-
1.
Early Impact of Mobilization Process on Cardiac Function and Size in Patients Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Vaitiekiene, A., Kulboke, M., Bieseviciene, M., Bartnykaite, A., Kireilis, B., Rinkuniene, D., Jankauskas, A., Zemaitis, J., Gaidamavicius, I., Gerbutavicius, R., et al
Journal of clinical medicine. 2024;13(3)
Abstract
Background: The hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) process is known to cause cardiac toxicity of different grades. In this paper, we aimed to evaluate the impact of mobilization procedure of hematopoietic stem cells for autologous HSCT process for left and right ventricle sizes and functions. Material and Methods: The data of 47 patients undergoing autologous HSCT were analyzed. All patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell mobilization with chemotherapy and filgrastim at 10 µg/kg/d. Echocardiography was performed two times: before enrolling in the transplantation process and after mobilization before the conditioning regimen for transplantation. Changes in left and right ventricle (RV) diameter and systolic and diastolic function of the left ventricle and systolic function of the RV were measured. Results: A statistically significant difference was observed in the change of right ventricular function (S')-it slightly decreased. Mean S' before mobilization was 13.93 ± 2.85 cm/s, and after mobilization it was 12.19 ± 2.64 cm/s (p = 0.003). No statistically significant change in left ventricular diameter and systolic and diastolic function and RV diameter was observed. Conclusions: The mobilization procedure in patients undergoing autologous HSCT is associated with reduced RV systolic function. S' could be used as a reliable tool to evaluate early cardiotoxicity in HSCT patients and guide further follow-up.
-
2.
An evidence-based and risk-adapted GSF versus GSF plus plerixafor mobilization strategy to obtain a sufficient CD34(+) cell yield in the harvest for autologous stem cell transplants
Balint, M. T., Lemajić, N., Jurišić, V., Pantelić, S., Stanisavljević, D., Kurtović, N. K., Balint, B.
Translational oncology. 2024;39:101811
Abstract
BACKGROUND Plerixafor is a bicyclam molecule with the ability to reversibly bind to receptor CXCR-4 thus leading to an increased release of stem cells (SC) into the circulation. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of G-CSF plus plerixafor versus G-CSF alone mobilizing regimens on the basis of CD34(+) cell yield and engraftment kinetics following hematopoietic SC transplants. METHODS The study incorporated 173 patients with plasma cell neoplasms (PCN), Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), undergoing mobilization and following autologous SC-transplant. For patients with mobilization failure and those predicted to be at risk of harvesting inadequate CD34(+) yields (poor-responders), plerixafor was administered. Data was collected and compared in relation to the harvesting protocols used, cell quantification, cell-engraftment potential and overall clinical outcome. RESULTS A total of 101 patients received plerixafor (58.4 %) and the median CD34(+)increase was 312 %. Chemotherapy-mobilized PCN-patients required less plerixafor administration (p = 0.01), no difference was observed in lymphoma groups (p = 0.46). The median CD34(+)cell yield was 7.8 × 10(6)/kg bm. Patients requiring plerixafor achieved lower, but still comparable cell yields. Total cell dose infused was in correlation with engraftment kinetics. Patients requiring plerixafor had delayed platelet engraftment (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS Adequately selected plerixafor administration reduces "mobilization-related-failure" rate and assure a high-level cell dose for SC transplants, with superior "therapeutic-potential" and safety profile. The mobilization strategy that incorporates "just-in-time" plerixafor administration, also leads to a reduction of hospitalization days and healthcare resource utilization. For definitive conclusions, further controlled/larger clinical trials concerning correlation of CD34(+) cell count/yield, with hematopoietic reconstitution are required.
-
3.
Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody impairs CD34+ mobilization and affects clonogenic potential in multiple myeloma patients
Zappaterra, A., Civettini, I., Cafro, A. M., Pezzetti, L., Pierini, S., Anghilieri, M., Bellio, L., Bertazzoni, P., Grillo, G., Minga, P., et al
Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue. 2024
Abstract
BACKGROUND Induction with daratumumab-based regimens followed by autologous stem cell transplantation is the current standard for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients eligible for intensive chemotherapy. However, concerns emerged regarding potential negative effects following daratumumab-based treatment on CD34+ mobilization. We here compared CD34+ mobilization and clonogenic potential between daratumumab and non-daratumumab based therapy without upfront plerixafor administration among patients affected by NDMM. MATERIALS AND METHODS Clinical, mobilization and clonogenic data from 41 consecutively enrolled NDMM patients were analyzed. Patients underwent collection of autologous CD34+ by apheresis at the ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy, from January 2021 to March 2023. Clonogenicity analysis was performed on BFU-E and CFU-GM. RESULTS Seventy-five percent of daratumumab-treated patients underwent >1 apheresis, compared to 24% of non-daratumumab patients (p=0.0017). Daratumumab-treated patients had significantly lower CD34+ count (mean 38 vs 79/μL, respectively; p=0.0011), with a median CD34+ harvest of 3.98×10(6)/kg (range 1.68-9.18) vs 6.87×10(6)/kg (range 1.63-16.85) in non-daratumumab-treated (p=0.0006). In multivariate analysis the likelihood of undergoing >1 apheresis was significantly higher in older patients (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1-1.4, Z=2.10, p=0.03) and daratumumab-treated patients (OR 15, 95% CI 2.8-129, p=0.004). Moreover, daratumumab-based induction therapy demonstrated an independent negative association with BFU-E colony formation (p=0.0148), even when accounting for patient age and CD34+ levels. DISCUSSION Our findings underscore the impact of daratumumab-based treatment on CD34+ mobilization in a real-life, upfront plerixafor-free population of NDMM patients. Higher probability of requiring multiple apheresis occurred among daratumumab-treated patients. Interestingly, the observation that daratumumab might negatively impact BFU-E colony formation, independent of CD34+ cell count, offers novel biological perspectives. Appropriate strategies should be adopted by the Apheresis teams to mitigate these potential negative effects.
-
4.
[Efficiency and safety analysis of Plerixafor combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in lymphoma]
Ji, M. M., Shen, Y. G., Gong, J. C., Tang, W., Xu, X. Q., Zheng, Z., Chen, S. Y., He, Y., Zheng, X., Zhao, L. D., et al
Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi. 2023;44(2):112-117
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the advantages and safety of Plerixafor in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization of lymphoma. Methods: Lymphoma patients who received autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization with Plerixafor in combination with G-CSF or G-CSF alone were obtained. The clinical data, the success rate of stem cell collection, hematopoietic reconstitution, and treatment-related adverse reactions between the two groups were evaluated retrospectively. Results: A total of 184 lymphoma patients were included in this analysis, including 115 cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (62.5%) , 16 cases of classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (8.7%) , 11 cases of follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (6.0%) , 10 cases of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (5.4%) , 6 cases of mantle cell lymphoma (3.3%) , and 6 cases of anaplastic large cell lymphoma (3.3%) , 6 cases of NK/T-cell lymphoma (3.3%) , 4 cases of Burkitt's lymphoma (2.2%) , 8 cases of other types of B-cell lymphoma (4.3%) , and 2 cases of other types of T-cell lymphoma (1.1%) ; 31 patients had received radiotherapy (16.8%) . The patients in the two groups were recruited with Plerixafor in combination with G-CSF or G-CSF alone. The baseline clinical characteristics of the two groups were basically similar. The patients in the Plerixafor in combination with the G-CSF mobilization group were older, and the number of recurrences and third-line chemotherapy was higher. 100 patients were mobilized with G-CSF alone. The success rate of the collection was 74.0% for one day and 89.0% for two days. 84 patients in the group of Plerixafor combined with G-CSF were recruited successfully with 85.7% for one day and 97.6% for two days. The success rate of mobilization in the group of Plerixafor combined with G-CSF was substantially higher than that in the group of G-CSF alone (P=0.023) . The median number of CD34(+) cells obtained in the mobilization group of Plerixafor combined with G-CSF was 3.9×10(6)/kg. The median number of CD34(+) cells obtained in the G-CSF Mobilization group alone was 3.2×10(6)/kg. The number of CD34(+) cells collected by Plerixafor combined with G-CSF was considerably higher than that in G-CSF alone (P=0.001) . The prevalent adverse reactions in the group of Plerixafor combined with G-CSF were grade 1-2 gastrointestinal reactions (31.2%) and local skin redness (2.4%) . Conclusion: The success rate of autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in lymphoma patients treated with Plerixafor combined with G-CSF is significantly high. The success rate of collection and the absolute count of CD34(+) stem cells were substantially higher than those in the group treated with G-CSF alone. Even in older patients, second-line collection, recurrence, or multiple chemotherapies, the combined mobilization method also has a high success rate of mobilization.
-
5.
A novel PEGylated form of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, mecapegfilgrastim, for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients with hematologic malignancies
Wen, J., Zhou, Q., Shi, L., Xu, F., Liu, Y., Su, J., Zhang, Y., Qu, W., Yue, J.
BMC cancer. 2023;23(1):694
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) has longer half-life and is given once only, which is more comfortable for patients. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of mecapegfilgrastim for hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization in patients with hematologic malignancies and to explore the potential factors related to HSC mobilization. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent HSC mobilization in the hematology department of Mianyang Central Hospital from April 2016 to November 2022. The number of CD34 + cells collected was compared between the patients receiving mecapegfilgrastim (PEG group) and those receiving recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF group), and the possible factors for mobilization failure were analyzed. RESULTS The success rates of collecting CD34 + cells in the PEG group and rhG-CSF group were 80.6% and 67.7%, respectively (χ = 1.444, P = 0.229). The median CD34 + cell counts were 3.62 × 10^6/kg and 2.92 × 10^6/kg (P = 0.178), respectively. After combination with plerixafor for mobilization, the median number of CD34 + cells collected in the PEG group and rhG-CSF group were 3.64 × 10^6/kg and 3.92 × 10^6/kg, respectively, with no significant difference (P = 0.754). There was no significant difference in hematopoietic cell recovery or infection between the groups (P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that more than 5 cycles of chemotherapy (OR = 15.897, 95% CI: 1.766-143.127, P = 0.014), a precollection WBC count < 32 × 10^9/L (OR = 14.441, 95% CI: 2.180-95.657, P = 0.006) and a precollection to premobilization lymphocyte ratio < 1.7 (OR = 11.388, 95% CI: 2.129-60.915, P = 0.004) were independent risk factors for HSC mobilization failure. CONCLUSIONS The HSC mobilization efficacy of mecapegfilgrastim in patients with hematologic malignancies was comparable to that of rhG-CSF, and combination with plerixafor for mobilization was feasible and effective. Patients with more than 5 cycles of chemotherapy before HSC mobilization, a precollection WBC count lower than 32 × 10^9/L, and a precollection lymphocyte count less than 1.7 times the premobilization lymphocyte count have a high probability of HSC mobilization failure.
-
6.
[Application of Mecapegfilgrastim for Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients With Hematologic Neoplasms and Analysis of Predictors for Poor Mobilization]
Wen, J. J., Shi, L., Xu, F., Zhou, Q. L., Liu, Y. P., Su, J., Zhang, Y., Qu, W., Yue, J., Liang, X. G., et al
Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition. 2023;54(3):625-630
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of applying mecapegfilgrastim for peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell (PBSC) mobilization in patients with hematologic neoplasms, and to investigate the influencing factors of PBSC collection. METHODS Patients who underwent PBSC mobilization in the Department of Hematology, Mianyang Central Hospital between April 2016 and May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The CD34 (+) cell collection results of two groups, the mecapegfilgrastim group ( n=28), or the PEG group, and the recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) group ( n=30), were compared, and the influencing factors of collection failure were analyzed. RESULTS The success rates of CD34 (+) cells collection in the PEG group and the rhG-CSF group were 75.0% and 63.3%, respectively ( P>0.05). The median CD34 (+) cell counts were 3.37×10 (6)/kg and 2.68×10 (6)/kg, respectively, showing no significant difference. After combined mobilization with plerixafor, the median counts of CD34 (+) cells collected in the PEG group and rhG-CSF group were 4.23×10 (6)/kg and 3.26×10 (6)/kg, respectively, showing no significant difference ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in hematopoietic system reconstruction and infections between the two groups ( P>0.05). Multivariate analysis found non-plasma cell disease (odds ratio [ OR]=19.697, 95% confidence interval [ CI] : 1.501-258.537, P=0.023), anemia before collection ( OR=18.571, 95% CI: 1.354-254.775, P=0.029) and white blood cell count before collection under 32×10 (9) L (-1) ( OR=85.903, 95% CI: 4.947-1491.807, P=0.002) to be independent risk factors for PBSC collection failure. CONCLUSION The effect of PBSC mobilization with mecapegfilgrastim was comparable to that of rhG-CSF in patients with hematologic neoplasms. Furthermore, combined mobilization with plerixafor was feasible and effective. Patients with leukemia or lymphoma, anemia, and WBC<32×10 (9) L (-1) before stem cell collection have a high probability of PBSC collection failure.
-
7.
Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells with lenograstim in multiple myeloma patients: Prospective multicenter observational study (KMM122)
Jung, E. H., Byun, J. M., Shin, D. Y., Do, Y. R., Jo, J. C., Lee, S. M., Yoon, S. S.
Cancer medicine. 2023
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current guidelines recommend using filgrastim or tbo-filgrastim to mobilize hematopoietic progenitor cells in an autologous setting. However, previous studies have suggested other forms of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) are equally efficacious, possibly with fewer leukaphereses required. Thus, we prospectively studied the efficacy of lenograstim, a glycosylated recombinant form of G-CSF, in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. METHODS From November 2011 to January 2020, 98 MM patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) from five academic centers in Korea were enrolled. Patients were mobilized with subcutaneous lenograstim (Neutrogin®) with fixed doses of 10 μg/kg for 4 days. RESULTS Most of the patients ( N = 90, 91.8%) achieved at least the targets of 2 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg body weight, and more than half of MM patients ( N = 57, 58.2%) reached a target of 5 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg body weight. The mobilization failure rate was 8.2% ( N = 8). The median number of CD34 + cell/kg using G-CSF only was 5.25 × 10(6) /kg (range 0.49-13.47). Adverse events included transfusion (TF, N = 53, 54.1%), bone pain ( N = 6, 6.1%), fever ( N = 2, 2.0%), and gastrointestinal troubles ( N = 2, 2.0%). There were no grade 3 or 4 adverse events during mobilization. Body surface area (BSA) at mobilization and platelet TF were factors associated with CD34+ collection. Most patients achieved neutrophil ( N = 93, 98.9%) and platelet ( N = 89, 95.7%) engraftment. CONCLUSION Lenograstim can safely and effectively mobilize stem cells in MM autologous settings.
-
8.
Prediction of mobilized hematopoietic stem cell yield in patients with multiple myeloma: Usefulness of whole-body MRI-derived indices
Takasu, M., Higashino, R., Sueoka, T., Kawai, S., Tanitame, N., Tamura, A., Iida, M., Kawase, T., Ichinohe, T., Awai, K.
PloS one. 2023;18(3):e0283241
Abstract
INTRODUCTION High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant is the mainstay of treatment for multiple myeloma (MM). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of MRI-derived indices to predict mobilized hematopoietic stem cell yield. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this exploratory pilot work, we retrospectively analyzed 38 mobilization procedures for MM. Successful mobilization procedure was defined as a total yield of >4.0×106 CD34+ cells/kg. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors with a significant effect on successful mobilization from among clinical characteristics including number of prior lines of therapy, period from diagnosis to harvest, type of monoclonal protein (M protein); and radiological characteristics including total diffusion volume (tDV), median apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of tDV, and mean fat fraction of bone marrow calculated by MRI. RESULTS Univariate analyses showed that relatively poor mobilization was significantly associated with M protein of Bence-Jones type and with median ADC of tDV (P = 0.02 and P = 0.004, respectively). Multivariate analyses using these two indices showed that median ADC of tDV was a significant predictive factor for adequate mobilization (P = 0.01), with an area under the curve of 0.784 (cutoff value, 1.18×10-3 mm2/s; sensitivity, 72.7%; specificity, 87.5%). CONCLUSION The present data indicate that median ADC of tDV is a predictive factor for relatively poor mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells in MM patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant.
-
9.
Poor Mobilizers in Lymphoma but Not Myeloma Patients Had Significantly Poorer Progression-Free Survival after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: Results of a Large Retrospective, Single-Center Observational Study
Steiner, N., Göbel, G., Mauser, L., Mühlnikel, L., Fischinger, M., Künz, T., Willenbacher, W., Hetzenauer, G., Rudzki, J., Nussbaumer, W., et al
Cancers. 2023;15(3)
Abstract
In our single-center study, 357 myeloma and lymphoma patients between 2009 and 2019 were mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF 7.5 µg/kg bid for four days) plus a fixed dose of 24 mg Plerixafor when indicated (Plerixafor Group, n = 187) or G-CSF alone (G-CSF Group, n = 170). The target CD34 cell yields were ≥2.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg in lymphoma and ≥4.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg in myeloma patients to enable putative second transplants in the latter. There were no significant differences in engraftment kinetics or transfusion requirements between the Plerixafor Group and the control group in the myeloma cohort, with lymphoma patients not requiring Plerixafor showing significantly faster neutrophil recovery, a trend to faster platelet recovery, and a significantly lower need for platelet transfusions, probably due to the significantly lower number of CD34-positive cells re-transfused. While in myeloma patients the outcome (overall survival, progression-free survival) following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was similar between the Plerixafor Group and the control group, hard to mobilize lymphoma patients had significantly poorer progression-free survival (47% vs. 74% at 36 months after ASCT, p = 0.003) with a trend also to poorer overall survival (71% vs. 84%). In conclusion, while there seem to be no differences in stemness capacity and long-term engraftment efficiency between the Plerixafor and the G-CSF Group in lymphoma as well as myeloma patients, poor mobilizing lymphoma patients per se constitute a high-risk population with a poorer outcome after ASCT. Whether disease characteristics and/or a more intense or stem cell-toxic pre-mobilization chemo-/radiotherapy burden in this cohort are responsible for this observation remains to be shown in future studies.
-
10.
Stem cell collection after lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone plus elotuzumab or isatuximab in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a single centre experience from the GMMG-HD6 and -HD7 trials
Kauer, J., Freundt, E. P., Schmitt, A., Weinhold, N., Mai, E. K., Müller-Tidow, C., Goldschmidt, H., Raab, M. S., Kriegsmann, K., Sauer, S.
BMC cancer. 2023;23(1):1132
Abstract
BACKGROUND While quadruplet induction therapies deepen responses in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients, their impact on peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection remains incompletely understood. This analysis aims to evaluate the effects of prolonged lenalidomide induction and isatuximab- or elotuzumab-containing quadruplet induction therapies on PBSC mobilization and collection. METHODS A total of 179 transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed MM treated at a single academic center were included. The patients were evaluated based on PBSC mobilization and collection parameters, including overall collection results, CD34(+) cell levels in peripheral blood, leukapheresis (LP) delays, overall number of LP sessions, and the rate of rescue mobilization with plerixafor. The patients underwent four different induction regimens: Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd, six 21-day cycles, n = 44), isatuximab-RVd (six 21-day cycles, n = 35), RVd (four 21-day cycles, n = 51), or elotuzumab-RVd (four 21-day cycles, n = 49). RESULTS The patients' characteristics were well balanced across the different groups. Collection failures, defined as the inability to collect three sufficient PBSC transplants, were rare (n = 3, 2%), with no occurrences in the isatuximab-RVd and elotuzumab-RVd groups. Intensified induction with six 21-day cycles of RVd did not negatively impact the overall number of collected PBSCs (9.7 × 10(6)/kg bw versus 10.5 × 10(6)/kg bw, p = 0.331) compared to four 21-day cycles of RVd. Plerixafor usage was more common after six cycles of RVd compared to four cycles (16% versus 8%). Addition of elotuzumab to RVd did not adversely affect overall PBSC collection (10.9 × 10(6)/kg bw versus 10.5 × 10(6)/kg bw, p = 0.915). Patients treated with isatuximab-RVd (six cycles) had lower numbers of collected stem cells compared to those receiving RVd (six cycles) induction (8.8 × 10(6)/kg bw versus 9.7 × 10(6)/kg bw, p = 0.801), without experiencing significant delays in LP or increased numbers of LP sessions in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. Plerixafor usage was more common after isatuximab plus RVd compared to RVd alone (34% versus 16%). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that stem cell collection is feasible after prolonged induction with isatuximab-RVd without collection failures and might be further explored as induction therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION Patients were treated within the randomized phase III clinical trials GMMG-HD6 (NCT02495922, 24/06/2015) and GMMG-HD7 (NCT03617731, 24/07/2018). However, during stem cell mobilization and -collection, no study-specific therapeutic intervention was performed.