 days after HCT, and grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) within 2 weeks after vaccination that were probably or definitely attributable to injection. Results: A total of 102 patients (51 per group) received the first vaccination, and 91 (89.2%) received both vaccinations (46 Triplex and 45 placebo). Reactivation of CMV occurred in 5 Triplex (9.8%) and 10 placebo (19.6%) recipients (hazard ratio, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.16 to 1.4]; P = 0.075). No Triplex recipient died of nonrelapse causes during the first 100 days or had serious AEs, and no grade 3 or 4 AEs related to vaccination were observed within 2 weeks after vaccination. Incidence of severe acute GVHD after injection was similar between groups (hazard ratio, 1.1 [CI, 0.53 to 2.4]; P = 0.23). Levels of long-lasting, pp65-specific T cells with effector memory phenotype were significantly higher in Triplex than placebo recipients. Limitation: The lower-than-expected incidence of CMV events in the placebo group reduced the power of the trial. Conclusion: No vaccine-associated safety concerns were identified. Triplex elicited and amplified CMV-specific immune responses, and fewer Triplex-vaccinated patients had CMV viremia. Primary Funding Source: National Cancer Institute and Helocyte.
PICO Summary
Population
CMV-seropositive HCT recipients at high risk for CMV reactivation (n=102)
Intervention
Intramuscular injections of Triplex CMV vaccine (n=51)
Comparison
Placebo (n=51)
Outcome
Reactivation of CMV occurred in 5 Triplex (9.8%) and 10 placebo (19.6%) recipients (hazard ratio, 0.46). No Triplex recipient died of nonrelapse causes during the first 100 days or had serious AEs, and no grade 3 or 4 AEs related to vaccination were observed within 2 weeks after vaccination. Incidence of severe acute GVHD after injection was similar between groups (hazard ratio, 1.1). Levels of long-lasting, pp65-specific T cells with effector memory phenotype were significantly higher in Triplex than placebo recipients.
-
9.
Myeloablative vs reduced intensity T-cell-replete haploidentical transplantation for hematologic malignancy
Solomon, S. R., St Martin, A., Shah, N. N., Fatobene, G., Al Malki, M. M., Ballen, K. K., Bashey, A., Bejanyan, N., Bolanos Meade, J., Brunstein, C. G., et al
Blood advances. 2019;3(19):2836-2844
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
In the absence of prospective studies that examine the effect of conditioning regimen intensity after T-cell-replete haploidentical transplant for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), a retrospective cohort analysis was performed. Of the 1325 eligible patients (AML, n = 818; ALL, n = 286; and MDS, n = 221), 526 patients received a myeloablative regimen and 799 received a reduced-intensity regimen. Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis was uniform with posttransplant cyclophosphamide, a calcineurin inhibitor, and mycophenolate mofetil. The primary end point was disease-free survival. Cox regression models were built to study the effect of conditioning regimen intensity on transplant outcomes. For patients aged 18 to 54 years, disease-free survival was lower (hazard ratio [HR], 1.34; 42% vs 51%; P = .007) and relapse was higher (HR, 1.51; 44% vs 33%; P = .001) with a reduced-intensity regimen compared with a myeloablative regimen. Nonrelapse mortality did not differ according to regimen intensity. For patients aged 55 to 70 years, disease-free survival (HR, 0.97; 37% vs 43%; P = .83) and relapse (HR, 1.32; 42% vs 31%; P = .11) did not differ according to regimen intensity. Nonrelapse mortality was lower with reduced-intensity regimens (HR, 0.64; 20% vs 31%; P = .02). Myeloablative regimens are preferred for AML, ALL, and MDS; reduced-intensity regimens should be reserved for those unable to tolerate myeloablation.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with haematological malignancies (n=1325)
Intervention
Myeloablative conditioning regimen (n=526)
Comparison
Reduced-intensity conditioning regimen (n=799)
Outcome
For patients aged 18 to 54 years, disease-free survival was lower and relapse was higher with a reduced-intensity regimen compared with a myeloablative regimen. Non-relapse mortality did not differ according to regimen intensity. For patients aged 55 to 70 years, disease-free survival and relapse did not differ according to regimen intensity. Nonrelapse mortality was lower with reduced-intensity regimens.
-
10.
MIPSS70+ v2.0 predicts long-term survival in myelofibrosis after allogeneic HCT with the Flu/Mel conditioning regimen
Ali, H., Aldoss, I., Yang, D., Mokhtari, S., Khaled, S., Aribi, A., Afkhami, M., Al Malki, M. M., Cao, T., Mei, M., et al
Blood advances. 2019;3(1):83-95
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Although allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is the only curative treatment for myelofibrosis (MF), data are limited on how molecular markers predict transplantation outcomes. We retrospectively evaluated transplantation outcomes of 110 consecutive MF patients who underwent allo-HCT with a fludarabine/melphalan (Flu/Mel) conditioning regimen at our center and assessed the impact of molecular markers on outcomes based on a 72-gene next-generation sequencing panel and Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Scoring System 70+ v2.0 (MIPSS70+ v2.0). With a median follow-up of 63.7 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 65% and the nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rate was 17%. In mutational analysis, JAK2 V617F and ASXL1 mutations were the most common. By univariable analysis, higher Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System scores, unrelated donor type, and very-high-risk cytogenetics were significantly associated with lower OS. Only CBL mutations were significantly associated with lower OS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.64; P = .032) and increased NRM (HR, 3.68; P = .004) after allo-HCT, but CALR, ASXL1, and IDH mutations did not have an impact on transplantation outcomes. Patient classification per MIPSS70 showed worse OS for high-risk (HR, 0.49; P = .039) compared with intermediate-risk patients. Classification per MIPSS70+ v2.0 demonstrated better OS when intermediate-risk patients were compared with high-risk patients (HR, 0.291) and much lower OS when very-high-risk patients were compared with high-risk patients (HR, 5.05; P ≤ .001). In summary, we present one of the largest single-center experiences of Flu/Mel-based allo-HCT, demonstrating that revised cytogenetic changes and MIPSS70+ v2.0 score predict transplantation outcomes, and thus can better inform physicians and patients in making decisions about allo-HCT.
PICO Summary
Population
110 consecutive MF patients who underwent allo-HCT with a fludarabine/melphalan (Flu/Mel) conditioning regimen
Intervention
Retrospective cohort study assessing the impact of molecular markers on outcomes based on a 72-gene next-generation sequencing panel and Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Scoring System
Comparison
none
Outcome
In the entire cohort, 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 65% and the nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rate was 17%. Higher Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System scores, unrelated donor type, and very-high-risk cytogenetics were significantly associated with lower OS. Only CBL mutations were significantly associated with lower OS. Patient classification per MIPSS70 showed worse OS for high-risk compared with intermediate-risk patients. Classification per MIPSS70+ v2.0 demonstrated better OS when intermediate-risk patients were compared with high-risk patients and much lower OS when very-high-risk patients were compared with high-risk patients.