2 results
Filters • 3
Sort By
Results Per Page
Filters
2 results
3
Download the following citations:
Email the following citations:
Print the following citations:
Editor's Choice
  • Böhm S
  • Wustrau K
  • Pachlopnik Schmid J
  • Prader S
  • Ahlmann M
  • et al.
Blood. 2024 Mar 7;143(10):872-881 doi: 10.1182/blood.2023022281.
POPULATION:

Children with primary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (pHLH) reported to the International HLH Registry between 2016-2021 (n=88)

INTERVENTION:

HSCT was performed in 75 patients,

COMPARISON:

Historical data from the HLH-2004 study

OUTCOME:

Compared to the HLH-2004 study, both pre-HSCT survival (83% to 91%) and post-HSCT survival of patients receiving first-line etoposide improved (70% to 88%). Differences to HLH-2004 included preferential use of reduced-toxicity conditioning and reduced time from diagnosis to HSCT (148 to 88 days). 3-year probability of survival was lower with haploidentical (44%, 4/9 patients) than with other types of donors (94%, 4/66). Importantly, also in this study, early HSCT of asymptomatic patients resulted in excellent survival (100%).

Primary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (pHLH) is a life-threatening hyperinflammatory syndrome that develops mainly in patients with genetic disorders of lymphocyte cytotoxicity and X-linked lymphoproliferative syndromes. Previous studies with etoposide-based treatment followed by hematopoetic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) resulted in 5-year survival of 50% to 59%. Contemporary data are lacking. We evaluated 88 patients with pHLH documented in the international HLH registry from 2016-2021. In 12 of 88 patients, diagnosis was made without HLH activity, based on siblings or albinism. Major HLH-directed drugs (etoposide, antithymocyte globulin, alemtuzumab, emapalumab, ruxolitinib) were administered to 66 of 76 patients who were symptomatic (86% first-line etoposide); 16 of 57 patients treated with etoposide and 3 of 9 with other first-line treatment received salvage therapy. HSCT was performed in 75 patients; 7 patients died before HSCT. Three-year probability of survival (pSU) was 82% (confidence interval [CI], 72%-88%) for the entire cohort and 77% (CI, 64%-86%) for patients receiving first-line etoposide. Compared with the HLH-2004 study, both pre-HSCT and post-HSCT survival of patients receiving first-line etoposide improved, 83% to 91% and 70% to 88%. Differences to HLH-2004 included preferential use of reduced-toxicity conditioning and reduced time from diagnosis to HSCT (from 148 to 88 days). Three-year pSU was lower with haploidentical (4 of 9 patients [44%]) than with other donors (62 of 66 [94%]; P < .001). Importantly, early HSCT for patients who were asymptomatic resulted in 100% survival, emphasizing the potential benefit of newborn screening. This contemporary standard-of-care study of patients with pHLH reveals that first-line etoposide-based therapy is better than previously reported, providing a benchmark for novel treatment regimes.

Editor's Choice
  • Kim H
  • Mizuno K
  • Masuda K
  • Sakurai M
  • Ara T
  • et al.
Transplant Cell Ther. 2024 Jan 22; doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.01.071.
POPULATION:

Adults with primary or secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) identified from the Japanese Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy registry (n= 56)

INTERVENTION:

Allogeneic transplantation: cord blood (n=26), peripheral blood or bone marrow transplant (n=30)

COMPARISON:

None

OUTCOME:

The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 40.6%, while the 3-year cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 19.8% and 39.6%, respectively. In univariable analysis, age at allo-HSCT (the 3-year OS: 27.5% for ≥ 25 years old vs 58.0% for < 25 years old), conditioning intensity (7.1% for MAC vs 51.8% for reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC)), and donor source (26.0% for CBT vs 52.9% for bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (BMT/PBSCT)) were associated with significantly inferior OS. In multivariable analysis, older age at allo-HSCT (≥ 25 years old) (Hazard ratio [HR], 2.37; 95% CI, 1.01-5.58), MAC (HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.09-5.53), and CBT (HR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.04-4.71) were independently associated with worse OS. In addition, only conditioning intensity predicted higher NRM (the 3-year NRM: 78.6% for MAC vs 26.6% for RIC), while no factors were associated with the relapse rate.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare, life-threatening disorder characterized by systemic hyperinflammation. Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only potentially curative treatment for primary and relapsed/refractory HLH, the optimal strategy has not been established. We retrospectively analyzed 56 adult patients (≥18 years) with primary and secondary HLH (mainly consisting of Epstein-Barr virus-associated HLH) who underwent allo-HSCT using the registry database of the Japanese Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, including 26 patients who underwent cord blood transplantation (CBT). One-fourth of patients received myeloablative conditioning (MAC), mainly consisting of total body irradiation-based regimens. The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 40.6%, while the 3-year cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 19.8% and 39.6%, respectively. In univariable analysis, age at allo-HSCT (the 3-year OS: 27.5% for ≥ 25 years old vs 58.0% for < 25 years old, P = .025), conditioning intensity (7.1% for MAC vs 51.8% for reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC), P = .002), and donor source (26.0% for CBT vs 52.9% for bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (BMT/PBSCT), P = .030) were associated with significantly inferior OS. In multivariable analysis, older age at allo-HSCT (≥ 25 years old) (Hazard ratio [HR], 2.37; 95% CI, 1.01 to 5.58; P = .048), MAC (HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.09 to 5.53; P = .031), and CBT (HR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.04 to 4.71; P = .040) were independently associated with worse OS. In addition, only conditioning intensity predicted higher NRM (the 3-year NRM: 78.6% for MAC vs 26.6% for RIC), while no factors were associated with the relapse rate. This study includes the largest number of adult HLH patients undergoing CBT. Although the use of CBT is acceptable, BMT/PBSCT are more favorable strategies in allo-HSCT in adult HLH. Regarding conditioning intensity, RIC regimens are more beneficial in this setting.