-
1.
Impact of tumor microenvironment on efficacy of anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy or chemotherapy and transplant in large B cell lymphoma
Locke, F. L., Filosto, S., Chou, J., Vardhanabhuti, S., Perbost, R., Dreger, P., Hill, B. T., Lee, C., Zinzani, P. L., Kröger, N., et al
Nature medicine. 2024
Abstract
The phase 3 ZUMA-7 trial in second-line large B cell lymphoma demonstrated superiority of anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy (axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel)) over standard of care (SOC; salvage chemotherapy followed by hematopoietic transplantation) ( NCT03391466 ). Here, we present a prespecified exploratory analysis examining the association between pretreatment tumor characteristics and the efficacy of axi-cel versus SOC. B cell gene expression signature (GES) and CD19 expression associated significantly with improved event-free survival for axi-cel (P = 0.0002 for B cell GES; P = 0.0165 for CD19 expression) but not SOC (P = 0.9374 for B cell GES; P = 0.5526 for CD19 expression). Axi-cel showed superior event-free survival over SOC irrespective of B cell GES and CD19 expression (P = 8.56 × 10(-9) for B cell GES high; P = 0.0019 for B cell GES low; P = 3.85 × 10(-9) for CD19 gene high; P = 0.0017 for CD19 gene low). Low CD19 expression in malignant cells correlated with a tumor GES consisting of immune-suppressive stromal and myeloid genes, highlighting the inter-relation between malignant cell features and immune contexture substantially impacting axi-cel outcomes. Tumor burden, lactate dehydrogenase and cell-of-origin impacted SOC more than axi-cel outcomes. T cell activation and B cell GES, which are associated with improved axi-cel outcome, decreased with increasing lines of therapy. These data highlight differences in resistance mechanisms to axi-cel and SOC and support earlier intervention with axi-cel.
-
2.
Analysis benefits of a second Allo-HSCT after CAR-T cell therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia who relapsed after transplant
Cao, X. Y., Zhang, J. P., Zhao, Y. L., Xiong, M., Zhou, J. R., Lu, Y., Sun, R. J., Wei, Z. J., Liu, D. Y., Zhang, X., et al
Frontiers in immunology. 2023;14:1191382
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has demonstrated high initial complete remission (CR) rates in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) patients, including those who relapsed after transplant. However, the duration of remission requires improvements. Whether bridging to a second allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) after CAR-T therapy can improve long-term survival remains controversial. We retrospectively analyzed long-term follow-up data of B-ALL patients who relapsed post-transplant and received CAR-T therapy followed by consolidation second allo-HSCT to investigate whether such a treatment sequence could improve long-term survival. METHODS A single-center, retrospective study was performed between October 2017 and March 2022, involving 95 patients who received a consolidation second transplant after achieving CR from CAR-T therapy. RESULTS The median age of patients was 22.8 years (range: 3.3-52.8) at the second transplant. After the first transplant, 71 patients (74.7%) experienced bone marrow relapse, 16 patients (16.8%) had extramedullary relapse, 5 patients (5.3%) had both bone marrow and extramedullary relapse and 3/95 patients (3.2%) had positive minimal residual disease (MRD) only. Patients received autologous (n=57, 60.0%) or allogeneic (n=28, 29.5%) CAR-T cells, while 10 patients (10.5%) were unknown. All patients achieved CR after CAR-T therapy. Before second HSCT, 86 patients (90.5%) were MRD-negative, and 9 (9.5%) were MRD-positive. All second transplant donors were different from the first transplant donors. The median follow-up time was 623 days (range: 33-1901) after the second HSCT. The 3-year overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were 55.3% (95%CI, 44.3-66.1%) and 49.8% (95%CI, 38.7-60.9%), respectively. The 3-year relapse incidence (RI) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 10.5% (95%CI, 5.6-19.6%) and 43.6% (95%CI, 33.9-56.2%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, the interval from CAR-T to second HSCT ≤90 days was associated with superior LFS(HR, 4.10, 95%CI,1.64-10.24; p=0.003) and OS(HR, 2.67, 95%CI, 1.24-5.74, p=0.012), as well as reduced NRM (HR, 2.45, 95%CI, 1.14-5.24, p=0.021). CONCLUSIONS Our study indicated that CAR-T therapy followed by consolidation second transplant could significantly improve long-term survival in B-ALL patients who relapsed post-transplant. The second transplant should be considered in suitable patients and is recommended to be performed within 90 days after CAR-T treatment.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia who were minimal residual disease-positive after first transplant at a single centre in China (n=95)
Intervention
CAR-T therapy followed by consolidation allogeneic transplant, using a different donor
Comparison
None
Outcome
The median follow-up time was 623 days (range: 33-1901) after the second HSCT. The 3-year overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were 55.3% (95%CI, 44.3-66.1%) and 49.8% (95%CI, 38.7-60.9%), respectively. The 3-year relapse incidence (RI) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 10.5% (95%CI, 5.6-19.6%) and 43.6% (95%CI, 33.9-56.2%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, the interval from CAR-T to second HSCT ≤90 days was associated with superior LFS(HR, 4.10, 95%CI,1.64-10.24) and OS(HR, 2.67, 95%CI, 1.24-5.74), as well as reduced NRM (HR, 2.45, 95%CI, 1.14-5.24).
-
3.
Prevention of CMV/EBV reactivation by double-specific T cells in patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: results from the randomized phase I/IIa MULTIVIR-01 study
Gerbitz, A., Gary, R., Aigner, M., Moosmann, A., Kremer, A., Schmid, C., Hirschbuehl, K., Wagner, E., Hauptrock, B., Teschner, D., et al
Frontiers in immunology. 2023;14:1251593
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is used to cure hematologic malignancies or deficiencies of the hematopoietic system. It is associated with severe immunodeficiency of the host early after transplant and therefore early reactivation of latent herpesviruses such as CMV and EBV within the first 100 days are frequent. Small studies and case series indicated that application of herpes virus specific T cells can control and prevent disease in this patient population. METHODS We report the results of a randomized controlled multi centre phase I/IIa study (MULTIVIR-01) using a newly developed T cell product with specificity for CMV and EBV derived from the allogeneic stem cell grafts used for transplantation. The study aimed at prevention and preemptive treatment of both viruses in patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation targeting first infusion on day +30. Primary endpoints were acute transfusion reaction and acute-graft versus-host-disease after infusion of activated T cells. RESULTS Thirty-three patients were screened and 9 patients were treated with a total of 25 doses of the T cell product. We show that central manufacturing can be achieved successfully under study conditions and the product can be applied without major side effects. Overall survival, transplant related mortality, cumulative incidence of graft versus host disease and number of severe adverse events were not different between treatment and control groups. Expansion of CMV/EBV specific T cells was observed in a fraction of patients, but overall there was no difference in virus reactivation. DISCUSSION Our study results indicate peptide stimulated epitope specific T cells derived from stem cell grafts can be administered safely for prevention and preemptive treatment of reactivation without evidence for induction of acute graft versus host disease. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02227641.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults undergoing allogeneic transplant from a matched donor who was seropositive for cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-barr virus (EBV) and enrolled in the MULTIVIR-01 study in centres in Germany (n=33)
Intervention
A newly developed T cell product with specificity for CMV and EBV derived from the allogeneic stem cell grafts used for transplantation. (n=16; 9 received full treatment)
Comparison
Control (n=13)
Outcome
Central manufacturing can be achieved successfully under study conditions and the product can be applied without major side effects. Overall survival, transplant related mortality, cumulative incidence of graft versus host disease and number of severe adverse events were not different between treatment and control groups. Expansion of CMV/EBV specific T cells was observed in a fraction of patients, but overall there was no difference in virus reactivation
-
4.
Safety and Efficacy of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel versus Standard of Care in Patients 65 Years of Age or Older with Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Westin, J. R., Locke, F. L., Dickinson, M., Ghobadi, A., Elsawy, M., van Meerten, T., Miklos, D. B., Ulrickson, M. L., Perales, M. A., Farooq, U., et al
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2023;:Of1-of12
Abstract
PURPOSE Older patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) may be considered ineligible for curative-intent therapy including high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDT-ASCT). Here, we report outcomes of a preplanned subgroup analysis of patients ≥65 years in ZUMA-7. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with LBCL refractory to or relapsed ≤12 months after first-line chemoimmunotherapy were randomized 1:1 to axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cel; autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy] or standard of care (SOC; 2-3 cycles of chemoimmunotherapy followed by HDT-ASCT). The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Secondary endpoints included safety and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). RESULTS Fifty-one and 58 patients aged ≥65 years were randomized to axi-cel and SOC, respectively. Median EFS was greater with axi-cel versus SOC (21.5 vs. 2.5 months; median follow-up: 24.3 months; HR, 0.276; descriptive P < 0.0001). Objective response rate was higher with axi-cel versus SOC (88% vs. 52%; OR, 8.81; descriptive P < 0.0001; complete response rate: 75% vs. 33%). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 94% of axi-cel and 82% of SOC patients. No grade 5 cytokine release syndrome or neurologic events occurred. In the quality-of-life analysis, the mean change in PRO scores from baseline at days 100 and 150 favored axi-cel for EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health, Physical Functioning, and EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale (descriptive P < 0.05). CAR T-cell expansion and baseline serum inflammatory profile were comparable in patients ≥65 and <65 years. CONCLUSIONS Axi-cel is an effective second-line curative-intent therapy with a manageable safety profile and improved PROs for patients ≥65 years with R/R LBCL.
-
5.
Efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in hematologic malignancies: a living systematic review on comparative studies
Saiz, L. C., Leache, L., Gutiérrez-Valencia, M., Erviti, J., Rojas Reyes, M. X.
Therapeutic advances in hematology. 2023;14:20406207231168211
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) cell therapies have been claimed to be curative in responsive patients. Nonetheless, response rates can vary according to different characteristics, and these therapies are associated with important adverse events such as cytokine release syndrome, neurologic adverse events, and B-cell aplasia. OBJECTIVES This living systematic review aims to provide a timely, rigorous, and continuously updated synthesis of the evidence available on the role of CAR-T therapy for the treatment of patients with hematologic malignancies. DESIGN A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSI), evaluating the effect of CAR-T therapy versus other active treatments, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, standard of care (SoC) or any other intervention, was performed in patients with hematologic malignancies. The primary outcome is overall survival (OS). Certainty of the evidence was determined using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. DATA SOURCES AND METHODS Searches were performed in the Epistemonikos database, which collates information from multiple sources to identify systematic reviews and their included primary studies, including Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, LILACS, DARE, HTA Database, Campbell database, JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, EPPI-Centre Evidence Library. A manual search was also carried out. We included the evidence published up to 1 July 2022. RESULTS We included the evidence published up to 1 July 2022. We considered 139 RCTs and 1725 NRSI as potentially eligible. Two RCTs (N = 681) comparing CAR-T therapy with SoC in patients with recurrent/relapsed (R/R) B-cell lymphoma were included. RCTs did not show statistical differences in OS, serious adverse events, or total adverse events with grade ⩾ 3. Higher complete response with substantial heterogeneity [risk ratio = 1.59; 95% confidence interval (CI) = (1.30-1.93); I (2) = 89%; 2 studies; 681 participants; very low certainty evidence] and higher progression-free survival [hazard ratio for progression or death = 0.49; 95% CI = (0.37-0.65); 1 study; 359 participants; moderate certainty evidence] were reported with CAR-T therapies. Nine NRSI (N = 540) in patients with T or B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia or R/R B-cell lymphoma were also included, providing secondary data. In general, the GRADE certainty of the evidence for main outcomes was mostly low or very low. CONCLUSION So far, assuming important limitations in the level of certainty due to scarce and heterogenous comparative studies, CAR-T therapies have shown some benefit in terms of progression-free survival, but no overall survival, in patients with R/R B-cell lymphoma. Despite one-arm trials have already facilitated approval of CAR-T cell treatments, additional evidence from large comparative studies is still needed to better characterize the benefit-harm ratio of the use of CAR-T in a variety of patient populations with hematological malignancies. REGISTRATION https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.14390.1. PROSPERO/OSF PREREGISTRATION 10.17605/OSF.IO/V6HDX.
-
6.
A pro-inflammatory environment in bone marrow of Treg transplanted patients matches with graft-versus-leukemia effect
Guardalupi, F., Sorrentino, C., Corradi, G., Giancola, R., Baldoni, S., Ulbar, F., Fabi, B., Andres Ejarque, R., Timms, J., Restuccia, F., et al
Leukemia. 2023
-
7.
ASCT vs CART for Patients with Relapsed LBCL in PR: Role of TMTV
Strati, P., Pasvolsky, O., Feng, L., Xu, G., Tewari, S., Varghese, J., Ow, K., Santiago, M. S., Al Zaki, A., Jallouk, A., et al
Blood advances. 2023
-
8.
Updated Indications for Immune Effector Cell Therapy: 2023 Guidelines from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
Kanate, A. S., Majhail, N., DeFilipp, Z. M., Dhakal, B., Dholaria, B., Hamilton, B., Herrera, A. F., Inamoto, Y., Jain, T., Perales, M. A., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2023
Abstract
The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) published its guidelines on indications for autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and immune effector cell therapy (IECT) in 2020. Since then we have witnessed rapid advancements in the field of IECT, resulting in several new chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) products and disease indications being approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). To keep abreast of these practice changes, the ASTCT Committee on Practice Guidelines commissioned a focused update covering CAR-T therapy indications. This brief manuscript presents updated ASTCT recommendations on indications for CAR-T therapy. Only FDA approved indications for CAR-T were recommended and categorized as "standard of care" (S), where indication is well defined and supported by evidence. The ASTCT will continue to periodically review these guidelines and update them as new evidence becomes available.
-
9.
Efficacy of Salvage Treatments in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Including Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Kim, J., Cho, J., Yoon, S. E., Kim, W. S., Kim, S. J.
Cancer research and treatment. 2023
Abstract
PURPOSE We intend to evaluate the efficacy of salvage treatments for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) through meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS R/R DLBCL trials were divided into two groups based on eligibility for autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT), and meta-analysis of each group was performed. Random effects models were used to estimate the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate, and CAR T-cell therapy was used as reference treatment. RESULTS 26 ASCT-eligible cohorts from 17 studies comprising 2924 patients and 59 ASCT-ineligible cohorts from 53 studies comprising 3617 patients were included in the pooled analysis. In the ASCT-eligible group, the pooled 1-year PFS rate was 0.40 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15-0.65) for the CAR T-cell group and 0.34 (95% CI 0.30-0.37) for the group with chemotherapy followed by ASCT intention. The two treatments were not significantly different in meta-regression analysis. In the ASCT-ineligible group, the pooled 1-year PFS was 0.40 (95% CI 0.35-0.46) for CAR T-cell, and the highest primary outcome was 0.47 (95% CI 0.37-0.57) for the tafasitamab group. CAR T-cell therapy showed significantly better outcomes than chemotherapy and therapies based on ibrutinib, lenalidomide, and selinexor. However, loncastuximab, polatuzumab plus bendamustine and rituximab, and the tafasitamab group showed no different efficacy than CAR T-cell therapy after adjusting for median number of previous lines of treatment. . CONCLUSION Although several regimens were crudely grouped for classification, CAR T-cell therapy did not outperform chemotherapy followed by ASCT in the second-line setting or several recently developed agents in the ASCT-ineligible setting.
-
10.
Paving the Road for CAR-Ts: ASTCT 80/20 Task Force consensus on challenges and solutions to improving efficiency of clinical center certification and maintenance of operations for commercially approved immune effector cell therapies
Nikiforow, S., Frigault, M. J., Frey, N. V., Gardner, R. A., Komanduri, K. V., Perales, M. A., Kebriaei, P., Warkentin, P. I., Pasquini, M., Aho, J. L., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2023
Abstract
As the number and type of regulatory authority-approved cellular therapies grow, clinical treatment centers face a heavy burden of duplicative documentation around initial qualification, ongoing auditing, and reporting-with overlapping requirements from each manufacturer to ensure safe use of their specific product, which in the United States are stipulated under individual Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Biologic License Applications (BLA). The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) convened the 80/20 Taskforce to consider challenges and potential solutions to these issues. The taskforce proposed that 80% of manufacturers' requirements for onboarding and ongoing operations of commercially available products could be standardized and streamlined. Taskforce members interviewed dozens of stakeholders, including clinicians at large academic medical centers already utilizing commercial and investigational immune effector cell (IEC) products, regulators, members of accrediting bodies and professional cellular therapy societies, and manufacturers of IEC therapies for oncologic indications. In November 2021, the taskforce organized and led virtual discussions in a public forum and at a private ASTCT 80/20 workshop at the online AcCELLerate Forum, a cellular-therapy stakeholders' meeting organized by the ASTCT, the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) and Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). At the workshop, approximately 60 stakeholders worked to identify and prioritize common challenges in onboarding and maintenance of operations at clinical sites for commercial FDA-approved and future IEC therapies and ways to streamline the process. It was agreed that standardization would improve efficiency of onboarding, allowing more cost-effective, sustainable growth of approved IEC therapies at treatment centers, and facilitate wider access while maintaining safety and clinical success. This early but extensive survey of stakeholders resulted in five overarching suggestions for both established and emerging treatment centers: 1. Eliminate duplication in accreditation and auditing of clinical sites; 2. Define expectations for education and management of CAR-T cell therapy toxicities to potentially replace product-specific REMS programs; 3. Streamline current REMS education, testing and data reporting; 4. Standardize IT platforms supporting enrollment, clinical site-to-manufacturer communication, and logistics of maintaining chain of identity/chain of custody across multiple transportation steps; 5. Encourage use of universal nomenclature by cell therapy manufacturers. Future discussions need to engage a broader range of stakeholders including administrators, pharmacists, nurses, data coordinators, surgeons, pathologists, and those developing promising cellular therapies for solid tumors, as well as teams from smaller academic or community cancer center settings. Continued collaboration with stakeholders outside of clinical sites will include accrediting bodies/auditors, established and emerging cell therapy companies, software developers, professional societies, and the patients who receive these therapies. Active dialogue with government regulators remains essential. Such joint efforts are critical as the number of IEC therapies for myriad oncologic and non-oncologic indications grows.