1.
Current status of clinical trials assessing mesenchymal stem cell therapy for graft versus host disease: a systematic review
Li, Y., Hao, J., Hu, Z., Yang, Y. G., Zhou, Q., Sun, L., Wu, J.
Stem cell research & therapy. 2022;13(1):93
Abstract
BACKGROUND Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common fatal complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), where steroids are used as a treatment option. However, there are currently no second-line treatments for patients that develop steroid-resistance (SR). Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have immunomodulatory functions and can exert immunosuppressive effects on the inflammatory microenvironment. A large number of in vitro experiments have confirmed that MSCs can significantly inhibit the proliferation or activation of innate and adaptive immune cells. In a mouse model of GVHD, MSCs improved weight loss and increased survival rate. Therefore, there is great promise for the clinical translation of MSCs for the prevention or treatment of GVHD, and several clinical trials have already been conducted to date. MAIN BODY In this study, we searched multiple databases and found 79 clinical trials involving the use of MSCs to prevent or treat GVHD and summarized the characteristics of these clinical trials, including study design, phase, status, and locations. We analyzed the results of these clinical trials, including the response and survival rates, to enable researchers to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the field's progress, challenges, limitations, and future development trends. Additionally, factors that might result in inconsistencies in clinical trial results were discussed. CONCLUSION In this study, we attempted to analyze the clinical trials for MSCs in GVHD, identify the most suitable group of patients for MSC therapy, and provide a new perspective for the design of such trials in the future.
2.
Mesenchymal stromal cells as prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease in haplo-identical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients with severe aplastic anemia?-a systematic review and meta-analysis
Li, R., Tu, J., Zhao, J., Pan, H., Fang, L., Shi, J.
Stem cell research & therapy. 2021;12(1):106
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are an emerging prophylaxis option for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in haplo-identical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) recipients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA), but studies have reported inconsistent results. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of MSCs as prophylaxis for GVHD in SAA patients with haplo-HSCT. METHODS Studies were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and http://clinicaltrials.gov from establishment to February 2020. Twenty-nine single-arm studies (n?=?1456) were included, in which eight (n?=?241) studies combined with MSCs and eleven (n?=?1215) reports without MSCs in haplo-HSCT for SAA patients. The primary outcomes were the incidences of GVHD. Other outcomes included 2-year overall survival (OS) and the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to compare the results pooled through random or fixed effects models. RESULTS Between MSCs and no MSCs groups, no significant differences were found in the pooled incidences of acute GVHD (56.0%, 95% CI 48.6-63.5% vs. 47.2%, 95% CI 29.0-65.4%; OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.91-2.25; p?=?0.123), grade II-IV acute GVHD (29.8%, 95% CI 24.1-35.5% vs. 30.6%, 95% CI 26.6-34.6%; OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.70-1.32; p?=?0.889), and chronic GVHD (25.4%, 95% CI 19.8-31.0% vs. 30.0%, 95% CI 23.3-36.6%; OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.56-1.11; p?=?0.187). Furtherly, there was no obvious difference in 2-year OS (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.60-1.61; p?=?1.000) and incidence of CMV infection (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40-1.92; p?=?0.018). CONCLUSIONS Our meta-analysis indicates that the prophylactic use of MSC co-transplantation is not an effective option for SAA patients undergoing haplo-HSCT. Hence, the general co-transplantation of MSCs for SAA haplo-HSCT recipients may lack evidence-based practice.
3.
Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells co-infusion in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Li, T., Luo, C., Zhang, J., Wei, L., Sun, W., Xie, Q., Liu, Y., Zhao, Y., Xu, S., Wang, L.
Stem cell research & therapy. 2021;12(1):246
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is life-saving for severe hematological conditions. However, its outcomes need further improvement, and co-infusion of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) may show promise. A growing body of research on this subject exists, while the results of different trials are conflicting. A systematic review and meta-analysis is needed to appraise the real efficacy and safety of MSC co-transplantation in allo-HSCT. METHODS Studies comparing MSC co-transplantation in allo-HSCT with allo-HSCT alone were searched in six medical databases from inception to June 10, 2020. The primary outcomes were engraftment and graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD and cGVHD, respectively). Other outcomes included overall survival (OS), relapse rate (RR), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and immune reconstitution. Information was independently extracted by two investigators. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. RESULTS Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 13 non-randomized controlled trials (nRCTs) were included. MSC co-infusion resulted in shorter times to neutrophil engraftment (RCTs: standardized mean difference (SMD) -?1.20, p =?0.04; nRCTs: SMD -?0.54, p =?0.04) and platelet engraftment (RCTs: SMD -?0.60, p =?0.04; nRCTs: SMD -?0.70, p =?0.01), a lower risk of cGVHD (RCTs: risk ratio (RR) 0.53, p =?0.01; nRCTs: RR 0.50, p 0.01), and a slightly positive trend towards reducing the risk of aGVHD and NRM, without affecting RR and OS. Subgroup analyses revealed that when MSCs were co-transplanted, children and adolescents, and patients receiving human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-nonidentical HSCT showed improvements in engraftment and incidence of GVHD and NRM; adults and patients who received HLA-identical HSCT had lower cGVHD; patients with malignancies exhibited improvements in GVHD and NRM incidence; and patients with non-malignancies experienced accelerated engraftment. Notably, a reduced OS was observed in patients with hematological malignancies undergoing HLA-identical HSCT. CONCLUSION MSC co-infusion generally improved engraftment and reduced cGVHD, without increasing mortality or relapse. Regarding aGVHD and NRM, the effects of MSCs were not quite significant. Specifically, our data support the utilization of MSC co-transplantation in children and young individuals with HLA-nonidentical HSCT, but not in adult patients with hematological malignancies undergoing HLA-identical HSCT.