1.
Myeloablative conditioning for allo-HSCT in pediatric ALL: FTBI or chemotherapy?-A multicenter EBMT-PDWP study
Willasch, A. M., Peters, C., Sedlacek, P., Dalle, J. H., Kitra-Roussou, V., Yesilipek, A., Wachowiak, J., Lankester, A., Prete, A., Hamidieh, A. A., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2020
Abstract
Although most children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) receive fractionated total body irradiation (FTBI) as myeloablative conditioning (MAC) for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), it is an important matter of debate if chemotherapy can effectively replace FTBI. To compare outcomes after FTBI versus chemotherapy-based conditioning (CC), we performed a retrospective EBMT registry study. Children aged 2-18 years after MAC for first allo-HSCT of bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) from matched-related (MRD) or unrelated donors (UD) in first (CR1) or second remission (CR2) between 2000 and 2012 were included. Propensity score weighting was used to control pretreatment imbalances of the observed variables. 3.054 patients were analyzed. CR1 (1.498): median follow-up (FU) after FTBI (1.285) and CC (213) was 6.8 and 6.1 years. Survivals were not significantly different. CR2 (1.556): median FU after FTBI (1.345) and CC (211) was 6.2 years. Outcomes after FTBI were superior as compared with CC with regard to overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), relapse incidence (RI), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). However, we must emphasize the preliminary character of the results of this retrospective "real-world-practice" study. These findings will be prospectively assessed in the ALL SCTped 2012 FORUM trial.
2.
How Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation has Evolved Over Time: 30-Years' Experience at a Single Institution
Abecasis, M., Miranda, N., Ferreira, I., Teixeira, G., Moita, F., Costa, F. L., Gutierrez, M. J., Espadinha, C., Esteves, S.
Acta medica portuguesa. 2020;33(2):116-123
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is an established procedure for a variety of diseases of the hematopoietic system. Our transplant program started in 1987 and since then advances have been made in the care of patients undergoing transplantation. We conducted a study to evaluate whether the changes implemented over time have improved the outcomes of transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS We analyzed changes in patients, cell source, transplantation and outcome among 682 consecutive patients receiving their first transplant between 1987 and 2016. We compared overall survival, progression-free survival, the incidence of nonrelapse mortality and relapse in 10-year cohorts over the three decades of the study. RESULTS The median age of transplanted patients, the use of peripheral blood and unrelated donors all increased very significantly. There was an increase in the number of high-risk patients when comparing the first decade with the two subsequent ones. The 3-year non-relapse mortality decreased significantly from 29% to 20% (p = 0.045), while the overall survival, progression free survival and cumulative incidence of relapse remained stable. DISCUSSION Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has evolved considerably since its introduction in clinical practice. In the present study, we evaluated how these changes affected our practice along 30 years of activity and compared the results with those published in the literature. CONCLUSION Despite increasing age, higher risk patients and the increasing use of unrelated donors our results show a continuous significantly reduced non-relapse mortality, with stable overall survival, progression free survival and relapse rate.