1.
Pediatric Patients with Stage IV Rhabdomyosarcoma Significantly Benefit from Long-Term Maintenance Therapy: Results of the CWS-IV 2002 and the CWS DOK IV 2004-Trials
Tramsen, L., Bochennek, K., Sparber-Sauer, M., Salzmann-Manrique, E., Scheer, M., Dantonello, T., Borkhardt, A., Dirksen, U., Thorwarth, A., Greiner, J., et al
Cancers. 2023;15(7)
Abstract
Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in childhood. Whereas more than 90% of patients with localized low-risk RMS can be cured, metastatic RMS have a dismal outcome, with survival rates of less than 30%. The HD CWS-96 trial showed an improved outcome for patients receiving maintenance therapy after completing intensive chemotherapy. Consequently, the international clinical trials CWS-IV 2002 and CWS DOK IV 2004 on metastatic disease of STS of the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe (CWS) were designed in addition to the CWS-2002P trial for localized RMS disease. All patients received a multimodal intensive treatment regimen. To maintain remission, three options were compared: long-term maintenance therapy (LTMT) versus allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) versus high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT). A total of 176 pediatric patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of metastatic RMS or RMS-like tumor were included. A total of 89 patients receiving LTML showed a significantly better outcome, with an event-free survival (EFS) of 41% and an overall survival (OS) of 53%, than alloHSCT (n = 21, EFS 19%, p = 0.02, OS 24%, p = 0.002). The outcome of LTML was slightly improved compared to HDCT (n = 13, EFS 35%, OS 34%). In conclusion, our data suggest that in patients suffering from metastatic RMS, long-term maintenance therapy is a superior strategy in terms of EFS and OS compared to alloHSCT. EFS and OS of HDCT are similar in these strategies; however, the therapeutic burden of LTMT is much lower.
2.
Predictors of survival in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma who failed tandem high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation
Yi, E. S., Son, M. H., Hyun, J. K., Cho, H. W., Ju, H. Y., Lee, J. W., Yoo, K. H., Sung, K. W., Koo, H. H.
Pediatric blood & cancer. 2019;:e28066
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to explore prognostic factors for high-risk neuroblastoma patients with response failure to tandem high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDCT/auto-SCT). METHODS Survival outcomes were compared according to characteristics at initial diagnosis, at relapse/progression, and after relapse/progression in patients who experienced relapse/progression after tandem HDCT/auto-SCT from 2006 to 2018. RESULTS Forty-nine patients experienced relapse/progression after tandem HDCT/auto-SCT during the study period: 43 received salvage treatment and 30 underwent allogeneic SCT (allo-SCT) after reinduction treatment. Although all six patients who did not undergo salvage treatment died, 13 of the 43 patients who did remain alive. The 3-year probabilities of event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) from initial relapse/progression among the 49 patients were 14.4% +/- 5.2% and 21.2% +/- 6.4%, respectively. A higher neuron-specific enolase (NSE) level (>24 ng/mL) at relapse/progression was an independent prognostic factor for worse OS. Nine of 30 patients who underwent allo-SCT remain alive, and the 3-year probabilities of EFS and OS from allo-SCT were 16.5% +/- 7.2% and 21.6% +/- 8.3%, respectively. A higher NSE level and no incorporation of high-dose (131) I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (HD-MIBG) treatment into allo-SCT were independent prognostic factors for worse EFS and OS after allo-SCT. CONCLUSION The results suggest that a higher serum NSE level at relapse/progression is a predictor of worse prognosis in patients with response failure to tandem HDCT/auto-SCT, and that incorporation of HD-MIBG treatment into allo-SCT may improve outcomes.
3.
Long-Term Follow-Up of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Solid Cancer
Omazic, B., Remberger, M., Barkholt, L., Soderdahl, G., Potacova, Z., Wersall, P., Ericzon, B. G., Mattsson, J., Ringden, O.
Biology of Blood & Marrow Transplantation. 2016;22(4):676-81
Abstract
We wanted to determine whether allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) may result in long-term survival in patients with solid cancer. HSCT was performed in 61 patients with solid cancer: metastatic renal carcinoma (n = 22), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 17), colon carcinoma (n = 15), prostate cancer (n = 3), pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 3), or breast cancer (n = 1). Liver transplantation was performed for tumor debulking in 18 patients. Median age was 56 years (range, 28 to 77). Donors were either HLA-identical siblings (n = 29) or unrelated (n = 32). Conditioning was nonmyeloablative (n = 23), reduced (n = 36), or myeloablative (n = 2). Graft failure occurred in 13 patients (21%). The cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) of grades II to IV was 47%, and that of chronic GVHD was 32%. Treatment-related mortality was 21%. At 5 years cancer-related mortality was 63%. Currently, 6 patients are alive, 2 with renal cell carcinoma, 1 with cholangiocarcinoma, and 3 with pancreatic carcinoma. Eight-year survival was 12%. Risk factors for mortality were nonmyeloablative conditioning (HR, 2.95; P < .001), absence of chronic GVHD (HR, 3.57; P < .001), acute GVHD of grades II to IV (HR, 2.90; P = .002), and HLA-identical transplant (HR, 5.00; P = .03). With none of these risk factors, survival at 6 years was 50% (n = 6). Long-term survival can be achieved in some patients with solid cancer after HSCT. Copyright © 2016 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.