-
1.
National diagnostic and care protocols (NDCP) for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in autoimmune diseases
Farge, D., Pugnet, G., Allez, M., Castilla-Llorente, C., Chatelus, E., Cintas, P., Faucher-Barbey, C., Labauge, P., Labeyrie, C., Lioure, B., et al
La Revue de medecine interne. 2024
Abstract
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for severe ADs was developed over the past 25years and is now validated by national and international medical societies for severe early systemic sclerosis (SSc) and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) and available as part of routine care in accredited center. HSCT is also recommended, with varying levels of evidence, as an alternative treatment for several ADs, when refractory to conventional therapy, including specific cases of connective tissue diseases or vasculitis, inflammatory neurological diseases, and more rarely severe refractory Crohn's disease. The aim of this document was to provide guidelines for the current indications, procedures and follow-up of HSCT in ADs. Patient safety considerations are central to guidance on patient selection and conditioning, always validated at the national MATHEC multidisciplinary team meeting (MDTM) based on recent (less than 3months) thorough patient evaluation. HSCT procedural aspects and follow-up are then carried out within appropriately experienced and Joint Accreditation Committee of International Society for Cellular Therapy and SFGM-TC accredited centres in close collaboration with the ADs specialist. These French recommendations were performed according to HAS/FAI2R standard operating procedures and coordinated by the Île-de-France MATHEC Reference Centre for Rare Systemic Autoimmune Diseases (CRMR MATHEC) within the Filière FAI2R and in association with the Filière MaRIH. The task force consisted of 3 patients and 64 clinical experts from various specialties and French centres. These data-derived and consensus-derived recommendations will help clinicians to propose HSCT for their severe ADs patients in an evidence-based way. These recommendations also give directions for future clinical research in this area. These recommendations will be updated according to newly emerging data. Of note, other cell therapies that have not yet been approved for clinical practice or are the subject of ongoing clinical research will not be addressed in this document.
-
2.
Gaining Consensus Around Patient Risk Groups and Prognostic Profiles to Guide CMV Management Among Patients With Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant: Insights From a Delphi Panel With Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Experts
Graf, M., Tuly, R., Pednekar, P., Wang, C., Batt, K.
Transplantation proceedings. 2024
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to characterize patient risk groups and prognostic profiles to optimize clinical decision-making and guide appropriate medical cytomegalovirus (CMV) management among patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). METHODS Between 8/2021 and 2/2022, a 3-round modified Delphi study was conducted to generate consensus among 10 international experts in HSCT and infectious diseases. Experts were asked about treatment and prognoses for patients in 7 distinct clinical scenarios. Furthermore, experts were asked to risk-stratify patients by pre-/post-transplant characteristics. Consensus around opting for/against a treatment was observed if ≥75% or <25% of experts reported ≥50% likelihood to recommend or if treatments were ranked inside/outside the top 2 options and ≥75% of experts were within 1 SD of mean ranks. RESULTS Experts agreed on several unmet needs in CMV disease management post-HSCT, particularly avoidance of treatment-limiting toxicities with conventional CMV therapy and the emergence of both refractory and drug-resistant treatment failures. Experts considered CMV viral load, resistance profile, and route of administration as critical to treatment selection. For newer CMV therapeutic options, experts listed a lack of long-term use data, concerns over potential resistance, high cost, and limited availability as challenges restricting adoption and successful patient management. CONCLUSIONS Experts achieved consensus around patient risk stratifications and factors influencing therapeutic options. Recommendations emerging from this Delphi study may support practicing physicians when confronted with challenging CMV scenarios in patients with HSCT.
-
3.
Genetic Findings of Potential Donor Origin following Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Recommendations on Donor Disclosure and Genetic Testing from the World Marrow Donor Association (WMDA): WMDA Guidelines on Genetic Findings of Donor Origin
Pryce, A., Van, E. E., Cody, M., Oakes, J., DeSalvo, A., Bannon, S., Burlton, C., Pawson, R., Fingrut, W., Barriga, F., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2023
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Following hematopoietic cell transplantation, recipients are subjected to extensive genetic testing to monitor the efficacy of the transplant and identify relapsing malignant disease. This testing increasingly includes the use of large gene panels which may lead to incidental identification of genetic and molecular information of potential donor origin. Deciphering whether variants are of donor origin, and if so, whether there are clinical implications for the donor, can prove challenging. In response to queries from donor registries and transplant centers regarding best practice in managing donors when genetic mutations of potential donor origin are identified, the Medical Working Group of the World Marrow Donor Association established an expert group to review available evidence and to develop a framework to aid decision-making. These guidelines aim to provide recommendations on pre-donation consenting, post-donation testing of recipients and informing and managing donors when findings of potential donor origin are identified in recipients post-transplantation. It is recognised that registries will have different access to resources and financing structures. Therefore, where possible, we have made suggestions on how recommendations can be adapted.
PICO Summary
Population
An expert group convened by the Medical Working Group of the World Marrow Donor Association
Intervention
Provide recommendations on pre-donation consenting, post-donation testing of recipients
Comparison
None
Outcome
These guidelines aim to provide recommendations on pre-donation consenting, post-donation testing of recipients and informing and managing donors when findings of potential donor origin are identified in recipients post-transplantation.
-
4.
ASTCT Clinical practice recommendations for transplant and cellular therapies in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Epperla, N., Kumar, A., Abutalib, S. A., Awan, F. T., Chen, Y. B., Gopal, A. K., Holter-Chakrabarty, J., Kekre, N., Lee, C. J., Lekakis, L., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2023
Abstract
Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) has long remained the standard approach for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) chemosensitive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, the advent of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has caused a paradigm shift in the management of R/R DLBCL patients, especially with the recent approval of CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy in the second line setting in high-risk groups (primary refractory and early relapse [≤12 months]). Consensus on the contemporary role, optimal timing, and sequencing of HCT and cellular therapies in DLBCL is lacking. Therefore, the American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) Committee on Practice Guidelines undertook this project to formulate consensus recommendations to address this unmet need. The RAND-modified Delphi method was used to generate 20 consensus statements with a few key statements as follows: 1) in the first-line setting, there is no role of auto-HCT consolidation for those achieving complete remission (CR) following R-CHOP or similar therapy in non-double hit/triple hit cases (DHL/THL) and in DHL/THL cases receiving intensive induction therapies, but auto-HCT may be considered in eligible patients receiving R-CHOP or similar therapies in DHL/THL cases. 2) Auto-HCT consolidation with thiotepa-based conditioning is standard-of-care for eligible patients with primary central nervous system achieving CR with first-line therapy. 3) In the primary refractory and early relapse setting, the preferred option is CAR T-cell therapy, while in late relapse (>12 months), consolidation with auto-HCT is recommended in those achieving chemosensitivity to salvage therapy (CR or partial response), and CAR T-cell therapy is recommended in those not achieving remission. These clinical practice recommendations will serve as a tool to guide clinicians managing patients with newly diagnosed and R/R DLBCL.
-
5.
Updated Indications for Immune Effector Cell Therapy: 2023 Guidelines from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
Kanate, A. S., Majhail, N., DeFilipp, Z. M., Dhakal, B., Dholaria, B., Hamilton, B., Herrera, A. F., Inamoto, Y., Jain, T., Perales, M. A., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2023
Abstract
The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) published its guidelines on indications for autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and immune effector cell therapy (IECT) in 2020. Since then we have witnessed rapid advancements in the field of IECT, resulting in several new chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) products and disease indications being approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). To keep abreast of these practice changes, the ASTCT Committee on Practice Guidelines commissioned a focused update covering CAR-T therapy indications. This brief manuscript presents updated ASTCT recommendations on indications for CAR-T therapy. Only FDA approved indications for CAR-T were recommended and categorized as "standard of care" (S), where indication is well defined and supported by evidence. The ASTCT will continue to periodically review these guidelines and update them as new evidence becomes available.
-
6.
Updated guidelines for chronic active Epstein-Barr virus disease
Kawada, J. I., Ito, Y., Ohshima, K., Yamada, M., Kataoka, S., Muramatsu, H., Sawada, A., Wada, T., Imadome, K. I., Arai, A., et al
International journal of hematology. 2023
Abstract
Chronic active Epstein-Barr virus disease (CAEBV), formerly named chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection, is characterized by systemic inflammation and clonal proliferation of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-infected T or NK cells. As CAEBV is a potentially life-threatening illness, appropriate diagnosis and therapeutic interventions are necessary for favorable clinical outcomes. Substantial evidence regarding the pathogenesis and treatment of CAEBV has been accumulated since previous guidelines for the diagnosis of CAEBV were proposed. To reflect this evidence, we updated the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of CAEBV to improve clinical management of the disease. The details of the updated guidelines are presented in this report. Diagnosis of CAEBV now requires confirmation of a high copy number of EBV genome and EBV-infected T or NK cells. An EBV DNA load ≥ 10,000 IU/mL in whole blood is proposed as the diagnostic cutoff value for CAEBV in this updated guideline. A standard treatment approach for CAEBV has not been established, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is considered the only curative treatment. Chemotherapy can be administered to control disease activity before HSCT.
-
7.
Management of patients with germline predisposition to haematological malignancies considered for allogeneic blood and marrow transplantation: Best practice consensus guidelines from the UK Clinical Genetics Group (UKCGG), CanGene-CanVar, NHS England Genomic Laboratory Hub (GLH) Haematological Malignancies Working Group and the British Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and cellular therapy (BSBMTCT)
Clark, A., Thomas, S., Hamblin, A., Talley, P., Kulasekararaj, A., Grinfeld, J., Speight, B., Snape, K., McVeigh, T. P., Snowden, J. A.
British journal of haematology. 2023
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Germline predisposition to haematological cancers is increasingly being recognised. Widespread adoption of high-throughput and whole genome sequencing is identifying large numbers of causative germline mutations. Constitutional pathogenic variants in six genes (DEAD-box helicase 41 [DDX41], ETS variant transcription factor 6 [ETV6], CCAAT enhancer binding protein alpha [CEBPA], RUNX family transcription factor 1 [RUNX1], ankyrin repeat domain containing 26 [ANKRD26] and GATA binding protein 2 [GATA2]) are particularly significant in increasing the risk of haematological cancers, with variants in some of these genes also associated with non-malignant syndromic features. Allogeneic blood and marrow transplantation (BMT) is central to management in many haematological cancers. Identification of germline variants may have implications for the patient and potential family donors. Beyond selection of an appropriate haematopoietic stem cell donor there may be sensitive issues surrounding identification and counselling of hitherto asymptomatic relatives. If BMT is needed, there is frequently a clinical urgency that demands a rapid integrated multidisciplinary approach to testing and decision making involving haematologists in collaboration with Clinical and Laboratory Geneticists. Here, we present best practice consensus guidelines arrived at following a meeting convened by the UK Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG), the Cancer Research UK (CRUK) funded CanGene-CanVar research programme (CGCV), NHS England Genomic Laboratory Hub (GLH) Haematological Oncology Malignancies Working Group and the British Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (BSBMTCT).
-
8.
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in the Management of Myelodysplastic Syndrome: An Evidence-Based Review from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Committee on Practice Guidelines
DeFilipp, Z., Ciurea, S. O., Cutler, C., Robin, M., Warlick, E. D., Nakamura, R., Brunner, A. M., Dholaria, B., Walker, A. R., Kröger, N., et al
Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. 2023;29(2):71-81
Abstract
The sole curative therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Here this therapeutic modality is reviewed and critically evaluated in the context of the evidence. Specific criteria were used for searching the published literature and for grading the quality and strength of the evidence and the strength of the recommendations. A panel of MDS experts comprising transplantation and nontransplantation physicians developed consensus treatment recommendations. This review summarizes the standard MDS indications for HCT and addresses areas of controversy. Recent prospective trials have confirmed that allogeneic HCT confers survival benefits in patients with advanced or high-risk MDS compared with nontransplantation approaches, and the use of HCT is increasing in older patients with good performance status. However, patients with high-risk cytogenetic or molecular mutations remain at high risk for relapse. It is unknown whether administration of novel therapies before or after transplantation may decrease the risk of disease relapse in selected populations. Ongoing and future studies will investigate revised approaches to disease risk stratification, patient selection, and post-transplantation approaches to optimize allogeneic HCT outcomes for patients with MDS.
-
9.
Paving the Road for CAR-Ts: ASTCT 80/20 Task Force consensus on challenges and solutions to improving efficiency of clinical center certification and maintenance of operations for commercially approved immune effector cell therapies
Nikiforow, S., Frigault, M. J., Frey, N. V., Gardner, R. A., Komanduri, K. V., Perales, M. A., Kebriaei, P., Warkentin, P. I., Pasquini, M., Aho, J. L., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2023
Abstract
As the number and type of regulatory authority-approved cellular therapies grow, clinical treatment centers face a heavy burden of duplicative documentation around initial qualification, ongoing auditing, and reporting-with overlapping requirements from each manufacturer to ensure safe use of their specific product, which in the United States are stipulated under individual Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Biologic License Applications (BLA). The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) convened the 80/20 Taskforce to consider challenges and potential solutions to these issues. The taskforce proposed that 80% of manufacturers' requirements for onboarding and ongoing operations of commercially available products could be standardized and streamlined. Taskforce members interviewed dozens of stakeholders, including clinicians at large academic medical centers already utilizing commercial and investigational immune effector cell (IEC) products, regulators, members of accrediting bodies and professional cellular therapy societies, and manufacturers of IEC therapies for oncologic indications. In November 2021, the taskforce organized and led virtual discussions in a public forum and at a private ASTCT 80/20 workshop at the online AcCELLerate Forum, a cellular-therapy stakeholders' meeting organized by the ASTCT, the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) and Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). At the workshop, approximately 60 stakeholders worked to identify and prioritize common challenges in onboarding and maintenance of operations at clinical sites for commercial FDA-approved and future IEC therapies and ways to streamline the process. It was agreed that standardization would improve efficiency of onboarding, allowing more cost-effective, sustainable growth of approved IEC therapies at treatment centers, and facilitate wider access while maintaining safety and clinical success. This early but extensive survey of stakeholders resulted in five overarching suggestions for both established and emerging treatment centers: 1. Eliminate duplication in accreditation and auditing of clinical sites; 2. Define expectations for education and management of CAR-T cell therapy toxicities to potentially replace product-specific REMS programs; 3. Streamline current REMS education, testing and data reporting; 4. Standardize IT platforms supporting enrollment, clinical site-to-manufacturer communication, and logistics of maintaining chain of identity/chain of custody across multiple transportation steps; 5. Encourage use of universal nomenclature by cell therapy manufacturers. Future discussions need to engage a broader range of stakeholders including administrators, pharmacists, nurses, data coordinators, surgeons, pathologists, and those developing promising cellular therapies for solid tumors, as well as teams from smaller academic or community cancer center settings. Continued collaboration with stakeholders outside of clinical sites will include accrediting bodies/auditors, established and emerging cell therapy companies, software developers, professional societies, and the patients who receive these therapies. Active dialogue with government regulators remains essential. Such joint efforts are critical as the number of IEC therapies for myriad oncologic and non-oncologic indications grows.
-
10.
Evaluation of children with malignancies for blood and marrow transplantation: A report from the ASTCT Committee on Practice Guidelines
Fraint, E., Abdel-Azim, H., Bhatt, N. S., Broglie, L., Chattha, A., Kohorst, M., Ktena, Y. P., Lee, M. A., Long, S., Qayed, M., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2023
Abstract
Evaluation of a candidate for hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) is a complex process with substantial inter-center variability. Although literature providing guidance for evaluating the eligibility of adults is well established, similar guidance for children is lacking. To address gaps between adult recommendations and the specific needs of children, we convened a panel of pediatric HCT experts from a wide geographic range of American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) member institutions to offer pediatric-focused pre-HCT evaluation recommendations. In this report from the ASTCT Committee on Practice Guidelines, we present a practical framework for evaluating children with malignancies who are candidates for HCT. We also highlight key differences from adults and emphasize areas of unmet need that require additional research to delineate best practices.