0
selected
-
1.
Allogeneic transplant and CAR-T therapy after autologous transplant failure in DLBCL: a noncomparative cohort analysis
Hamadani, M., Gopal, A. K., Pasquini, M., Kim, S., Qiu, X., Ahmed, S., Lazaryan, A., Bhatt, V. R., Daly, A., Lulla, P., et al
Blood Advances. 2022;6(2):486-494
Abstract
Allogeneic transplant (alloHCT) and chimeric antigen receptor modified (CAR)-T cell therapy are potentially cuarative options of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapsing after an autologous (auto)HCT. Although the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) prognostic model can predict outcomes of alloHCT in DLBCL after autoHCT failure, corresponding models of CAR-T treatment in similar patient populations are not available. In this noncomparative registry analysis, we report outcomes of patients with DLBCL (≥18 years) undergoing a reduced intensity alloHCT or CAR-T therapy with axicabtagene ciloleucel during 2012 to 2019 after a prior auto-HCT failure and apply the CIBMTR prognostic model to CAR-T recipients. A total of 584 patients were included. The 1-year relapse, nonrelapse mortality, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival for CAR-T treatment after autoHCT failure were 39.5%, 4.8%, 73.4%, and 55.7%, respectively. The corresponding rates in the alloHCT cohort were 26.2%, 20.0%, 65.6%, and 53.8%, respectively. The 1-year OS of alloHCT recipients classified as low-, intermediate- and high/very high-risk groups according to the CIBMTR prognostic score was 73.3%, 59.9%, and 46.3%, respectively (P = .002). The corresponding rates for low-, intermediate-, and high/very high-risk CAR-T patients were 88.4%, 76.4%, and 52.8%, respectively (P < .001). This registry analysis shows that both CAR-T and alloHCT can provide durable remissions in a subset of patients with DLBCL relapsing after a prior autoHCT. The simple CIBMTR prognostic score can be used to identify patients at high risk of treatment failure after either procedure. Evaluation of novel relapse mitigations strategies after cellular immunotherapies are warranted in these high-risk patients.
-
2.
Autologous Transplant versus Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy for Relapsed DLBCL in Partial Remission
Shadman, M., Pasquini, M. C., Ahn, K. W., Chen, Y., Turtle, C. J., Hematti, P., Cohen, J. B., Khimani, F., Ganguly, S., Merryman, R. W., et al
Blood. 2021
Abstract
The relative efficacy of autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (auto-HCT) versus chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients who achieve a partial remission (PR) after salvage chemotherapy is not known. Using the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research registry database, we identified adult DLBCL patients who received either an auto-HCT (2013-2019) or CAR-T treatment with axicabtagene ciloleucel (2018-2019) while in a PR by CT or PET scan. We compared the clinical outcomes between the two cohorts using univariable and multivariable regression models after adjustment for relevant baseline and clinical factors. In the univariable analysis, the 2-year progression-free survival (52% vs. 42% ; p=0.1) and the rate of 100-day non-relapse mortality (4% vs. 2% ; p=0.3) were not different between the 2 cohorts but consolidation with auto-HCT was associated with a lower rate of relapse/progression (40% vs. 53% ; p=0.05) and a superior overall survival (OS) (69% vs. 47% ; p=0.004) at 2-years. In the multivariable regression analysis, treatment with auto-HCT was associated with a significantly lower risk of relapse/progression rate (HR=1.49; p=0.01) and a superior OS (HR=1.63; p=0.008). In patients with DLBCL in a PR after salvage therapy, treatment with auto-HCT was associated with a lower incidence of relapse and a superior OS compared with CAR-T. These data support the role of auto-HCT as the standard-of-care in transplant-eligible patients with relapsed DLBCL in PR after salvage therapy.
-
3.
Is Autologous Transplant in Relapsed DLBCL Patients Achieving Only a PET+ PR Appropriate in the CAR-T cell Era?
Shah, N. N., Ahn, K. W., Litovich, C. A., He, Y., Sauter, C. S., Fenske, T. S., Hamadani, M.
Blood. 2020
Abstract
For relapsed, chemosensitive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) consolidation with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) is a standard option. Since the approval of anti-CD19 CAR T-cells in 2017, the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) reported a 45% decrease in the number of auto-HCT for DLBCL in the U.S. in 2018. Using the CIBMTR database, we report outcomes for auto-HCT in relapsed chemosensitive DLBCL in a partial response (PR). 249 relapsed DLBCL patients undergoing auto-HCT from 2003-13 with a PET/CT+ PR prior to transplant were identified. The study cohort was divided into two groups: (a) early chemo-immunotherapy failure (ECF) defined as patients with primary refractory disease (PRefD) or relapse within 12 months of diagnosis, (b) late chemoimmunotherapy failure defined as patients relapsing ≥12 months. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and relapse. 182 patients had ECF and 67 were no ECF. ECF patients were younger (57 versus (vs) 63 years, p<0.01) and 79% of had PRefD. The adjusted 5-year probabilities for PFS and OS (ECF vs no ECF) was not different: 41% vs 41% (p=0.93) and 51% vs 63% (p=0.09), respectively. On multivariate analysis, ECF patients had increased risk of death (HR=1.61, 95%CI 1.05-2.46, p=0.03) but no increased risk in PFS or relapse. In conclusion, for relapsed, chemosensitive DLBCL patients with residual PET/CT+ disease prior to auto-HCT, the adjusted 5-year PFS (41%) was comparable irrespective of time to relapse. These data support ongoing application of auto-HCT in chemosensitive DLBCL.
-
4.
Impact of T-cell dose on the outcome of T-cell replete HLA matched allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation
Saad, A., Lamb, L., Wang, T., Hemmer, M. T., Spellman, S., Couriel, D., Alousi, A., Pidala, J., Abdel-Azim, H., Agrawal, V., et al
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2019
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on whether T-cell dose of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) product influences transplant outcome are conflicting. METHODS Using CIBMTR database, we identified 2,736 adult patients who underwent first allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplant for acute leukemia (AML, ALL) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) between 2008-2014 using an HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD) or 8/8-matched unrelated donor (MUD). We excluded ex-vivo and in-vivo T-cell depleted transplants. Correlative analysis was performed between CD3+ T-cell dose and risk of graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Using maximum likelihood estimation method, we identified CD3+ T-cell cell dose cutoff that separated risk of acute GVHD (aGVHD) grade II-IV in both MSD and MUD groups. A CD3+ T-cell dose cutoff of 14x10(7) cells/kg identified MSD/low CD3+ (n=223) and MSD/high CD3+ (n=1214), and a dose of 15x10(7) cells/kg identified MUD/low CD3+ (n=197) and MUD/high CD3+ (n=1102). With univariate analysis, MSD/high CD3+ group had higher cumulative incidence of day 100 aGVHD grade II-IV of 33% vs 25% when compared to MSD/low CD3+ group (P value =0.009). There was no other difference between both groups in engraftment rate, risk of aGVHD grade III-IV or chronic GVHD (cGVHD), NRM, relapse, DFS, or OS. MUD/high CD3+ group had higher cumulative incidence of day 100 aGVHD grade II-IV of 49% vs 41% when compared to MUD/low CD3+ group (P value =0.04). There was no other difference between both groups in engraftment rate, risk of severe aGVHD or cGVHD, NRM, relapse, DFS, or OS. Multivariate analysis of MSD and MUD groups failed to show an association between CD3+ T-cell dose and risk of either aGVHD grade II-IV (p value =0.1 and 0.07 respectively) or cGVHD (p value=0.8 and 0.3 respectively). Sub-analysis of CD4, CD8 and CD4/CD8 ratio failed to identify cutoff values predictive of transplant outcome. Using log-rank test, the sample size was, however, suboptimal to identify difference at these cutoff cell dose. CONCLUSION In this registry study, CD3+ T-cell dose of PBSCT product did not influence risk of aGVHD or cGVHD or other transplant outcomes when using HLA-matched sibling or 8/8 unrelated donors. Subset analysis of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell dose was not possible for small sample size.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients reported to CIBMTR database with acute leukaemia (ALL or AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome between 2008-2014 (n=2736)
Intervention
First allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell using an HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD)
Comparison
8/8-matched unrelated donor (MUD)
Outcome
Using maximum likelihood estimation method, we identified CD3+ T-cell cell dose cutoff that separated risk of acute GVHD (aGVHD) grade II-IV in both MSD and MUD groups. A CD3+ T-cell dose cutoff of 14x10(7) cells/kg identified MSD/low CD3+ (n=223) and MSD/high CD3+ (n=1214), and a dose of 15x10(7) cells/kg identified MUD/low CD3+ (n=197) and MUD/high CD3+ (n=1102). With univariate analysis, MSD/high CD3+ group had higher cumulative incidence of day 100 aGVHD grade II-IV of 33% vs 25% when compared to MSD/low CD3+ group. MUD/high CD3+ group had higher cumulative incidence of day 100 aGVHD grade II-IV of 49% vs 41% when compared to MUD/low CD3+ group. Multivariate analysis of MSD and MUD groups failed to show an association between CD3+ T-cell dose and risk of either aGVHD grade II-IV or cGVHD. Sub-analysis of CD4, CD8 and CD4/CD8 ratio failed to identify cutoff values predictive of transplant outcome.