-
1.
Bone marrow graft versus peripheral blood graft in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cells transplantation: a retrospective analysis in1344 patients of SFGM-TC registry
Lacan, C., Lambert, J., Forcade, E., Robin, M., Chevallier, P., Loron, S., Bulabois, CÉ, Orvain, C., Ceballos, P., Daguindau, E., et al
Journal of hematology & oncology. 2024;17(1):2
Abstract
The use of peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM) stem cells graft in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis remains controversial. Moreover, the value of adding anti-thymoglobulin (ATG) to PTCy is unknown. A total of 1344 adult patients received an unmanipulated haploidentical transplant at 37 centers from 2012 to 2019 for hematologic malignancy. We compared the outcomes of patients according to the type of graft, using a propensity score analysis. In total population, grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) were lower with BM than with PB. Grade III-IV aGVHD was lower with BM than with PB + ATG. All outcomes were similar in PB and PB + ATG groups. Then, in total population, adding ATG does not benefit the procedure. In acute leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative syndrome (AL-MDS-MPS) subgroup receiving non-myeloablative conditioning, risk of relapse was twice greater with BM than with PB (51 vs. 22%, respectively). Conversely, risk of aGVHD was greater with PB (38% for aGVHD II-IV; 16% for aGVHD III-IV) than with BM (28% for aGVHD II-IV; 8% for aGVHD III-IV). In this subgroup with intensified conditioning regimen, risk of relapse became similar with PB and BM but risk of aGVHD III-IV remained higher with PB than with BM graft (HR = 2.0; range [1.17-3.43], p = 0.012).
-
2.
Comparison of clinical outcomes between peripheral blood stem cells and peripheral blood stem cells plus bone marrow in myelodysplastic syndrome patients with haploidentical transplantation
Chu, M., Hu, S., Shen, Y., Shen, D., Zhan, Y., Fan, Y., Chen, J., Tang, X., Wu, D., Xu, Y.
Bone marrow transplantation. 2023;58(2):142-151
Abstract
The comparison of haploidentical G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood and bone marrow transplantation (HBMT) for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and haploidentical G-CSF-primed peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (HPBSCT) remains unclear. We performed a retrospective analysis using a propensity score method on 140 MDS patients who received HPBSCT (n = 46) or HBMT (n = 94) with BU/CY as a conditioning regimen prior to transplantation at our center between June 2016 and June 2021. HBMT recipients were associated with a reduced incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD (17.22% vs. 30.57%, p = 0.019) within 100 days, reduced 2-year transplant-related mortality (TRM) (14.29% vs. 28.94%, p = 0.045) and superior 2-year overall survival (OS) (81.6% vs. 66.0%, p = 0.027), progression-free survival (PFS) (80.9% vs. 61.2%, p = 0.015), and GVHD relapse-free survival (GRFS) (64.6% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.062) compared with HPBSCT, but 2-year relapse incidence (RI) (5.96% vs. 9.39%, p = 0.445) was not affected. Multivariate analysis revealed that a GPB/GBM mixture was the independent factor for a reduced incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD (p = 0.018) and TRM (p = 0.048), improved OS (p = 0.029), PFS (p = 0.019) and GRFS (p = 0.072). Collectively, the use of a GPB/GBM mixture as stem cell grafts for haplo-HSCT in patients with MDS appears to be an optimal choice.
-
3.
HLA-haploidentical transplantation for relapsed/refractory AML: better LFS with BM than with PBSC in patients ≥ 55 years of age
Baron, F., Labopin, M., Tischer, J., Ciceri, F., Raiola, A. M., Blaise, D., Sica, S., Vydra, J., Fanin, R., Stölzel, F., et al
American journal of hematology. 2022
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
The best stem cell source for T-cell replete HLA-haploidentical transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) remains to be determined. In this EBMT retrospective study we analyzed the impact of stem cell source on leukemia-free survival (LFS) in adult patients with primary refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) given grafts from HLA-haploidentical donors with PTCy as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. A total of 668 patients (249 bone marrow (BM) and 419 peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) recipients) met the inclusion criteria. The use of PBSC was associated with a higher incidence of grade II-IV (HR = 1.59, P = 0.029) and grade III-IV (HR = 2.08, P = 0.013) acute GVHD. There was a statistical interaction between patient age and the impact of stem cell source for LFS (P < 0.01). In multivariate Cox models, among patients <55 years, the use of PBSC versus BM resulted in comparable LFS (HR = 0.82, P = 0.2). In contrast, in patients ≥55 years of age, the use of PBSC versus BM was associated with higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) (HR = 1.7, P = 0.01), lower LFS (HR = 1.37, P = 0.026) and lower overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.33, P = 0.044). In conclusions, our data suggest that in patients ≥55 years of age with active AML at HLA-haploidentical transplantation, the use of BM instead of PBSC as stem cell source results in lower NRM and better LFS. In contrast among younger patients, the use of PBSC results in at least a comparable LFS. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults with primary refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia receiving haploidentical transplantation (n=668)
Intervention
Stem cell graft sourced from peripheral blood stem (PBSC, n=419)
Comparison
Stem cell graft sourced from bone marrow (BM, n=249)
Outcome
The use of PBSC was associated with a higher incidence of grade II-IV (HR = 1.59) and grade III-IV (HR = 2.08) acute GVHD. There was a statistical interaction between patient age and the impact of stem cell source for LFS. In multivariate Cox models, among patients <55 years, the use of PBSC versus BM resulted in comparable LFS (HR = 0.82). In contrast, in patients ≥55 years of age, the use of PBSC versus BM was associated with higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) (HR = 1.7), lower LFS (HR = 1.37) and lower overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.33).
-
4.
G-CSF-Primed Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Haploidentical Transplantation Could Achieve Satisfactory Clinical Outcomes for Acute Leukemia Patients in the First Complete Remission: A Registered Study
Ma, Y. R., Zhang, X., Xu, L., Wang, Y., Yan, C., Chen, H., Chen, Y., Han, W., Wang, F., Wang, J., et al
Frontiers in oncology. 2021;11:631625
Abstract
G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood (G-PB) harvest is the predominant graft for identical sibling donor and unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients, but it was controversial in haploidentical related donor (HID) HSCT. In this registry study, we aimed to identify the efficacy of HID G-PB HSCT (HID-PBSCT) for acute leukemia (AL) patients in first complete remission (CR1). Also, we reported the outcomes for the use of G-PB grafts in comparison with the combination of G-BM and G-PB grafts in HID HSCT recipients. Sixty-seven AL patients in CR1 who received HID-PBSCT were recruited at Institute of Hematology, Peking University. Patients who received haploidentical HSCT using the combination of G-BM and G-PB harvests in the same period were enrolled as controls (n=392). The median time from HSCT to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 12 days (range, 9-19 days) and 12 days (range, 8-171 days), respectively. The 28-day cumulative incidence of neutrophil and platelet engraftment after HSCT was 98.5% and 95.5%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were 29.9% (95%CI 18.8-40.9%) and 7.5% (95%CI 1.1-13.8%), respectively. The cumulative incidences of total and moderate-severe chronic GVHD were 54.9% (95%CI 40.9-68.8%) and 17.4% (95%CI 6.7-28.0%), respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality were 13.9% (95%CI 5.4-22.5%) and 3.4% (95%CI 0-8.1%), respectively. The probabilities of overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were 84.7% (95%CI 74.7-94.7%) and 82.7% (95%CI 73.3-92.1%) respectively. Compared with the HID HSCT recipients using the combination of G-BM and G-PB grafts, the engraftments of neutrophil and platelet were both significantly faster for the G-PB group, and the other clinical outcomes were all comparable between the groups. In multivariate analysis, graft types did not influence the clinical outcomes. Overall, for the patients with AL CR1, G-PB graft could be considered an acceptable graft for HID HSCT recipients. This study was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03756675.
-
5.
Outcomes of Bone Marrow Compared to Peripheral Blood for Haploidentical Transplantation
Sharma, N., Faisal, M. S., Zhao, Q., Jiang, J., Elder, P., Benson, D. M., Rosko, A., Chaudhry, M., Bumma, N., Khan, A., et al
Journal of clinical medicine. 2021;10(13)
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) from a haploidentical (haplo) donor has emerged as a suitable alternative in the absence of a matched donor. However, haplo-HCT patients have a higher risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Hence, bone marrow (BM) stem cell source and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) have been routinely used to help mitigate this. Due to ease of collection, peripheral blood (PB) stem cells are increasingly being considered for haplo-HCT. We retrospectively analyzed 74 patients (42 BM and 32 PB) who underwent haplo-HCT at Ohio State University from 2009 to 2018. Median age at transplant was 60 years (yrs) for BM and 54 yrs for PB, (p = 0.45). There was no difference in OS (p = 0.13) and NRM (p = 0.75) as well as PFS (p = 0.10) or GRFS (p = 0.90) between the groups. The BM cohort showed a 3-year OS rate of 63% (95% confidence interval (CI): 46-76), and 3-year PFS of 49% (95% CI: 33-63). For the PB group, 3-year OS and PFS were 78% (95% CI: 59-89) and 68% (95% CI: 49-82), respectively. There were no differences in the incidence of acute GVHD (grade II-IV) (p = 0.31) and chronic GVHD (p = 0.18). Patients receiving BM had a significantly higher risk for relapse with relapse rates by 2 years at 36% (95% CI: 22-50) vs. 16% (95% CI: 6-31) for PB (p = 0.03). The findings from this study suggest that PB is an excellent alternative to BM for haplo-HCT.
-
6.
Bone Marrow versus Peripheral Blood Graft for Haploidentical HCT with Post Transplantation Cyclophosphamide
Mehta, R. S., Saliba, R. M., Alsfeld, L. C., Jorgensen, J. L., Wang, S. A., Anderlini, P., Al-Atrash, G., Bashir, Q., Ciurea, S. O., Hosing, C. M., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2021
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the COVID-19 pandemic era, the numbers of haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with peripheral blood (PB) versus bone marrow (BM) grafts increased significantly, which may be associated with adverse outcomes. METHODS We compared outcomes of BM vs PB grafts in patients =18 years with hematological malignancy who underwent T-cell replete haploidentical HCT and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. FINDINGS Of 264 patients, 180 (68%) received BM and 84 (32%) received PB graft. Median age was 50 years in both groups. Majority (n=199, 75%) received reduced-intensity conditioning. More patients had acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome in BM (n=152, 85%) than PB (n=46, 55%), p<0.01. The median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment, and incidence of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) was comparable in both groups. Among grade II-IV aGVHD, steroid-refractory aGVHD (SR-aGVHD) was 9% (95% CI 5-18) in BM vs 32% (95% CI 19-54) in PB; hazard ratio (HR) 3.7, 95% CI 1.5-9.3, p=0.006. Chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 8% (95% CI 4-13) vs 22% (95% CI 14-36); HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.4-6.6, p=0.005 and systemic therapy-requiring cGVHD was 2.5% (95% CI 1-7) vs 14% (95% CI 7-27), respectively; HR 5.6, 95% CI 1.7-18, p=0.004 at 1 year. PB group had a significantly higher risk of bacterial and viral infections with no appreciable advantage in the duration of hospitalization, immune reconstitution, relapse, non-relapse mortality, or survival. INTERPRETATION Our data suggest the use of BM over PB graft for haploidentical HCT.
PICO Summary
Population
Adult patients with haematological malignancies undergoing haploidentical transplantation (n=264)
Intervention
Bone marrow graft (n=180)
Comparison
Peripheral blood graft (n=84)
Outcome
Median age was 50 years in both groups. Majority (n=199, 75%) received reduced-intensity conditioning. More patients had acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome in BM (n=152, 85%) than PB (n=46, 55%). The median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment, and incidence of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) was comparable in both groups. Among grade II-IV aGVHD, steroid-refractory aGVHD (SR-aGVHD) was 9% (95% CI 5-18) in BM vs 32% (95% CI 19-54) in PB; hazard ratio (HR) 3.7, 95% CI 1.5-9.3. Chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 8% (95% CI 4-13) vs 22% (95% CI 14-36); HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.4-6.6, and systemic therapy-requiring cGVHD was 2.5% (95% CI 1-7) vs 14% (95% CI 7-27), respectively; HR 5.6, 95% CI 1.7-18 at 1 year. PB group had a significantly higher risk of bacterial and viral infections with no appreciable advantage in the duration of hospitalization, immune reconstitution, relapse, non-relapse mortality, or survival
-
7.
Bone marrow versus mobilized peripheral blood stem cell graft in T-cell-replete haploidentical transplantation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Nagler, A., Dholaria, B., Labopin, M., Savani, B. N., Angelucci, E., Koc, Y., Arat, M., Pioltelli, P., Sica, S., Gulbas, Z., et al
Leukemia. 2020
Abstract
The ideal stem cell graft source remains unknown in haploidentical haematopietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy). This study compared outcomes of bone marrow (BM) versus peripheral blood (PB) stem cell graft for haplo-HCT in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). A total of 314 patients with ALL (BM-157; PB-157) were included in this study. The cumulative incidence of engraftment at day 30 was higher in the PB group compared with BM (93% vs. 88%, p < 0.01). The incidences of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and chronic GVHD were not significantly different between the study cohorts. In the multivariate analysis, there were tendencies toward a higher incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.52, p = 0.07), chronic GVHD (HR = 1.58, p = 0.05), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (HR = 1.66, p = 0.06) in patients receiving PB versus BM graft, respectively. The use of PB grafts was associated with lower leukemia-free survival (LFS) (HR = 1.43, p = 0.05), overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.59, p = 0.02), and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) (HR = 1.42, p = 0.03) compared with BM grafts. There was no difference in relapse incidence (HR = 1.23, p = 0.41) between the study groups. In conclusion, use of BM graft results in better survival after haplo-HCT with PTCy in patients with ALL, compared with PB stem cell graft.
-
8.
Bone marrow versus peripheral blood as a graft source for haploidentical donor transplantation in adults using post-transplant cyclophosphamide-A systematic review and meta-analysis
Yu, X., Liu, L., Xie, Z., Dong, C., Zhao, L., Zhang, J., Gu, J., Zhu, H. H.
Critical reviews in oncology/hematology. 2019;133:120-128
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peripheral-blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) are both widely used in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, it is unclear whether PB or BM produces a more satisfactory outcome in haploidentical HSCT, particularly for patients using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy), which is the standard therapy. However, to date, no meta-analysis focusing on this issue has been published. METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and the ClinicalTrials.gov website for studies regarding the use of BM or PB in haploidentical HSCT for hematological malignancies in adults using PTCy. Data were analyzed using Open Meta-Analyst statistical software. RESULTS Fourteen studies were extracted including four comparative retrospective reports and ten single-arm reports, with a total of 1759 patients received PTCy haploidentical HSCT (462 patients received PBSCT, 1297 patients received BMT). The pooled outcomes of comparative retrospective studies showed significantly higher incidence of grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (OR=1.741, 95%CI 1.032-2.938), incidence of grade IIIV acute GVHD (OR=1.778, 95%CI 1.314, 2.406) and engraftment rate (OR=1.843, 95%CI 1.066-3.185) in the PB group. No significant differences were found on the incidence of relapse, 2-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), acute IIIV GVHD and chronic GVHD between PBSCT or BMT. CONCLUSION The efficacy of PB is not inferior to BM for patients undergoing PTCy haploidentical HSCT with regard to primary outcomes, including OS, DFS, NRM and relapse. However, with regards to convenience and pain relief, PB graft is suitable for haploidentical HSCT, but with a higher risk of acute GVHD.
-
9.
Peripheral Blood Stem Cells vs Bone Marrow for T Cell-replete Haploidentical Transplantation with Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide in Hodgkin Lymphoma
Mariotti, J., Devillier, R., Bramanti, S., Giordano, L., Sarina, B., Furst, S., Granata, A., Maisano, V., Pagliardini, T., De Philippis, C., et al
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2019
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (Haplo-SCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) represents a potential curative strategy for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) when a matched related or unrelated donor is not available. The role of graft source, either bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in this setting was not fully elucidated. We performed a retrospective study on 91 patients with HL in order to compare the outcome after BM (n=53) or PBSC (n=38) transplant. Eighty-nine patients engrafted with no difference between BM and PBSC in terms of median time for neutrophil (20 vs 20 days, p=0.405) and platelet (26 vs 26.5 days, p=0.994) engraftment. With a median follow-up of 40.2 months, 100-days cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 acute graft-versus host disease (GVHD) and grade 3-4 acute GVHD was 24% and 4%, respectively. Graft source was not associated with a different risk of acute GVHD both by univariate and multivariate analysis. Consistently, 1-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 7% with no differences between the two graft types (p=0.761). Two-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM) and GVHD/relapse-free survival (GRFS) were 67%, 58%, 20% and 52%, respectively. By univariate analysis, pre-transplant disease status was the main variable affecting all outcomes. By multivariate analysis, PBSC resulted a protective factor both for OS (HR: 0.29, p=0.006), PFS (HR: 0.38, p=0.001) and GRFS (HR: 0.44, p=0.020). The other independent variables affecting the final outcome were pre-transplant disease status and hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index (HCT-CI). In conclusion, when planning a Haplo-SCT with PT-Cy for patients with poor risk HL, graft type is an important variable to take into account when selecting the best available donor.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (n=91)
Intervention
Haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplant (n=38)
Comparison
Haploidentical bone marrow transplant (n=53)
Outcome
Graft source was not associated with a different risk of acute GVHD both by univariate and multivariate analysis. Consistently. By univariate analysis, pre-transplant disease status was the main variable affecting all outcomes. By multivariate analysis, PBSC resulted a protective factor both for OS (HR: 0.29), PFS (HR: 0.38) and GRFS (HR: 0.44).