2 results
Filters • 2
Sort By
Results Per Page
Filters
2 results
2
Download the following citations:
Email the following citations:
Print the following citations:
Editor's Choice
  • Penack O
  • Marchetti M
  • Aljurf M
  • Arat M
  • Bonifazi F
  • et al.
Lancet Haematol. 2024 Feb;11(2):e147-e159 doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(23)00342-3.
POPULATION:

Panel of 22 experts and one methdologist convened by the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

INTERVENTION:

Update of the EBMT consensus recommendations

COMPARISON:

OUTCOME:

Key updates to the recommendations include: (1) primary use of ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory acute GVHD and steroid-refractory chronic GVHD as the new standard of care, (2) use of rabbit anti-T-cell (thymocyte) globulin or post-transplantation cyclophosphamide as standard GVHD prophylaxis in peripheral blood stem-cell transplantations from unrelated donors, and (3) the addition of belumosudil to the available treatment options for steroid-refractory chronic GVHD.

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major factor contributing to mortality and morbidity after allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). In the last 3 years, there has been regulatory approval of new drugs and considerable change in clinical approaches to prophylaxis and management of GVHD. To standardise treatment approaches, the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) has updated its clinical practice recommendations. We formed a panel of one methodologist and 22 experts in the field of GVHD management. The selection was made on the basis of their role in GVHD management in Europe and their contributions to the field, such as publications, presentations at conferences, and other research. We applied the GRADE process to ten PICO (patient, intervention, comparator, and outcome) questions: evidence was searched for by the panel and graded for each crucial outcome. In two consensus meetings, we discussed the evidence and voted on the wording and strengths of recommendations. Key updates to the recommendations include: (1) primary use of ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory acute GVHD and steroid-refractory chronic GVHD as the new standard of care, (2) use of rabbit anti-T-cell (thymocyte) globulin or post-transplantation cyclophosphamide as standard GVHD prophylaxis in peripheral blood stem-cell transplantations from unrelated donors, and (3) the addition of belumosudil to the available treatment options for steroid-refractory chronic GVHD. The EBMT proposes to use these recommendations as the basis for routine management of GVHD during allogenic HSCT. The current recommendations favour European practice and do not necessarily represent global preferences.

Editor's Choice
  • Pryce A
  • Van Eerden E
  • Cody M
  • Oakes J
  • DeSalvo A
  • et al.
Transplant Cell Ther. 2024 Feb;30(2):143-154 doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.11.019.
POPULATION:

An expert group convened by the Medical Working Group of the World Marrow Donor Association

INTERVENTION:

Provide recommendations on pre-donation consenting, post-donation testing of recipients

COMPARISON:

None

OUTCOME:

These guidelines aim to provide recommendations on pre-donation consenting, post-donation testing of recipients and informing and managing donors when findings of potential donor origin are identified in recipients post-transplantation.

Following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), recipients are subjected to extensive genetic testing to monitor the efficacy of the transplantation and identify relapsing malignant disease. This testing is increasingly including the use of large gene panels, which may lead to incidental identification of genetic and molecular information of potential donor origin. Deciphering whether variants are of donor origin, and if so, whether there are clinical implications for the donor can prove challenging. In response to queries from donor registries and transplant centers regarding best practices in managing donors when genetic mutations of potential donor origin are identified, the Medical Working Group of the World Marrow Donor Association established an expert group to review available evidence and develop a framework to aid decision making. These guidelines aim to provide recommendations on predonation consenting, postdonation testing of recipients, and informing and managing donors when findings of potential donor origin are identified in recipients post-transplantation. It is recognized that registries will have different access to resources and financing structures, and thus whenever possible, we have made suggestions on how recommendations can be adapted.