-
1.
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is equally effective in secondary acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) compared to de-novo ALL-a report from the EBMT registry
Sadowska-Klasa, A., Zaucha, J. M., Labopin, M., Bourhis, J. H., Blaise, D., Yakoub-Agha, I., Salmenniemi, U., Passweg, J., Fegueux, N., Schroeder, T., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2024
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Secondary acute lymphoblastic leukemia (s-ALL) comprises up to 10% of ALL patients. However, data regarding s-ALL outcomes is limited. To answer what is the role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in s-ALL, a matched-pair analysis in a 1:2 ratio was conducted to compare outcomes between s-ALL and de novo ALL (dn-ALL) patients reported between 2000-2021 to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry. Among 9720 ALL patients, 351 (3.6%) were s-ALL, of which 80 were in first complete remission (CR1) with a known precedent primary diagnosis 58.8% solid tumor (ST), 41.2% hematological diseases (HD). The estimated 2-year relapse incidence (RI) was 19.1% (95%CI: 11-28.9), leukemia-free survival (LFS) 52.1% (95%CI: 39.6-63.2), non-relapse mortality (NRM) 28.8% (95%CI: 18.4-40), GvHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) 39.4% (95%CI: 27.8-50.7), and overall survival (OS) 60.8% (95%CI: 47.9-71.4), and did not differ between ST and HD patients. In a matched-pair analysis, there was no difference in RI, GRFS, NRM, LFS, or OS between s-ALL and dn-ALL except for a higher incidence of chronic GvHD (51.9% vs. 31.4%) in s-ALL. To conclude, patients with s-ALL who received HCT in CR1 have comparable outcomes to patients with dn-ALL.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, reported to the EBMT registry (n=9720)
Intervention
A detailed analysis cohort who were transplanted for secondary acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (s-ALL, n=80)
Comparison
Matched controls who were transplanted for de novo ALL (dn-ALL, n=80)
Outcome
The estimated 2-year relapse incidence (RI) was 19.1% (95%CI: 11-28.9), leukemia-free survival (LFS) 52.1% (95%CI: 39.6-63.2), non-relapse mortality (NRM) 28.8% (95%CI: 18.4-40), GvHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) 39.4% (95%CI: 27.8-50.7), and overall survival (OS) 60.8% (95%CI: 47.9-71.4), and did not differ between solid tumour and haematological disease patients. In a matched-pair analysis, there was no difference in RI, GRFS, NRM, LFS, or OS between s-ALL and dn-ALL except for a higher incidence of chronic GvHD (51.9% vs. 31.4%) in s-ALL.
-
2.
Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for therapy-related myeloid neoplasms arising following treatment for lymphoma: a retrospective study on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT
Nabergoj, M., Eikema, D. J., Koster, L., Platzbecker, U., Sockel, K., Finke, J., Kröger, N., Forcade, E., Nagler, A., Eder, M., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2024
Abstract
Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN), either myelodysplastic neoplasms (t-MDS) or acute myeloid leukemias (t-AML), have a poor prognosis and allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) represents the only curative option. In this multicenter, registry-based study, we analyzed outcomes of 378 patients undergoing first allo-HCT between 2006-2017 for t-MN arising secondary to lymphoma treatment. Median age was 58 years at allo-HCT; 222 (59%) had a diagnosis of t-MDS and 156 (41%) of t-AML, respectively. At the time of allo-HCT, 46% of t-MN cases were reported as in complete remission (CR) and 15% of lymphomas were recorded as not in remission. A reduced intensity conditioning regimen was used in 70% of cases. For the entire cohort, 5-year OS, and t-MN PFS, relapse incidence and NRM were 32%, 28%, 35% and 37%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, undergoing allo-HCT with t-MN not in CR and older age were associated with significantly worse OS, PFS and NRM. At 5 years post allo-HCT, the relapse incidence of lymphoma was low at 3%, while the rate of secondary malignancies was 8%. This analysis shows the curative potential of allo-HCT for patients with t-MN arising secondary to lymphoma treatment in approximately a third of patients.
-
3.
Allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients surviving at least 2 years without relapse: outcome and risk factors
Grønvold, B. L., Ali, M. M., Myklebust, TÅ, Lenartova, A., Remberger, M., Abrahamsen, I. W., Tjønnfjord, G. E., Myhre, A. E., Fløisand, Y., Gedde-Dahl, T.
EJHaem. 2024;5(1):117-124
Abstract
Outcomes of 2-year survivours undergoing allo-haematopoietic stem cell transplantation at Oslo University Hospital were retrospectively assessed with the objectives of identification of risk factors for late death as possible means for precautionary measures and interventions to improve long-term survival. 421 patients with haematological malignancy, transplanted between 2005 and 2019, alive and free of disease after 2 years were included with data reported from The OUS-HSCT registry. Median follow-up was 6.2 years (2.016.1), and 232 patients (55%) were observed for minimum 5 years. The probability of being alive 5 and 10 years after HSCT was 86% and 76%. Primary risk factors for late death included initial diagnosis of age ≥ 60 years, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), previous blood stream- or invasive fungal infection (BSI, IFI), and chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). Transplant-related mortality (TRM) and relapse at 5 years were 9.0% and 7.7%, respectively. Two factors were associated with the latter: cytomegalovirus (CMV) seronegative donor and CLL. Compared with the age- and gender-matched Norwegian general population, life expectancy was lower for each disease, except for CML. The prospect for the long-term survival is good for 2-year survivors of the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, life expectancy remains inferior to the age- and gender-matched general population. Optimising prophylaxis and treatment for chronic GVHD, BSI and IFI are needed along with the improved adherence to guidelines for early detection of secondary malignancies. Measures to improve immune reconstitution, possibly the microbiota, and the use of CMV seropositive donors regardless of recipient sero-status may be warranted and should be addressed in further studies.
-
4.
Fludarabine-treosulfan versus fludarabine-melphalan or busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning in older AML or MDS patients - A clinical trial to registry data comparison
Beelen, D. W., Iacobelli, S., Koster, L., Eikema, D. J., van Biezen, A., Stölzel, F., Ciceri, F., Bethge, W., Dreger, P., Wagner-Drouet, E. M., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2024
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
A randomized study (acronym: MC-FludT.14/L Trial II) demonstrated that fludarabine plus treosulfan (30 g/m²) was an effective and well tolerated conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). To further evaluate this regimen, all 252 study patients aged 50 to 70 years were compared with similar patients, who underwent allo-HCT after fludarabine/melphalan (140 mg/m²) (FluMel) or busulfan (12.8 mg/kg)/cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg) (BuCy) regimens and whose data was provided by the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry. In 1:1 propensity-score matched-paired analysis (PSA) of AML patients, there was no difference in 2-year-relapse-incidence after FluTreo compared with either FluMel (n = 110, p = 0.28) or BuCy (n = 78, p = 0.98). However, 2-year-non-relapse-mortality (NRM) was lower compared with FluMel (p = 0.019) and BuCy (p < 0.001). Consequently, 2-year-overall-survival (OS) after FluTreo was higher compared with FluMel (p = 0.04) and BuCy (p < 0.001). For MDS patients, no endpoint differences between FluTreo and FluMel (n = 30) were evident, whereas 2-year-OS after FluTreo was higher compared with BuCy (n = 25, p = 0.01) due to lower 2-year-NRM. Multivariate sensitivity analysis confirmed all significant results of PSA. Consequently, FluTreo (30 g/m²) seems to retain efficacy compared with FluMel and BuCy, but is better tolerated by older patients.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults aged 50-70 years with primary or secondary AML in complete remission or MDS, receiving a peripheral blood allogeneic transplant (n=1220)
Intervention
Participants in the MC-FludT.14/L trial who received fludarabine-treosulfan conditioning (FluTreo, n=252)
Comparison
Propensity-score matched patients identified from the EBMT registry (n=968) who received fludarabine/melphalan (FluMel, n=338) or busulfan/cyclophosphamide (BuCy, n=630) regimens
Outcome
In 1:1 propensity-score matched-paired analysis (PSA) of AML patients, there was no difference in 2-year-relapse-incidence after FluTreo compared with either FluMel (n=110) or BuCy (n=78). However, 2-year-non-relapse-mortality (NRM) was lower compared with FluMel and BuCy. Consequently, 2-year-overall-survival (OS) after FluTreo was higher compared with FluMel and BuCy. For MDS patients, no endpoint differences between FluTreo and FluMel (n=30) were evident, whereas 2-year-OS after FluTreo was higher compared with BuCy (n=25) due to lower 2-year-NRM. Multivariate sensitivity analysis confirmed all significant results of PSA.
-
5.
A nationwide retrospective analysis of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adult hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis
Kim, H., Mizuno, K., Masuda, K., Sakurai, M., Ara, T., Naito, K., Uehara, Y., Yamamoto, G., Osada, M., Machida, S., et al
Transplantation and cellular therapy. 2024
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
[BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE]: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare, life-threatening disorder characterized by systemic hyperinflammation. Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only potentially curative treatment for primary and relapsed/refractory HLH, the optimal strategy has not been established. [STUDY DESIGN]: We retrospectively analyzed 56 adult patients (≥ 18 years) with primary and secondary HLH (mainly consisting of Epstein-Barr virus-associated HLH) who underwent allo-HSCT using the registry database of the Japanese Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, including 26 patients who underwent cord blood transplantation (CBT). One-fourth of patients received myeloablative conditioning (MAC), mainly consisting of total body irradiation-based regimens. [RESULTS]: The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 40.6%, while the 3-year cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 19.8% and 39.6%, respectively. In univariable analysis, age at allo-HSCT (the 3-year OS: 27.5% for ≥ 25 years old vs 58.0% for < 25 years old, P = 0.030), conditioning intensity (7.1% for MAC vs 51.8% for reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC), P = 0.003), and donor source (26.0% for CBT vs 52.9% for bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (BMT/PBSCT), P = 0.033) were associated with significantly inferior OS. In multivariable analysis, older age at allo-HSCT (≥ 25 years old) (Hazard ratio [HR], 2.37; 95% CI, 1.01-5.58; P = 0.048), MAC (HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.09-5.53; P = 0.031), and CBT (HR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.04-4.71; P = 0.040) were independently associated with worse OS. In addition, only conditioning intensity predicted higher NRM (the 3-year NRM: 78.6% for MAC vs 26.6% for RIC), while no factors were associated with the relapse rate. [CONCLUSION]: This study includes the largest number of adult HLH patients undergoing CBT. Although the use of CBT is acceptable, BMT/PBSCT are more favorable strategies in allo-HSCT in adult HLH. Regarding conditioning intensity, RIC regimens are more beneficial in this setting.
PICO Summary
Population
Adults with primary or secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) identified from the Japanese Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy registry (n= 56)
Intervention
Allogeneic transplantation: cord blood (n=26), peripheral blood or bone marrow transplant (n=30)
Comparison
None
Outcome
The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 40.6%, while the 3-year cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 19.8% and 39.6%, respectively. In univariable analysis, age at allo-HSCT (the 3-year OS: 27.5% for ≥ 25 years old vs 58.0% for < 25 years old), conditioning intensity (7.1% for MAC vs 51.8% for reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC)), and donor source (26.0% for CBT vs 52.9% for bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (BMT/PBSCT)) were associated with significantly inferior OS. In multivariable analysis, older age at allo-HSCT (≥ 25 years old) (Hazard ratio [HR], 2.37; 95% CI, 1.01-5.58), MAC (HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.09-5.53), and CBT (HR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.04-4.71) were independently associated with worse OS. In addition, only conditioning intensity predicted higher NRM (the 3-year NRM: 78.6% for MAC vs 26.6% for RIC), while no factors were associated with the relapse rate.
-
6.
HLA haploidentical stem cell transplantation from HLA homozygous donors to HLA heterozygous donors may have lower survival rates than haploidentical transplantation from HLA heterozygous donors to HLA heterozygous donors: a retrospective nationwide analysis
Fukunaga, K., Ikegame, K., Nakamae, H., Doki, N., Fukuda, T., Kondo, Y., Ara, T., Eto, T., Mori, Y., Matsuoka, K. I., et al
International journal of hematology. 2024
Abstract
In HLA haploidentical stem cell transplantation, patients and donors usually share one HLA haplotype and have one different HLA haplotype (hetero-to-hetero). However, there are rare cases of transplantation from HLA homozygous donors to heterozygous recipients (homo-to-hetero), resulting in mismatches only in the graft-versus-host direction. We previously reported that homo-to-hetero transplants have a lower survival rate in a mouse model than hetero-to-hetero transplants due to stronger graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) but inferior graft-versus-leukemia effect. To examine whether homo-to-hetero transplant effects also occur in humans, we retrospectively compared the results of 59 homo-to-hetero and 4,539 hetero-to-hetero cases in the Japanese transplant registry data. The results showed no statistical difference between the homo-to-hetero and hetero-to-hetero groups in the cumulative incidences of neutrophil engraftment (83.1% vs 89.0%), acute GVHD II-IV (36.8% vs 38.8%), III-IV (16.8% vs 17.4%), chronic GVHD (32.7% vs 30.7%), relapse (52.9% vs 49.0%), and non-relapse mortality (31.6% vs 28.2%). In contrast, overall survival was significantly lower in the homo-to-hetero group than in the hetero-to-hetero group (12.6% vs 26.2%, p = 0.0308). The inferior effect of homo-to-hetero transplantation on overall survival remained significant in multivariate analyses.
-
7.
Outcomes of CMML patients undergoing allo-HCT are significantly worse compared to MDS-a study of the CMWP of the EBMT
Rovó, A., Gras, L., Piepenbroek, B., Kröger, N., Reinhardt, H. C., Radujkovic, A., Blaise, D., Kobbe, G., Niityvuopio, R., Platzbecker, U., et al
American journal of hematology. 2024;99(2):203-215
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Although CMML since long has been separated from MDS, many studies continue to evaluate the outcomes of both diseases after hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) together. Data evaluating outcomes of a large CMML cohort after allo-HCT compared to MDS are limited. We aim to compare outcomes of CMML to MDS patients who underwent allo-HCT between 2010 and 2018. Patients ≥18 years with CMML and MDS undergoing allo-HCT reported to the EBMT registry were analyzed. Progression to AML before allo-HCT was an exclusion criterion. Overall survival (OS), progression/relapse-free survival (PFS), relapse incidence (including progression) (REL), and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were evaluated in univariable and multivariable (MVA) Cox proportional hazard models including interaction terms between disease and confounders. In total, 10832 patients who underwent allo-HCT were included in the study, there were a total of 1466 CMML, and 9366 MDS. The median age at time of allo-HCT in CMML (median 60.5, IQR 54.3-65.2 years) was significantly higher than in the MDS cohort (median 58.8, IQR 50.2-64.5 years; p < .001). A significantly higher percentage of CMML patients were male (69.4%) compared to MDS (61.2%; p < .001). There were no clinically meaningful differences in the distribution of Karnofsky score, Sorror HCT-CI score at allo-HCT, and donor type, between the CMML and MDS patients. RIC platforms were utilized in 63.9% of CMML allo-HCT, and in 61.4% of MDS patients (p = .08). In univariable analyses, we found that OS, PFS, and REL were significantly worse in CMML when compared with MDS (all p < .0001), whereas no significant difference was observed in NRM (p = .77). In multivariable analyses, the HR comparing MDS versus CMML for OS was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.74-0.88, p < .001), PFS 0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.82, p < .001), relapse 0.66 (95% CI 0.59-0.74, p < .001), and NRM 0.87 (95% CI 0.78-0.98, p = .02), respectively. The association between baseline variables and outcome was found to be similar in MDS and CMML (all interaction p > .05) except for a decreasing trend over time of the risk of relapse in CMML (HR allo-HCT per year later 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.98), whereas no such trend was observed in MDS (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.98-1.02). The poor outcome observed for CMML could be related to variables not measured in this study or to factors inherent to the disease itself. This study demonstrates that outcomes of CMML patients after allo-HCT are significantly worse compared to MDS. The results of this study may contribute to future recommendations for allo-HCT in CMML patients.
-
8.
Association of individual comorbidities with outcomes in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation from unrelated adult donors versus unrelated cord blood: A study on behalf of the Donor/Source and Transplant Complications Working Groups of the Japanese Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
Konuma, T., Harada, K., Shinohara, A., Uchida, N., Shingai, N., Ito, A., Ozawa, Y., Tanaka, M., Sawa, M., Onizuka, M., et al
American journal of hematology. 2024
Abstract
We retrospectively evaluated the effect of 17 individual comorbidities, defined by the hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-specific comorbidity index, on non-relapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS) in 9531 patients aged between 16 and 70 years who underwent their first allogeneic HCT from 8/8 and 7/8 allele-matched unrelated donors (8/8 and 7/8 MUDs) or single-unit unrelated cord blood (UCB) between 2011 and 2020 using data from a Japanese registry database. In the multivariate analysis, infection (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-1.99 for 8/8 and 7/8 MUDs; adjusted HR, 1.33, 95%CI, 1.12-1.58 for UCB) and moderate/severe hepatic comorbidity (adjusted HR, 1.57, 95%CI, 1.04-2.38 for 8/8 and 7/8 MUDs; adjusted HR, 1.53, 95%CI, 1.09-2.15 for UCB) had a significant impact on NRM in both donor groups. Cardiac comorbidity (adjusted HR, 1.40, 95%CI, 1.08-1.80), mild hepatic comorbidity (adjusted HR, 1.22, 95%CI, 1.01-1.48), rheumatologic comorbidity (adjusted HR, 1.67, 95%CI, 1.11-2.51), renal comorbidity (adjusted HR, 2.44, 95%CI, 1.46-4.09), and severe pulmonary comorbidity (adjusted HR, 1.40, 95%CI, 1.11-1.77) were significantly associated with an increased risk of NRM but only in UCB recipients. Renal comorbidity had the strongest impact on poor OS in both donor groups (adjusted HR, 1.73, 95%CI, 1.10-2.72 for 8/8 and 7/8 MUDs; adjusted HR, 2.24, 95%CI, 1.54-3.24 for UCB). Therefore, unrelated donor selection should be taken into consideration along with the presence of specific comorbidities, such as cardiac, rheumatologic, renal, mild hepatic, and severe pulmonary comorbidities.
-
9.
The effect of center experience on allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia
Yanada, M., Yano, S., Kuwatsuka, Y., Kawamura, K., Fukuda, T., Ichinohe, T., Hashii, Y., Goto, H., Kato, K., Ishimaru, F., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2024
Abstract
This study aimed to address the prognostic impact of center experience based on the data of 7821 adults with acute myeloid leukemia who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from 2010 to 2019 in Japan, where medical care was provided within a uniform healthcare system. Center experience was defined based on the number of allogeneic HCTs performed for any indication during the study period, by which centers were divided into low-, intermediate-, and high-volume centers. After adjusting for known confounding factors, the risk of overall mortality was lowest for the high-volume centers and highest for the low-volume centers, with the difference between the center categories attributed primarily to the risk of relapse. Patients transplanted at high-volume centers had higher risks of acute and chronic graft-versus-host diseases but without an increased risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM). These findings reveal the presence of a center effect in allogeneic HCT conducted during the past decade in Japan, highlighting the difference in relapse based on center experience. The weaker effect on NRM compared with that on relapse suggests that the transplantation care quality is becoming equalized across the country.
-
10.
Comparative Analysis of Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation Outcomes Between Japanese and Non-Japanese Populations
Yanagisawa, R., Shindo, M., Shinohara, A., Kuwatsuka, Y., Nakase, K., Kimura, F., Shingai, N., Nishida, T., Fukuda, T., Sakurai, M., et al
Transplantation proceedings. 2024
Abstract
BACKGROUND As the Japanese population may have less genetic diversity than other ethnic groups, treatment outcomes may be affected when allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is performed in other races. However, evidence explaining the effect of racial differences is limited. METHODS We used the Japanese National Database to examine the outcomes of first allogeneic bone marrow transplantations (BMTs) performed between Japanese and non-Japanese patients from 1996 to 2021. We performed propensity score matching using sex, age group, underlying disease group, HLA mismatch, conditioning regimen intensity, and BMT implementation age to select Japanese-to-Japanese BMT patients as the controls. RESULTS The numbers of non-Japanese-to-Japanese and Japanese-to-non-Japanese BMT cases included in the analysis were 48 and 75, respectively, and the following outcomes were compared: overall survival, non-relapse mortality, acute graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) ≥ grade II, chronic GVHD, and engraftment of neutrophils and platelets. Most parameters did not differ when comparing BMTs according to ethnicity; only platelet engraftment was delayed in Japanese-to-non-Japanese BMT but not in non-Japanese-to-Japanese BMT. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggested that BMT performed in Japanese and non-Japanese patients has little effect on treatment outcomes. The results of this study may be useful for donor selection in Japan, where internationalization has progressed in recent years.