0
selected
-
1.
[Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation with Co-Infusion of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Acquired Severe Aplastic Anemia: A Report of 127 Cases]
Han, D. M., Ding, L., Zheng, X. L., Yan, H. M., Xue, M., Liu, J., Zhu, L., Li, S., Wang, H. X.
Zhongguo shi yan xue ye xue za zhi. 2022;30(4):1230-1237
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze the prognostic factors of haplo-HSCT combined with MSC in the treatment of SAA. METHODS 127 SAA patients who had undergone haplo-HSCT with co-infusion of MSC in our center from January 2014 to August 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Median age was 11 (1-37) years, and median follow-up time was 39.8 (1-74) months. RESULTS The median time for neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 14 d and 18 d respectively. The cumulative incidences of grade III-IV aGVHD was 4.4%±1.9% at day +100. The 2-year cumulative incidence of extensive cGVHD was 8.3%± 2.7%. The estimated 3-year OS was 86.1%±3.1%. Univariate analysis showed that high-dose CD34(+) cells (>6.69×106/kg) could promote the engraftment of neutrophil (97.9%±0.05% vs 88.6%±0.13% at day +21, P=0.0006) and platelet (81.2%±0.33% vs 70.8%±0.26% at day +28, P=0.002) and did not increase the incidence of aGVHD (10.4%±0.1% vs 18.9%±0.1% at day +100, P=0.18). More nucleated cells (>12.78×10(8)/kg) caused a lower incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD (8.6%±0.13% vs 21.7%±0.25% at day+100, P=0.04) and a higher incidence of 3-year OS (91.3%±3.2% vs 78.1%±6.5%, P=0.03) than less nucleated cells (≤12.78×10(8)/kg). Younger patients (age≤12 y) had faster neutrophil engraftment (94.9%±0.06% vs 87.5%±0.24% at day+21, P=0.02), higher 3-year OS (93.6%±2.8% vs 75.9%±6.4%, P=0.006) and higher 3-year FFS (93.6%±2.8% vs 68.3%±7.1%, P=0.000) than older patients (age>12 y). The shorter the time from diagnosis to HSCT (≤29.5 months), the higher the 3-year FFS of patients (88.8%±3.5% vs 74.2%±7.2%, P=0.028). Male patients with female donors had higher cumulative incidence of extensive cGVHD than others (20.0%±0.8% vs 4.6%±0.1%, P=0.01). CONCLUSION In the haplo-HSCT of SAA, the prognosis of children patients is better than that of adults patients. More CD34(+) cells and nucleated cells can promote engraftment, reduce the incidence of aGVHD and improve OS. HSCT should be performed as early as possible, and the occurrence of cGVHD should be reduced in male patients by avoiding female donors.
-
2.
Mesenchymal stromal cells as prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease in haplo-identical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients with severe aplastic anemia?-a systematic review and meta-analysis
Li, R., Tu, J., Zhao, J., Pan, H., Fang, L., Shi, J.
Stem cell research & therapy. 2021;12(1):106
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are an emerging prophylaxis option for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in haplo-identical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) recipients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA), but studies have reported inconsistent results. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of MSCs as prophylaxis for GVHD in SAA patients with haplo-HSCT. METHODS Studies were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and http://clinicaltrials.gov from establishment to February 2020. Twenty-nine single-arm studies (n?=?1456) were included, in which eight (n?=?241) studies combined with MSCs and eleven (n?=?1215) reports without MSCs in haplo-HSCT for SAA patients. The primary outcomes were the incidences of GVHD. Other outcomes included 2-year overall survival (OS) and the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to compare the results pooled through random or fixed effects models. RESULTS Between MSCs and no MSCs groups, no significant differences were found in the pooled incidences of acute GVHD (56.0%, 95% CI 48.6-63.5% vs. 47.2%, 95% CI 29.0-65.4%; OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.91-2.25; p?=?0.123), grade II-IV acute GVHD (29.8%, 95% CI 24.1-35.5% vs. 30.6%, 95% CI 26.6-34.6%; OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.70-1.32; p?=?0.889), and chronic GVHD (25.4%, 95% CI 19.8-31.0% vs. 30.0%, 95% CI 23.3-36.6%; OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.56-1.11; p?=?0.187). Furtherly, there was no obvious difference in 2-year OS (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.60-1.61; p?=?1.000) and incidence of CMV infection (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40-1.92; p?=?0.018). CONCLUSIONS Our meta-analysis indicates that the prophylactic use of MSC co-transplantation is not an effective option for SAA patients undergoing haplo-HSCT. Hence, the general co-transplantation of MSCs for SAA haplo-HSCT recipients may lack evidence-based practice.
-
3.
Co-transplantation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells with hematopoietic stem cells does not improve transplantation outcome in class III beta-thalassemia major: A prospective cohort study with long-term follow-up
Rostami, T., Maleki, N., Kasaeian, A., Nikbakht, M., Kiumarsi, A., Asadollah Mousavi, S., Ghavamzadeh, A.
Pediatric transplantation. 2020;:e13905
Abstract
Bone marrow transplantation is the only curative treatment for beta-thalassemia major. Data on the co-transplantation of MSCs with HSCs in beta-thalassemia major patients are scarce. We aimed to investigate the outcomes of thalassemia major patients who underwent bone marrow-derived MSC co-transplantation with HSCs compared with those who only received HSCs. This prospective randomized study included patients with class III thalassemia major undergoing HSCT divided randomly into two groups: Thirty-three patients underwent co-transplantation of bone marrow-derived MSCs with HSCs, and 26 patients only received HSCs. Five-year OS, TFS, TRM, graft rejection rate, and GVHD were estimated. The 5-year OS was 66.54% (95% CI, 47.8% to 79.9%) in patients who underwent co-transplantation of MSCs with HSCs vs 76.92% (95% CI, 55.7% to 88.9%) in patients who only received HSCs (P = .54). No significant difference was observed in the 5-year TFS between the two groups (59.1% vs 69.2%; P = .49). The 5-year cumulative incidence of TRM was not statistically significant among patients who underwent co-transplantation of MSCs with HSCs (27.27%) vs those who only received HSCs (19.23%; P = .61). There was no statistically significant difference in graft rejection, acute GvHD, and chronic GvHD between the two groups. Based on our findings, the co-transplantation of MSCs and HSCs to class III thalassemia major patients does not alter their transplantation outcomes including OS, TFS, rejection rate, transplant-related mortality, and GvHD.
-
4.
Co-transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells makes haploidentical HSCT a potential comparable therapy with matched sibling donor HSCT for patients with severe aplastic anemia
Liu, Z., Wu, X., Wang, S., Xia, L., Xiao, H., Li, Y., Li, H., Zhang, Y., Xu, D., Nie, D., et al
Therapeutic advances in hematology. 2020;11:2040620720965411
Abstract
The application of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) infusion as a treatment regimen for severe aplastic anemia (SAA) has been reported to be efficacious in single-arm trials. However, it is difficult to assess without comparing the results with those from a first-line, matched-sibling HSCT. Herein, we retrospectively reviewed 91 patients with acquired SAA. They received HSCT from haploidentical donors combined with MSC transfer (HID group). We compared these patients with 103 others who received first-line matched-sibling HSCT (MSD group) to evaluate relative treatment efficacy. Compared with the patients in the MSD group, those in the HID group presented with higher incidences of grades II-IV and III-IV acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) and chronic graft versus host disease (cGvHD) (p?0.05). However, the incidence of myeloid and platelet engraftment, graft failure, poor graft function, and extensive cGvHD were comparable for both groups. The median follow-up was 36.6?months and the 3-year overall survival rate was similar for both groups (83.5% versus 79.1%). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that time intervals greater than 4?months from diagnosis to transplantation, experienced graft failure, poor graft function, or grade III-IV aGvHD were significantly associated with adverse outcomes. All HID patients received MSC co-transplantation with hematopoietic stem cells. However, the infused MSCs were derived from umbilical cord (UC-MSC group; 43 patients) or bone marrow (BM-MSC group; 48 patients) and were administered at different medical centers. We first compared the outcomes between the two groups and detected that the BM-MSC group exhibited lower incidences of grade III-IV aGvHD and cGvHD (p?0.05). This study suggests that co-transplantation of hematopoietic and MSCs significantly reduces the risk and incidence of graft rejection and may effectively improve overall survival in patients with SAA even in the absence of closely related histocompatible donor material.
-
5.
Donor-derived marrow mesenchymal stromal cell co-transplantation following a haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation trail to treat severe aplastic anemia in children
Wang, Z., Yu, H., Cao, F., Liu, Z., Liu, Z., Feng, W., Liu, X., Yu, Y., Xiao, Y., Li, L., et al
Annals of hematology. 2018
Abstract
Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) is associated with an increased risk of graft failure and severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Recent studies have shown that mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) display potent immunosuppressive effects and can support normal hematopoiesis. In a multi-center trial, we co-transplanted culture-expanded donor-derived bone marrow MSCs (BM-MSCs) into 35 children with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) undergoing haplo-HSCT. All 35 patients (100%) achieved hematopoietic reconstitution and showed sustained full donor chimerism. The median time for myeloid engraftment was 14 days (range 10-22 days), while that for platelet engraftment was 18 days (range 9-36 days). The incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD and chronic GVHD was 25.71 and 22.86%, respectively. The overall survival rate was 85.71% with a median of 22 months (range 3.5-37 months). The combined transplantation of haploidentical HSCs and BM-MSCs into children with SAA without an HLA-identical sibling donor is relatively safe and may represent an effective new therapy to improve survival rates and reduce the risk of graft failure.