1.
Impact of Defibrotide in the Prevention of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
Tilmont, R., Yakoub-Agha, I., Ramdane, N., Srour, M., Coiteux, V., Magro, L., Odou, P., Simon, N., Beauvais, D.
The Annals of pharmacotherapy. 2022;:10600280211068177
Abstract
BACKGROUND Defibrotide is indicated for patients who develop severe sinusoidal obstructive syndrome following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Preclinical data suggested that defibrotide carries a prophylactic effect against acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of defibrotide on the incidence and severity of aGVHD. METHODS This single-center retrospective study included all consecutive transplanted patients between January 2014 and December 2018. A propensity score based on 10 predefined confounders was used to estimate the effect of defibrotide on aGVHD via inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). RESULTS Of the 482 included patients, 64 received defibrotide (defibrotide group) and 418 did not (control group). Regarding main patient characteristics and transplantation modalities, the two groups were comparable, except for a predominance of men in the defibrotide group. The median age was 55 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 40-62). Patients received allo-HCT from HLA-matched related donor (28.6%), HLA-matched unrelated donor (50.8%), haplo-identical donor (13.4%), or mismatched unrelated donor (7.0%). Stem cell source was either bone marrow (49.6%) or peripheral blood (50.4%). After using IPTW, exposure to defibrotide was not significantly associated with occurrence of aGVHD (HR = 0.97; 95% CI 0.62-1.52; P = .9) or occurrence of severe aGVHD (HR = 1.89, 95% CI: 0.98-3.66; P = .058). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE Defibrotide does not seem to have a protective effect on aGVHD in patients undergoing allo-HCT. Based on what has been reported to date and on these results, defibrotide should not be considered for the prevention of aGVHD outside clinical trials.
2.
Effect of Sirolimus levels between days 11 and 20 after allogeneic stem cell transplantation on the risk of hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome
Agrawal, V., Ranganath, P., Ervin, K. D., Schmidt, C. A., Cox, E. A., Nelson, R. P., Jr., Schwartz, J. E., Zaid, M. A., Abonour, R., Robertson, M. J., et al
Bone marrow transplantation. 2020
Abstract
Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) is a serious complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Sirolimus plus tacrolimus is an accepted regimen for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, with both agents implicated as risk factors for SOS. We analyzed 260 consecutive patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT following myeloablative conditioning using total body irradiation (TBI)-based (n = 151) or chemotherapy only (n = 109) regimens, with sirolimus plus tacrolimus for GVHD prophylaxis. SOS occurred in 28 patients at a median of 22 (range, 12-58) days. Mean sirolimus trough levels were higher between days 11 and 20 following transplant in patients who developed SOS (10.3 vs. 8.5 ng/ml, P = 0.008), with no significant difference in mean trough levels between days 0 and 10 (P = 0.67) and days 21-30 (P = 0.37). No differences in mean tacrolimus trough levels during the same time intervals were observed between those developing SOS and others. On multivariable analysis, a mean sirolimus trough level ≥ 9 ng/ml between days 11 and 20 increased the risk of SOS (hazard ratio 3.68, 95% CI: 1.57-8.67, P = 0.003), together with a longer time from diagnosis to transplant (P = 0.004) and use of TBI (P = 0.006). Our results suggest that mean trough sirolimus levels ≥ 9 ng/mL between days 11 and 20 post transplant may increase the risk of SOS and should be avoided.
3.
Hepatic veno-occlusive disease following sirolimus-based immune suppression
Khimani, F., McDonald, G. B., Shulman, H. M., Betts, B., Locke, F., Fernandez, H., Anasetti, C., Pidala, J.
Bone marrow transplantation. 2018
Abstract
Sirolimus-based graft vs. host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis is associated with higher incidence of veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, whether the clinical manifestations and prognosis of VOD/SOS differs when diagnosed in the setting of sirolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis is not well studied. To address this question, we examined presenting features and treatment outcome of VOD/SOS cases identified in a large retrospective cohort of consecutive HCT procedures (n = 818 total, sirolimus (SIR)/tacrolimus (TAC) n = 308, and methotrexate (MTX) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/TAC n = 510). In multivariate analysis, sirolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis (p = 0.006, HR 3.33, 1.94-5.7) increased risk for VOD/SOS. A total of 58 patients were clinically diagnosed with VOD/SOS (SIR/TAC 38/308, 12.3%, vs. MTX or MMF/TAC 20/510, 3.9%). VOD/SOS diagnosed following SIR/TAC prophylaxis demonstrated later time of onset (median 39 vs. 26 days; p = 0.005), less severe hyperbilirubinemia (Bili > 2, 65% vs. 90% p = 0.04), lesser degree of weight gain (weight gain > 5%, 52% vs 80%, p = 0.04), and more frequent complete resolution of hepatic injury (79% vs. 55%, p = 0.05). Presenting features and natural history of VOD/SOS in the context of SIR/TAC GVHD prophylaxis differ and thus warrant particular clinical attention to later hepatic injury in these patients.